View clinical trials related to Psychosis.
Filter by:The objective of the proposed study is to determine the feasibility of an Early Detection program that aims to: (i) identify college students at clinical high risk (CHR) of psychosis or with first episode psychosis (FEP), and (ii) efficiently link them to coordinated specialty care (CSC) services for a 2nd stage screen, a clinical assessment, and appropriate treatment. The study will also determine pathways to care and perceived barriers to care among those students enrolled in Coordinated Specialty Care.
Standard psychological therapy for psychosis (Cognitive Behavioural Therapy) is made up of different 'ingredients', also called treatment components. In therapy, different treatment components can be included or excluded depending on the needs of the individual. In this study, the investigators want to find out if standard psychological therapy for psychosis can be improved by including new treatment components. Therefore, participants in this study will be offered psychological therapy for psychosis with new treatment components included or standard psychological therapy for psychosis without new treatment components included. Which of these two options participants are offered will be decided by chance, and during the study neither the study participants nor the researcher will know which of these two variations of psychological therapy are given. Researchers call this a randomized double-blind study. The investigators are aiming to use the results from this study to guide the improvement of psychological therapies for psychosis.
Randomized control trial assessing supplemental melatonin for youth with at-risk or psychotic symptoms.
This study will investigate dentate gyrus (DG) and hippocampal CA3 sub field function, using the pattern separation paradigm, as reflected by the difference in brain activation in response to same-as-previously- seen (OLD) vs. similar-to-previously-seen (SIM) objects in first episode psychosis (FEP) subjects before and after anti psychotic treatment and in matched healthy controls (HC). The current study uses three novel high-resolution task-based and post-encoding resting fMRI measures to probe hippocampal circuitry in delusions. It will also study CA1 function, using a sequential associative mismatch paradigm, as reflected by activation of CA1 in response to mismatching information compared to memory of that stimulus in FEP subjects before and after antipsychotic treatment and in matched HC. Finally, this study will evaluate plasticity of hippocampal intrinsic functional connectivity (IFC) in response to memory consolidation, using an encoding-plasticity paradigm, in FEP subjects before and after anti psychotic treatment and in matched HC. For each of the three imaging projects, a total of 50 FEP subjects and 50 matched healthy controls (HC) will be studied; hence, 300 subjects will be studied over 5 years. Within each paradigm, medication-naive FEP subjects will be studied at baseline and 8 weeks after starting anti psychotic medication. HC participants will be studied at baseline and 8 weeks later but will not receive any treatment.
Cognitive impairments are a core and enduring feature of first-episode psychosis and schizophrenia, and are associated with significant functional impairment. Cognitive remediation (CR) is a behavioural intervention that has been found to have a small to moderate effect on cognition in individuals with schizophrenia, and recent studies suggests that it leads to improved cognition in persons with first-episode psychosis. Results from a CR feasibility project that was conducted through the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority's Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Service (EPPIS) showed promising findings. Specifically, large effect sizes were found in the areas of verbal learning and self-esteem. Moreover, the intervention was found to be acceptable to the participants. However, the findings are limited by the sample size and lack of control group. In this proposed study, the investigators seek to expand the scientific support for treating neurocognitive impairments in order to increase functional productivity associated with first-episode psychosis. A novel group CR program, action-based cognitive remediation (ABCR), has been developed by Dr. C. Bowie (co-investigator) to promote the generalization of cognitive skills to real-world activities. ABCR has been found to improve both cognition and functional competence in persons with schizophrenia. The primary outcome measure will examine whether ABCR results in improved executive functioning in persons with first-episode psychosis compared to psychiatric rehabilitation alone. Secondary outcome measures (e.g., memory, processing speed, self-esteem, emotional functioning, adaptive functioning) will also be analyzed.
The overall objective is to develop scalable interventions to address the physical health needs of patients affected by early psychosis. The objective of this project is to conduct a feasibility study of a high intensity technology-enabled collaborative care model (CCM) compared to lower intensity self-help modules and email support for early identification and treatment of cardio-metabolic risk factors in youth, ages 16-29, affected by early psychosis.
About 1 in 100 people will experience an episode of psychosis. Some people will only experience one 'psychotic episode' and about a quarter of people make a full recovery. Others will have recurring periods of problems ('relapses'), perhaps at times of particular stress. As people often find psychosis distressing, this study looks at ways to help them stay well in the future. There is growing evidence that 'early signs' interventions can prevent relapses of psychosis. Early signs are things that might happen when people start to become unwell. For example some people start to sleep badly when they are becoming unwell. Most people with psychosis can identify early signs emerging in the weeks before relapse. In early signs interventions, service users are taught to recognise early signs that their mental health may be deteriorating so that they can take action to avoid becoming unwell. Although early signs interventions show promise, the investigators suggest that they can be improved by more accurate assessment of relapse risk. This might be achieved by monitoring 'basic symptoms' in addition to conventional early signs of relapse. Basic symptoms are subtle, subclinical disturbances in one's experience of oneself and the world. Typical basic symptoms include: changes in perceptions, such as increased vividness of colour visionÍž impaired tolerance to certain stressorsÍž difficulty finding or understanding common words. In this study the investigators want to design and test a mobile phone app to help monitor basic symptoms. They hope that the app might help service users to stay well in the future. During the study the investigators will ask participants to use the app once a week for 6 months. At the end of the study they will interview them about their experiences of using the phone app and participating in the study.
The aim of the current study is to pilot a novel intervention to help people explore their decision making around the use of neuroleptic medication. A case series design will be used, with outcome variables measured at multiple time points pre-, during- and post-intervention. Participants will also be asked to complete an evaluation interview post-intervention. The primary aim is to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of offering the intervention.
In response to the growing need for training on interventions to address first episode psychosis, the Center for Social Innovation (C4) partnered with experts in Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) to develop and test CSC OnDemand: An Innovative Online Learning Platform for Implementing Coordinated Specialty Care. The product builds on the findings of the Recovery After an Initial Schizophrenia Episode (RAISE) studies, funded by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). RAISE examined team-based models of care for people early in the course of schizophrenia. Through a Fast Track Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) grant, investigators will prototype, test, refine, and evaluate the impact of CSC OnDemand.
Just Do You is a young-adult-centered and theoretically guided intervention that has shown promise for keeping young adults connected to their professional treatments, while also enhancing their hope for the future and their own recovery. Just Do You is a brief two-module engagement program that utilizes a hybrid provider team of a licensed clinician and peer to address mistrust, lack of hope for the future, stigma concerns, literacy and a sense of efficacy early on when young adults begin a new service experience in adult outpatient day programs (i.e., New York State Personalized Recovery Oriented Services). The aim of this study is to test Just Do You through a moderately-sized randomized trial in order to see if it improves initial and secondary engagement among young adults with serious mental health conditions. The program is designed as an orientation to services, coupled with a curriculum designed to enhance motivation and agency, and keep young adults connected to their care. This study utilizes a randomized controlled trial to test the preliminary impact of the intervention, compared to best available services (treatment as usual, TAU) at two outpatient programs for adults with serious mental illnesses (n = 195). The program was adapted to two-sessions from the piloted four-session version through conversations with leadership at partnering agencies. The intervention involves intensive staff training and 24 months of ongoing provision, monitoring and supervision of the program. Quantitative survey data will be collected at baseline (pre), 2 weeks (post), 1 month, and 3 months. In this intention-to-treat analysis, we will conduct basic omnibus analyses to examine whether Just Do You leads to improved outcomes relative to TAU utilizing t tests across treatment conditions for each outcome measure specified. The investigators will likewise examine whether changes in the proposed mediating variables differ across groups.