Prostate Cancer Clinical Trial
Official title:
Single-injection Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Randomized Sham-controlled Trial
NCT number | NCT04337060 |
Other study ID # | ESP0255 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | May 1, 2020 |
Est. completion date | January 11, 2021 |
Verified date | December 2021 |
Source | Ondokuz Mayis University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
In the proposed study, a bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block [10 ml 1%lidocaine + 10 ml 0.5 % bupivacaine vs normal saline (NS)] will be performed preoperatively to patients undergoing open radical prostatectomy. Analgesic efficacy will be assessed on the numeric rating scale (NRS) along with intra- and 24 h post-operative narcotic consumption.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 52 |
Est. completion date | January 11, 2021 |
Est. primary completion date | January 11, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: AmericanSociety of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-III patients between the ages of 18 and 65 who are scheduled for elective open radical prostatectomy. Exclusion criteria: - Patients who do not give informed consent or do not want to participate in the study - Ages <18 or>65 - ASA IV patients - Obesity (>100 kg, BMI >35 kg/m2) - Contraindications of regional anesthesia (coagulopathy, thrombocytopenia, or infection at injection site) - Serious renal, cardiac, or hepatic disease - Hypersensitivity to local anesthetics or a history of allergy - History of opioid or steroid use longer than four weeks - Psychiatric disorders - Analgesic preoperative treatment within the preceding 48 hours - In order to establish better standard surgery, operations shorter than 60 minutes and longer than 180 minutes will also be excluded |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Turkey | Ondokuz Mayis University | Samsun | Atakum |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
BURHAN DOST | Ondokuz Mayis University |
Turkey,
Chin KJ, Adhikary S, Sarwani N, Forero M. The analgesic efficacy of pre-operative bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks in patients having ventral hernia repair. Anaesthesia. 2017 Apr;72(4):452-460. doi: 10.1111/anae.13814. Epub 2017 Feb 11. — View Citation
Diwan S, Nair A. Is Paravertebral-Epidural Spread the Underlying Mechanism of Action of Erector Spinae Plane Block? Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2020 Feb;48(1):86-87. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2019.81226. Epub 2019 Nov 11. — View Citation
Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451. — View Citation
Ibrahim M, Elnabtity AM. Analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block in percutaneous nephrolithotomy : A randomized controlled trial. Anaesthesist. 2019 Nov;68(11):755-761. doi: 10.1007/s00101-019-00673-w. Epub 2019 Oct 16. — View Citation
Kot P, Rodriguez P, Granell M, Cano B, Rovira L, Morales J, Broseta A, Andrés J. The erector spinae plane block: a narrative review. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019 Jun;72(3):209-220. doi: 10.4097/kja.d.19.00012. Epub 2019 Mar 19. Review. — View Citation
Singh S, Kumar G, Akhileshwar. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in modified radical mastectomy: A randomised control study. Indian J Anaesth. 2019 Mar;63(3):200-204. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_758_18. — View Citation
Tulgar S, Kapakli MS, Kose HC, Senturk O, Selvi O, Serifsoy TE, Thomas DT, Ozer Z. Evaluation of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block and Oblique Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Randomized, Controlled, Prospective Study. Anesth Essays Res. 2019 Jan-Mar;13(1):50-56. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_194_18. Retraction in: Anesth Essays Res. 2020 Jul-Sep;14(3):544. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Narcotic consumption in the first 24 hours after surgery | Morphine consumption in the first 24 hours will be measured by IV PCA. Patients will be able to request opioids via a PCA device when their NRS score is above 3. | Postoperative day 1 | |
Secondary | Postoperative pain: NRS score | Pain status at rest and while coughing will be assessed by NRS score at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours after surgery. In addition, the time until first analgesic requirement will be recorded.The NRS is an 11-point numeric scale which ranges from 0 to 10. | Postoperative day 1 | |
Secondary | Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) | The patients will be verbally evaluated according to a descriptive five-point PONV scale. If a score of 3 or more is registered, ondansetron 4 mg IV will be administered and repeated after 8 hours if required.The PONV scale is 0 = no nausea; 1 = slight nausea; 2 = moderate nausea; 3 = vomiting once;and 4 = vomiting more than once | Postoperative day 1 | |
Secondary | Intraoperative remifentanil consumption | Following anesthesia induction, a bispectral index (BIS) of 40 to 50 will be maintained with sevoflurane. When the BIS measures 40-50, the remifentanil infusion rate will be adjusted to consider ±20% blood pressure changes compared to baseline values.The total amount of remifentanil consumed will be recorded. | Postoperative day 1 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05540392 -
An Acupuncture Study for Prostate Cancer Survivors With Urinary Issues
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05613023 -
A Trial of 5 Fraction Prostate SBRT Versus 5 Fraction Prostate and Pelvic Nodal SBRT
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05156424 -
A Comparison of Aerobic and Resistance Exercise to Counteract Treatment Side Effects in Men With Prostate Cancer
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03177759 -
Living With Prostate Cancer (LPC)
|
||
Completed |
NCT01331083 -
A Phase II Study of PX-866 in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05540782 -
A Study of Cognitive Health in Survivors of Prostate Cancer
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04742361 -
Efficacy of [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT in Patients With Biochemial Recurrent Prostate Cancer
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04400656 -
PROState Pathway Embedded Comparative Trial
|
||
Completed |
NCT02282644 -
Individual Phenotype Analysis in Patients With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer With CellSearch® and Flow Cytometry
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06037954 -
A Study of Mental Health Care in People With Cancer
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06305832 -
Salvage Radiotherapy Combined With Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) With or Without Rezvilutamide in the Treatment of Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05761093 -
Patient and Physician Benefit/ Risk Preferences for Treatment of mPC in Hong Kong: a Discrete Choice Experiment
|
||
Completed |
NCT04838626 -
Study of Diagnostic Performance of [18F]CTT1057 for PSMA-positive Tumors Detection
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03101176 -
Multiparametric Ultrasound Imaging in Prostate Cancer
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03290417 -
Correlative Analysis of the Genomics of Vitamin D and Omega-3 Fatty Acid Intake in Prostate Cancer
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00341939 -
Retrospective Analysis of a Drug-Metabolizing Genotype in Cancer Patients and Correlation With Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamics Data
|
||
Completed |
NCT01497925 -
Ph 1 Trial of ADI-PEG 20 Plus Docetaxel in Solid Tumors With Emphasis on Prostate Cancer and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03679819 -
Single-center Trial for the Validation of High-resolution Transrectal Ultrasound (Exact Imaging Scanner ExactVu) for the Detection of Prostate Cancer
|
||
Completed |
NCT03554317 -
COMbination of Bipolar Androgen Therapy and Nivolumab
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03271502 -
Effect of Anesthesia on Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Patients Undergoing Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy
|
N/A |