Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04337060
Other study ID # ESP0255
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date May 1, 2020
Est. completion date January 11, 2021

Study information

Verified date December 2021
Source Ondokuz Mayis University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

In the proposed study, a bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block [10 ml 1%lidocaine + 10 ml 0.5 % bupivacaine vs normal saline (NS)] will be performed preoperatively to patients undergoing open radical prostatectomy. Analgesic efficacy will be assessed on the numeric rating scale (NRS) along with intra- and 24 h post-operative narcotic consumption.


Description:

It has been reported that the ESP block produces effective postoperative analgesia for abdominal surgeries by relieving both somatic and visceral pain. In the present study, the investigators presume that an ESP block will decrease narcotic consumption and NRS values both intraoperatively and during the first 24 postoperative hours. Patients will be divided into two groups: Group LB (Lidocaine-Bupivacaine): A bilateral ESP block will be performed preoperatively (10 ml 1%lidocaine + 10 ml 0.5% bupivacaine). In addition, IV morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) will be applied postoperatively for 24 hours. Group S: A bilateral ESP block will be performed preoperatively (20 ml NS).In addition, IV morphine-PCA will be applied postoperatively for 24 hours.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 52
Est. completion date January 11, 2021
Est. primary completion date January 11, 2021
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 65 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: AmericanSociety of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-III patients between the ages of 18 and 65 who are scheduled for elective open radical prostatectomy. Exclusion criteria: - Patients who do not give informed consent or do not want to participate in the study - Ages <18 or>65 - ASA IV patients - Obesity (>100 kg, BMI >35 kg/m2) - Contraindications of regional anesthesia (coagulopathy, thrombocytopenia, or infection at injection site) - Serious renal, cardiac, or hepatic disease - Hypersensitivity to local anesthetics or a history of allergy - History of opioid or steroid use longer than four weeks - Psychiatric disorders - Analgesic preoperative treatment within the preceding 48 hours - In order to establish better standard surgery, operations shorter than 60 minutes and longer than 180 minutes will also be excluded

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Single-injection ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block-Sham
With the patient in the sitting position, 20 ml normal saline will be administered between the T11 spinous process and the erector spinae muscles with the guidance of an ultrasound probe placed on a parasagittal plane. Intraoperative analgesia: after anesthesia induction, paracetamol 1 gr intravenous (IV)+ tenoxicam 20 mg IV + morphine 0.05 mg/kg IV (max 4 mg). Postoperative analgesia: IV morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) of 0.5 mg/ml morphine (demand dose 1 mg; lockout interval 8 m; 6 mg/h limit).
Single-injection ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block-Lidocaine/Bupivacaine
With the patient in the sitting position, 10 ml 1% lidocaine + 10 ml 0.5% bupivacaine will be administered between the T11 spinous process and the erector spinae muscles with the guidance of an ultrasound probe placed on a parasagittal plane. Intraoperative analgesia: After anesthesia induction, paracetamol 1 gr IV + tenoxicam 20 mg IV + morphine 0.05 mg/kg IV (max 4 mg). Postoperative analgesia: IV PCA of 0.5 mg/ml morphine (demand dose 1 mg; lockout interval 8 m; 6 mg/h limit).
Other:
Pain follow-up and monitorization
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score will be recorded from 15th minute in recovery room followed by 1.-3.-6.-12.-18.-24.hours with two different conditions which are at rest and while couching.If NRS score becomes =4 Dexketoprofen 50 mg will be administered (max 4 times).

Locations

Country Name City State
Turkey Ondokuz Mayis University Samsun Atakum

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
BURHAN DOST Ondokuz Mayis University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Turkey, 

References & Publications (7)

Chin KJ, Adhikary S, Sarwani N, Forero M. The analgesic efficacy of pre-operative bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks in patients having ventral hernia repair. Anaesthesia. 2017 Apr;72(4):452-460. doi: 10.1111/anae.13814. Epub 2017 Feb 11. — View Citation

Diwan S, Nair A. Is Paravertebral-Epidural Spread the Underlying Mechanism of Action of Erector Spinae Plane Block? Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2020 Feb;48(1):86-87. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2019.81226. Epub 2019 Nov 11. — View Citation

Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451. — View Citation

Ibrahim M, Elnabtity AM. Analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block in percutaneous nephrolithotomy : A randomized controlled trial. Anaesthesist. 2019 Nov;68(11):755-761. doi: 10.1007/s00101-019-00673-w. Epub 2019 Oct 16. — View Citation

Kot P, Rodriguez P, Granell M, Cano B, Rovira L, Morales J, Broseta A, Andrés J. The erector spinae plane block: a narrative review. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019 Jun;72(3):209-220. doi: 10.4097/kja.d.19.00012. Epub 2019 Mar 19. Review. — View Citation

Singh S, Kumar G, Akhileshwar. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in modified radical mastectomy: A randomised control study. Indian J Anaesth. 2019 Mar;63(3):200-204. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_758_18. — View Citation

Tulgar S, Kapakli MS, Kose HC, Senturk O, Selvi O, Serifsoy TE, Thomas DT, Ozer Z. Evaluation of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block and Oblique Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Randomized, Controlled, Prospective Study. Anesth Essays Res. 2019 Jan-Mar;13(1):50-56. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_194_18. Retraction in: Anesth Essays Res. 2020 Jul-Sep;14(3):544. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Narcotic consumption in the first 24 hours after surgery Morphine consumption in the first 24 hours will be measured by IV PCA. Patients will be able to request opioids via a PCA device when their NRS score is above 3. Postoperative day 1
Secondary Postoperative pain: NRS score Pain status at rest and while coughing will be assessed by NRS score at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours after surgery. In addition, the time until first analgesic requirement will be recorded.The NRS is an 11-point numeric scale which ranges from 0 to 10. Postoperative day 1
Secondary Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) The patients will be verbally evaluated according to a descriptive five-point PONV scale. If a score of 3 or more is registered, ondansetron 4 mg IV will be administered and repeated after 8 hours if required.The PONV scale is 0 = no nausea; 1 = slight nausea; 2 = moderate nausea; 3 = vomiting once;and 4 = vomiting more than once Postoperative day 1
Secondary Intraoperative remifentanil consumption Following anesthesia induction, a bispectral index (BIS) of 40 to 50 will be maintained with sevoflurane. When the BIS measures 40-50, the remifentanil infusion rate will be adjusted to consider ±20% blood pressure changes compared to baseline values.The total amount of remifentanil consumed will be recorded. Postoperative day 1
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05540392 - An Acupuncture Study for Prostate Cancer Survivors With Urinary Issues Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05613023 - A Trial of 5 Fraction Prostate SBRT Versus 5 Fraction Prostate and Pelvic Nodal SBRT Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05156424 - A Comparison of Aerobic and Resistance Exercise to Counteract Treatment Side Effects in Men With Prostate Cancer Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT03177759 - Living With Prostate Cancer (LPC)
Completed NCT01331083 - A Phase II Study of PX-866 in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05540782 - A Study of Cognitive Health in Survivors of Prostate Cancer
Active, not recruiting NCT04742361 - Efficacy of [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT in Patients With Biochemial Recurrent Prostate Cancer Phase 3
Completed NCT04400656 - PROState Pathway Embedded Comparative Trial
Completed NCT02282644 - Individual Phenotype Analysis in Patients With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer With CellSearch® and Flow Cytometry N/A
Recruiting NCT06037954 - A Study of Mental Health Care in People With Cancer N/A
Recruiting NCT06305832 - Salvage Radiotherapy Combined With Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) With or Without Rezvilutamide in the Treatment of Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05761093 - Patient and Physician Benefit/ Risk Preferences for Treatment of mPC in Hong Kong: a Discrete Choice Experiment
Completed NCT04838626 - Study of Diagnostic Performance of [18F]CTT1057 for PSMA-positive Tumors Detection Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting NCT03101176 - Multiparametric Ultrasound Imaging in Prostate Cancer N/A
Completed NCT03290417 - Correlative Analysis of the Genomics of Vitamin D and Omega-3 Fatty Acid Intake in Prostate Cancer N/A
Completed NCT00341939 - Retrospective Analysis of a Drug-Metabolizing Genotype in Cancer Patients and Correlation With Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamics Data
Completed NCT01497925 - Ph 1 Trial of ADI-PEG 20 Plus Docetaxel in Solid Tumors With Emphasis on Prostate Cancer and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Phase 1
Recruiting NCT03679819 - Single-center Trial for the Validation of High-resolution Transrectal Ultrasound (Exact Imaging Scanner ExactVu) for the Detection of Prostate Cancer
Completed NCT03554317 - COMbination of Bipolar Androgen Therapy and Nivolumab Phase 2
Completed NCT03271502 - Effect of Anesthesia on Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Patients Undergoing Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy N/A