The Effects of MDMA on Prefrontal and Amygdala Activation in PTSD.

Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Clinical Trial

Official title:

The Effects of MDMA on Prefrontal and Amygdala Activation in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03752918
• Other study ID #: 2000020348
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: Phase 1
• Start date: January 2024
• Est. completion date: January 2028

Study information

• Verified date: August 2023
• Source: Yale University
• Contact: PTSD/MDMA Research Study
• Phone: 203-376-2035
• Email: ptsd.mdma[@]yale.edu
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study aims to investigate the effects of MDMA on prefrontal and amygdala activation, and to explore the relationship between these MDMA-induced neural changes and the acute behavioral effects of the drug in patients with PTSD.

Description:

The investigators intend to utilize state-of-the-art validated Human Connectome Project (HCP) style approaches to determine the effects of MDMA on prefrontal and amygdala activation, and to explore the relationship between these MDMA-induced neural changes and the acute behavioral effects of the drug in patients with PTSD. In addition, the investigators will collect preliminary data on the MDMA effects on large-scale intrinsic functional connectivity using novel graph-based network analyses. Specifically, the investigators will measure medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and amygdala activation in response to negative stimuli in patients with PTSD. The investigators hypothesize that MDMA will increase mPFC, but decrease amygdala, activation in response to negative stimuli. The investigators will also explore the relationship between the MDMA-induced mPFC and amygdala activation, and performance on Ekman's Emotional Facial Expression task. This task is modulated by the mPFC and amygdala and as well as trauma severity in participants with PTSD. And finally, to explore the effects of MDMA on resting-state functional connectivity (rs-fcMRI) the investigators will use Coupled Intrinsic Connectivity Distribution (Coupled-ICD); an innovative, graph-based, fully data-driven approach that is particularly sensitive to paired rs-fcMRI data (e.g. pre/post-treatment). Adult participants with PTSD will be recruited for a double-blind, placebo-controlled, within-subjects, crossover-dose neuroimaging study in which they will initially receive either a single dose of MDMA 1.5mg/kg or a placebo (niacin 250mg), with a crossover dose to follow. Doses will be separated by 2 weeks.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 20
• Est. completion date: January 2028
• Est. primary completion date: January 2028
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 21 Years to 55 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Males or females between the ages of 21-55 years. Females will be included if they are not pregnant and agreed to utilize a medically (non-hormonal)* accepted birth control method (to include implant birth control, condom, diaphragm with spermicide, intrauterine device, tubal ligation, abstinence, or partner with vasectomy) or if post-menopausal for at least 1 year, or surgically sterile.
• Able to provide written informed consent according to Yale HIC guidelines.
• Able to read and write English as a primary language.
• Diagnosis of PTSD, as determined by the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-5).
• Must have a score of 23 or higher on the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-5) at screening.
• No more than mild TBI according to a modified version of the Brief TBI Screen.
• Must not have a medical/neurological problem or use medication that would render MDMA unsafe by history or medical evaluation.
• No prior exposure to MDMA.
• Are willing to remain overnight at the study site after each experimental session.
• Are willing to be driven home the day after the experimental sessions.
• Not currently taking any of the listed medications at the time of the study.
• Are willing to sign a medical release for the investigators to communicate directly with their therapist and doctors.
• Are willing to abstain from alcohol, street drugs, and tobacco products while in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients with a diagnostic history of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder or currently exhibiting psychotic features as determined by the MINI 7.0 for the DSM-5.
• Serious suicide or homicide risk, as assessed by evaluating clinician.
• Substance abuse or dependence during the 6 months prior to screening; or a positive pre-study (screening) urine drug screen.
• Any significant history of serious medical or neurological illness.
• Any signs of major medical or neurological illness on examination or as a result of ECG screening or laboratory tests (e.g. positive urine tox, positive HIV/AIDS tests ).
• Abnormality on physical examination. A participant with a clinical abnormality may be included only if the study physician considers the abnormality will not introduce additional risk factors and will not interfere with the study procedure.
• Pregnant or lactating women or a positive urine pregnancy test for women of child-bearing potential at screening or prior to any imaging day.
• Any history indicating learning disability, mental retardation, or attention deficit disorder.
• Family history of cardiovascular diseases. History of hypertension with baseline blood pressure above 140 mmHg (systolic) and over 90 mmHg (diastolic). Any history of syncope and/or baseline blood pressure below 100mmHg (systolic).
• History of claustrophobia.
• BMI > 30 kg/m2 or >250 pounds.
• Anxiolytic, neuroleptic and SRI medications (off SRIs for 4 weeks, fluoxetine 5 weeks).
• Females taking hormonal contraceptives will not be able to participate in the study *(Hormonal contraceptives are exclusionary because MDMA increases production of oxytocin which is heavily modulated by other hormones (e.g. estrogen). Therefore, women need to be naturally cycling/ovulating and not taking any hormonal medications to participate in this study).
• Any metal or electromagnetic implants, including: (Cardiac pacemaker, artificial heart valve, defibrillator, aneurysm clip, cochlear implants, shrapnel, neurostimulators, history of metal fragments in eyes or skin, significant hearing loss or other severe sensory impairment, a history of seizures or current use of anticonvulsants.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
• Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
• Stress Disorders, Traumatic

Intervention

Drug:
• MDMA
A single dose of 1.5mg/kg will be administered once orally.
• Niacin
A single dose of 250mg will be administered once orally.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Connecticut Mental Health Center	New Haven	Connecticut

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Yale University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (40)

Abad S, Camarasa J, Pubill D, Camins A, Escubedo E. Adaptive Plasticity in the Hippocampus of Young Mice Intermittently Exposed to MDMA Could Be the Origin of Memory Deficits. Mol Neurobiol. 2016 Dec;53(10):7271-7283. doi: 10.1007/s12035-015-9618-z. Epub 2015 Dec 21. — View Citation

Baggott MJ, Coyle JR, Siegrist JD, Garrison KJ, Galloway GP, Mendelson JE. Effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine on socioemotional feelings, authenticity, and autobiographical disclosure in healthy volunteers in a controlled setting. J Psychopharmacol. 2016 Apr;30(4):378-87. doi: 10.1177/0269881115626348. Epub 2016 Feb 15. — View Citation

Baggott MJ, Kirkpatrick MG, Bedi G, de Wit H. Intimate insight: MDMA changes how people talk about significant others. J Psychopharmacol. 2015 Jun;29(6):669-77. doi: 10.1177/0269881115581962. Epub 2015 Apr 28. — View Citation

Bailey CR, Cordell E, Sobin SM, Neumeister A. Recent progress in understanding the pathophysiology of post-traumatic stress disorder: implications for targeted pharmacological treatment. CNS Drugs. 2013 Mar;27(3):221-32. doi: 10.1007/s40263-013-0051-4. — View Citation

Cami J, Farre M, Mas M, Roset PN, Poudevida S, Mas A, San L, de la Torre R. Human pharmacology of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine ("ecstasy"): psychomotor performance and subjective effects. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2000 Aug;20(4):455-66. doi: 10.1097/00004714-200008000-00010. — View Citation

Carhart-Harris RL, Murphy K, Leech R, Erritzoe D, Wall MB, Ferguson B, Williams LT, Roseman L, Brugger S, De Meer I, Tanner M, Tyacke R, Wolff K, Sethi A, Bloomfield MA, Williams TM, Bolstridge M, Stewart L, Morgan C, Newbould RD, Feilding A, Curran HV, Nutt DJ. The Effects of Acutely Administered 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine on Spontaneous Brain Function in Healthy Volunteers Measured with Arterial Spin Labeling and Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent Resting State Functional Connectivity. Biol Psychiatry. 2015 Oct 15;78(8):554-62. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.12.015. Epub 2014 Jan 10. — View Citation

Carhart-Harris RL, Wall MB, Erritzoe D, Kaelen M, Ferguson B, De Meer I, Tanner M, Bloomfield M, Williams TM, Bolstridge M, Stewart L, Morgan CJ, Newbould RD, Feilding A, Curran HV, Nutt DJ. The effect of acutely administered MDMA on subjective and BOLD-fMRI responses to favourite and worst autobiographical memories. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014 Apr;17(4):527-40. doi: 10.1017/S1461145713001405. Epub 2013 Dec 17. — View Citation

Connor TJ. Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, 'Ecstasy'): a stressor on the immune system. Immunology. 2004 Apr;111(4):357-67. doi: 10.1111/j.0019-2805.2004.01847.x. — View Citation

Dumont GJ, Sweep FC, van der Steen R, Hermsen R, Donders AR, Touw DJ, van Gerven JM, Buitelaar JK, Verkes RJ. Increased oxytocin concentrations and prosocial feelings in humans after ecstasy (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine) administration. Soc Neurosci. 2009;4(4):359-66. doi: 10.1080/17470910802649470. — View Citation

Dumont GJ, Verkes RJ. A review of acute effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine in healthy volunteers. J Psychopharmacol. 2006 Mar;20(2):176-87. doi: 10.1177/0269881106063271. — View Citation

Dziobek I, Rogers K, Fleck S, Bahnemann M, Heekeren HR, Wolf OT, Convit A. Dissociation of cognitive and emotional empathy in adults with Asperger syndrome using the Multifaceted Empathy Test (MET). J Autism Dev Disord. 2008 Mar;38(3):464-73. doi: 10.1007/s10803-007-0486-x. Epub 2007 Nov 8. — View Citation

Ekman, P. and W.V. Friesen, Measuring facial movement. Environmental psychology and nonverbal behavior, 1976. 1(1): p. 56-75.

Etkin A, Wager TD. Functional neuroimaging of anxiety: a meta-analysis of emotional processing in PTSD, social anxiety disorder, and specific phobia. Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Oct;164(10):1476-88. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07030504. — View Citation

Grob CS, Danforth AL, Chopra GS, Hagerty M, McKay CR, Halberstadt AL, Greer GR. Pilot study of psilocybin treatment for anxiety in patients with advanced-stage cancer. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Jan;68(1):71-8. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.116. Epub 2010 Sep 6. — View Citation

Haagen JF, Smid GE, Knipscheer JW, Kleber RJ. The efficacy of recommended treatments for veterans with PTSD: A metaregression analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Aug;40:184-94. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jun 27. — View Citation

Harris RJ, Young AW, Andrews TJ. Morphing between expressions dissociates continuous from categorical representations of facial expression in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Dec 18;109(51):21164-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212207110. Epub 2012 Dec 3. — View Citation

Heinrichs M, Domes G. Neuropeptides and social behaviour: effects of oxytocin and vasopressin in humans. Prog Brain Res. 2008;170:337-50. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)00428-7. — View Citation

Hysek CM, Domes G, Liechti ME. MDMA enhances "mind reading" of positive emotions and impairs "mind reading" of negative emotions. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Jul;222(2):293-302. doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2645-9. Epub 2012 Jan 27. — View Citation

Hysek CM, Schmid Y, Simmler LD, Domes G, Heinrichs M, Eisenegger C, Preller KH, Quednow BB, Liechti ME. MDMA enhances emotional empathy and prosocial behavior. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Nov;9(11):1645-52. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst161. Epub 2013 Oct 4. — View Citation

Kamilar-Britt P, Bedi G. The prosocial effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA): Controlled studies in humans and laboratory animals. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015 Oct;57:433-46. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.08.016. Epub 2015 Sep 25. — View Citation

Kessler RC, Sonnega A, Bromet E, Hughes M, Nelson CB. Posttraumatic stress disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995 Dec;52(12):1048-60. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950240066012. — View Citation

Kirkpatrick MG, Francis SM, Lee R, de Wit H, Jacob S. Plasma oxytocin concentrations following MDMA or intranasal oxytocin in humans. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2014 Aug;46:23-31. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.04.006. Epub 2014 Apr 19. — View Citation

Kirkpatrick MG, Lee R, Wardle MC, Jacob S, de Wit H. Effects of MDMA and Intranasal oxytocin on social and emotional processing. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014 Jun;39(7):1654-63. doi: 10.1038/npp.2014.12. Epub 2014 Jan 22. — View Citation

Kuypers KP, Ramaekers JG. Transient memory impairment after acute dose of 75mg 3.4-Methylene-dioxymethamphetamine. J Psychopharmacol. 2005 Nov;19(6):633-9. doi: 10.1177/0269881105056670. — View Citation

Lanius RA, Bluhm R, Lanius U, Pain C. A review of neuroimaging studies in PTSD: heterogeneity of response to symptom provocation. J Psychiatr Res. 2006 Dec;40(8):709-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2005.07.007. Epub 2005 Oct 7. — View Citation

Liechti ME, Gamma A, Vollenweider FX. Gender differences in the subjective effects of MDMA. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2001 Mar 1;154(2):161-8. doi: 10.1007/s002130000648. — View Citation

Liechti ME, Vollenweider FX. Which neuroreceptors mediate the subjective effects of MDMA in humans? A summary of mechanistic studies. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2001 Dec;16(8):589-598. doi: 10.1002/hup.348. — View Citation

Mithoefer MC, Wagner MT, Mithoefer AT, Jerome L, Doblin R. The safety and efficacy of +/-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine-assisted psychotherapy in subjects with chronic, treatment-resistant posttraumatic stress disorder: the first randomized controlled pilot study. J Psychopharmacol. 2011 Apr;25(4):439-52. doi: 10.1177/0269881110378371. Epub 2010 Jul 19. Erratum In: J Psychopharmacol. 2011 Jun;25(6):852. — View Citation

Mithoefer MC, Wagner MT, Mithoefer AT, Jerome L, Martin SF, Yazar-Klosinski B, Michel Y, Brewerton TD, Doblin R. Durability of improvement in post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms and absence of harmful effects or drug dependency after 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine-assisted psychotherapy: a prospective long-term follow-up study. J Psychopharmacol. 2013 Jan;27(1):28-39. doi: 10.1177/0269881112456611. Epub 2012 Nov 20. — View Citation

Mueller D, Porter JT, Quirk GJ. Noradrenergic signaling in infralimbic cortex increases cell excitability and strengthens memory for fear extinction. J Neurosci. 2008 Jan 9;28(2):369-75. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3248-07.2008. — View Citation

Parrott AC. The psychotherapeutic potential of MDMA (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine): an evidence-based review. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007 Apr;191(2):181-93. doi: 10.1007/s00213-007-0703-5. Epub 2007 Feb 13. — View Citation

Pitman RK, Rasmusson AM, Koenen KC, Shin LM, Orr SP, Gilbertson MW, Milad MR, Liberzon I. Biological studies of post-traumatic stress disorder. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012 Nov;13(11):769-87. doi: 10.1038/nrn3339. Epub 2012 Oct 10. — View Citation

Quirk GJ, Mueller D. Neural mechanisms of extinction learning and retrieval. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008 Jan;33(1):56-72. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301555. Epub 2007 Sep 19. — View Citation

Ramos L, Hicks C, Kevin R, Caminer A, Narlawar R, Kassiou M, McGregor IS. Acute prosocial effects of oxytocin and vasopressin when given alone or in combination with 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine in rats: involvement of the V1A receptor. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013 Oct;38(11):2249-59. doi: 10.1038/npp.2013.125. Epub 2013 May 16. — View Citation

Shin LM, Liberzon I. The neurocircuitry of fear, stress, and anxiety disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010 Jan;35(1):169-91. doi: 10.1038/npp.2009.83. — View Citation

Shin LM, Rauch SL, Pitman RK. Amygdala, medial prefrontal cortex, and hippocampal function in PTSD. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006 Jul;1071:67-79. doi: 10.1196/annals.1364.007. — View Citation

Southwick SM, Bremner JD, Rasmusson A, Morgan CA 3rd, Arnsten A, Charney DS. Role of norepinephrine in the pathophysiology and treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 1999 Nov 1;46(9):1192-204. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00219-x. — View Citation

Thompson MR, Hunt GE, McGregor IS. Neural correlates of MDMA ("Ecstasy")-induced social interaction in rats. Soc Neurosci. 2009;4(1):60-72. doi: 10.1080/17470910802045042. Epub 2008 May 23. — View Citation

Vollenweider FX, Gamma A, Liechti M, Huber T. Psychological and cardiovascular effects and short-term sequelae of MDMA ("ecstasy") in MDMA-naive healthy volunteers. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1998 Oct;19(4):241-51. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(98)00013-X. — View Citation

Wardle MC, de Wit H. MDMA alters emotional processing and facilitates positive social interaction. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2014 Oct;231(21):4219-29. doi: 10.1007/s00213-014-3570-x. Epub 2014 Apr 12. — View Citation

* Note: There are 40 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Changes in activation of mPFC, amygdala, and nucleus accumbens upon presentation of emotional faces.	This will be assessed using mixed effects regression models, with group, time, and group X time effects modeled to examine the effect of MDMA on region of interests (ROI) activation. We will also assess the functional connectivity of between these ROIs.	Initial Drug Dose, 2 weeks post drug dose (second drug dose).
Secondary	Changes in PTSD symptoms, which will be measured by The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale 5 (CAPS-5).	Assesses PTSD symptoms. It is a structured interview that consists of 30 items. Items are rated using a 0 to 4 severity scale. In addition to assessing the 20 DSM-5 PTSD symptoms, questions target the onset and duration of symptoms, subjective distress, impact of symptoms on social and occupational functioning, improvement in symptoms since a previous CAPS administration, overall response validity, overall PTSD severity, and specifications for the dissociative subtype (depersonalization and derealization. Higher scores indicate more severe PTSD symptoms.	Baseline, Initial Drug Dose and Second Drug Dose, 24 hours and 1 week after initial and second drug dose.
Secondary	Changes in depression symptoms, which will be measured by The Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II).	Assesses depression symptoms. Consists of 21 items and uses a 0 to 3 severity scale. Total scores range from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating more severe depression.	Baseline, Initial Drug Does and Second Drug Dose, 24 hours after initial and second drug dose, 3 and 5 days after initial and second drug dose (by phone), 1 week after initial and second drug dose, 15, 17, 19, and 21 days after second drug dose (phone).
Secondary	Changes in sleep patterns, which will be measured by The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).	Assesses the quality and patterns of sleep in adults. It differentiates "poor" from "good" sleep quality by measuring seven areas (components): subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medications, and daytime dysfunction over the last month. Items are rated using a 0 to 3 scale. The component scores are summed to produce a global score (range 0 to 21). Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality.	Baseline, 24 hours after first and second drug dose, 1 week after initial and second drug dose.
Secondary	Changes in PTSD symptoms, which will be measured by The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for the DSM-5 (PCL-5).	Assesses PTSD symptoms. It is a 20-item self-report measure that assesses the 20 DSM-5 symptoms of PTSD. Items are rated using a 0 to 4 scale. Total scores range from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating more severe PTSD symptoms.	Baseline, 24 hours after initial and second drug dose, 3 and 5 days after initial and second drug dose (phone), 1 week after initial and second drug dose, 15, 17, 19, and 21 days after second drug dose (phone).
Secondary	Changes in personality traits, which will be measured by The NEO Personality Inventory - Revised (NEO PI-R).	Assesses changes in personality traits. It is a personality inventory that examines a person's Big Five personality traits. It consist of 240 items that assess 30 specific traits, which in turn define the five factors: Neuroticism (N), Extraversion (E), Openness to Experience (O), Agreeableness (A), and Conscientiousness (C). Items are rated on a five-point Likert scale, from strongly disagree to strongly agree.	Baseline, 1 week after initial and second drug dose.
Secondary	Changes in mental states, which will be measured The 5-Dimensional Altered States of Consciousness Scale (5D-ASC).	Assesses different mental states induced by the interventions. Consists of 94 items which are rated by placing marks on a horizontal visual analogue scale (100 millimeters in length). The scale ranges from no, not more than usual (on the left) to yes, very much more than usual (on the right). The items are scored by measuring the millimeters from the low end of the scale to the participant's mark (from 0 to 100).	Initial and second drug dose.
Secondary	Changes in growth following a traumatic event, which will be measured by The Post traumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI).	Assesses positive outcomes reported by persons who have experienced traumatic events. It is a 21-item scale that includes factors of New Possibilities, Relating to Others, Personal Strength, Spiritual Change, and Appreciation of Life. Participants are asked to rate the degree to which this change occurred in their life as a result of the crisis/disaster. Each item is rated from 0 (I did not experience this change as a result of my crisis) to 5 (I experienced this change to a very great degree as a result of my crisis). Total score is calculated by summing all items. Individual factors are scored by adding responses to items on each factor. Higher scores indicate greater growth.	Baseline, 24 hours after initial and second drug dose, 1 week after initial and second drug dose.
Secondary	Changes in well-being, which will be measured by The Well-Being Inventory (WBI).	Assesses well-being across life domains and such as work, finances, health, and social relationships. Participants are first asked questions about their level of functioning in each domain. Items are rated from 1 (never) to 5 (most or all of the time). Then they are asked questions about their satisfaction in each domain. Items are rated from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied). Higher total scores indicate greater well-being.	Baseline, 1 week after initial and second drug dose.
Secondary	Changes in psychological inflexibility/experiential avoidance, which will be measured by The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire II (AAQ-II).	Assesses psychological inflexibility/experiential avoidance. Participants are asked to rate how true each statement is for them. Items are rated from 1 (never true) to 7 (always true). Higher scores equal greater levels of psychological inflexibility.	Baseline, 1 Week after initial and second drug dose.
Secondary	Changes in emotional regulation, which will be measured by The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ).	Assesses emotional regulation. A 10-item scale designed to measure respondents' tendency to regulate their emotions in two ways: (1) Cognitive Reappraisal and (2) Expressive Suppression. Participants answer each item on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). The higher the scores the greater the use of the emotion regulation strategy.	Baseline, 1 week after initial and second drug dose.
Secondary	Changes in cognitive and emotional empathy, which will be measured by the Multifaceted Empathy Test (MET).	Measures cognitive and emotional empathy simultaneously and independently using a series of photorealistic stimuli computer based tasks.	Baseline, Initial and Second Drug Dose, 24 hours after initial and second drug dose, 1 week after initial and second drug dose.
Secondary	Changes in the quality of specific relationships in terms of supportive and conflictual dynamics will be assessed with the Quality of Relationships Inventory (QRI)	The 25 question task assesses the contemporary quality of specific relationships (between the patient and a specific individual, such as a family member) at a particular point in time in terms of conflict, support, and depth. It uses a Likert-type 4 point scale going from "1" indicating the item does not apply at all, while "4" indicates the item applies quite a lot.	Baseline, Initial and Second Drug Dose, 1 week after initial and second drug dose.
Secondary	Cognitive schemas about oneself and others, will be assessed by the Trauma and Attachment Beliefs Scale (TABS)	The 84 item self-report scale, which measures responses on a 1-6 scale (1 = "Disagree Strongly, 6 = Agree Strongly) the degree to which respondents believe the statements correspond with their own beliefs. The measures of these beliefs relate to self-safety, other-safety, self-trust, other-trust, self-esteem, other-esteem, self-intimacy, other-intimacy, self-control, and other control.	Baseline
Secondary	Brain injury will be assessed for with the CogState Neuropsychological Test	Brain injuries associated with traumatic events, such as concussions, will be screened for in the CogState Neuropsychological Test, a standard computerized test used to assess neuropsychological deficits associated with brain injury.	Baseline, 1 week after initial and second drug dose.
Secondary	Moral injury, or the sense of distress due to contradiction of deeply-held beliefs due to a traumatic event, will be measured by the Moral Injury Events Scale (MIES)	This 9 item self-report scale measures the moral injury, or distress due to the contradiction to a deeply-held belief about the world that often accompanies a traumatic incident. The injury is assessed in terms of "perceived transgression" and "perceived betrayal." Items are assessed with a Likert-type Scale (1 to 6, 1 = "strongly disagree," 6 = "strongly agree," with no neutral option). Higher scores indicate greater severity of associated event.	Baseline, Initial and Second Drug Dose, 24 hours after initial and second drug dose, 1 week after initial and second drug dose.
Secondary	Changes in concept and sense of existential meaning will be measured with the Purpose and Meaning scale (PIL)	Measures evaluation of the sense of existential purpose and enthusiasm for life in a three part self-report survey. Part A is a 20 point scale test which uses a 1-7 scale in which low number answers correspond attitudes such as boredom and directionless-ness. Parts B and C are not empirically useful, but ask for participants to completes sentences and compose a paragraph respectively. Higher scores indicate a greater existential sense of purpose, with scores above 113 indicate a high degree of purpose, scores below 92 suggesting a lack of purpose, and scores between 92 and 112 indicate moderate levels of purpose.	Baseline, 1 week after second drug dose.
Secondary	Changes in depression symptoms, which will be measured Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS).	Assesses depression symptoms. Consists of 10 items and uses a 0 to 6 severity scale. Total scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe depression.	Baseline, Initial and Second Drug Dose, 24 hours after initial and second drug dose, 1 week after initial and second administration.