Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04228913
Other study ID # ADÜDHF 2017/021
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 4
First received
Last updated
Start date August 31, 2017
Est. completion date August 15, 2019

Study information

Verified date January 2020
Source Aydin Adnan Menderes University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study evaluated the postoperative pain after the endodontic treatment by using three different obturation techniques. ( Cold lateral condensation (CLC), thermoplasticized solid-core carrier method (GuttaCore) and cold free-flow compation tecnique ( GuttaFlow2))


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 90
Est. completion date August 15, 2019
Est. primary completion date March 4, 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 72 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

1. Participants between 18 - 72 years of ages,

2 Good oral hygiene,

3. Have not taken any analgesic in the last 7 days,

4. Have not taken any antibiotics in the last 7 days,

5. Positive response to both cold test (EndoIce; Coltene/Whaledent Inc, Cuyahoga ),

6. Patients diagnosed with asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis with his/her single-rooted teeth caused by a deep carious lesion,

7. Patients have single-rooted teeth requiring endodontic treatment according to the pre-prosthetic reason,

8.The presence of profusely pulp bleeding with a thick consistency, which is exposed during caries removing.

9. The periapical region was healthy in radiographic diagnosis.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Patients who refuse to participate in this study,

2. Medically compromised patients (with immunosuppressive/systemic diseases, patients on medications),

3. Devital teeth that have no response to pulp test,

4. The presence of advanced periodontal disease (probing depth > 4 mm),

5. The presence of open apex,

6. The presence of calcification,

7. The presence of resorption,

8. Patients who had multiple teeth requiring endodontic treatment,

9. Patients with allergic sensitivity to materials and agents that should be used during the root canal treatment,

10. Allergic sensitivity to local anesthetics,

11. Patients who had systemic or allergic sensitivity for the NSAIDs,

12. Pregnant participants or participants in the lactation period,

13. Teeth cannot be applied to a rubber-dam.

Study Design


Intervention

Other:
Root Canal Obturation Technique
This study aims to compare the effects of three different obturation techniques(cold lateral condensation,thermoplasticized solid-core carrier method, cold free flow compaction technique) on postoperative pain following the endodontic therapy

Locations

Country Name City State
Turkey Hicran Dönmez Özkan Aydin

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Aydin Adnan Menderes University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Turkey, 

References & Publications (3)

Alonso-Ezpeleta LO, Gasco-Garcia C, Castellanos-Cosano L, Martín-González J, López-Frías FJ, Segura-Egea JJ. Postoperative pain after one-visit root-canal treatment on teeth with vital pulps: comparison of three different obturation techniques. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 Jul 1;17(4):e721-7. — View Citation

Graunaite I, Skucaite N, Lodiene G, Agentiene I, Machiulskiene V. Effect of Resin-based and Bioceramic Root Canal Sealers on Postoperative Pain: A Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Trial. J Endod. 2018 May;44(5):689-693. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.02.010. E — View Citation

Su Y, Wang C, Ye L. Healing rate and post-obturation pain of single- versus multiple-visit endodontic treatment for infected root canals: a systematic review. J Endod. 2011 Feb;37(2):125-32. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.09.005. Epub 2010 Nov 12. Review. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Pain level comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique:: VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 6th hours. Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line. 6th hours.
Primary Pain level comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique.: VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 12th hours. ased on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line. 12th hours.
Primary Pain level comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique.: VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 24th hours Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line. 24th hours.
Primary Pain level comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique.: VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 2nd days. Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line. 2nd days
Primary Pain level comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique.: VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 3th days. Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line. 3th days
Primary Pain level comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique.: VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 4th days. Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line. 4th days.
Primary Pain level comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique.: VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 5th days. Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line. 5th days
Primary Pain level comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique.: VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 6th days. Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line. 6th days
Primary Pain level comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique.: VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 7th days. Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line. 7th days
Secondary Analgesic intake comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique at 6th hours The patients were asked to choose one of the three options: "0: No pain, or no pain which does not require the use of analgesics", "1: Moderate pain which can be controlled very well by the use of analgesics and does not affect daily activities or sleep", "2: Daily activities Unbearable pain that cannot be controlled by the use of analgesics" 6th hours.
Secondary Analgesic intake comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique at 12th hours The patients were asked to choose one of the three options: "0: No pain, or no pain which does not require the use of analgesics", "1: Moderate pain which can be controlled very well by the use of analgesics and does not affect daily activities or sleep", "2: Daily activities Unbearable pain that cannot be controlled by the use of analgesics" 12th hours
Secondary Analgesic intake comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique at 24th hours The patients were asked to choose one of the three options: "0: No pain, or no pain which does not require the use of analgesics", "1: Moderate pain which can be controlled very well by the use of analgesics and does not affect daily activities or sleep", "2: Daily activities Unbearable pain that cannot be controlled by the use of analgesics" 24th hours.
Secondary Analgesic intake comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique at 2nd days The patients were asked to choose one of the three options: "0: No pain, or no pain which does not require the use of analgesics", "1: Moderate pain which can be controlled very well by the use of analgesics and does not affect daily activities or sleep", "2: Daily activities Unbearable pain that cannot be controlled by the use of analgesics" 2nd days
Secondary Analgesic intake comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique at 3th days The patients were asked to choose one of the three options: "0: No pain, or no pain which does not require the use of analgesics", "1: Moderate pain which can be controlled very well by the use of analgesics and does not affect daily activities or sleep", "2: Daily activities Unbearable pain that cannot be controlled by the use of analgesics" 3th days
Secondary Analgesic intake comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique at 4th days The patients were asked to choose one of the three options: "0: No pain, or no pain which does not require the use of analgesics", "1: Moderate pain which can be controlled very well by the use of analgesics and does not affect daily activities or sleep", "2: Daily activities Unbearable pain that cannot be controlled by the use of analgesics" 4 th days
Secondary Analgesic intake comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique at 5th days The patients were asked to choose one of the three options: "0: No pain, or no pain which does not require the use of analgesics", "1: Moderate pain which can be controlled very well by the use of analgesics and does not affect daily activities or sleep", "2: Daily activities Unbearable pain that cannot be controlled by the use of analgesics" 5th days
Secondary Analgesic intake comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique at 6th days The patients were asked to choose one of the three options: "0: No pain, or no pain which does not require the use of analgesics", "1: Moderate pain which can be controlled very well by the use of analgesics and does not affect daily activities or sleep", "2: Daily activities Unbearable pain that cannot be controlled by the use of analgesics" 6th days
Secondary Analgesic intake comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique at 7th days The patients were asked to choose one of the three options: "0: No pain, or no pain which does not require the use of analgesics", "1: Moderate pain which can be controlled very well by the use of analgesics and does not affect daily activities or sleep", "2: Daily activities Unbearable pain that cannot be controlled by the use of analgesics" 7th days.
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT05559255 - Changes in Pain, Spasticity, and Quality of Life After Use of Counterstrain Treatment in Individuals With SCI N/A
Completed NCT04748367 - Leveraging on Immersive Virtual Reality to Reduce Pain and Anxiety in Children During Immunization in Primary Care N/A
Terminated NCT04356352 - Lidocaine, Esmolol, or Placebo to Relieve IV Propofol Pain Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT05057988 - Virtual Empowered Relief for Chronic Pain N/A
Completed NCT04466111 - Observational, Post Market Study in Treating Chronic Upper Extremity Limb Pain
Recruiting NCT06206252 - Can Medical Cannabis Affect Opioid Use?
Completed NCT05868122 - A Study to Evaluate a Fixed Combination of Acetaminophen/Naproxen Sodium in Acute Postoperative Pain Following Bunionectomy Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT05006976 - A Naturalistic Trial of Nudging Clinicians in the Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic. The NSAC Nudge Study N/A
Completed NCT03273114 - Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT06087432 - Is PNF Application Effective on Temporomandibular Dysfunction N/A
Completed NCT05508594 - Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Relationship of Intranasally Administered Sufentanil, Ketamine, and CT001 Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting NCT03646955 - Partial Breast Versus no Irradiation for Women With Early Breast Cancer N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03472300 - Prevalence of Self-disclosed Knee Trouble and Use of Treatments Among Elderly Individuals
Completed NCT03678168 - A Comparison Between Conventional Throat Packs and Pharyngeal Placement of Tampons in Rhinology Surgeries N/A
Completed NCT03286543 - Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the SPRINT Beta System N/A
Completed NCT03931772 - Online Automated Self-Hypnosis Program N/A
Completed NCT02913027 - Can We Improve the Comfort of Pelvic Exams? N/A
Terminated NCT02181387 - Acetaminophen Use in Labor - Does Use of Acetaminophen Reduce Neuraxial Analgesic Drug Requirement During Labor? Phase 4
Recruiting NCT06032559 - Implementation and Effectiveness of Mindfulness Oriented Recovery Enhancement as an Adjunct to Methadone Treatment Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT03613155 - Assessment of Anxiety in Patients Treated by SMUR Toulouse and Receiving MEOPA as Part of Their Care