Pain Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparison of Postoperative Pain Intensity After Three Different Obturation Techniques: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Verified date | January 2020 |
Source | Aydin Adnan Menderes University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This study evaluated the postoperative pain after the endodontic treatment by using three different obturation techniques. ( Cold lateral condensation (CLC), thermoplasticized solid-core carrier method (GuttaCore) and cold free-flow compation tecnique ( GuttaFlow2))
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 90 |
Est. completion date | August 15, 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | March 4, 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 72 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Participants between 18 - 72 years of ages, 2 Good oral hygiene, 3. Have not taken any analgesic in the last 7 days, 4. Have not taken any antibiotics in the last 7 days, 5. Positive response to both cold test (EndoIce; Coltene/Whaledent Inc, Cuyahoga ), 6. Patients diagnosed with asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis with his/her single-rooted teeth caused by a deep carious lesion, 7. Patients have single-rooted teeth requiring endodontic treatment according to the pre-prosthetic reason, 8.The presence of profusely pulp bleeding with a thick consistency, which is exposed during caries removing. 9. The periapical region was healthy in radiographic diagnosis. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients who refuse to participate in this study, 2. Medically compromised patients (with immunosuppressive/systemic diseases, patients on medications), 3. Devital teeth that have no response to pulp test, 4. The presence of advanced periodontal disease (probing depth > 4 mm), 5. The presence of open apex, 6. The presence of calcification, 7. The presence of resorption, 8. Patients who had multiple teeth requiring endodontic treatment, 9. Patients with allergic sensitivity to materials and agents that should be used during the root canal treatment, 10. Allergic sensitivity to local anesthetics, 11. Patients who had systemic or allergic sensitivity for the NSAIDs, 12. Pregnant participants or participants in the lactation period, 13. Teeth cannot be applied to a rubber-dam. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Turkey | Hicran Dönmez Özkan | Aydin |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Aydin Adnan Menderes University |
Turkey,
Alonso-Ezpeleta LO, Gasco-Garcia C, Castellanos-Cosano L, Martín-González J, López-Frías FJ, Segura-Egea JJ. Postoperative pain after one-visit root-canal treatment on teeth with vital pulps: comparison of three different obturation techniques. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 Jul 1;17(4):e721-7. — View Citation
Graunaite I, Skucaite N, Lodiene G, Agentiene I, Machiulskiene V. Effect of Resin-based and Bioceramic Root Canal Sealers on Postoperative Pain: A Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Trial. J Endod. 2018 May;44(5):689-693. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.02.010. E — View Citation
Su Y, Wang C, Ye L. Healing rate and post-obturation pain of single- versus multiple-visit endodontic treatment for infected root canals: a systematic review. J Endod. 2011 Feb;37(2):125-32. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.09.005. Epub 2010 Nov 12. Review. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Pain level comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique:: VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 6th hours. | Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line. | 6th hours. | |
Primary | Pain level comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique.: VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 12th hours. | ased on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line. | 12th hours. | |
Primary | Pain level comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique.: VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 24th hours | Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line. | 24th hours. | |
Primary | Pain level comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique.: VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 2nd days. | Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line. | 2nd days | |
Primary | Pain level comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique.: VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 3th days. | Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line. | 3th days | |
Primary | Pain level comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique.: VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 4th days. | Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line. | 4th days. | |
Primary | Pain level comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique.: VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 5th days. | Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line. | 5th days | |
Primary | Pain level comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique.: VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 6th days. | Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line. | 6th days | |
Primary | Pain level comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique.: VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 7th days. | Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line. | 7th days | |
Secondary | Analgesic intake comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique at 6th hours | The patients were asked to choose one of the three options: "0: No pain, or no pain which does not require the use of analgesics", "1: Moderate pain which can be controlled very well by the use of analgesics and does not affect daily activities or sleep", "2: Daily activities Unbearable pain that cannot be controlled by the use of analgesics" | 6th hours. | |
Secondary | Analgesic intake comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique at 12th hours | The patients were asked to choose one of the three options: "0: No pain, or no pain which does not require the use of analgesics", "1: Moderate pain which can be controlled very well by the use of analgesics and does not affect daily activities or sleep", "2: Daily activities Unbearable pain that cannot be controlled by the use of analgesics" | 12th hours | |
Secondary | Analgesic intake comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique at 24th hours | The patients were asked to choose one of the three options: "0: No pain, or no pain which does not require the use of analgesics", "1: Moderate pain which can be controlled very well by the use of analgesics and does not affect daily activities or sleep", "2: Daily activities Unbearable pain that cannot be controlled by the use of analgesics" | 24th hours. | |
Secondary | Analgesic intake comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique at 2nd days | The patients were asked to choose one of the three options: "0: No pain, or no pain which does not require the use of analgesics", "1: Moderate pain which can be controlled very well by the use of analgesics and does not affect daily activities or sleep", "2: Daily activities Unbearable pain that cannot be controlled by the use of analgesics" | 2nd days | |
Secondary | Analgesic intake comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique at 3th days | The patients were asked to choose one of the three options: "0: No pain, or no pain which does not require the use of analgesics", "1: Moderate pain which can be controlled very well by the use of analgesics and does not affect daily activities or sleep", "2: Daily activities Unbearable pain that cannot be controlled by the use of analgesics" | 3th days | |
Secondary | Analgesic intake comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique at 4th days | The patients were asked to choose one of the three options: "0: No pain, or no pain which does not require the use of analgesics", "1: Moderate pain which can be controlled very well by the use of analgesics and does not affect daily activities or sleep", "2: Daily activities Unbearable pain that cannot be controlled by the use of analgesics" | 4 th days | |
Secondary | Analgesic intake comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique at 5th days | The patients were asked to choose one of the three options: "0: No pain, or no pain which does not require the use of analgesics", "1: Moderate pain which can be controlled very well by the use of analgesics and does not affect daily activities or sleep", "2: Daily activities Unbearable pain that cannot be controlled by the use of analgesics" | 5th days | |
Secondary | Analgesic intake comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique at 6th days | The patients were asked to choose one of the three options: "0: No pain, or no pain which does not require the use of analgesics", "1: Moderate pain which can be controlled very well by the use of analgesics and does not affect daily activities or sleep", "2: Daily activities Unbearable pain that cannot be controlled by the use of analgesics" | 6th days | |
Secondary | Analgesic intake comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique at 7th days | The patients were asked to choose one of the three options: "0: No pain, or no pain which does not require the use of analgesics", "1: Moderate pain which can be controlled very well by the use of analgesics and does not affect daily activities or sleep", "2: Daily activities Unbearable pain that cannot be controlled by the use of analgesics" | 7th days. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05559255 -
Changes in Pain, Spasticity, and Quality of Life After Use of Counterstrain Treatment in Individuals With SCI
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04748367 -
Leveraging on Immersive Virtual Reality to Reduce Pain and Anxiety in Children During Immunization in Primary Care
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT04356352 -
Lidocaine, Esmolol, or Placebo to Relieve IV Propofol Pain
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05057988 -
Virtual Empowered Relief for Chronic Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04466111 -
Observational, Post Market Study in Treating Chronic Upper Extremity Limb Pain
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06206252 -
Can Medical Cannabis Affect Opioid Use?
|
||
Completed |
NCT05868122 -
A Study to Evaluate a Fixed Combination of Acetaminophen/Naproxen Sodium in Acute Postoperative Pain Following Bunionectomy
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05006976 -
A Naturalistic Trial of Nudging Clinicians in the Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic. The NSAC Nudge Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03273114 -
Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT06087432 -
Is PNF Application Effective on Temporomandibular Dysfunction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05508594 -
Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Relationship of Intranasally Administered Sufentanil, Ketamine, and CT001
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03646955 -
Partial Breast Versus no Irradiation for Women With Early Breast Cancer
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03472300 -
Prevalence of Self-disclosed Knee Trouble and Use of Treatments Among Elderly Individuals
|
||
Completed |
NCT03678168 -
A Comparison Between Conventional Throat Packs and Pharyngeal Placement of Tampons in Rhinology Surgeries
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03286543 -
Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the SPRINT Beta System
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03931772 -
Online Automated Self-Hypnosis Program
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02913027 -
Can We Improve the Comfort of Pelvic Exams?
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02181387 -
Acetaminophen Use in Labor - Does Use of Acetaminophen Reduce Neuraxial Analgesic Drug Requirement During Labor?
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06032559 -
Implementation and Effectiveness of Mindfulness Oriented Recovery Enhancement as an Adjunct to Methadone Treatment
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03613155 -
Assessment of Anxiety in Patients Treated by SMUR Toulouse and Receiving MEOPA as Part of Their Care
|