View clinical trials related to Otitis Media.
Filter by:Otitis media with effusion (OME) is thought to be associated with comorbidities such as allergic rhinitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, asthma, and more. Many of these comorbidities can be caused by type 2 inflammation (T2I). This study aims to characterize the risk of undergoing OME surgery. This retrospective, matched-cohort study involved the retrospective recruitment of patients from 2009 to 2020, using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD)
The aim of study is to clarify the role of sugammadex in head and neck surgery patients with a prior history of urinary retention, benign prostatic hypertrophy, or a history of prostate cancer, to prevent postoperative urinary retention. The main question it aims to answer are: - Anticholinergic agent interferes the postoperative urination - Sugammadex does not interfere postoperative urination Sugammadex can be recommended for these patients with high risk in postoperative urinary retention in the future.
Microplastic rate is increasing ib athmosphere. They can be found in lung, kidney, heart, even placenta. Otitis media with effusion (OME) is a clinical condition that is ver common in children. Biofilms are blamed in the pathogenesis of OME. Microplastics can include biofilms. Importance of microplastics for potential pathogens and their toxicity aspects should be enlighted with studies. This study aims to investigate presency of microplastics in middle ear fluid of patients with OME.
A pragmatic, mixed-method trial is to show the ability of OtoSight to change management of the pediatric patient presenting with ear pain in a way that improves patient outcomes and reduces costs.
The general purpose of this study is to compare Chitosan-dextran (Chitodex) gel versus current standard of care, Gelfoam, as a middle ear (ME) and external auditory canal (EAC) packing agent as part of tympanoplasty procedures to close tympanic membrane perforations (TMP).
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the results of ear tube placement in two different parts of the ear drum. The ear drum can be divided into four parts (called quadrants). Ear tubes are usually placed in one section of the ear drum, called the anterior-inferior quadrant. However, tubes can also be placed in another section, called the posterior-inferior quadrant. Ear tubes usually fall out of the ear drum on their own. In most patients, the hole in the ear drum where the tube used to be closes on its own. Sometimes (in about 2% of patients), the hole does not close on its own and might need surgery. We want to study ear tube placement in the posterior-inferior quadrant because surgery to repair a hole in the eardrum is easier in this location. For this study, children will receive an ear tube in the usual location (anterior-inferior quadrant) in one ear and the new location (posterior-inferior quadrant) in the other ear. Researchers will determine which ear has the new location using random assignment (like flipping a coin). Researchers will collect information about hearing tests, whether there is ear drainage (otorrhea), if the tube is blocked (occluded), and how the ear drum looks for up to 37 months after tube placement. Participants will answer study questions at 2-12 weeks and 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months after surgery. These questions will ask about whether tubes have fallen out of the ear drum, whether there is a hole in the ear drum, whether there has been drainage from the ear or other ear symptoms, and whether there have been any visits to the doctor for ear problems. Researchers will use this information to compare ears with anterior-inferior tube placement and ears with posterior-inferior tube placement to see if there are differences in common complications following tube placement.
This is an observational cohort study to investigate the incidence of radiation-induced otitis media, changes in tubal function and hearing in newly diagnosed nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients without metastasis at multiple time points from baseline to 1 year after radiotherapy.
Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) is characterized by intermittent or continuous otorrhea lasting for longer than 6 weeks. Most cases can be treated conservatively using antibiotic drops and oral antibiotics. However, some cases will not respond to conservative treatment and demonstrate persistant discharge. In these cases, especially if a CT-scan shows opacification of the mastoid air cells, a mastoidectomy can be considered as treatment modality. In recent years, obliteration of the mastoid cavity following mastoidectomy is gaining popularity. However, the effectiveness of obliterating the mastoid in comparison to mastoidectomy alone is uncertain for CSOM. In this retrospective cohort study, our aim is to compare mastoidectomy to mastoidectomy + mastoid obliteration in a cohort of patients suffering from CSOM with mastoid involvement. The hypothesis is that obliterating the mastoid cavity will result in a higher frequency of dry ears and in a lower frequency of revision surgeries.
The goal of this clinical, randomized trial is to compare the sleeping patterns and quality of life of children with chronic otitis media with effusion (OME) with or without tympanic tubes insertion. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Does tympanic tube insertion have an effect on sleep quality in children with chronic OME? - Does tympanic tube insertion improve the quality of life for the children with chronic OME and their caregivers? Participants will have their movements during sleep and number of awakenings measured by an accelerometer placed on their wrist for 7 nights before and after tympanic tube insertion. Their caregivers will answer questionnaires regarding quality of life on behalf of the child. Researchers will compare with a control group of children who also is diagnosed with chronic OME. They will also have their sleep monitored for 7 nights and their caregivers will complete quality of life questionnaires, but the will not receive a tympanic tube. However the control group will be reassessed a month after baseline, and if they still qualify for tympanic tube insertion they will undergo the same routine as the intervention group.
The aim of this study is to investigate the cost, functional benefits, and impact on the quality of life of using bone-anchored hearing devices in chronic otitis media patients