Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Active, not recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT03744000 |
Other study ID # |
INNOVATION-CORE |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Active, not recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
April 3, 2018 |
Est. completion date |
November 30, 2025 |
Study information
Verified date |
April 2024 |
Source |
Korea University Anam Hospital |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Trial Name) Impact of Immediate SteNt ImplaNtatiOn Versus Deferred Stent ImplAntaTION on
Clinical Outcomes in Patients with AnteRior Wall ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
(INNOVATION-CORE)
Objectives) To evaluate the impact of deferred versus immediate stenting in patients with
acute ST-segment elevation anterior wall myocardial infarction (STEMI) on
1. the clinical efficacy and safety
2. the microvascular obstruction using Cardiac magnetic resonance (MR)
3. the structural and functional cardiac remodeling using conventional echocardiography and
strain imaging
4. the intravascular findings using optical coherence tomography (OCT)
Study Design) A multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label clinical trial
for anterior wall STEMI patients
Patient Enrollment) 460 patients will be enrolled at 20 centers in South-Korea
Patient Follow-Up) Clinical follow-up will occur at 1, 6, 12 months, 2, 3 years and 5 years.
Investigator or designee may conduct follow-up as telephone contacts or office visits.
Primary Endpoint) Composite of all-cause death, hospitalization due to heart failure,
recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 2 years.
Secondary Endpoints)
1. Clinical events A. All-cause death B. Cardiac death C. Hospitalization due to heart
failure D. Recurrent MI E. TVR F. Stent thrombosis
2. Imaging parameters A. Echocardiographic parameters i. Left ventricle (LV) remodeling
index ii. %LV strain iii. Regional wall motion abnormality B. Cardiac MR parameters
(optional) i. Infarct size ii. Microvascular obstruction (MVO) size iii. MVO incidence
iv. MVO to infarct ratio C. OCT parameters (optional) i. Plaque morphology ii. Lipid
index iii. Minimal scaffold area and area stenosis iv. Stent malapposition
Description:
1. Study background The main treatment for acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction
due to thrombogenesis and complete occlusion resulting from rupture or erosion of the
atherosclerotic plaque in the coronary artery is to rapid open of the coronary artery
through the coronary intervention. Infarction-associated epicardial coronary arteries
reach Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 3 blood flow in approximately 90% of
patients after primary coronary intervention. However, many of these patients had
microvascular dysfunction assessed by myocardial brush and ST segment complete response,
and only about 35% of these patients achieved ideal reperfusion in which blood flow was
smoothly delivered to the myocardium and tissue. A "no-reflow" phenomenon or
microvascular obstruction, a serious form of microvascular dysfunction, raises the late
mortality rate of patients who underwent reperfusion from 1.9 to 7.1 times. It is also
well known that the phenomenon increases the incidence of re-infarction and the size of
myocardial infarction and induces left ventricular remodeling after several months.
To date, two treatment strategies have been proven to be effective in the treatment of
distal microvascular embolism, which are manual thrombus aspiration and intracoronary
administration of abciximab.
Recently, the theory that deferred stenting can reduce microvascular obstruction has
been suggested. The theoretical basis for the hypothesis is that prolonged antiplatelet
therapy and anticoagulation for a deferral period may enable the resolution of the
thrombus burden in infarct-related arteries, which is a substrate of distal embolization
and subsequent microvascular obstruction. additional rationale is what is called the
"vascular cooling down" to avoid mechanical stimulus in the milieu of active
inflammation within an infarct-related artery in the early stages of myocardial
infarction and prolong exposure to intensive statin therapy before stent implantation.
Based on this theory, four randomized control trials were published recently, but their
results were different. According to the subgroup analysis of the INNOVATION study, in
the cases of anterior wall myocardial infarction, deferred stenting strategy reduced not
only the infarction size but also the incidence of microvascular obstruction. These
findings suggest that the left anterior descending artery has more microvascular bed
than the other vessels, and thus the positive result of deferred stenting could be
maximized. However, these subgroup analysis results do not have sufficient statistical
power to conclude deferred stenting is beneficial in the left anterior wall myocardial
infarction, it is important to reaffirm the results with a large randomized control
trial exclusively selected for left anterior wall myocardial infarction.
In this study, we sought to evaluate the impact of deferred versus immediate stenting in
patients with acute ST-segment elevation anterior wall myocardial infarction on clinical
efficacy and safety.
2. Study objectives The primary objective of this study was to evaluate 1) the clinical
efficacy and safety of immediate versus deferred stent implantation in patients with
acute ST-segment elevation anterior wall myocardial infarction; 2) the degree of
microvascular occlusion reflecting distal microvascular embolization using Cardiac MR
and 3) the LV strain using echocardiography.
3. Medical devices and therapeutic agents The medical devices and therapeutic agents to be
used in this study are the treatment modalities that have been proven to be beneficial
in the treatment and prognosis evaluation of acute ST segment elevation myocardial
infarction in general. The stent is a third-generation drug-coated stent, and we intend
to unify it as one type (Xience alpine, everolimus eluting coronary stent, Abbott, USA)
in order to prevent the difference in results due to differences in stent types.
4. Expected effects of the research The treatment of acute myocardial infarction has been
continuously developed not only in the revascularization of the coronary arteries but
also in the improvement of microvascular perfusion. In addition to conventional thrombus
aspiration, the use of Glycoprotein IIb / IIIa inhibitors such as Abxicimab has been
used to improve the therapeutic results. However, it is also true that such treatment
methods alone have limitations in the prevention and treatment of microvascular
obstruction. Recently, deferred stenting has been attracting attention as a new method
to reduce microvascular occlusion. Especially, deferred stenting is expected to have a
positive result in left anterior wall MI with high microvascular volume. It is expected
to be able to determine the effect of deferred stenting strategy on the incidence of
clinical events and improvement of microvascular revascularization in patients with ST
elevation anterior wall myocardial infarction through this study.
5. Clinical trial monitoring Monitor personnel designated by the investigator to obtain
quality test data will review the clinical trial data at appropriate intervals to ensure
accuracy, completeness, and compliance with the protocol. The monitoring personnel can
investigate all documents and essential records held by clinical investigators or
clinical trial laboratories, including the medical records (office, clinic, and
hospital) of the subjects participating in the clinical trial. Clinical investigators
and researchers should allow access to these records to the monitoring personnel. The
monitoring plan will be conducted three times in total, at the time of registering the
number of subjects corresponding to 50% or more of the total enrollment number, when the
completed research subject reaches 70% or more, and immediately before the end of the
study.