Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Terminated
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT03686696 |
Other study ID # |
EudraCT number 2018-000889-11 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Terminated |
Phase |
Phase 4
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
December 16, 2018 |
Est. completion date |
August 22, 2023 |
Study information
Verified date |
November 2023 |
Source |
Uppsala University |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries" (MINOCA) occurs in 5-10% of all
patients with AMI. There are neither any randomized clinical trials in MINOCA patients
evaluating effects of secondary preventive treatments proven beneficial in patients with
classic AMI, nor any treatment guidelines.
The primary objective of this multi-national, multi-center pragmatic randomized clinical
trial is to determine whether oral beta-blockade compared to no oral beta-blockade, and
whether Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEI/ Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB)
compared to no ACEI/ARB, reduce the composite endpoint of death of any cause and readmission
because of AMI, ischemic stroke or heart failure in patients discharged with myocardial
infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA) and with no clinical signs
of heart failure and with left ventricular (LV) systolic ejection fraction ≥40%.
Description:
Large-scale use of acute coronary angiography has revealed a large portion of AMI without
angiographically obstructive (defined as ≥50% diameter stenosis) coronary artery disease
(CAD). The term "myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries" (MINOCA) has
been coined for this entity. MINOCA occurs in 5-10% of all patients with AMI and these
patients are younger and more often females compared to patients with AMI and obstructive
CAD. The 1-year mortality after MINOCA was found to be 3.5% in the systematic review by
Pasupathy et al.. There are no randomized clinical trials in MINOCA patients evaluating
effects of secondary preventive treatments proven beneficial in patients with classic AMI.
However, in an observational study with propensity score matched comparisons the risk of
experiencing a Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) was 18% lower in patients treated with
ACEI/ARB compared to no ACEI/ARB; in patients on beta blockers compared to patients not using
beta blockers there was a non-significant 14% reduction in MACE.
The primary objective of this multi-national, multi-center pragmatic randomized clinical
trial is to determine whether oral beta-blockade compared to no oral beta-blockade, and
whether ACEI/ARB compared to no ACEI/ARB, reduce the composite endpoint of death of any cause
and readmission because of AMI, ischemic stroke or heart failure in patients discharged with
myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA) and with no
clinical signs of heart failure and with LV systolic ejection fraction ≥40%.
PRIMARY ENDPOINT: Time to death of any cause or readmission because of myocardial infarction,
ischemic stroke or heart failure.
SECONDARY ENDPOINTS:
Time to:
- All-cause mortality
- Cardiovascular mortality
- Readmission because of AMI
- Readmission because of ischemic stroke
- Readmission because of heart failure
- Readmission because of unstable angina pectoris
- Readmission because of atrial fibrillation.
Safety:
Time to readmission because of:
- AV-block II-III, hypotension, syncope or need for pacemaker
- Acute kidney injury
- Ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation