Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Phase IIb, Randomized (Stratified), Double-Blind (Sponsor Open), Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Finding Study of Nemiralisib (GSK2269557) Added to Standard of Care (SoC) Versus SoC Alone in Participants Diagnosed With an Acute Moderate or Severe Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Verified date | July 2021 |
Source | GlaxoSmithKline |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Nemiralisib is being developed as an anti-inflammatory drug for the treatment of inflammatory airways disease. This study is designed to assess the dose response, efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of nemiralisib across a range of doses [up to 750 micrograms (µg)] compared with placebo. The study consists of a Screening Period, a 12-Week Treatment Period and a 12-Week Post-Treatment Follow-Up Period. Approximately 1,250 subjects with an acute moderate or severe exacerbation of COPD requiring standard of care (SoC) therapy will be randomized in this double-blind study. Subjects will be randomized to receive different doses of nemiralisib or placebo via ELLIPTA® inhaler. The total duration of study participation is approximately 6 months (170 days). ELLIPTA is the registered trademark of GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) group of companies.
Status | Terminated |
Enrollment | 943 |
Est. completion date | January 10, 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | January 10, 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 40 Years to 80 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - 40 to 80 years of age, inclusive, at Screening (Visit 1). - An established clinical history of COPD in accordance with the definition by the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society [ global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease (GOLD), 2017] as follows: "Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a common, preventable and treatable disease that is characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms and airflow limitation that is due to airway and/or alveolar abnormalities usually caused by significant exposure to noxious particles or gases." - Current or former cigarette smoker with a history of cigarette smoking of >=10 pack-years. Former smokers are defined as those who have stopped smoking for at least 6 months prior to Screening (Visit 1). Number of pack years = (number of cigarettes per day / 20) x number of years smoked). - Acute exacerbation of COPD requiring an escalation in therapy to include oral/systemic corticosteroid(s) (prednisone 40 mg/day or equivalent) for 5 days and antibiotic(s) for 7 days; the dose and/or duration of prednisone (40 mg/day or equivalent) and/or the antibiotic can be modified according to the Investigator's/medically qualified designee's judgment or according to local country/institution practice. Acute exacerbation to be confirmed by an experienced physician and to represent a recent worsening of at least two major and one minor symptoms, one major and two minor symptoms, or all 3 major symptoms. Major symptoms include subjective increase in dyspnea, increase in sputum volume or change in sputum color. Minor symptoms include increased cough, increased wheeze, sore throat, colds or fever (oral temperature >37.5 degree Celsius) without other cause. - Body weight >=45 kilogram (kg) and body mass index (BMI) within the range 16 - 35 kg per meter square (kg/m^2) (inclusive) - Male and female subjects are eligible to participate in the study. A female subject is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant, not breastfeeding, and at least one of the following conditions applies: Not a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) or a WOCBP who agrees to follow the contraceptive guidance during the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment Period and for at least 5 half-lives (10 days) after the last of double-blind study treatment. - Capable of giving signed informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: - Current diagnosis of asthma, according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA, 2017). Subjects with a prior history of asthma are eligible if they have a current diagnosis of COPD. - Potential of hydrogen (pH) < 7.30 or the need for invasive mechanical ventilation. - Moderate/severe exacerbation of COPD for which SoC was started >48 hours since diagnosis. - A chest X-ray [or computed tomography (CT) scan] that reveals evidence of clinically significant abnormalities not believed to be due to the presence of COPD. A chest X-ray (or CT scan) must be taken at Screening (Visit 1). For sites in Germany: if a chest X-ray (or CT scan) within 1 year of Screening (Visit 1) is not available, approval to conduct a diagnostic chest X-ray (CT scan) will need to be obtained from the Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS). - Clinically significant pneumonia, identified by chest X-ray (CT scan) at Screening. - A diagnosis of alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency as the underlying cause of COPD, active tuberculosis, lung cancer, clinically overt bronchiectasis (Note: focal bronchiectasis is not exclusionary), sarcoidosis, pulmonary fibrosis (Note: focal fibrotic pulmonary lesions are not exclusionary), primary pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung diseases,or any other respiratory condition that might, in the opinion of the investigator, compromise the safety of the subject or affect the interpretation of the results. - A history or current evidence of clinically significant and unstable disease such as cardiovascular (e.g., subjects requiring implanted cardioverter defibrillator [ICD], pacemaker requiring a rate set >60 beats per minute (bpm), uncontrolled hypertension, New Your Heart Association Class IV [NYHA, 1994], known left ventricular ejection fraction <30 percent) neurological, psychiatric, renal, hepatic, immunological, endocrine (including uncontrolled diabetes or thyroid disease), peptic ulcer disease, or hematological abnormalities. Significant is defined as any disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would put the safety of the subject at risk through participation, or which would affect the efficacy or safety analysis if the disease/condition exacerbated during the study. (Note: subjects with adequately treated and well controlled concurrent medical conditions (e.g. hypertension or noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus [NIDDM]) are permitted to be entered into the study). - Having undergone lung volume reduction surgery or lung resection for any other reason e.g. lung carcinoma - Liver diseases including ALT>2x upper limit of normal (ULN); Total bilirubin >1.5xULN (Isolated bilirubin >1.5xULN is acceptable if bilirubin is fractionated and direct bilirubin <35 percent); current or chronic history of liver disease or known hepatic or biliary abnormalities (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones); Presence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) at Screening or within 3 months prior to first dose of study treatment; Positive hepatitis C antibody test result at Screening or within 3 months prior to first dose of study treatment. - Positive hepatitis C ribonucleic acid (RNA) test result at Screening or within 3 months prior to first dose of study treatment. - Carcinoma that has not been in complete remission for at least 5 years. Carcinoma in situ of the cervix, squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma of the skin are not excluded if the subject has been considered cured within 5 years since diagnosis. - History of allergy or hypersensitivity to any of the study medications [e.g. beta-agonists, Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Delta (PI3Kd) inhibitors] or components of the inhalation powder (e.g., lactose). In addition, subjects with a history of severe milk protein allergy that, in the opinion of the investigator, contraindicates the subject's participation are excluded. - Strong inhibitors of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) including antiretrovirals including protease inhibitors; Oral antifungal treatments such as ketoconazole and itraconazole. It is recommended that posaconazole is used as the oral antifungal treatment of choice. Short courses of up to 14 days are allowed for fluconazole and voriconazole, but chronic administrations are not permitted; Antibiotics such as telithromycin and troleandomycin (macrolide). It is recommended that azithromycin is used as the macrolide antibiotic of choice. Short courses up to 14 days are allowed for mibefradil (calcium channel blocker), erythromycin and clarithromycin (including intravenous clarithromycin) but chronic administrations are not permitted; Anti-epileptic treatments; and anti-tuberculosis therapy. These medications must all have been stopped at least 14 days prior to first dose of study treatment. Use of sensitive narrow therapeutic index CYP3A4 substrates including alfentanil, cyclosporine, dihydroergotamine, ergotamine, fentanyl, pimozide, quinidine, sirolimus and tacrolimus; Intravenous theophylline will be allowed but only under strict therapeutic drug monitoring for signs of theophylline toxicity as a result of co-administration with nemiralisib; Subjects may be recruited into the study already under treatment with theophylline or started on theophylline following the start of treatment and before the end of 14 days post last dose. - Chronic treatment with long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) or nocturnal oxygen therapy required for >15 hours a day. Oxygen prn use (<=15 hours per day) is not exclusionary. Oxygen use during an exacerbation is permitted. - Chronic treatment with anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (anti-TNF), anti-Interleukin-1 (anti-IL1), or any other immunosuppressive therapy within 60 days prior to the first dose of double-blind study treatment. - Clinically significant sleep apnea that requires the use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) device or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) for > 48 hours. - Any other investigational treatment within the following time periods prior to the first dose of double-blind study treatment in the current study: 30 days, 5 half-lives or twice the duration of the biological effect of the investigational product, whichever is longer. Note: subjects who participated in a previously completed study and/or were withdrawn from an ongoing study that included/includes nemiralisib are excluded from participating in this study. - Exposure to more than 4 investigational medicinal products within 12 months prior to the first dose of double-blind study treatment in the current study. - A clinical abnormality or laboratory parameter(s) which is/are not specifically listed in the exclusion criteria, outside of the reference range for the population being studied may be included if the Investigator [in consultation with the GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Medical Monitor if required] documents that the finding is unlikely to introduce additional risk factors and will not interfere with the study procedures. - Abnormal, clinically significant ECG finding (e.g. myocardial Infarction or demonstrating a clinically significant arrhythmia requiring treatment) at Screening (Visit 1) or upon repeat prior to randomization. - QT interval corrected for heart rate according to Fridericia's formula (QTcF) >480 milliseconds (msec) for subjects with or without Bundle Branch Block, based on single QTcF value. - A positive test for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody at Screening. - Known or suspected history of alcohol or drug abuse within the last 2 years. - History of regular alcohol consumption defined as an average weekly intake of >28 units for males or >21 units for females within 6 months of Screening (Visit 1). One unit is equivalent to 8 grams of alcohol: a half-pint [approximately 240 milliliter (mL)] of beer, 1 glass (125 mL) of wine or 1 (25 mL) measure of spirits. - Subjects at risk of non-compliance, or unable to comply with the study procedures. Any infirmity, disability, or geographic location that would limit compliance for scheduled visits. - Subjects with a history of psychiatric disease, intellectual deficiency, poor motivation or other conditions that will limit the validity of informed consent to participate in the study. - Study investigators, sub-investigators, study coordinators, employees of a participating investigator or immediate family members of the aforementioned are excluded from participating in this study. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Argentina | GSK Investigational Site | Buenos Aires | |
Argentina | GSK Investigational Site | Buenos Aires | |
Argentina | GSK Investigational Site | Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires | |
Argentina | GSK Investigational Site | Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires | Buenos Aires |
Argentina | GSK Investigational Site | Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires | |
Argentina | GSK Investigational Site | Florida | Buenos Aires |
Argentina | GSK Investigational Site | Mar del Plata | Buenos Aires |
Argentina | GSK Investigational Site | Mendoza | |
Argentina | GSK Investigational Site | Mendoza | |
Argentina | GSK Investigational Site | Rosario | Santa Fe |
Argentina | GSK Investigational Site | San Rafael | Mendoza |
Argentina | GSK Investigational Site | Santo Tome | Santa Fe |
Argentina | GSK Investigational Site | Tucuman | |
Australia | GSK Investigational Site | Clayton | Victoria |
Australia | GSK Investigational Site | Gosford | New South Wales |
Australia | GSK Investigational Site | Murdoch | Western Australia |
Australia | GSK Investigational Site | Westmead | New South Wales |
Australia | GSK Investigational Site | Woodville South | South Australia |
Australia | GSK Investigational Site | Woolloongabba | Queensland |
Canada | GSK Investigational Site | Edmonton | Alberta |
Canada | GSK Investigational Site | Montreal | Quebec |
Canada | GSK Investigational Site | Quebec City | Quebec |
Canada | GSK Investigational Site | Sherwood Park | Alberta |
Canada | GSK Investigational Site | St-Charles-Borromée | Quebec |
Canada | GSK Investigational Site | Windsor | Ontario |
Canada | GSK Investigational Site | Winnipeg | Manitoba |
France | GSK Investigational Site | Brest cedex | |
France | GSK Investigational Site | Lyon | |
France | GSK Investigational Site | Montpellier cedex 5 | |
France | GSK Investigational Site | Rennes Cedex 9 | |
France | GSK Investigational Site | Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy cedex | |
Germany | GSK Investigational Site | Aschaffenburg | Bayern |
Germany | GSK Investigational Site | Bamberg | Bayern |
Germany | GSK Investigational Site | Berlin | |
Germany | GSK Investigational Site | Darmstadt | Hessen |
Germany | GSK Investigational Site | Frankfurt | Hessen |
Germany | GSK Investigational Site | Frankfurt | Hessen |
Germany | GSK Investigational Site | Geesthacht | Schleswig-Holstein |
Germany | GSK Investigational Site | Hannover | Niedersachsen |
Germany | GSK Investigational Site | Koblenz | Rheinland-Pfalz |
Germany | GSK Investigational Site | Leipzig | Sachsen |
Germany | GSK Investigational Site | Luebeck | Schleswig-Holstein |
Germany | GSK Investigational Site | Potsdam | Brandenburg |
Germany | GSK Investigational Site | Rheine | Nordrhein-Westfalen |
Germany | GSK Investigational Site | Rosenheim | Bayern |
Germany | GSK Investigational Site | Schleswig | Schleswig-Holstein |
Germany | GSK Investigational Site | Warendorf | Nordrhein-Westfalen |
Italy | GSK Investigational Site | Catania | Sicilia |
Italy | GSK Investigational Site | Messina | Sicilia |
Italy | GSK Investigational Site | Milano | Lombardia |
Italy | GSK Investigational Site | Negrar | Veneto |
Italy | GSK Investigational Site | Pavia | Lombardia |
Italy | GSK Investigational Site | Reggio Emilia | Emilia-Romagna |
Italy | GSK Investigational Site | Roma | Lazio |
Italy | GSK Investigational Site | Roma | Lazio |
Italy | GSK Investigational Site | Tradate (VA) | Lombardia |
Korea, Republic of | GSK Investigational Site | Daejon | |
Korea, Republic of | GSK Investigational Site | Incheon | |
Korea, Republic of | GSK Investigational Site | Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do | |
Korea, Republic of | GSK Investigational Site | Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do | |
Korea, Republic of | GSK Investigational Site | Seoul | |
Korea, Republic of | GSK Investigational Site | Seoul | |
Korea, Republic of | GSK Investigational Site | Seoul | |
Korea, Republic of | GSK Investigational Site | Seoul | |
Korea, Republic of | GSK Investigational Site | Seoul | |
Korea, Republic of | GSK Investigational Site | Seoul | |
Mexico | GSK Investigational Site | Guadalajara | Jalisco |
Mexico | GSK Investigational Site | Monterrey | Nuevo León |
Mexico | GSK Investigational Site | Zapopan | Jalisco |
Netherlands | GSK Investigational Site | Alkmaar | |
Netherlands | GSK Investigational Site | Breda | |
Netherlands | GSK Investigational Site | Eindhoven | |
Netherlands | GSK Investigational Site | Groningen | |
Netherlands | GSK Investigational Site | Harderwijk | |
Netherlands | GSK Investigational Site | Hoorn | |
Netherlands | GSK Investigational Site | Rotterdam | |
Netherlands | GSK Investigational Site | Utrecht | |
Netherlands | GSK Investigational Site | Zwolle | |
Poland | GSK Investigational Site | Bialystok | |
Poland | GSK Investigational Site | Elblag | |
Poland | GSK Investigational Site | Krakow | |
Poland | GSK Investigational Site | Lubin | |
Poland | GSK Investigational Site | Olawa | |
Poland | GSK Investigational Site | Ruda Slaska | |
Poland | GSK Investigational Site | Slupsk | |
Poland | GSK Investigational Site | Sosnowiec | |
Poland | GSK Investigational Site | Tarnow | |
Romania | GSK Investigational Site | Bucarest | |
Romania | GSK Investigational Site | Bucharest | |
Romania | GSK Investigational Site | Bucharest | |
Romania | GSK Investigational Site | Cluj Napoca | |
Romania | GSK Investigational Site | Comuna Alexandru Cel Bun | |
Romania | GSK Investigational Site | Iasi | |
Romania | GSK Investigational Site | Oradea | |
Romania | GSK Investigational Site | Ramnicu Valcea | |
Romania | GSK Investigational Site | Suceava | |
Romania | GSK Investigational Site | Timisoara | |
Russian Federation | GSK Investigational Site | Barnaul | |
Russian Federation | GSK Investigational Site | Belgorod | |
Russian Federation | GSK Investigational Site | Blagoveshchensk | |
Russian Federation | GSK Investigational Site | Chelyabinsk | |
Russian Federation | GSK Investigational Site | Chelyabinsk | |
Russian Federation | GSK Investigational Site | Ivanovo | |
Russian Federation | GSK Investigational Site | Kemerovo | |
Russian Federation | GSK Investigational Site | Nizhniy Novgorod | |
Russian Federation | GSK Investigational Site | Novgorod | |
Russian Federation | GSK Investigational Site | Novosibirsk | |
Russian Federation | GSK Investigational Site | Perm | |
Russian Federation | GSK Investigational Site | Ryazan | |
Russian Federation | GSK Investigational Site | Saratov | |
Russian Federation | GSK Investigational Site | Tomsk | |
Russian Federation | GSK Investigational Site | Ulyanovsk | |
Russian Federation | GSK Investigational Site | Voronezh | |
Spain | GSK Investigational Site | Barcelona | |
Spain | GSK Investigational Site | Basurto/Bilbao | |
Spain | GSK Investigational Site | Cáceres | |
Spain | GSK Investigational Site | Cartagena (Murcia) | |
Spain | GSK Investigational Site | Elda (Alicante) | |
Spain | GSK Investigational Site | Gerona | |
Spain | GSK Investigational Site | Laredo | Cantabria |
Spain | GSK Investigational Site | Logroño | |
Spain | GSK Investigational Site | Madrid | |
Spain | GSK Investigational Site | Madrid | |
Spain | GSK Investigational Site | Madrid | |
Spain | GSK Investigational Site | Mérida (Badajoz) | |
Spain | GSK Investigational Site | Orihuela (Alicante) | |
Spain | GSK Investigational Site | Palma de Mallorca | |
Spain | GSK Investigational Site | Pama de Mallorca | |
Spain | GSK Investigational Site | Ponferrada (León) | |
Spain | GSK Investigational Site | Pozuelo De Alarcón/Madrid | |
Sweden | GSK Investigational Site | Göteborg | |
Sweden | GSK Investigational Site | Lund | |
United Kingdom | GSK Investigational Site | Blackburn | |
United Kingdom | GSK Investigational Site | Bradford | |
United Kingdom | GSK Investigational Site | Chesterfield | Derbyshire |
United Kingdom | GSK Investigational Site | Edgbaston | |
United Kingdom | GSK Investigational Site | Edinburgh | |
United Kingdom | GSK Investigational Site | Liverpool | |
United Kingdom | GSK Investigational Site | Sheffield | |
United Kingdom | GSK Investigational Site | Stockton-on-Tees | |
United Kingdom | GSK Investigational Site | Wishaw | Lanarkshire |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Abingdon | Virginia |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Adairsville | Georgia |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Charleston | South Carolina |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Chesterfield | Missouri |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Cincinnati | Ohio |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Colorado Springs | Colorado |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Columbia | Maryland |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Dayton | Ohio |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Daytona Beach | Florida |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Erie | Pennsylvania |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Gastonia | North Carolina |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Mobile | Alabama |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Morgantown | West Virginia |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Omaha | Nebraska |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Rapid City | South Dakota |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Richmond | Virginia |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Richmond | Virginia |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Saint Charles | Missouri |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Saint Petersburg | Florida |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Spartanburg | South Carolina |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Woodstock | Georgia |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
GlaxoSmithKline |
United States, Argentina, Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Korea, Republic of, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Russian Federation, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom,
Fahy WA, Homayoun-Valiani F, Cahn A, Robertson J, Templeton A, Meeraus WH, Wilson R, Lowings M, Marotti M, West SL, Tabberer M, Hessel EM. Nemiralisib in Patients with an Acute Exacerbation of COPD: Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging Study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 Jun 3;16:1637-1646. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S309320. eCollection 2021. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to 24 Hours [AUC(0-24)] of Nemiralisib | Plasma samples were collected at indicated time points and analyzed. | Pre-dose, 0-1 hour, >1-6 hours post-dose on Days 14 and 28 | |
Other | AUC From Time Zero to Time 't' [AUC(0-t)] of Nemiralisib | Plasma samples were collected at indicated time points and analyzed. | Pre-dose, 0-1 hour, >1-6 hours post-dose on Days 14 and 28 | |
Other | Maximum Observed Plasma Drug Concentration (Cmax) of Nemiralisib | Plasma samples were collected at indicated time points and analyzed. | Pre-dose, 0-1 hour, >1-6 hours post-dose on Days 14 and 28 | |
Other | Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) of Nemiralisib | Plasma samples were collected at indicated time points and analyzed. | Pre-dose, 0-1 hour, >1-6 hours post-dose on Days 14 and 28 | |
Other | Plasma Drug Concentration at Pre-dose (Ctrough) of Nemiralisib | Plasma samples were collected at indicated time points and analyzed. | Pre-dose, 0-1 hour, >1-6 hours post-dose on Days 14 and 28 | |
Primary | Change From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Day 84 Measured Post Bronchodilator | FEV1 is maximal amount of air exhaled forcefully from lungs in 1 second. Post-bronchodilator FEV1 was conducted approximately 10-30 minutes after participant was administered 4 inhalations of albuterol (salbutamol) via MDI using spacer/valved-holding chamber or via one nebulized treatment. Post-bronchodilator Baseline FEV1 is latest FEV1 measured prior to first dose of study treatment and post-bronchodilator. Change from Baseline in clinic visit trough FEV1 at Day 84 measured post-bronchodilator is FEV1 measured prior to dosing and post-bronchodilator on Day 84 minus post-bronchodilator Baseline FEV1. Bayesian repeated measure model adjusted for Baseline by visit interaction, treatment by visit interaction, smoking status at Baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in previous 12 months and gender was used. Posterior adjusted median change from Baseline and 95% highest posterior density (HPD) credible interval (CrI) was presented. | Baseline and Day 84 | |
Secondary | Rate of Moderate and Severe Exacerbations Over 12-week Treatment Period | Moderate COPD exacerbations are defined as worsening symptoms of COPD treated with short-acting bronchodilators (SABDs) plus antibiotics and/or oral/systemic corticosteroids. Severe COPD exacerbations are defined as worsening symptoms of COPD that require hospitalization or visit to the emergency room. Severe exacerbation may also be associated with acute respiratory failure. Rate of exacerbations was analyzed using Bayesian Poisson model adjusting for length of on-treatment follow-up, smoking status at Baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in the previous 12 months and gender. Posterior median exacerbation rate and 95% HPD CrI has been presented. | Up to Week 12 | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Time to Next Moderate/Severe Exacerbation Following Index Exacerbation | Number of participants with time to next (on-treatment) moderate/severe exacerbation following index exacerbation during the 12-Week Treatment Period was defined as time from the date of randomization until the date of onset of the first moderate/severe exacerbation whilst on study treatment. Participants who did not have an exacerbation whilst on study treatment were censored at the date of their last dose of study treatment. Time to next exacerbation was analyzed using a Bayesian Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for treatment group, smoking status at Baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in the previous 12 months and gender. | Up to Week 12 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough FEV1 Measured Pre and Post-bronchodilator | Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as maximal amount of air exhaled forcefully from the lungs in 1 second. Post-bronchodilator FEV1 was conducted approximately 10-30 minutes after participant was administered with 4 inhalations of albuterol via MDI using a spacer/valved-holding chamber or via 1 nebulized treatment. Pre-bronchodilator and post-bronchodilator Baseline FEV1 is latest FEV1 measured prior to first dose of study treatment and pre-bronchodilator and post-bronchodilator, respectively. Change from Baseline in clinic visit trough FEV1 at Days 14, 28, 56 and 84 measured pre-bronchodilator is defined as FEV1 measured prior to dosing and pre-bronchodilator on Days 14, 28, 56 and 84 minus pre-bronchodilator Baseline FEV1. | Baseline and Days 14, 28, 56 (pre and post bronchodilaor), 84 (pre-bronchodilator) and at hospital discharge (maximum 24 Weeks) | |
Secondary | Change From Hospital Discharge in Clinic Visit Trough FEV1 Measured Pre and Post-bronchodilator | Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as maximal amount of air exhaled forcefully from the lungs in 1 second. Post-bronchodilator FEV1 was conducted approximately 10 to 30 minutes after participant was administered with 4 inhalations of albuterol via MDI using a spacer/valved-holding chamber or via 1 nebulized treatment. Pre-bronchodilator and post-bronchodilator Baseline FEV1 is defined as latest FEV1 measured prior to first dose of study treatment and pre-bronchodilator and post-bronchodilator, respectively. Change from hospital discharge in clinic visit trough FEV1 at Days 14, 28, 56 and 84 measured pre- and post-bronchodilator is defined as FEV1 measured prior to dosing and pre- and post-bronchodilator on Days 14, 28, 56 and 84 minus pre and post-bronchodilator Baseline FEV1. | Baseline and pre- and post-bronchodilator on Days 14, 28, 56 and 84 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving the Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT) Definition of Recovery From the Index Exacerbation | EXACT patient-reported outcome (EXACT-PRO), 14-item instrument to capture occurrence, frequency, severity, and duration of exacerbations using an electronic diary (eDiary). Total score ranges from 0-100, higher score indicates more severe condition. Participants were required to complete EXACT-PRO every evening; however, on the day of randomization it was to be completed in the morning. Response was decrease in rolling average EXACT Total Score >=9 points from maximum observed value, sustained for >=7 days, with first of 7 days defined as recovery day. Analysis was performed using Bayesian Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for treatment group, smoking status at Baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in previous 12 months and gender. | Days 14, 28, 56 and 84 | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Time to Recovery From Index Exacerbation Using EXACT- PRO Tool | Time to EXACT-defined recovery from index exacerbation is defined as time from the date of randomization until date of the first EXACT-defined recovery day during the 12-Week Treatment Period. EXACT-defined recovery from the index exacerbation is defined as a decrease in the Rolling Average EXACT total Score >=9 points from the Maximum Observed Value, sustained for >=7 days, with the first of the 7 days defined as the recovery day. Analysis was performed using a Bayesian Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for treatment group, smoking status at Baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in the previous 12 months and gender. Number of participants reporting events is presented. | From randomization to Week 12 | |
Secondary | Mean Severity of Subsequent Health Care Resource Use (HCRU) Exacerbations Defined by EXACT | Severity of subsequent HCRU-defined exacerbations defined by EXACT was defined as the highest EXACT Total Score (not using the 3-day Rolling Average) during the period from date of onset of the subsequent HCRU-exacerbation until date of EXACT-defined recovery of subsequent exacerbation. EXACT-PRO, 14-item instrument to capture occurrence, frequency, severity, and duration of exacerbations using an eDiary. Total score ranges from 0-100, higher score indicates more severe condition. For participants with more than one subsequent exacerbation, severity was calculated for each subsequent exacerbation. | Up to Week 12 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Responders Using the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) on Treatment Days 28, 56, and 84, and Following EXACT Defined Recovery From the Index Exacerbation | The CAT is a short, self-completed, 8-item questionnaire, each item was rated on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (no impairment) to 5 (maximum impairment). The total CAT score is calculated by summing the scores of all items and ranges from 0 to 40, higher scores indicating severe condition. The percentage of responders using the CAT is defined as number of participants with a decrease from Baseline in CAT Total Score >=2 on or before Days 28, 56 and 84 divided by total number of participants in the MITT population. Percentage of responders using CAT was derived only for participants with a Baseline CAT Total Score >=2. Analysis was performed using a separate Bayesian logistic regression for each time point adjusting for treatment group, smoking status at baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in the previous 12 months and gender. | Days 28, 56 and 84 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in CAT Total Score | The CAT is a short, self-completed, 8-item questionnaire, each item was rated on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (no impairment) to 5 (maximum impairment). The total CAT score was calculated by summing the scores of all items and ranges from 0 to 40, higher scores indicating more severe condition. Baseline (Day 1) is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline in CAT Total Score is defined as CAT Total Score on Days 28, 56 and 84 minus Baseline CAT Total Score. Analysis was performed using Bayesian repeated measures model adjusting for Baseline by visit interaction, treatment by visit interaction, smoking status at Baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in the previous 12 months and gender. Posterior adjusted median change from Baseline and 95% HPD CrI has been presented. | Baseline and at Days 28, 56 and 84 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Responders on the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score as Measured by the SGRQ for COPD Participants (SGRQ-C) at Days 28, 56, and 84 | SGRQ-C is a 40-item questionnaire designed specifically to focus on COPD participants and was scored equivalent to the SGRQ Total Score, ranging from 0 to 100, where higher scores reflect worse health-related quality of life. The percentage of responders on the SGRQ Total Score was derived for participants with a Baseline SGRQ Total Score >=4. Percentage of responders on the SGRQ Total Score is defined as number of participants with a decrease from Baseline in SGRQ Total Score >=4 on or before Days 28, 56 and 84 divided by total number of participants in the MITT population. Analysis was performed using a separate Bayesian logistic regression for each time point adjusting for treatment group, smoking status at baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in the previous 12 months and gender. | Days 28, 56 and 84 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in SGRQ Total Score at Days 28, 56 and 84 | SGRQ-C is a 40-item questionnaire designed specifically to focus on COPD participants and was scored equivalent to SGRQ Total Score, ranging from 0 to 100, where higher scores reflect worse health-related quality of life. Scores on a scale were calculated as 100 multiplied by summed weights from positive items in questionnaire divided by sum of weights of all items in questionnaire. Baseline (Day 1) is defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline in SGRQ Total Score is defined as SGRQ Total Score on Days 28, 56 and 84 minus Baseline SGRQ Total Score. Analysis was performed using Bayesian repeated measures model adjusting for Baseline by visit interaction, treatment by visit interaction, smoking status at Baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in previous 12 months and gender. Posterior adjusted median change from Baseline and 95% HPD CrI was presented | Baseline and Days 28, 56 and 84 | |
Secondary | Mean Number of Occasions of Rescue Medication Use Per Day | Albuterol (Salbutamol) MDI or nebules was used as a rescue medication. Rescue medication use was recorded as the number of occasions of rescue medication use each day. The mean number of occasions of rescue medication use per day is defined as sum of the number of occasions of rescue medication use each day within the time-period divided by the total number of days with non-missing values within the time-period. Over the 12-Week treatment period is defined as Day 1 to Day of last dose. | Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 of treatment and over the Week 12 treatment period | |
Secondary | Percentage of Rescue-free Days | Albuterol (Salbutamol) MDI or nebules was used as a rescue medication. Percentage of Rescue-Free Days is defined as sum of the number of days where the number of occasions of rescue medication use is zero within the time-period divided by total number of days with non-missing values within the time-period multiplied by 100 where the time-period is defined as follows: Week 1: Day 1-7; Week 2: Day 8 - 14; Week 3: Day 15-21; Week 4: Day 22-28; Week 5: Day 29-35; Week 6: Day 36-42; Week 7: Day 43-49; Week 8: Day 50-56; Week 9: Day 57-63; Week 10: Day 64-70; Week 11: Day 71-77; Week 12: Day 78 to Day of last dose; Over the 12-Week: Day 1 to Day of last dose. | Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 of treatment and over the Week 12 treatment period | |
Secondary | Plasma Concentration of Nemiralisib | Plasma samples were collected at indicated time points and analyzed for concentrations of Nemiralisb. Pharmacokinetic (PK) Population consists of all participants in the Safety population who had at least 1 non-missing PK assessment (Non-quantifiable [NQ] values will be considered as non-missing values). Participants were summarized according to the treatment that they actually received. | Pre-dose, 0-1 hour, >1-6 hours post-dose on Days 14 and 28 | |
Secondary | Number of Participants Reporting Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs), SAEs and AE of Special Interest (AESI) | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability, is a congenital anomaly/ birth effect and other important medical events. Safety Population consists of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Participants were summarized according to treatment that they actually received. | Up to Week 24 | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Worst Case Post Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Pulse Rate | The DBP, SBP and pulse rate were measured with participants seated at least 5 minutes before the assessments. Participants are counted in the worst case category if their value changes to (low, within range or no change, or high). Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High), or whose value became within range, are recorded in the "To w/in Range or No Change" category. Participants are counted twice if the participant has values that changed "To Low" and "To High", so the percentages may not add to 100%. Participants with missing baseline value are assumed to have within range value. | Up to Week 16 | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings | A single 12-lead ECG with a 15-second rhythm strip was obtained using an ECG machine that automatically calculated the heart rate and measured PR, QRS, QT and corrected QT (QTc) intervals. Abnormal ECG findings are presented. | Screening, Days 14, 84, 112 and at early withdrawal | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Worst Case Post Baseline Clinical Chemistry Values | Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters including: blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Crt), glucose (Glu), potassium (Pot), sodium (Sod), calcium (Cal), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total and direct bilirubin, total protein and albumin (Alb). Participants are counted in the worst case category if their value changes to (low, within range or no change, or high). Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High), or whose value became within range, are recorded in the "To w/in Range or No Change" category. Participants are counted twice if the participant has values that changed "To Low" and "To High", so the percentages may not add to 100%. Participants with missing baseline value are assumed to have within range value. | Upto Week 16 | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Worst Case Post Baseline Hematology Values | Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameters including: platelets (Pla), red blood cells count, Hemoglobin (Hb), Hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH), percentage reticulocytes, neutrophils (Neu), lymphocytes (Lym), monocytes, eosinophils, leukocytes (Leu) and basophils. Participants are counted in the worst case category if their value changes to (low, within range or no change, or high). Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High), or whose value became within range, are recorded in the "To w/in Range or No Change" category. Participants are counted twice if the participant has values that changed "To Low" and "To High", so the percentages may not add to 100%. Participants with missing baseline value are assumed to have within range value. | Upto Week 16 | |
Secondary | Number of Participants Reporting COPD Exacerbations | Participants reporting acute COPD exacerbations during the study period has been presented. | Up to Week 16 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05043428 -
The Roles of Peers and Functional Tasks in Enhancing Exercise Training for Adults With COPD
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00528996 -
An Efficacy and Safety Study to Compare Three Doses of BEA 2180 BR to Tiotropium and Placebo in the Respimat Inhaler.
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03740373 -
A Study to Assess the Pulmonary Distribution of Budesonide, Glycopyrronium and Formoterol Fumarate
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT05393245 -
Safety of Tiotropium + Olodaterol in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Patients in Taiwan: a Non-interventional Study Based on the Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI) Data
|
||
Completed |
NCT05402020 -
Effectiveness of Tiotropium + Olodaterol Versus Inhaled Corticosteroids (ICS) + Long-acting β2-agonists (LABA) Among COPD Patients in Taiwan
|
||
Completed |
NCT04011735 -
Re-usable Respimat® Soft MistTM Inhaler Study
|
||
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT03075709 -
The Development, Implementation and Evaluation of Clinical Pathways for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in Saskatchewan
|
||
Completed |
NCT03764163 -
Image and Model Based Analysis of Lung Disease
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00515268 -
Endotoxin Challenge Study For Healthy Men and Women
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT04085302 -
TARA Working Prototype Engagement Evaluation: Feasibility Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03691324 -
Training of Inhalation Technique in Hospitalized Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Patients - a Pilot Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02236611 -
A 12-week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Umeclidinium 62.5 Microgram (mcg) Compared With Glycopyrronium 44 mcg in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00153075 -
Flow Rate Effect Respimat Inhaler Versus a Metered Dose Inhaler Using Berodual in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01017952 -
A Study to Evaluate Annual Rate of Exacerbations and Safety of 3 Dosage Strengths of Fluticasone Furoate (FF)/GW642444 Inhalation Powder in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01009463 -
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fluticasone Furoate (FF)/GW642444 Inhalation Powder in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04882124 -
Study of Effect of CSJ117 on Symptoms, Pharmacodynamics and Safety in Patients With COPD
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02853123 -
Effect of Tiotropium + Olodaterol on Breathlessness in COPD Patients
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02619357 -
Method Validation Study to Explore the Sensitivity of SenseWear Armband Gecko for Measuring Physical Activity in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) & Asthma
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05858463 -
High Intensity Interval Training and Muscle Adaptations During PR
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05032898 -
Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Inpatient Registry Study Stage II
|