Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04107714
Other study ID # 375/18
Secondary ID
Status Terminated
Phase Phase 2
First received
Last updated
Start date October 1, 2019
Est. completion date May 1, 2021

Study information

Verified date May 2021
Source University of Ulm
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the group-based intervention "Starting the Conversation" as a webinar in Germany. Feasibility and efficacy of the program will be tested in a pilot randomized-controlled trial (RCT).


Description:

Parents of children with mental illness often experience public and self-stigma, and keeping a child's mental illness secret is a common strategy to avoid stigma. Both secrecy and disclosure have pros and cons for parents and their children. Therefore, the decision whether, when, and to whom to disclose a child's mental illness is complex. Interventions can provide guidance for systematic consideration and a well informed decision. The manualized peer-led group intervention "Honest, Open, Proud" (HOP) supports people with mental illness in their decision whether to disclose mental illness. Research showed positive effects of the intervention on stigma stress, disclosure-related distress and quality of life. Based on HOP, "Starting the Conversation" (STC) was developed to systematically guide parents through their decision whether and how to disclose a child's mental illness. At the moment, there is no data regarding feasibility and efficacy of STC, but two pilot RCTs of STC are currently underway, one in Western Australia and one in Wisconsin, USA. The aim of the current study is to evaluate feasibility and efficacy of STC as a webinar in a pilot RCT in German.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Terminated
Enrollment 5
Est. completion date May 1, 2021
Est. primary completion date February 1, 2021
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Parent with at least one child or adolescent that (i) is aged between 6 to 17 years (ii) has a current mental disorder according to ICD-10 diagnosed by a psychiatrist or psychologist - Age = 18 years - Positive screening for disclosure distress (1 item: "In general, how distressed or worried are you in terms of secrecy or disclosure of the mental illness of your child?", self-report, persons with a score = 4 on a scale from 1-7 were included) - Online informed consent - Sufficient German language skills Exclusion Criteria: - Intellectual disability of child (IQ<70, self-report)

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Behavioral:
STC
The peer-led and web-based group program contains four lessons plus one booster session: Lesson 1: Consider the pros and cons of disclosing: Participants reflect on their experience of self-stigma and weight their pros and cons of (non-)disclosing their child's mental illness. Lesson 2: Different ways to disclose: Participants learn about different ways to disclose and their respective pros and cons. Afterwards participants discuss possible responses they might experience and develop strategies to cope with. Lesson 3: Communication about disclosure between parents and their child: Participants discuss pros and cons of (non-)disclosure for their children and how to negotiate whether to disclose or not. Lesson 4: Telling your story: Participants learn how to tell their own story. In a booster session, participants discuss their experiences with disclosure or non-disclosure.

Locations

Country Name City State
Germany Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Ulm Ulm

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Ulm

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Germany, 

References & Publications (10)

Angermeyer MC, Kilian R, Matschinger H. WHOQOL-100 und WHOQOL-BREF: Handbuch für die deutschsprachigen Versionen der WHO Instrumente zur Erfassung von Lebensqualität [WHOQOL-100 and WHOQOL-BREF: Handbook for the German version of WHO instruments to assess quality of life]. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2000.

Eaton K, Ohan JL, Stritzke WGK, Corrigan PW. The Parents' Self-Stigma Scale: Development, Factor Analysis, Reliability, and Validity. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2019 Feb;50(1):83-94. doi: 10.1007/s10578-018-0822-8. — View Citation

Hacking S, Secker J, Spandler H, Kent L, Shenton J. Evaluating the impact of participatory art projects for people with mental health needs. Health Soc Care Community. 2008 Dec;16(6):638-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2008.00789.x. Epub 2008 May 13. — View Citation

Kliem S, Mößle T, Rehbein F, Hellmann DF, Zenger M, Brähler E. A brief form of the Perceived Social Support Questionnaire (F-SozU) was developed, validated, and standardized. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 May;68(5):551-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.003. Epub 2014 Nov 13. — View Citation

Morris E, Hippman C, Murray G, Michalak EE, Boyd JE, Livingston J, Inglis A, Carrion P, Austin J. Self-Stigma in Relatives of people with Mental Illness scale: development and validation. Br J Psychiatry. 2018 Mar;212(3):169-174. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2017.23. Epub 2018 Feb 5. — View Citation

Rüsch N, Corrigan PW, Powell K, Rajah A, Olschewski M, Wilkniss S, Batia K. A stress-coping model of mental illness stigma: II. Emotional stress responses, coping behavior and outcome. Schizophr Res. 2009 May;110(1-3):65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2009.01.005. Epub 2009 Feb 23. — View Citation

Rüsch N, Corrigan PW, Wassel A, Michaels P, Olschewski M, Wilkniss S, Batia K. A stress-coping model of mental illness stigma: I. Predictors of cognitive stress appraisal. Schizophr Res. 2009 May;110(1-3):59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2009.01.006. Epub 2009 Mar 6. — View Citation

Secker J, Hacking S, Kent L, Shenton J, Spandler H. Development of a measure of social inclusion for arts and mental health project participants. Journal of Mental Health. 2009;18(1):65-72. doi:10.1080/09638230701677803

The KIDSCREEN Group Europe. The Kidscreen questionnaires: Quality of life questionnaires for children and adolescents: handbook. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers; 2006.

Tröster H. Eltern-Belastungs-Inventar: Deutsche Version des Parenting Stress Index (PSI) von R. R. Abidin [German version of Parenting Stress Index of R. R. Abidin]. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2011.

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Self-stigma of parents Parent's Self-Stigma Scale (PSSS) (Eaton et al., 2018), 11 items rated from 1 to 5, sum score (range 5-55) with higher scores indicating more self-stigma. 8 weeks
Secondary Self-stigma of parents Parent's Self-Stigma Scale (PSSS) (Eaton et al., 2018), 11 items rated from 1 to 5, sum score (range 5-55) with higher scores indicating more self-stigma. baseline, 4 weeks, 16 weeks
Secondary Self-stigma of parents Self-Stigma in Relatives of People with Mental Illness Scale (SSRMI) (Morris et al., 2018), 10 items rated from 1 to 5, mean score across all items (range 1-5) with higher scores indicating more self-stigma. baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 16 weeks
Secondary Stigma stress related to child's mental illness Stigma Stress Scale (Rüsch et al., 2009a,b) adapted for parents of children with mental illness, 8 items rated from 1 to 7 with 4 items measuring the primary appraisal of stigma as harmful and 4 items measuring the secondary appraisal of perceived resources to cope with stigma-related harm, for each of the two subscales there is a mean score (range 1-7), and a total stigma stress score will be calculated by subtracting perceived resources from perceived harm with higher difference scores (range -6 to +6) indicating more stigma stress. baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 16 weeks
Secondary Parenting distress Parenting Stress Index, parent domain (PSI) (Tröster, 2011), 28 items rated from 1 to 5, sum scores of subscales (range 4-20) and across all items (range 28-140) with higher scores indicating more parenting distress. baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 16 weeks
Secondary Quality of life of parents World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment-short form (WHOQOL-BREF), domains general quality of life, psychological and social relationships (Angermeyer, Kilian & Matschinger, 2000), 11 items rated from 1 to 5, mean scores of each domain (range 1-5) with higher scores indicating better quality of life. baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 16 weeks
Secondary Parent-rated child quality of life KIDSCREEN-10, parent version (The KIDSCREEN Group Europe, 2006), 10 items rated from 1 to 5, sum score across all items (range 5-50) with higher scores indicating better child quality of life. baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 16 weeks
Secondary Self-esteem Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE) (Collani & Herzberg, 2003), 10 items rated from 0 to 3, sum score across all items (range 0-30) with higher scores indicating higher self-esteem. baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 16 weeks
Secondary Social support Perceived Social Support Questionnaire (FsozU K-6) (Kliem et al., 2015), 6 items rated from 1 to 5, mean score across all items (range 1-5) with higher scores indicating more perceived social support. baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 16 weeks
Secondary Social inclusion Social Inclusion Scale (SIS) (Hacking et al., 2008; Secker et al., 2009) adapted for parents of children with mental illness, 20 items rated from 1 to 4, mean scores (range 1-4) of subscales and across all items with higher scores indicating higher social inclusion. baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 16 weeks