Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03988634
Other study ID # CLCZ696DUS01
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received
Last updated
Start date June 27, 2019
Est. completion date December 14, 2022

Study information

Verified date February 2023
Source Novartis
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The effect of sacubitril/valsartan vs. valsartan on changes in NT-proBNP, safety, and tolerability in HFpEF patients with a WHF event (HFpEF decompensation) who have been stabilized and initiated at the time of or within 30 days post-decompensation.


Description:

The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of sacubitril/valsartan vs. valsartan on changes in NT-proBNP, safety, and tolerability in HFpEF patients with a WHF event (HFpEF decompensation) who have been stabilized and initiated at the time of or within 30 days post-decompensation


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 465
Est. completion date December 14, 2022
Est. primary completion date December 14, 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 99 Years
Eligibility INCLUSION CRITERIA: 1. Signed informed consent must be obtained prior to participation in the study 2. Patients >=18 years of age, male or female 3. Current hospitalization for Worsening Heart Failure (WHF) (HFpEF decompensation), or within 30 days of discharge following a WHF event (defined as hospitalization, emergency department (ED) visit or out-of-hospital urgent HF visit, all requiring IV diuretics). Patients with a diagnosis of acute heart failure had to have symptoms and signs of fluid overload (i.e. jugular venous distention, edema or rales on auscultation or pulmonary congestion on chest x-ray). Eligible patients will be randomized after IV diuresis for HFpEF is given (and no earlier than 36 hours from their last ACEi dose if applicable) and within 30 days post-decompensation after presentation with acute HFpEF decompensation and meeting the following definitions of hemodynamic stability: Randomized patients will have been hemodynamically stable defined in this study as: 1. SBP >=100mmHg for the preceding 6 hours prior to randomization; no symptomatic hypotension 2. No increase (intensification) in IV diuretic dose within last 6 hours prior to randomization 3. No IV inotropic drugs for 24 hours prior to randomization 4. No IV vasodilators including nitrates within last 6 hours prior to randomization 4. HFpEF with most recent LVEF > 40% (within past 3 months) 5. Elevated NT-proBNP or BNP at the time of acute HFpEF decompensation or post-decompensation screening (and within 72 hours for out-of-hospital randomization, if applicable): a. Patients not in Atrial Fibrillation(AF) at the time of biomarker assessment: NT-proBNP >= 500pg/mL or BNP >= 150 pg/mL; patients in AF at the time of biomarker assessment: NT-proBNP >= 1000pg/mL or BNP >= 300 pg/mL b. Patients recruited in-hospital will be randomized based on the qualifying local lab value in-hospital NT-proBNP or BNP value. c. Patients enrolled post-decompensation can be randomized based on their NT-proBNP or BNP value in the following way: i. if enrolling in post-decompensation setting then need eligible screening/local NTproBNP/BNP within 72 hours of randomization. The test value could be from recent hospitalization if within 72 hours or ii. would require (re)drawing NT-proBNP or BNP labs in post-decompensation setting if the lab value is not already available within the last 72 hours). 6) Has not taken an ACEi for 36 hours prior to randomization EXCLUSION CRITERIA: 1. Any clinical event within the 90 days prior to randomization that could have reduced the LVEF (i.e., myocardial infarction (MI), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), unless an echo measurement was performed after the event confirming the LVEF to be > 40% 2. Entrestoâ„¢ (sacubitril/valsartan) usage within the past 60 days 3. eGFR < 20ml/min/1.73 m2 as measured by the simplified Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula at most recent assessment prior to randomization and within 24 hours prior to inpatient randomization or 72 hours prior to outpatient randomization 4. Serum potassium > 5.2 mEq/L at most recent assessment prior to randomization and within 24 hours prior to inpatient randomization or 72 hours prior to outpatient randomization 5. Acute coronary syndrome, stroke, transient ischemic attack; cardiac, carotid or other major CV surgery; percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or carotid angioplasty, within 30 days prior to randomization 6. Probable alternative diagnoses that in the opinion of the investigator could account for the patient's HF symptoms (i.e. dyspnea, fatigue) such as significant pulmonary disease (including primary pulmonary HTN), anemia or obesity. 7. Isolated right HF in the absence of left-sided structural heart disease 8. History of hypersensitivity (i.e. including angioedema), known or suspected contraindications, or intolerance to any of the study drugs including ARNIs (i.e. sacubitril/valsartan), and/or ARBs 9. Patients with a known history of angioedema due to any etiology 10. Patients with a history of heart transplant or LVAD, currently on the transplant list, or with planned intent to implant LVAD or CRT device within the initial three months of enrollment during the trial 11. A cardiac or non-cardiac medical condition other than HF with an estimated life expectancy of < 6 months 12. Known pericardial constriction, genetic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, or infiltrative cardiomyopathy including suspected or confirmed amyloid heart disease (amyloidosis) 13. Life-threatening or uncontrolled dysrhythmia, including symptomatic or sustained ventricular tachycardia and atrial fibrillation or flutter with a resting ventricular rate > 110 bpm 14. Clinically significant congenital heart disease felt to be the cause of the patient's symptoms and signs of HF 15. Coronary or carotid artery disease or valvular heart disease likely to require surgical or percutaneous intervention within the duration of the trial 16. Any surgical or medical condition, which in the opinion of the investigator, may place the patient at higher risk from his/her participation in the study, or is likely to prevent the patient from complying with the requirements of the study or completing the study 17. Known hepatic impairment (as evidenced by total bilirubin > 3 mg/dL, or increased ammonia levels, if performed), or history of cirrhosis with evidence of portal hypertension such as varices 18. Participation in any other clinical trial involving investigational agents or devices within the past 30 days 19. Current confirmed COVID19 infection 20. Past COVID19 infection with persistent symptom burden suspected due to COVID19 (further defined in Section 5.2). 21. Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women, where pregnancy is defined as the state of a female after conception and until the termination of gestation, confirmed by a positive hCG laboratory test. 22. Women of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, unless they are using highly effective methods of contraception during dosing of investigational drug and for 7 days off of study drug. Highly effective contraception methods are defined in protocol.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms

  • Heart Failure
  • Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)

Intervention

Drug:
sacubitril/valsartan
Sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) is available as 24/26 mg, 49/51 mg, and 97/103 mg in tablet form to be taken orally, twice daily, for the double-blind period. Valsartan matching placebo is available as 40 mg, 80 mg, and 160 mg in tablet form to be taken orally, twice daily, for the double-blind period.
valsartan
Valsartan is available as 40 mg, 80 mg, and 160 mg in tablet form to be taken orally, twice daily, for the double-blind period. Sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) matching placebo is available as 24/26 mg, 49/51 mg, and 97/103 mg in tablet form to be taken orally, twice daily, for the double-blind period.

Locations

Country Name City State
Canada Novartis Investigative Site Hamilton Ontario
Canada Novartis Investigative Site Montreal Quebec
Canada Novartis Investigative Site Montreal Quebec
Canada Novartis Investigative Site Montreal Quebec
Canada Novartis Investigative Site Quebec
Canada Novartis Investigative Site Saguenay Quebec
Canada Novartis Investigative Site Sherbrooke Quebec
Canada Novartis Investigative Site Terrebonne Quebec
Canada Novartis Investigative Site Victoria British Columbia
Canada Novartis Investigative Site Winnipeg Manitoba
United States Novartis Investigative Site Abington Pennsylvania
United States Novartis Investigative Site Albany New York
United States Novartis Investigative Site Albuquerque New Mexico
United States Novartis Investigative Site Alexandria Louisiana
United States Novartis Investigative Site Amarillo Texas
United States Novartis Investigative Site Ann Arbor Michigan
United States Novartis Investigative Site Atlanta Georgia
United States Novartis Investigative Site Atlanta Georgia
United States Novartis Investigative Site Augusta Georgia
United States Novartis Investigative Site Baltimore Maryland
United States Novartis Investigative Site Bangor Maine
United States Novartis Investigative Site Bartlesville Oklahoma
United States Novartis Investigative Site Baton Rouge Louisiana
United States Novartis Investigative Site Boise Idaho
United States Novartis Investigative Site Boston Massachusetts
United States Novartis Investigative Site Boston Massachusetts
United States Novartis Investigative Site Boston Massachusetts
United States Novartis Investigative Site Bronx New York
United States Novartis Investigative Site Burlington Vermont
United States Novartis Investigative Site Camp Hill Pennsylvania
United States Novartis Investigative Site Chapel Hill North Carolina
United States Novartis Investigative Site Chicago Illinois
United States Novartis Investigative Site Cleveland Ohio
United States Novartis Investigative Site Colorado Springs Colorado
United States Novartis Investigative Site Dallas Texas
United States Novartis Investigative Site Detroit Michigan
United States Novartis Investigative Site Detroit Michigan
United States Novartis Investigative Site Durham North Carolina
United States Novartis Investigative Site Elk Grove Village Illinois
United States Novartis Investigative Site Elkhart Indiana
United States Novartis Investigative Site Elmer New Jersey
United States Novartis Investigative Site Flushing New York
United States Novartis Investigative Site Gainesville Florida
United States Novartis Investigative Site Galveston Texas
United States Novartis Investigative Site Haddon Heights New Jersey
United States Novartis Investigative Site Hialeah Florida
United States Novartis Investigative Site Indianapolis Indiana
United States Novartis Investigative Site Indianapolis Indiana
United States Novartis Investigative Site Jackson Mississippi
United States Novartis Investigative Site Jacksonville Florida
United States Novartis Investigative Site Johnson City New York
United States Novartis Investigative Site Kansas City Kansas
United States Novartis Investigative Site Lakewood Colorado
United States Novartis Investigative Site Las Vegas Nevada
United States Novartis Investigative Site Lincoln Nebraska
United States Novartis Investigative Site Littleton Colorado
United States Novartis Investigative Site Long Beach California
United States Novartis Investigative Site Los Angeles California
United States Novartis Investigative Site Lynchburg Virginia
United States Novartis Investigative Site Madison Wisconsin
United States Novartis Investigative Site Manhasset New York
United States Novartis Investigative Site Muncie Indiana
United States Novartis Investigative Site Nashville Tennessee
United States Novartis Investigative Site Natrona Heights Pennsylvania
United States Novartis Investigative Site New York New York
United States Novartis Investigative Site Newark New Jersey
United States Novartis Investigative Site Newark Delaware
United States Novartis Investigative Site Oakbrook Terrace Illinois
United States Novartis Investigative Site Omaha Nebraska
United States Novartis Investigative Site Orange California
United States Novartis Investigative Site Park Ridge Illinois
United States Novartis Investigative Site Peoria Illinois
United States Novartis Investigative Site Peoria Illinois
United States Novartis Investigative Site Philadelphia Pennsylvania
United States Novartis Investigative Site Poughkeepsie New York
United States Novartis Investigative Site Rapid City South Dakota
United States Novartis Investigative Site Reno Nevada
United States Novartis Investigative Site Richmond Indiana
United States Novartis Investigative Site Roslyn New York
United States Novartis Investigative Site Saint Paul Minnesota
United States Novartis Investigative Site Salisbury Maryland
United States Novartis Investigative Site San Diego California
United States Novartis Investigative Site San Francisco California
United States Novartis Investigative Site San Pablo California
United States Novartis Investigative Site Santa Ana California
United States Novartis Investigative Site Sarasota Florida
United States Novartis Investigative Site Seattle Washington
United States Novartis Investigative Site Sioux Falls South Dakota
United States Novartis Investigative Site Staten Island New York
United States Novartis Investigative Site Stony Brook New York
United States Novartis Investigative Site Toledo Ohio
United States Novartis Investigative Site Tulsa Oklahoma
United States Novartis Investigative Site West Hartford Connecticut
United States Novartis Investigative Site West Haven Connecticut
United States Novartis Investigative Site Winfield Illinois
United States Novartis Investigative Site Ypsilanti Michigan

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Canada, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Proportional change in NT-proBNP from baseline to the average of weeks 4 and 8 To demonstrate the effect of sacubitril/valsartan vs. valsartan on time-averaged proportional change in NT-proBNP from baseline to Weeks 4 and 8 in HFpEF patients with a WHF event (HFpEF decompensation) who have been stabilized for and initiated at the time of or within 30 days post-decompensation Baseline to weeks 4 and 8
Secondary Composite hierarchical outcome The effect of sacubitril/valsartan vs. valsartan on composite hierarchical outcome consisting of: a) time to CV death, b) total HF hospitalizations, c) total urgent HF visits, and d) time-averaged proportional change in NT-proBNP (from baseline to Weeks 4 and 8) using win ratio methodology Baseline, Weeks 4, Weeks 8, and Overtime Up to 84 Weeks
Secondary Cumulative number of recurrent composite events overtime To assess the effect of sacubitril/valsartan vs. valsartan on total composite events based on CV death, HF hospitalizations, and urgent HF visits Overtime up to Week 84
Secondary Incidences of a composite endpoint of worsening renal function To assess the effect of sacubitril/valsartan vs. valsartan on the incidences of a composite endpoint of worsening renal function (renal death, reaching ESRD, or decline in eGFR >/= 50%) Overtime up to Week 84
Secondary Proportional change in NT-proBNP from baseline to Week 8 To assess the effect of sacubitril/valsartan vs. valsartan on change in NT-proBNP from baseline to Week 8 Baseline to week 8
Secondary Proportional change from baseline in hs-Troponin (high sensitivity) at Weeks 4 and 8 To assess the effect of sacubitril/valsartan vs. valsartan on change from baseline in hs-Troponin (high sensitivity) at Weeks 4 and 8 Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05371496 - Cardiac and Metabolic Effects of Semaglutide in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05441839 - UK Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Completed NCT01989299 - Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia Detection by Implantable Loop Recording in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction
Terminated NCT03909295 - An Open-label Extension Study Evaluating Safety and Tolerability of LCZ696 in Subjects Who Completed PARAGON-HF in Japan. Phase 3
Completed NCT04327024 - Study of Verinurad in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT05136820 - Flow Regulation by Opening the SepTum in Patients With Heart Failure; a Prospective, Randomized, Sham-controlled, Double-blind, Global Multicenter Study N/A
Recruiting NCT03876223 - Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Pre-HFpEF
Completed NCT04232345 - A Study to Assess the Effect AZD4831 in Japanese and Chinese Healthy Volunteers Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05792059 - DevElopMent of Clinical PATHwaYs to the Diagnosis of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Completed NCT03843060 - A Phase 1 Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics of AZD9977 Administered Alone and in Combination With Itraconazole in Healthy Volunteers Phase 1
Completed NCT01714752 - Evaluation of Left Ventricular Filling Pressures During Exercise N/A
Recruiting NCT06036186 - Study for the Treatment of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Associated With High Blood Pressure Using Right Atrial Pacing Controlled by the PressurePaceTM System N/A
Recruiting NCT05383287 - Characteristics, Phenotypes, and TRAITS of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (TRAITS-HFpEF)
Completed NCT03877224 - DETERMINE-preserved - Dapagliflozin Effect on Exercise Capacity Using a 6-minute Walk Test in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT04847557 - A Study of Tirzepatide (LY3298176) in Participants With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) and Obesity: The SUMMIT Trial Phase 3
Recruiting NCT04822649 - Exercise Capacity According to Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction and Body Composition N/A