Patients (>=60 Years Old) Suffering From Mild-moderate Stroke (Ischemic or Hemorrhagic, Stroke Severity Assessed by NIHSS <16 Points) Clinical Trial
— IMAGINEOfficial title:
Motivational Intervention for Older Adults Undergoing Inpatient Post-stroke Geriatric Rehabilitation and in Transition to Home
Background: Rehabilitation pathways are crucial to reduce stroke-related disability. Motivational Interviewing (MI), a centred-person intervention aimed to empower and motivate the patient, could be a resource to improve rehabilitation and its outcomes for older stroke survivors. Objective: The IMAGINE project aims to assess the impact of MI associated to standard geriatric rehabilitation, on 30 days functional improvement measured by the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), compared to standard geriatric rehabilitation alone, in patients admitted to geriatric rehabilitation after a stroke. Secondary objectives will be to assess the impact on physical activity and performance, self-efficacy, sense of coherence, safety, cost-utility and participants' experience, plus functional status at 3 months. Methods: Multicenter randomized clinical trial in three geriatric rehabilitation departments. Older adults after mild-moderate stroke without previous dementia, post-stroke severe cognitive impairment or delirium at admission, severe previous disability, aphasia or terminal conditions will be randomized into the control or the intervention group (136 per group, total N = 272). The control group will receive written information about the benefits of exercising, besides standard rehabilitation. The intervention group, in addition, will receive 4 sessions of MI by trained nurses. A shared tailored plan based on patients' goals, needs, preferences and capabilities will be agreed. Besides the FIM, in-hospital physical activity will be measured through accelerometers (activPAL) and secondary outcomes using internationally validated scales. As a complex intervention, a process evaluation and cost-utility assessments will be performed too. Results: Final results are expected by end of 2020. Implications: This project aims to achieve impacts on functional status, disability and physical performance and behavioral (increasing physical activity) and psychological implications (on general self-efficacy and sense of coherence) through a non-pharmacological and likely accessible, acceptable and scalable intervention. Efficiency and value, based on costs/quality adjusted life years, will be assessed. Moreover, a reduction in post-stroke disability would have social benefits also for families and would reduce health and social care costs. In brief, advances will be in terms of a better rehabilitation process.
| Status | Recruiting |
| Enrollment | 272 |
| Est. completion date | June 30, 2021 |
| Est. primary completion date | June 30, 2021 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 60 Years to 110 Years |
| Eligibility | Inclusion criteria: 1. Older adults (>=60 years old). 2. Admitted to the geriatric rehabilitation hospital after a mild-moderate stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic); stroke severity assessed by National Institute of Health Stroke Severity (NIHSS) scale <16 points. 3. Able to provide informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Previous diagnosis of dementia (ascertained from medical records). 2. Moderate-severe post-stroke cognitive impairment (Pfeiffer SMPQ>7 errors) or persistent delirium after 7 days from admission. 3. Previous severe disability in the activities of daily living (pre-stroke Barthel index <20/100 points). 4. Severe stroke which might limit recovery (NIHSS>=16). 5. Aphasia or other problems which limit communication and 6) advanced and terminal condition (prognosis not exceeding 6 months). |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spain | Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron - Fundació Institut de Recerca Vall d'Hebron | Barcelona | |
| Spain | Parc Sanitari Pere Virgili | Barcelona | |
| Spain | Fundació Salut i Envelliment Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona | Bellaterra | Barcelona |
| Spain | Consorci Sanitari Integral - Hospital General de L'Hospitalet & Hospital de St Joan Despí | L'Hospitalet De Llobregat | Barcelona |
| Spain | Hospital Universitari Santa Maria | Lleida | |
| Sweden | University of Lund | Lund |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Parc Sanitari Pere Virgili | Center for Ageing and Supportive Environments, Consorci Sanitari Integral, Health and Ageing Foundation of the Autonomous University of Barcelona, Hospital Universitari de Santa Maria, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research |
Spain, Sweden,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Participants perceptions and experiences of the intervention. | Qualitative evaluation will be aimed to explore participant's experiences in the frame of the process evaluation of the intervention. Process evaluation will be based on MRC guidance, and will focus on how the context, implementation and impact mechanisms will influence the results. In particular, participants' experiences, their perceived impacts as well as unexpected effects will be explored through in-depth interviews at 30 days and at 3 months on a purposeful sample of participants, selected to maximize variability (by gender, disability levels, socio-economic levels, and social support). In addition, a purposeful sample of caregivers and professionals who performed the intervention will be also interviewed and we will conduct a focus group with reference professionals of the wards. | At 30 days of hospitalization, and at 3 months follow-up. | |
| Primary | Change in Functional Independence Measure (FIM). | The FIM is used to track functional evolution during in-hospital rehabilitation process. FIM is comprised of 18 items, grouped into 2 subscales: 1) motor and 2) cognition. The motor subscale includes: Eating, grooming, bathing, dressing (upper body), dressing (lower body), toileting, bladder management, bowel management, transfers (bed/chair/wheelchair), transfers (toilet), transfers (bath/shower), walk/wheelchair, stairs. The cognition subscale includes: Comprehension, expression, social interaction, problem solving, memory. The total score for the FIM instrument (the sum of the motor and cognition subscale scores) will be a value between 18 and 126. The higher the score, the more independent the patient is in performing the task associated with that item. | At admission (within 72 hours), 30 days, and at 3 months follow-up. | |
| Secondary | Modified-Rankin Scale (mRS) | The Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) assesses disability in post-stroke patients and it can be used to track functional evolution over time. A score of 0 is "no disability", 5 is "disability requiring constant care for all needs" and 6 is "death". | At admission (within 72 hours; recall period, previous to event), and at 3 months follow-up. | |
| Secondary | The Canadian Performance Oriented Measure (COPM). | The COPM is a semi-structure interview that enables patient to identify problems and priorities in the three areas of occupational performance: self-care, productivity, and leisure. Once problems have been identify, patient needs to rate them using a 10-point scale. Then, patient will need to pick up to 5 most important problems to work. Finally, two subscale scores are obtained: performance (COPM-P) and satisfaction with performance (COPM-S). | At 30 days from admission, and at 3 months follow-up. | |
| Secondary | In-hospital physical activity. | This will be measured through accelerometers (ActivPAL) located at the preserved leg, to measure mainly time spent sitting and standing. | 7 consecutive in-hospital days after admission, preferably within 10 days before discharge. | |
| Secondary | Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). | Improvement in physical performance will be measured using the SPPB, including balance, strength and gait velocity sub-items. | At admission (within 72 hours), 30 days, and at 3 months follow-up. | |
| Secondary | Number of adverse events registration. | The incidence of diverse adverse events will be registered (yes vs. no; and number of times occuring each incident). Variables collected are: Falls, fractures, cranial traumatism, cardiovascular events (specifically: angina, myocardial infarction, TIA, stroke), aspiration pneumonia/respiratory infections, readmissions to acute hospitals and death. A final composite (total number of adverse events for each patient) will be obtained. | At 30 days after admission, and at 3 months follow-up. | |
| Secondary | Self-perceived pain: 10-point numeric scale | Self-perceived pain will be assessed by means of a 10-point numeric scale (0 = no pain at all, 10 = worst possible pain). | At 30 days after admission, and at 3 months follow-up. | |
| Secondary | General Self-Efficacy scale (GSE). | The GSE is a 10-item tool designed to assess optimistic self-beliefs to cope with a variety of difficult demands in life. This scale is correlated to emotion, optimism and work satisfaction. Negative coefficients are found for depression, stress, health complaints, burnout, and anxiety. The total score is calculated by finding the sum of the all items. For the GSE, the total score ranges between 10 and 40, with a higher score indicating more self-efficacy. | At 30 days after admission, and at 3 months follow-up. | |
| Secondary | Sense of coherence (SOC) questionnaire. | SOC-13 has three components: Comprehensibility, Manageability and Meaningfulness. This scale is rated on a 7-point likert scale, a total score can also be used. The mean alpha of the SOC-13 scale was .82 (range = .74 - .81). | At 30 days after admission, and at 3 months follow-up. | |
| Secondary | Process variables - Length of hospital stay. | Length of stay (total numer of days) for each patient will be measured considering as an endpoint patients' hospital discharge. | Through study completion, an average of 40 days. | |
| Secondary | Process variables - Destination at discharge. | Discharge destination (specifically: home, nursing home, long-term care, acute hospital, death) will be registered for each patient. | Through study completion, an average of 40 days. | |
| Secondary | Process variables - Total time of rehabilitation. | Total time of rehabilitation (total numer of days) will be registered for each patient. | Through study completion, an average of 40 days. | |
| Secondary | Cost-utility measures. | Cost-utility will be measured as the ratio between direct costs during hospitalization (considering costs that include workforce time use, exams, use of other hospital resources, visits) and Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) obtained by means of the EQoL-5D administered before and after the treatment. Cost-utility will be calculated as the incremental ratio €/QALYs in the intervention vs. control group. |
At admission (within 72 hours), 30 days, and at 3 months follow-up. | |
| Secondary | Rehabilitation efficiency. | Rehabilitation efficiency scores for each patient will be computed as the improvement in the FIM/length of hospital stay. | Through study completion, an average of 40 days. |