Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03374800
Other study ID # CCT38473
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received
Last updated
Start date July 9, 2018
Est. completion date January 31, 2024

Study information

Verified date April 2024
Source McMaster University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Patients who are critically ill in the in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), especially those who need a breathing machine, can develop ulcers in the stomach that bleed. To prevent bleeding, many such patients around the world receive a drug called pantoprazole that decreases acid production. However, today, compared to decades ago, critically ill patients rarely develop upper gastrointestinal bleeding. This decrease is likely due to modern medicine, better resuscitation and earlier feeding. There may also be harms associated with pantoprazole and other drugs that reduce acid levels in the stomach including lung infections (pneumonia) and bowel infections (Clostridioides difficile). Studies in this area are old and of modest quality. Therefore, it is difficult to know whether pantoprazole does decrease stomach bleeding these days, or whether the possible harms of lung and bowel infections are actually more common and more serious problems. The goal of this international study is to determine if, in critically ill patients using breathing machines, the use of pantoprazole is effective in preventing bleeding from stomach ulcers or whether it causes more problems such as lung infection (pneumonia) and bowel infection (Clostridioides difficile), or whether pantoprazole has no effect at all. Whether the harms are worth the benefits, and whether the benefits are worth the costs, will be determined by an economic analysis to inform patients, families, clinicians, and healthcare systems globally.


Description:

Background: For 40 years, pharmacologic prevention of stress ulcer-related gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding with acid suppression has been the standard of care for invasively mechanically ventilated ICU patients. Worldwide, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are more commonly used than histamine-2-receptor antagonists. Observational studies and the latest network meta-analysis suggest that PPIs increase the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). However, a recent large randomized trial showed that pantoprazole had no impact on the primary outcome of 90-day mortality. The secondary outcome (a composite of pneumonia, gastrointestinal bleeding, CDI and acute myocardial ischemia) was not different between the groups. Although pantoprazole was associated with a significantly lower rate of clinically important upper GI bleeding, some bleeding events required no blood transfusion, endoscopy or other diagnostic or therapeutic interventions, calling into question whether these bleeding events were truly patient-important. Further, patients with high illness severity on pantoprazole had a significant, unexplainable higher risk of death than those receiving placebo. REVISE Pilot Trial: We completed the 91-patient REVISE Pilot Trial in Canada, Australia and Saudi Arabia, demonstrating a high consent rate (77.8%); recruitment rate (2.6 patients/month/center); and protocol adherence (96.8%), thereby successfully establishing the feasibility of a larger REVISE Trial. Objectives of the REVISE Trial: To determine, among invasively mechanically ventilated patients, the effect of pantoprazole versus placebo on the primary efficacy outcome of clinically important upper GI bleeding, and the primary safety outcome of 90-day mortality. Secondary outcomes are VAP, CDI, acute kidney injury, ICU mortality, hospital mortality and patient-important upper GI bleeding. Tertiary outcomes are transfused packed red blood cells, serum creatinine, duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of ICU stay and duration of hospital stay. Methods: We will include 4,800 ICU patients >18 years old who have an anticipated duration of mechanical ventilation of ≥48 hours. Exclusion criteria are acute or recent GI bleeding, dual antiplatelet therapy, combined antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy, hopeless prognosis or intent to withdraw advanced life support, and previous enrolment in this or a confounding trial. Patients will be randomized in a fixed 1:1 allocation, stratified by center and pre-ICU acid suppression ('start or no start' strata, and 'continue or discontinue' strata). Research Coordinators will obtain informed consent using a deferred or a priori consent model. Study Pharmacists will obtain concealed allocation from the REVISE website; all research team and clinical team members, patients and families will be blinded. Patients will receive pantoprazole 40 mg or identical placebo intravenously daily while in ICU up to 90 days or until: 1) successful discontinuation of mechanical ventilation for >48 hours; 2) development of clinically important upper GI bleeding, or 3) death in ICU. Analyses will be by intention-to-treat with a sensitivity analysis restricted to patients receiving study drug on ≥ 80% of study days while mechanically ventilated per protocol. Collaborations: REVISE will be conducted in collaboration with the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group, the Australian and New Zealand Critical Care Trials Group, other consortia and interested international investigators. Ethical Imperative: Many factors converge to underscore the ethical imperative for REVISE. Critical care has evolved, research standards have improved, epidemiology may have changed, the risk:benefit and cost:benefit ratios of prophylaxis may have shifted. Thus, stress ulcer prophylaxis may need to be REVISED. Relevance: Most invasively mechanically ventilated patients around the world receive daily stress ulcer prophylaxis, although variation exists such that some centers do not use any. Many RCTs of stress ulcer prophylaxis were conducted 10-30 years ago, several are at moderate or high risk of bias, and cointerventions may not reflect current critical care. A recent large trial raised concerns about death associated with pantoprazole in the most severely ill patient subgroup. Although clinically important upper GI bleeding events were less frequent, they may not have been patient-important, and there were no other benefits observed. Consensus in the scientific and clinical community is that equipoise remains regarding whether routine use of pantoprazole should continue for stress ulcer prophylaxis during critical illness. The question is especially important for patients who are receiving acid suppression pre-ICU, those who are receiving enteral nutrition, and those at high risk of death. Today, infectious complications of PPIs have emerged as potentially more common and serious than upper GI bleeding. The number needed to prophylax to prevent 1 GI bleed and the cost per GI bleed averted may be very high; furthermore, the number needed to harm to cause 1 episode of VAP or CDI may be low. Recent practice guidelines are conflicting. Remaining doubts about the effectiveness and safety of PPIs urge re-examination of universal prophylaxis for possible de-adoption. Aligned with the 'Choosing Wisely' Campaign, REVISE and the companion economic evaluation (E-REVISE) will be incorporated into guidelines to inform global practice.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 4800
Est. completion date January 31, 2024
Est. primary completion date October 31, 2023
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age 18 years or more. 2. Receiving invasive mechanical ventilation in an ICU and in the opinion of the treating ICU physician mechanical ventilation will not be discontinued before the end of the day after tomorrow. Exclusion Criteria: 1. The treating clinician considers either Pantoprazole or placebo are indicated or contraindicated for this patient. 2. Pantoprazole contraindicated for patient due to local product information; Australia/New Zealand; - being treated with HIV protease inhibitors atazanavir or nelfinavir - being treated with high dose methotrexate (i.e., greater than 300 mg as part of a chemotherapy regimen). - documented cirrhosis or severe liver disease (for example as indicated by an INR greater than 5.0 due to underlying liver disease). Canada; - being treated with rilpivirine or atazanavir - patients who are hypersensitive to pantoprazole, substituted benzimidazoles, or to any ingredient in the formulation 3. Patients in whom a PPI or histamine 2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) is indicated due to active bleeding or increased bleeding risk, defined as patients with acute GI bleeding, severe oesophagitis or peptic ulcer disease within the previous 8 weeks, Zollinger Ellison syndrome, Barrett's oesophagus or any previous admission to hospital because of upper GI bleeding (patients receiving PPIs for mild dyspepsia or mild gastroesophageal reflux disease or an uncertain indication are not excluded). 4. Received invasive mechanical ventilation during this ICU admission for 72 hours or more. 5. Patients who have received more than 24 hours treatment (i.e., more than one daily dose equivalent) with a PPI or H2RA during this ICU admission. 6. Being treated with or need for dual anti-platelet therapy. 7. Admitted for palliative care or the ICU physician is not committed to continuing life-sustaining therapies at the time of enrolment. 8. Known or suspected pregnancy. 9. Physician, patient, or substitute decision maker (SDM) declines. 10. Previously enrolled in the REVISE trial 11. Enrolled in another trial for which co-enrolment is not approved.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Placebo (0.9% saline)
normal saline
Pantoprazole
40 mg powder for injection reconstituted with 0.9% saline

Locations

Country Name City State
Australia Royal Adelaide Hospital Adelaide South Australia
Australia Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital Bankstown New South Wales
Australia Bendigo Health Bendigo Victoria
Australia Blacktown Hospital Blacktown New South Wales
Australia Royal Brisbane Womens Hospital Brisbane Queensland
Australia Sutherland Hospital Caringbah New South Wales
Australia Geelong University Hospital Geelong Victoria
Australia Gosford Hospital Gosford New South Wales
Australia Austin Hospital Heidelberg Victoria
Australia Ipswich Hospital Ipswich Queensland
Australia Nepean Hospital Kingswood New South Wales
Australia St George Hospital Kogarah New South Wales
Australia Alfred Hospital Melbourne Victoria
Australia Epworth Hospital Melbourne Victoria
Australia Royal Melbourne Hospital Melbourne Victoria
Australia Royal North Shore Hospital Saint Leonards New South Wales
Australia Mater Hospital South Brisbane Queensland
Australia Wollongong Hospital Wollongong New South Wales
Australia Princess Alexandra Hospital Woolloongabba Queensland
Brazil Sociedade Hospitalar Angelina Caron Campina Grande Do Sul
Brazil Beneficência Social Bom Samaritano Governador Valadares
Canada William Osler Hospital, McKenzie Health, Brampton Civic Hospital Brampton Ontario
Canada Brantford General Hospital Brantford Ontario
Canada Foothills Hospital Calgary Alberta
Canada Peter Lougheed Hospital Calgary Alberta
Canada Cambridge Memorial Hospital Cambridge Ontario
Canada University of Alberta Hospital Edmonton Alberta
Canada QEII Health Sciences Centre Halifax Nova Scotia
Canada Hamilton Health Science Center - General Hospital Hamilton Ontario
Canada Hamilton Health Science Center - Juravinski Hospital Hamilton Ontario
Canada St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton Hamilton Ontario
Canada Kingston General Hospital Kingston Ontario
Canada Grand River Hospital Kitchener Ontario
Canada Centre de recherche de l'Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis Lévis Quebec
Canada London Health Science Center (LHSC) - University Hospital London Ontario
Canada London Health Science Center (LHSC) - Victoria Hospital London Ontario
Canada Center Hospital University Montreal (CHUM) Montréal Quebec
Canada Centre Universitaire de Santé McGill / McGill University Health Centre Montréal Quebec
Canada CIUSS du Nord de l'île de Montréal - Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal Montréal Quebec
Canada Hôpital Maisonneuve Rosemont Montréal Quebec
Canada McGill University Health Centre - Montreal General Hospital Montréal Quebec
Canada Nanaimo Regional General Hospital Nanaimo British Columbia
Canada Royal Columbian Hospital New Westminster British Columbia
Canada North York General Hospital North York Ontario
Canada Ottawa Health Research Institute - OHRI (General and Civic Hospital) Ottawa Ontario
Canada CHU de Québec-Université Laval - Hôpital Enfant-Jésus Quebec City Quebec
Canada Institut Universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec Laval, Quebec Quebec City Quebec
Canada Regina General Hospital Regina Saskatchewan
Canada Saint John Regional Hospital Saint John New Brunswick
Canada Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke Sherbrooke Quebec
Canada Niagara Health Services - St. Catharine's Hospital St. Catharines Ontario
Canada Mount Sinai Hospital Toronto Ontario
Canada St. Joseph's Health Centre, Toronto Toronto Ontario
Canada St. Michael's Hospital Toronto Ontario
Canada Sunnybrook Health Science Center Toronto Ontario
Canada University Health Network - Toronto Western Hospital Toronto Ontario
Canada Vancouver General Hospital Vancouver British Columbia
Canada Vancouver Island Health Authority Victoria British Columbia
Canada Windsor Regional Hospital Windsor Ontario
Canada Grace Hospital Winnipeg Manitoba
Canada Health Science Center Winnipeg Winnipeg Manitoba
Canada St. Boniface Hospital Winnipeg Manitoba
Kuwait AL-Amiri Hospital Kuwait City
Pakistan Maroof International Hospital Islamabad
Saudi Arabia King Abdulaziz Medical Center Riyadh
United Kingdom Guys & St. Thomas Hospital London New Westminster
United States University of Nebraska - Nebraska Medical Center Omaha Nebraska

Sponsors (5)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
McMaster University Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group, Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Australia,  Brazil,  Canada,  Kuwait,  Pakistan,  Saudi Arabia,  United Kingdom, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other Total units of red blood cells transfused in the first 14 days of ICU stay Total units of red blood cells transfused in the ICU in the first 14 days Censored at 14 days after randomization
Other Peak serum creatinine concentration in ICU Peak serum creatinine concentration in ICU Censored at 90 days after randomisation
Other Duration of mechanical ventilation (days) Duration of mechanical ventilation (days) Censored at 90 days after randomisation
Other ICU length of stay (days) ICU length of stay (days) Censored at 90 days after randomisation
Other Hospital length of stay (days) Hospital length of stay (days) Censored at 90 days after randomisation
Primary Rate of clinically important upper gastro-intestinal bleeding Clinically important upper GI bleeding requires the presence of overt GI bleeding which is defined as one of the following;
Hematemesis
Overt nasogastric bleeding
Melena
Hematochezia
PLUS (in the absence of another cause), at least one of the following in the 24 hours following overt GI bleeding:
Haemodynamic change defined as a spontaneous decrease in invasively monitored mean arterial pressure or non-invasive systolic or diastolic blood pressure of 20 mmHg or more or an orthostatic increase in pulse rate of 20 beats/minute and a decrease in systolic blood pressure of 10 mmHg, with or without vasopressor initiation, or increase
Vasopressor initiation
A decrease in haemoglobin of = 20 g/l in a 24-hour period or less,
Transfusion of =2 units of packed red blood cells within 24 hours of bleeding to maintain stable haemoglobin or haemodynamics, or
Need for therapeutic intervention (e.g. angiography, surgery or endoscopic treatment of bleeding).
90 days (In ICU or resulting in ICU readmission, censored at 90 days after randomization)
Primary Primary Safety Outcome: 90 Day Mortality Mortality status at day 90 post randomization 90 days post randomization
Secondary Rate of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) in ICU Diagnostic criteria for VAP include: previous mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours, a new, progressive or persistent radiographic infiltrate on chest X-ray (without other obvious cause) plus at least 2 of the following 4 features:
fever or hypothermia (temperature >38 °C or <36 °C)
relative leukopenia or leukocytosis (WBC<4.0 or >12 x 10^9/L)
purulent sputum
gas exchange deterioration Using these uploaded data, the Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score is calculated. A score of 6 or greater is the primary definition of ventilator-associated pneumonia
90 Days (while in ICU,censored at 90 days after randomization)
Secondary Rate of Clostridioides difficile associated infection We will use clinical features (diarrhea, ileus, toxic megacolon) and either microbiological evidence of toxin producing Clostridioides difficile or Pseudomembranous colitis on colonoscopy. 90 days (during the index hospital admission, censored at 90 days)
Secondary New initiation of treatment with renal replacement therapy in ICU Rate of New initiation of treatment with renal replacement therapy in ICU 90 Days (In the ICU, censored at 90 days)
Secondary Rate of all-cause-in-hospital mortality hospital mortality While in hospital, censored at 90 days after randomization
Secondary Rate of ICU mortality ICU mortality While in the ICU, censored at 90 days after randomization
Secondary Rate of patient important upper GI bleeding in ICU or resulting in ICU readmission, censored at 90 days after randomization Patient important upper GI bleeding in ICU or resulting in ICU readmission, censored at 90 days after randomization Censored at 90 days after randomization