Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02346851
Other study ID # 4-2012-0602
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date November 12, 2013
Est. completion date September 16, 2015

Study information

Verified date February 2019
Source Yonsei University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Post stroke hemiplegia patient have shoulder subluxation in affected side. The investigators use functional electrical stimulation in posterior deltoid and supraspinatus for prevention and treatment. But the investigators hypothesis self triggered myoelectric stimulation system has more effective for shoulder subluxation. The purpose of this study is to compare post-stroke shoulder subluxation treatment FES and triggered FES.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 76
Est. completion date September 16, 2015
Est. primary completion date September 16, 2015
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 20 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

1. Within 3months after stroke

2. 1st stroke patients with hemiplegic shoulder subluxation which is measured above one finger breadth by physical examination

3. Shoulder abduction strength is above P- grade (MMT)

4. Male or female, = 20 years of age

5. Written informed consent has beed obtained

6. Patients who understand purpose of this study and conform with intervention process

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Quadriplegia or double hemiplegia

2. History of injury, surgery, etc. of U/E and upper chest area

3. person who implanted metalic device(ex. pacemaker, vagus nerve stimulator)

4. patients who have lower motor neuron lesion

5. person who have difficulty using electrode due to skin problem such as skin ulcer or open wound

6. who have seizure or epilepsy history

7. Female who are pregnant

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms

  • Post-Stroke Hemiplegic Shoulder Subluxation
  • Stroke

Intervention

Procedure:
Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) treatment
This study is randomized controlled trial performed by Random permuted blocks. This study has 2 experimental groups and 1 control group. Both experimental group receive FES treatment of their posterior deltoid and supraspinatus. Experimental group 1(Acceleration group) uses Novastim CU FS1 once a day for 30 minutes during 3 weeks. During treatment patient give a maximal effort for shoulder abduction. Experimental group 2 (Convention group) receive cyclic FES treatment for reducing shoulder subluxation. All patients have evaluation pre-intervention, post-intervention, 3 weeks after intervention and 9 weeks after intervention including physical examination and x-ray.

Locations

Country Name City State
Korea, Republic of Severance hospital Seoul

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Yonsei University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Korea, Republic of, 

References & Publications (7)

Chaco J, Wolf E. Subluxation of the glenohumeral joint in hemiplegia. Am J Phys Med. 1971 Jun;50(3):139-43. — View Citation

Chan MK, Tong RK, Chung KY. Bilateral upper limb training with functional electric stimulation in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 May;23(4):357-65. doi: 10.1177/1545968308326428. Epub 2008 Dec 12. — View Citation

Embrey DG, Holtz SL, Alon G, Brandsma BA, McCoy SW. Functional electrical stimulation to dorsiflexors and plantar flexors during gait to improve walking in adults with chronic hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 May;91(5):687-96. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.12.024. — View Citation

Ikai T, Tei K, Yoshida K, Miyano S, Yonemoto K. Evaluation and treatment of shoulder subluxation in hemiplegia: relationship between subluxation and pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Sep-Oct;77(5):421-6. — View Citation

Koyuncu E, Nakipoglu-Yüzer GF, Dogan A, Ozgirgin N. The effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation for the treatment of shoulder subluxation and shoulder pain in hemiplegic patients: A randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(7):560-6. doi: 10.3109/09638280903183811. — View Citation

Lau H, Tong K. The reliability of using accelerometer and gyroscope for gait event identification on persons with dropped foot. Gait Posture. 2008 Feb;27(2):248-57. Epub 2007 May 21. — View Citation

Tong KY, Mak AF, Ip WY. Command control for functional electrical stimulation hand grasp systems using miniature accelerometers and gyroscopes. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2003 Nov;41(6):710-7. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Difference of vertical distance 12 weeks
Secondary Physical examination of affected side 12 weeks
Secondary Difference of joint distance of shoulder A-P radiograph 12 weeks