Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01637103
Other study ID # H10-12-123
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received April 18, 2012
Last updated May 9, 2016
Start date September 2011
Est. completion date February 2015

Study information

Verified date May 2016
Source Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, CHU de Québec
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Canada: Ethics Review Committee
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Depressive symptoms are highly frequent among cancer patients. These symptoms significantly impair quality of life (e.g., hopelessness, greater risk of suicidal behaviours) and may even affect patients' prognosis (e.g., through decreased adherence to cancer treatments). Cognitive therapy (CT) is an established treatment for depression in the general population, but its efficacy has not yet been investigated in non-metastatic cancer patients. Furthermore, because the accessibility to CT is very limited in routine cancer care and because many patients are reluctant to use pharmacological treatment, they often turn to alternative treatments such as bright light therapy (BLT), but empirical data on its efficacy are needed before its use can be recommended. Goal 1: To assess at post-treatment, as compared to a waiting-list control condition, the effect of bright light therapy (BLT) and cognitive therapy (CT): (1a) in reducing depressive symptoms; and (1b) in improving subjective and objective sleep parameters, in reducing fatigue and anxiety and in increasing patients' functioning and quality of life. Goal 2: To compare at post-treatment and at 3- and 6-month follow-ups the effect of BLT and CT : (2a) in reducing depressive symptoms; and (2b) in improving subjective and objective parameters of sleep, in reducing fatigue and anxiety and in increasing patients' functioning and quality of life. It is hypothesized that, As compared to control patients after their waiting period, both BLT and CT groups will have significantly greater improvement of all symptoms at post-treatment. However, as compared to BLT patients, CT patients will show greater improvements of all symptoms at post-treatment and at 3- and 6-month follow-ups. This study will provide empirical data on the efficacy of two approaches for treating depressive symptoms in cancer patients in order to better inform the scientific community, health care providers, and patients on the most effective depression treatments to implement in cancer care.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 62
Est. completion date February 2015
Est. primary completion date February 2015
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years to 75 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- having received a diagnosis for a stage I-III cancer within the past 18 months;

- having a score of 7 or higher on the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D)84 or of 14 or higher on the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II);

Exclusion Criteria:

- have received bright light therapy in the past month or having previously received cognitive therapy for depression;

- having severe cognitive impairments (e.g., diagnosis of Parkinson's disease, dementia, or Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] score < 27);

- meeting DSM-IV criteria for a major depressive episode of severe intensity, or another severe psychiatric disorder (e.g., psychotic, bipolar, or substance use disorder);

- presenting suicidal ideations with a risk of acting out, or having attempted suicide in the past five years;

- having started a new psychotropic medication or having modified the dosage or frequency of use during the past two weeks;

- currently taking a photosensitive medication (e.g., lithium, L-tryptophan);

- having evidence of an ocular pathology from an optometrist exam or a medical condition contraindicating the use of bright light therapy (e.g., severe cataracts, glaucoma, diabetes).

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms

  • Depression
  • Treatment of Depressive Symptoms in Cancer Patients

Intervention

Behavioral:
Cognitive therapy of depression
Cognitive therapy will involve eight individual weekly sessions of 50 minutes with a Ph.D. student in psychology.
Bright light therapy
Bright light therapy will consist of a 30-min daily morning exposition to a 10 000-lux BLT lamp during 8 weeks.

Locations

Country Name City State
Canada L'Hôtel-Dieu de Québec Québec Quebec

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, CHU de Québec Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Changes in depressive symptoms Pre-treatment (at recruitment; about 2 weeks before starting the experimental condition of 8 weeks), post-treatment (immediately after the experimental condition of 8 weeks), 3-month follow-up and 6-month follow-up No
Secondary Changes in subjective and objective parameters of sleep Pre-treatment (at recruitment; about 2 weeks before starting the experimental condition of 8 weeks), post-treatment (immediately after the experimental condition of 8 weeks), 3-month follow-up and 6-month follow-up No
Secondary Changes in fatigue Pre-treatment (at recruitment; about 2 weeks before starting the experimental condition of 8 weeks), post-treatment (immediately after the experimental condition of 8 weeks), 3-month follow-up and 6-month follow-up No
Secondary Changes in anxiety Pre-treatment (at recruitment; about 2 weeks before starting the experimental condition of 8 weeks), post-treatment (immediately after the experimental condition of 8 weeks), 3-month follow-up and 6-month follow-up No
Secondary Changes in quality of life Pre-treatment (at recruitment; about 2 weeks before starting the experimental condition of 8 weeks), post-treatment (immediately after the experimental condition of 8 weeks), 3-month follow-up and 6-month follow-up No