Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01455415
Other study ID # A0081268
Secondary ID 2011-002743-10
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received
Last updated
Start date December 2011
Est. completion date December 2013

Study information

Verified date April 2015
Source Pfizer
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study is to test the effectiveness of pregabalin in treating nerve pain caused by diabetes. The suitable subjects will be patients who also use an non-steroid anti-inflammatory drug for another pain which is not related to the diabetic nerve pain.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 306
Est. completion date December 2013
Est. primary completion date November 2013
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Type 1 or 2 diabetes with painful neuropathy - Currently treated with one NSAID (including COX 2 inhibitors) for a co morbid pain condition with a regular dose - Meet pre-defined level of pain severity at entrance Exclusion Criteria: - History of failed pregabalin treatment due to lack of efficacy at therapeutic dose - Participated in a previous or ongoing pregabalin clinical trial - Neurologic disorders unrelated to diabetic neuropathy that may confound the assessment of distal neuropathic pain

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
pregabalin
150 - 300 mg/day in divided dose (3 time a day) for 6 weeks
placebo
matching placebo 3 time a day

Locations

Country Name City State
Czechia UNARS, s.r.o. Pelhrimov
Czechia Clintrial, s.r.o. Praha 10
Czechia Fakultni nemocnice v Motole Praha 5
Italy Fondazione PTV Policlinico Tor Vergata di Roma Roma
Sweden Center for Lakemedelsstudier Malmo
Sweden Citydiabetes Stockholm
United States Blair Orthopedic Associates, Inc. Altoona Pennsylvania
United States Meridien Research Bradenton Florida
United States Beacon Clinical Research, LLC Brockton Massachusetts
United States Miray Medical Center Brockton Massachusetts
United States Meridien Research Brooksville Florida
United States Suburban Clinical Research Chicago Illinois
United States Radiant Research (admin office) Cincinnati Ohio
United States Columbus Research Foundation Columbus Georgia
United States Radiant Research Columbus Ohio
United States University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas Dallas Texas
United States Altoona Center for Clinical Research Duncansville Pennsylvania
United States Genesis Clinical Research, LLC Fall River Massachusetts
United States Gulfcoast Clinical Research Center Fort Myers Florida
United States Neuro-Pain Medical Center Fresno California
United States Dedicated Clinical Research Goodyear Arizona
United States MD Clinical Hallandale Beach Florida
United States AGA Clinical Trials Hialeah Florida
United States Centex Research, Inc. Houston Texas
United States Houston Neurocare Houston Texas
United States Borgess Diabetes Center Kalamazoo Michigan
United States Borgess Research Institute Kalamazoo Michigan
United States New Phase Research and Development Knoxville Tennessee
United States Center for United Research, Inc. Lakewood California
United States Clinical Research Consortium Las Vegas Nevada
United States Mirkil Medical Group Las Vegas Nevada
United States V.Jerome Mirkil, MD Las Vegas Nevada
United States Central Kentucky Research Associates, Inc. Lexington Kentucky
United States Davidson Medical Ministries Lexington North Carolina
United States HealthCare Partners Medical Group Los Angeles California
United States IDS Pharmacy Los Angeles California
United States National Research Institute Los Angeles California
United States University of Southern California Los Angeles California
United States Sunstone Medical Research, LLC Medford Oregon
United States Arthritis and Diabetes Clinic, Inc. Monroe Louisiana
United States Suburban Clinical Research Naperville Illinois
United States Coastal Connecticut Research, LLC New London Connecticut
United States Neurological Group, PC New London Connecticut
United States The Medical Research Network, LLC New York New York
United States Sooner Clinical Research Oklahoma City Oklahoma
United States The Office of Veronique Sebastian, MD Oklahoma City Oklahoma
United States Quality Clinical Research, Inc. Omaha Nebraska
United States Neurology and Pain Clinic, LLC Orangeburg South Carolina
United States Palm Beach Neurological Center, Palm Beach Gardens Florida
United States Advanced Podiatry Phoenix Arizona
United States Arizona Research Center Phoenix Arizona
United States Clinical Research Consortium Phoenix Arizona
United States Precision Trials Phoenix Arizona
United States The Office of Joshua D. Holland, M.D. Phoenix Arizona
United States Mercy Health Research Saint Louis Missouri
United States Meridien Research Saint Petersburg Florida
United States Meridien Research Tampa Florida
United States Genova Clinical Research Tucson Arizona
United States Diablo Clinical Research, Inc. Walnut Creek California
United States Chase Medical Research, LLC Waterbury Connecticut
United States Clinical Research of Central Florida Winter Haven Florida

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Czechia,  Italy,  Sweden, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Average Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN) Pain Based on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over the Last 7 Days of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period) The daily pain diary consisted of an 11-point numeric scale ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst possible pain"). Participants described their pain during the past 24 hours by having chosen the appropriate number between 0 and 10. Self assessment was performed daily in the evening before bedtime on a telephone via interactive voice recognition system (IVRS) (time window for completion between 6.00 pm to midnight). The endpoint mean pain score was defined as the mean of the last 7 daily diary pain ratings while taking study drug in each treatment period - period 1 and period 2, respectively. A rating of 1 - 3 was considered as mild pain; 4 - 6 as moderate pain; and 7 - 10 as severe pain. End of Period (includes both Visits 5 and 9)
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving 30% Reduction in Mean DPN Pain Score From Baseline at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period) Daily pain diary consisted of an 11-point numeric scale ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst possible pain"). Participants described their pain during the past 24 hours by having chosen the appropriate number between 0 and 10. Self assessment was performed daily in the evening before bedtime on a telephone via IVRS (time window for completion between 6.00 pm to midnight). The endpoint mean pain score was defined as the mean of the last 7 daily diary pain ratings while taking study drug in each treatment period - period 1 and period 2, respectively. A rating of 1 - 3 was considered as mild pain; 4 - 6 as moderate pain; and 7 - 10 as severe pain. End of Period (includes both Visits 5 and 9)
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving 50% Reduction in Mean DPN Pain Score From Baseline at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period) Daily pain diary consisted of an 11-point numeric scale ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst possible pain"). Participants described their pain during the past 24 hours by having chosen the appropriate number between 0 and 10. Self assessment was performed daily in the evening before bedtime on a telephone via IVRS (time window for completion between 6.00 pm to midnight). The endpoint mean pain score was defined as the mean of the last 7 daily diary pain ratings while taking study drug in each treatment period - period 1 and period 2, respectively. A rating of 1 - 3 was considered as mild pain; 4 - 6 as moderate pain; and 7 - 10 as severe pain. End of Period (includes both Visits 5 and 9)
Secondary Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score for Pain-Severity Domain at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period) The BPI-sf is a self-administered questionnaire developed to assess the severity of pain and the impact of pain on daily functions during a 24 hour period prior to evaluation. Four items measure pain (0: no pain; 10: worst pain possible) at its "worst, "least", "average", and "now" (current pain) on an 11-point scale. Scores range from 0 - 10 with higher scores indicating greater pain severity. End of Period (includes both Visits 5 and 9)
Secondary BPI-sf Score for Pain-Interference Domain at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period) The BPI-sf is a self-administered questionnaire developed to assess the severity of pain and the impact of pain on daily functions during a 24 hour period prior to evaluation. Seven sub-questions evaluates the level of interference of pain on daily functioning (general activity, walking, work ability, mood, enjoyment of life, relations with other people, and sleep) on an 11-point scale (0: does not interfere; 10: completely interferes). Scores range from 0 - 10 with higher scores indicating greater interference. End of Period (includes both Visits 5 and 9)
Secondary Mean Sleep Interference Rating Score at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period) The daily sleep diary consists of an 11-point numeric rating scale with which the participant rates how painful DPN pain has interfered with their sleep during the past 24 hours. Zero indicates "does not interfere with sleep" and 10 indicates "completely interferes (unable to sleep due to pain)". Self assessment was performed daily in the evening before bedtime on a telephone via IVRS (time window for completion between 6.00 pm to midnight) after completion of the daily pain diary. End of Period (includes both Visits 5 and 9)
Secondary Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Anxiety (HADS-A) Total Score at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period) The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a 14- item self-administered questionnaire that consists of 2 scales, one measuring anxiety (HADS-A), and the other measuring depression (HADS-D). Each subscale consists of 7 statements and the participant responds as to how each item applies to him/her over the past week on 4- point response scale. Separate scores are calculated for anxiety and depression and a score (ranging from 0 to 21) is obtained for each subscale. The higher the score, the more severe the anxiety or depression. End of Period (includes both Visits 5 and 9)
Secondary HADS-D Total Score at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period) HADS is a 14- item self-administered questionnaire that consists of 2 scales, one measuring anxiety (HADS-A), and the other measuring depression (HADS-D). Each subscale consists of 7 statements and the participant responds as to how each item applies to him/her over the past week on 4- point response scale. Separate scores are calculated for anxiety and depression and a score (ranging from 0 to 21) is obtained for each subscale. The higher the score, the more severe the anxiety or depression. End of Period (includes both Visits 5 and 9)
Secondary Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) Total Quality of Life (TQOL) Score at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period) Norfolk QOL-DN is a 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess impact of diabetic neuropathy on quality of life of participants with diabetic neuropathy. All symptoms (1 - 7) are scored as either 1 or 0, indicating presence or absence of the symptom. With exception of questions 31 and 32, the other items are scored according to the 5-point Likert Scale (0 - 4, "no problem" to "severe problem"). In question 31, "good", the middle item, is scored as 0, "very good" as -1, "excellent" as -2, "fair" as 1, and "poor" as 2. In question 32, "about the same", the middle item, is scored as 0, "somewhat better" as -1, "much better" as -2, "somewhat worse" as 1, and "much worse" as 2. TQOL score should be summed as follow: sum (S) (1 - 7, 8 - 35). The (sub)scales are calculated without weighting of any kind, and reported as the integer sum of listed questionnaire items (range: -4 - 136). The QOL-DN version that was administered in this study was modified with a 2-week recall period. End of Period (includes both Visits 5 and 9)
Secondary Norfolk QOL-DN Symptoms Domain Score at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period) Norfolk QOL-DN is a 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess the impact of diabetic neuropathy on quality of life of participants with diabetic neuropathy. All symptoms (1 - 7) are scored as either 1 or 0, indicating presence or absence of the symptom. Item 9 is scored according to the 5-point Likert Scale (0 - 4, "no problem" to "severe problem"). The symptoms domain score should be summed as follow: S (1 - 7, 9). The scales and subscales are calculated without weighting of any kind, and reported as the integer sum of the listed questionnaire items (range: 0 - 32). The QOL-DN version that was administered in this study was modified with a 2-week recall period. End of Period (includes both Visits 5 and 9)
Secondary Norfolk QOL-DN Activities of Daily Living Domain Score at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period) Norfolk QOL-DN is a 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess the impact of diabetic neuropathy on quality of life of participants with diabetic neuropathy. The items are scored according to the 5-point Likert Scale (0 - 4, "no problem" to "severe problem"). Activities of the daily living domain score should be summed as follow: S (12, 22, 23, 25, 26). Scales and subscales are calculated without weighting of any kind, and reported as integer sum of listed questionnaire items (range: 0 - 20). The QOL-DN version that was administered in the study was modified with a 2-week recall period. End of Period (includes both Visits 5 and 9)
Secondary Norfolk QOL-DN Physical Functioning / Large Fiber Domain Score at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period) Norfolk QOL-DN is a 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess the impact of diabetic neuropathy on quality of life of participants with diabetic neuropathy. With exception of questions 31 and 32, items are scored according to the 5-point Likert Scale (0 - 4, "no problem" to "severe problem"). In question 31, "good", middle item, is scored as 0, "very good" as -1 , "excellent" as -2, "fair" as 1, and "poor" as 2. In question 32, "about the same", middle item, is scored as 0, "somewhat better" as -1, "much better" as -2, "somewhat worse" as 1, and "much worse" as 2. Physical functioning / large fiber domain score should be summed as follow: S (8, 11, 13 - 15, 24, 27 - 35). Scales and subscales are calculated without weighting of any kind, and reported as integer sum of listed questionnaire items (range: -4 - 56). QOL-DN version that was administered in the study was modified with a 2-week recall period. End of Period (includes both Visits 5 and 9)
Secondary Norfolk QOL-DN Small Fiber Domain Score at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period) Norfolk QOL-DN is a 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess impact of diabetic neuropathy on quality of life of participants with diabetic neuropathy. The items are scored according to the 5-point Likert Scale (0 - 4, "no problem" to "severe problem"). The small fiber domain score should be summed as follow: S (10, 16, 17, 18). Scales and subscales are calculated without weighting of any kind, and reported as integer sum of the listed questionnaire items (range: 0 - 16). The QOL-DN version that was administered in this study was modified with a 2-week recall period. End of Period (includes both Visits 5 and 9)
Secondary Norfolk QOL-DN Autonomic Domain Score at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period) Norfolk QOL-DN is a 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess the impact of diabetic neuropathy on quality of life of participants with diabetic neuropathy. The items are scored according to the 5-point Likert Scale (0 - 4, "no problem" to "severe problem"). The autonomic domain score should be summed as follow: S (19, 20, 21). The scales and subscales are calculated without weighting of any kind, and reported as the integer sum of the listed questionnaire items (range: 0 - 12). The QOL-DN version that was administered in this study was modified with a 2-week recall period. End of Period (includes both Visits 5 and 9)
Secondary Euro QoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Domain Score at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period) EQ-5D is a participant-completed 5-item questionnaire designed to assess health related quality of life in terms of a single index value or utility score. There are 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain / discomfort, and anxiety / depression. Each dimension is rated on a 3-point response scale (no problems, some/moderate problems, extreme problems) and the scores are combined to form a single index utility value between 0 and 1 with higher scores indicating better health. End of Period (includes both Visits 5 and 9)
Secondary EQ-5D Self-Care Domain Score at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period) EQ-5D is a participant-completed 5-item questionnaire designed to assess health related quality of life in terms of a single index value or utility score. There are 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain / discomfort, and anxiety / depression. Each dimension is rated on a 3-point response scale [1 = no problems, 2 = some/moderate problems, 3 = extreme problems] and the scores are combined to form a single index utility value between 0 and 1 with higher scores indicating better health. End of Period (includes both Visits 5 and 9)
Secondary EQ-5D Usual Activities Domain Score at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period) EQ-5D is a participant-completed 5-item questionnaire designed to assess health related quality of life in terms of a single index value or utility score. There are 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain / discomfort, and anxiety / depression. Each dimension is rated on a 3-point response scale [1 = no problems, 2 = some/moderate problems, 3 = extreme problems] and the scores are combined to form a single index utility value between 0 and 1 with higher scores indicating better health. End of Period (includes both Visits 5 and 9)
Secondary EQ-5D Pain / Discomfort Domain Score at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period) EQ-5D is a participant-completed 5-item questionnaire designed to assess health related quality of life in terms of a single index value or utility score. There are 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain / discomfort, and anxiety / depression. Each dimension is rated on a 3-point response scale [1 = no problems, 2 = some/moderate problems, 3 = extreme problems] and the scores are combined to form a single index utility value between 0 and 1 with higher scores indicating better health. End of Period (includes both Visits 5 and 9)
Secondary EQ-5D Anxiety / Depression Domain Score at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period) EQ-5D is a participant-completed 5-item questionnaire designed to assess health related quality of life in terms of a single index value or utility score. There are 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain / discomfort, and anxiety / depression. Each dimension is rated on a 3-point response scale [1 = no problems, 2 = some/moderate problems, 3 = extreme problems] and the scores are combined to form a single index utility value between 0 and 1 with higher scores indicating better health. End of Period (includes both Visits 5 and 9)
Secondary EQ-5D Dolan 1997 Index Summary Score at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period) EQ-5D is a participant-completed 5-item questionnaire designed to assess health related quality of life in terms of a single index value or utility score. There are 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain / discomfort, and anxiety / depression. Each dimension is rated on a 3-point response scale [1 = no problems, 2 = some/moderate problems, 3 = extreme problems] and the scores are combined to form a single index utility value between 0 and 1 with higher scores indicating better health. The utility score is calculated using the Dolan 1997 algorithm and the revised version which was provided to the EuroQol Group by Dolan in 2001 - but later published in medical care in 2002. End of Period (includes both Visits 5 and 9)
Secondary EQ-5D Dolan 2002 Index Summary Score at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period) EQ-5D is a participant-completed 5-item questionnaire designed to assess health related quality of life in terms of a single index value or utility score. There are 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain / discomfort, and anxiety / depression. Each dimension is rated on a 3-point response scale [1 = no problems, 2 = some/moderate problems, 3 = extreme problems] and the scores are combined to form a single index utility value between 0 and 1 with higher scores indicating better health. The utility score is calculated using the Dolan 1997 algorithm and the revised version which was provided to the EuroQol Group by Dolan in 2001 - but later published in medical care in 2002. End of Period (includes both Visits 5 and 9)
Secondary Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score at the End of Period 1 (Week 6) - Original Scores The PGIC is a participant-rated instrument that measures the participant's assessment of change in his/her overall status on a scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Due to the crossover design, PGIC was analyzed at the end of period 1 (V5). End of Period 1 (V5)
Secondary PGIC Score at the End of Period 1 (Week 6) - Categorized Scores The PGIC is a participant-rated instrument that measures the participant's assessment of change in his/her overall status on a scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Original scores (7 different scores) and categorized scores (4 different scores) were provided. Categorized scores were very much improved (consisting of very much improved and much improved); any improvement (consisting of very much improved, much improved, and minimally improved); no change (consisting of no change); and any worsening (consisting of minimally worse, much worse, and very much worse). Due to the crossover design, PGIC was analyzed at the end of period 1 (V5). End of Period 1 (V5)
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT06158529 - High-frequency Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation Versus Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Treatment of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain N/A
Completed NCT01726413 - A Clinical Trial to Study the Effects GRC 17536 in Patients With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (Painful Extremities Due to Peripheral Nerve Damage in Diabetic Patients). Phase 2
Completed NCT05123196 - Exploratory Study of MT-8554 in Subjects With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Phase 2
Terminated NCT04246619 - Efficacy of Pregabalin and Duloxetine in Patients With PDPN: the Effect of Pain on Cognitive Function, Sleep and Quality of Life Phase 4
Recruiting NCT03520608 - Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Study of Chinese OutPatiEnt
Completed NCT03172598 - Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of MT- 8554 in Subjects With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Phase 2
Terminated NCT01280747 - Examination of Pregabalin Access for Treatment of Indicated Pain Disorders: the ExPAND Study
Completed NCT03176472 - Ricolinostat in Patients With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Phase 2