View clinical trials related to Other.
Filter by:Brachial plexus blocks are widely used to provide anesthesia for upper limb surgery. Although many different approaches to the brachial plexus block have been described, there is widespread acceptance that injecting at the supraclavicular level is the most reliable method in terms of spread of local anesthetic agent. Each approach of ultrasound guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block (US -SCBPB ) has a different success rate and complications. . A supraclavicular block can provide effective surgical anesthesia of the forearm and hand. The most commonly performed US- SCBPB is the corner pocket approach which was described by Chan et al with probe resting posterior to the clavicle, with postero latero-anteromedial orientation provides a very stable location, but has the disadvantage of "looking" across the first rib, with the apex of the lung visualized close to thePlexus . A new Parasagittal approach for brachial plexus block at the supraclavicular level was studied by Adrian Searle where the arc of the first rib was used to provide a deep limit to needle transit in order to minimize the risk of pneumothorax ;the aim of our study is to further evaluate the parasagittal approach for brachial plexus block and compare it with the popular corner pocket approach
The ENLIGHTEN study that will evaluate the efficacy of a novel DTx lifestyle intervention in participants with non-cirrhotic MASH. People who have MASH, the progressive subtype of MASLD, have the highest risk for liver disease progression and poor outcomes, including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, and greater overall mortality. Thus, these participants are expected to experience the greatest benefit from treatment. This is a randomized, controlled trial comparing DTx lifestyle intervention in participants with non-cirrhotic MASH to standard clinical care. The study includes a screening period (up to 2 wks.) followed by randomization, 48-wk treatment period and 12-wk follow-up period (total duration up to 62 wks.).
Background: The prevalence of comorbid insomnia is 8-10 times higher in patients with chronic pain than in the general population. Insomnia adds a considerable burden as it worsens the quality of life, restoration and repair, mental health and pain symptoms. Since pain and sleep problems are mutually reinforcing, improvements in sleep may have beneficial effects on pain. Unfortunately, the customary use of sleep medication (TAU: treatment-as-usual) often yields short-lived plus side effects. The "Sleep-Well" intervention examines if a group-based intervention program focusing on sleep literacy, sleep restriction, stimulus control and metacognitive therapy modules may perform better than TAU in improving patients' insomnia and sleep quality. Eligible patients: Investigators target adult patients referred to the University Hospital of North Norway (Tromsø) for a diagnostic evaluation of their pain condition. Patients eligible for the Sleep-Well study are those who satisfy diagnostic criteria for a non-malign pain disorder plus a comorbid insomnia sleep disorder. Patients are not eligible if they use drugs or large doses of morphine (>100 equivalents), are engaged in an insurance case due to their diagnosis, or participate in other ongoing group programs at the hospital. Aims: This trial uses a randomized semi-crossover design to examine if the Sleep-Well group does better regarding insomnia and sleep quality than the control patients (TAU). The primary outcome measures are reductions in diagnostic criteria for insomnia, self-reported insomnia symptoms, quality of life, and actigraphy-measured insomnia indicators (long sleep onset latency, frequent nightly awakenings and early morning awakening). The secondary outcome measures include a simplified polysomnography measurement of brain activity during sleep to assess if proportions or durations of slow-wave versus light-wave sleep and EEG-based arousal indices improve. In addition, it is examined if the Sleep-Well intervention incurs benefits concerning pain complaints, dysfunctional sleep and pain cognitions, anxiety and depression. The intervention: The Sleep-Well program schedules group sessions that cover four topics (sleep literacy, behavioural and mental strategies, maintenance and relapse prevention). All sessions are led by two therapists. Those randomized to the active control group (TAU) cross over to the Sleep-Well intervention three months later.
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignancy characterized by uncontrolled proliferation of plasma cells for which there is an urgent and unmet need to develop new, effective therapeutics. Onconova Therapeutics has developed a first-in-class oral inhibitor of CDK4 and ARK5 ON 123300 (NARAZACICLIB) which shows potent anti-myeloma activity in vitro and in vivo in preclinical models, and is undergoing evaluation in Phase 1-2 trials worldwide. In this study, the researchers will test the safety and preliminary efficacy of inhibition of CDK4 and ARK5 by ON 123300 (NARAZACICLIB) in combination with dexamethasone in myeloma patients in a Phase I/II clinical trial.
This study is researching an experimental drug called ALN-SOD (called "study drug"). This study is focused on people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) who have a mutation in a gene called the superoxide dismutase-1 (SOD1) gene. This type of ALS is known as "SOD1-ALS". This is the first time that ALN-SOD will be given to people. The aim of the study is to see how safe and tolerable the study drug is. The study is looking at several other research questions, including: - The effect the study drug has on specific biomarkers, which are molecules in the blood or in the fluid that surrounds the brain and spinal cord, known as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) - How much study drug is in the blood and in the CSF, at different times - Whether the body makes antibodies against the study drug (which could make the drug less effective or could lead to side effects) - What effects the study drug has on ALS symptoms
Introduction Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is considered as the standard of care for the treatment of peritoneal metastases. Cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC is characterized by large intra operative fluid shift secondary to surgical resection, peritoneal inflammation and capillary shifts, requesting high volume of intra operative fluid therapy. Previous studies found a strong association between intra operative hypovolemia or volume overload with post operative outcomes. Albumin as an intravenous fluid has been widely studied in critical ill patients, but evaluation of its efficacy during major surgery on post operative clinical outcomes are lacking. We hypothesize that a reduction of intra operative crystalloid volume infusion by using 20% albumin during CRS with HIPEC could improve patients' prognosis. The aim of this study will be to assess the efficacy of 20% albumin combined with Ringer Lactate versus Ringer Lactate for fluid therapy during CRS with HIPEC on post operative outcome at 28 day. Methods and analysis The study protocol has been designed and written in accordance with the Prospective randomised, comparative, controlled, prospective, open-label, with parallel group and multicentre clinical trial. Recruitment, randomisation and allocation Information on the study and screening of patients will be conducted during the consultation of anaesthesia (= selection visit), 2 months at 3 days before the surgery. Information notice and consent form will be delivered. The day before the surgery, anaesthesiologist who will conduct the pre anaesthetic visit will be able to include patients in the study (=inclusion visit). Randomisation will be done at the inclusion visit after information and signature of consent form of voluntary patients. A randomization number will be assigned. The 1:1 randomisation will be centralized via an online interface ensuring secret group assignment, and based on predefined randomisation lists with variable-size permutation blocks, stratified by center. Randomisation will be accomplished using a computer-generated random sequence. Randomized Open, Blinded endpoint (PROBE) design. This study is a randomised, comparative, controlled, prospective, open-label, with parallel group and multicentre clinical trial. Intervention - 20% Albumin + Ringer Lactate group (intervention group) Per-operative fluid therapy consisting in Ringer Lactate combined with 20% albumin. Patients will receive a bolus of 3 mL/kg on one hour of 20% albumin from anaesthetic induction. Then, infusion of 20% albumin (100 mL, 20g) will be administered for each 1200 mL of vascular filling by Ringer Lactate. Dosage of intra operative albuminemia will be realized 2 hours after the end of the bolus or infusion to ensure albuminemia is within the target concentrations (35-45 g/L). Use of 20% albumin will be realized for the entire duration of the surgery and stopped at the end of the surgery. - Control group Ringer Lactate for intra operative fluid management based on the latest scientific recommendations. As the the study is an open labelled randomized clinical trial, placebo use is not planned. Outcome measures The primary outcome will be the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI score) at day 28 after CRS with HIPEC. Secondary outcomes are mortality at day 28, CCI score at day 7, volume of intra operative and post operative (48h) post operative fluid therapy, cumulated incidence of surgical post operative complications, cumulated incidence of medical post operative complications, need for mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy between surgery and day 28, SOFA score variation between pre operative period and 48h after surgery, number of days alive out of intensive care unit and out of hospital until day 28 Sample size calculation To ensure a power of 80%, a number of patients 130 (65 patients by group) will be necessary with a reduction of 13.6 (SD 24) points of the CCI score at day 28 in the intervention group. Because of a risk of neoplastic evolution between anaesthetic consultation and randomisation (10% of early cancellation), a total of 146 patients (73 by group) will be included in the study. Discussion In summary, ALBUCHIP study will be the first randomized clinical trial assessing efficacy of intraoperative use of 20% albumin combined with Ringer Lactate versus Ringer Lactate during CRS with HIPEC. Results yielded from this study will be helpful for vascular filling during CRS with HIPEC but, thanks to ancillary studies, to improve pathophysiological understanding of this surgery.
This research assesses the tear performance of five distinct types of soft contact lenses commonly found in the market. The study involves contact lens participants, all of whom are students enrolled at UKM. Before the study, participants were instructed to discontinue wearing their usual contact lenses for two weeks. The lenses utilized in this clinical trial all possess current refractive power. Participants are required to wear the lenses for an entire day only. Upon completion of the study, participants will be requested to complete a brief questionnaire.
This study plans to conduct a DEX dose halving study and a normal dose study in 34+0-35+6 GW women with preterm preterm labour. In addition, this study plans to conduct a DEX dose halving study and a normal dose study in 34-38+6 GW preterm pregnant women with GDM or diabetic co-pregnancy to explore the feasibility of dose halving in pregnant women with diabetes mellitus.
This study is a preliminary investigation, with a single-group design, not randomized and transparent, focusing on treatment. Its purpose is to identify the highest dose of BH002 injection (CD19-BCMA CAR-T cells) that patients suffering from resistant systemic lupus erythematosus can tolerate.
Background: Cholecystitis is treated by in various types of hospitals by different specialists, and treatment strategy is influenced by logistical and medical reasons and personal preference. This may significantly impact hospital stay and other outcomes. Purpose: To determine the variation in treatment of cholecystitis in the Netherlands and its impact on outcome. Methods: Nation-wide cohort study of all patients diagnosed and treated for cholecystitis during a 6 month period. The primary outcome will be the proportion of patients with an acute cholecystitis in which the guideline is followed. This group will be compared to those in which the guideline is not followed, focussing on total hospital stay and complications. Secondary aims are to determine: factors related to guideline compliance; the best method of cystic duct closure; the best treatment strategy for a >7-day existing cholecystitis; factors predictive for concomitant common bile duct stones; strategies following gallbladder drainage. Multivariable analysis and propensity score matching will be used when appropriate for the etiological study aims. The TRIPOD guideline for prediction modelling will be used for the predictive study aims. Hospitals will receive their own results, set out against the national average and best practices, thereafter subsequent changes in hospital practice will be recorded. Conclusion: This study will determine the variation in treatment of cholecystitis in the Netherlands and its impact on clinical outcome. Its results will serve as an important incentive to create optimal, uniform cholecystitis treatment in the Netherlands.