View clinical trials related to Osteoarthritis, Knee.
Filter by:Taping is a non-invasive technique that has been used for various musculoskeletal conditions, including knee OA. However, there is limited research on the effects of combination taping techniques on disability, functional capacity, and knee isokinetic torque in patients with knee OA.
For the first time in Russia, it is planned to introduce a system of personalized preoperative planning, applying the concept of kinematic alignment in robotic knee arthroplasty. Aim: to improve the results of robotic knee alignment by developing and implementing a personalized approach in preoperative planning. Objectives: to develop a system of personalized robotic knee arthroplasty; implementation of the system in clinical practice, to determine indications, contraindications; study of the results of personalized endoprosthetics, comparison with the results of mechanical alignment; detection of complications; development of an algorithm and protocol for personalized endoprosthetics. It is planned to conduct an open retrospective and prospective clinical study in parallel groups. The study is planned to include 150 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee joint stage 3-4 (according to Kellgren-Lawrence). The methodology developed and improved in the dissertation will be introduced into the work of the clinical Departments of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Disaster Surgery, studying the learning curve.
The primary research purpose is to determine if the use of a drug therapy intervention (each study participant will be randomly assigned to receive one of 3 study medications which will be blinded from everyone, including the study participants, and all research staff (except the principal investigator), combined with a series of 3 injections of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) into an osteoarthritic knee joint, leads to reductions in knee pain, and improvements in physical function. Improvements will be assessed by serially evaluating pain scores and functionality using standardized and validated questionaires which will be completed by the study participant at each clinic office visit. In addition, blood tests will be drawn at each visit to evalute any changes in blood compostion. If the participant meets the study inclusion and exclusion criteria and agrees to attend 7 follow up office visits, they will be eligble to enroll in the study. If they wish to volunarily enroll in the study, it will be explained in detail, afterwhich all questions and any concerns will be answered. Each office visit will take between 30-45 minutes and will take place over a 12-month study period comittment.
To determine if robotically-assisted UKA results in more consistent and improved component positioning and better patient reported outcome scores compared to manual TKA and MAKO TKA.
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common type of arthritis, characterized by pain and physical disability. More than 10% of persons > 55 years have symptomatic OA, primarily involving the knees. Knee arthroplasty is considered a successful orthopaedic procedure in progressed knee OA (KOA) with severe pain and disability where non-surgical treatments have been tried. It has long been recognized that injury to the body, either from trauma or surgery causes an inflammatory response. As TKA is considered a more invasive procedure compared with UKA, TKA and UKA may not trigger inflammatory reactions of the same magnitude. Differences in inflammatory response between TKA and UKA could help explain why differences in outcome are present, despite both procedures being technically successful. Even though knee arthroplasty is a very common and successful procedure, there are no existing studies comparing the invasiveness of TKA and UKA. As morbidity and mortality rates differ between the groups, the aim of this prospective cohort study is to investigate whether the post-operative inflammatory responses differ between TKA and UKA, and secondarily whether this difference can explain the difference in outcome between the two procedures. The investigators hypothesize that TKA generates a larger postoperative systemic inflammatory response compared with UKA due to more extensive periarticular soft tissue and bone trauma. The study's primary outcome is C-reactive Protein (CRP) measured in blood 24 hours after surgery (22-26 hours after surgery ~ day 1). Participants which are candidates for either a TKA or a UKA will through serial blood test measurement have their postoperative systemic inflammatory response measured. This further will be correlated to the clinical and functional outcomes over a 2-years postoperative follow-up period.
Background: Patient's pain experience is a complex phenomenon. A comprehensive clinical assessment of the patient's pain experience is helpful to define individual differences between patients and thus to plan effective individualized treatment programs. Gait assessment is an important functional task in the clinical evaluation, which allows the definition and modulation of therapeutic intervention. The influence of patient's pain experience on gait parameters is currently understudied in literature. Objective: To investigate patient's pain experience based on an assessment model proposed by Walton and Elliott in patients with knee OA. The study's second aim is to examine the correlation between the parameters of the 10 Meter Walking Test (10MWT) and Time Up and Go test (TUG) assessed by an inertial sensor and the patient's pain experience.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare a pain informed movement program to standard neuromuscular exercise in people with knee osteoarthritis. The main question it aims to answer are: 1. Are the two interventions a) pain informed movement program plus pain neuroscience education and b) neuromuscular exercise plus standard osteoarthritis education feasible in terms of recruitment, treatment adherence, timelines, data collection procedures, patient follow-up, and resources required? 2. Is there a difference in patient's satisfaction and acceptability of the two programs? 3. Are there any differences in the potential effects of the two programs on subjective pain measures, self-reported function, quality of life, functional leg strength, nervous system pain modulation, brain derived neurotrophic factor and nerve growth factor levels, and psychological factors?
The aim of this randomized controlled study is to investigate whether the implementation of Blood Flow Restriction, in which the de-loading factor is delivered by the combined progressive de-loaded walking to running activity on an antigravity treadmill (treatment group), is more effective than the same antigravity protocol alone (control group). Participants will be divided as follows: Intervention group: anti-gravity treadmill combined with blood flow restriction Control group: anti-gravity treadmill Both groups will also undergo a standardized knee Osteoarthritis management through an aerobic and strength program.
In this clinical trial the investigator assess the safety and efficacy of a single injection of a combination of cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA) with autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) obtained with the RegenMatrix medical device to improve symptoms of moderate to severe knee osteoarthitis (grade III-IV Kellgren-Lawrence).
The purpose of the study is post-operative recovery from prosthetic knee surgery will be assessed by the proportion of patients entering the Accelerated Rehabilitation After Surgery program eligible for discharge from hospital at 2 days according to the following definition: Chung score ≥ 9 with no intravenous (IV) infusion, solid food, transit restored, no signs of infection and Cumulated Ambulation Score D1 ≥ 5 (if discharged on Day 1), Cumulated Ambulation Score Day 2 ≥ 10 (if discharged on Day 2), or Cumulated Ambulation Score Day 3 ≥ 11/18.