View clinical trials related to Osteoarthritis, Knee.
Filter by:This is the first study to test the effect of Tai Chi on pain from knee osteoarthritis in community-dwelling elders with mild cognitive impairment. If Tai Chi is effective in reducing pain, clinicians can use it routinely with this population; then elders can maintain their functional ability longer, and perhaps delay or prevent long-term care admission, and the investigators can save health care dollars.
The purpose of this study is to see if using a topical nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (Pennsaid) to treat osteoarthritis knee pain will affect coagulation values in patients who are also taking anticoagulant or antithrombotic medications.
Primary Objective: To assess the safety and tolerability of SAR113945 in Japanese patients with knee osteoarthritis after ascending single intra-articular doses Secondary Objective: To assess the pharmacokinetics of SAR113945 in Japanese patients with knee osteoarthritis after ascending single intra-articular doses
The purpose of this study is to compare efficacy and safety of intra-articular LBSA0103 once versus intra-articular hyaluronic acid injections (Hyruan Plus Injection) once weekly for 3 weeks in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.
The patients are asked to take part in this study because you have chronic pain as a result of knee osteoarthritis. This study is done to investigate the pain relieving effects of the study drug Savella (milnacipran HCl) for people who experience chronic osteoarthritis pain. The purpose of this research is to look at how the study drug can be used to benefit people who experience osteoarthritis knee pain. This is a phase IV study done to study the safety and effectiveness of the drug. At this point the drug is already approved by the Food and Drug Administration for people with fibromyalgia but it has not yet been approved for people with knee osteoarthritis.
Patients scheduled for total knee replacements and suitable for sciatic nerve block will be randomized to one of 2 groups. Group 1 will have the nerve block performed using a standard Pajunk block needle under ultrasound guidance and with electrical nerve stimulation (ENS), and have catheter placement also guided by electrical nerve stimulation. Group 2 will have the block performed using a Sonoplex echogenic block needle and have an echogenic catheter sited, all under ultrasound (US) guidance. Group 2 will have needle location aided by ENS, but ENS will not be used for catheter location. An observer blinded to the needle type will assess the quality of needle visualisation on a recording of the US image taken during the procedure, along with adequacy of spread of local anesthetic. The primary outcome will be needle visibility, and secondary outcomes will be block success rate, block performance time, complication rate, number of needle passes per block, and adequacy of spread of local anesthetic.
Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is an effective procedure for reducing pain and improving function in patients with disabling osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip or knee. However, as with all invasive procedures, TJA is associated with certain risks and substantial costs. Since the indications for TJA are heavily dependent on patients' quality of life and expectations. TJA utilization rates vary widely throughout the United States, as seen with other 'preference-sensitive' procedures. Early evidence suggests shared decision making (SDM) strategies are effective in enhancing patient decision quality, or the degree to which treatment decisions reflect the preferences of fully informed patients, especially for preference-sensitive procedures like TJA. Despite these advantages, however, SDM has not been embraced or widely adopted in orthopaedics. To investigate this limited uptake, the investigators propose a series of evaluations of individual-level strategies. The investigators innovative and unique contribution is to approach patients, surgeons and healthcare purchasers as having symmetric and equally valid concerns about the benefits and cost associated with SDM. The investigators overall objective is to facilitate wider dissemination of SDM strategies in orthopaedic practices. The specific aims of the project are to assess, for SDM strategies, the impact on key patient, surgeon, and healthcare purchaser priorities; By achieving this aim our project will produce new interventions and incentives for disseminating SDM that are endorsed as feasible and acceptable by a coalition of patients, surgeons, and purchasers. The investigators plans for evaluation include a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of SDM on outcomes of interest to patients, surgeons, and purchasers.
The primary purpose of this study is to compare the effects of a high and low intensity strength training programs vs. a control group on knee pain and compressive joint forces.
The purpose of this research study is to determine whether low intensity resistance training with concurrent application of a peripheral blood flow restriction device to the exercising limb will elicit increased quadriceps strength, functional gains, ability to complete knee-related activities of daily living, mobility, and quality of life in individuals at risk for developing symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA). It is known that higher quadriceps strength is protective against developing symptomatic knee OA.1 However, people at risk for knee OA frequently do not tolerate the high intensity resistance training that is generally believed necessary to increase muscle strength. Partial blood flow restriction (PBFR) to the exercising muscle has been reported to result in strength gains, while requiring lower levels of joint loading.2 This method may be better tolerated, enabling efficacious exercise in older adults who may not tolerate high knee joint loads. To asses the efficacy of a 4 week low-intensity resistance training program with concurrent application of PBFR to the exercising limbs to improve quadriceps strength and size, leg muscle power, and mobility in individuals at risk for developing symptomatic knee osteoarthritis,we will test the following hypotheses. In comparison with low-intensity resistance training without use of PBFR, a four-week low-intensity resistance-training program with PBFR will: Primary Hypothesis: Increase (a) double leg-press 1RM strength and (b) isokinetic knee extensor strength Secondary Hypotheses: 1. Increase quadriceps muscle volume assessed by MRI 2. Increase lower limb muscle power on (a) double leg-press at 40% 1RM and (b) a timed stair climb 3. Not adversely effect knee pain or quality of life assessed by the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of FX006 in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.