View clinical trials related to Opioid Use.
Filter by:The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of a social network intervention to recruit people who inject drugs and their networks for HIV testing and linkage to HIV prevention and treatment services in Maryland. Study aims are to determine the effectiveness of a social network driven intervention to increase: - HIV testing (primary); - PrEP knowledge; - Uptake of HIV services and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP); - Uptake of medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) initiation. Eligible participants who access syringe service programs (SSPs) serving two counties in Maryland and their risk network members (NMs) will be recruited using an established network inventory and coupon recruitment method. When an index successfully recruits NMs, the index-NM cluster will be randomized to either a peer-educator intervention arm or an equal-attention control arm. Index participants randomized to the peer-educator intervention arm will complete a training program adapted with stakeholder input to context that emphasizes effective communication, frequent HIV testing, and awareness of evidence-based HIV prevention and treatment services. An important innovation to the network intervention will be training indexes to use and distribute HIV self-test kits and naloxone to their NMs. Index participants randomized to the equal-attention control arm will receive training sessions focused on the opioid overdose epidemic and will not include any training to serve as a peer educator. All participants (indexes and NMs) will complete study assessments at baseline and at 3 and 9 months. We will compare the peer-educator intervention group and the equal-attention control group on rates of HIV testing, knowledge of PrEP options and resources, and rates of initiation of HIV treatment, PrEP, and MOUD treatment since the previous assessment (past 3 or 6 months).
The purpose of this study, entitled "Delivering Transcutaneous Auricular Neurostimulation as an Adjunct Non-Opioid Pain Management Therapy for Patients Undergoing Lumbar Fusion Surgery", is to demonstrate whether transcutaneous auricular neurostimulation (tAN) can non-invasively reduce the perception of pain in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery. tAN is placed on and around the ear to non-invasively stimulate branches of the vagus and trigeminal nerves and modulate specific brain regions associated with pain.
The goal of this clinical trial is to see whether the Healthy Minds Program for Addictions could be used to help veterans with moderate-severe opioid use disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder stay on buprenorphine maintenance treatment. Participants will be asked to complete a six-week program consisting of 6 weekly, 2-hour in-person group sessions, as well as assessments before the start of the sessions.
Maxigesic is combined intravenous analgesic of ibuprofen and acetaminphen. The purpose of this study is investigate weather preoperative Maxigesic administration can reduce intraoperative remifentanil requirement.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare postoperative pain and opioid consumption in patients who undergo cosmetic breast surgery and are treated preoperatively with gabapentin. The main questions to answer are the amount of postoperative pain on a scale of 0-10 and amount of opioids consumed postoperatively. Participants will be randomized into two groups: treatment vs no treatment. Treatment group will receive 600mg of gabapentin preopreatively. Researchers will compare treatment vs no treatment group to determine the effects of preoperative gabapentin on postoperative pain management and opioid consumption.
Determine the incidence of early post-operative hypoventilation in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery under opioid-sparing compared with sevoflurane-based anesthesia.
This study is a nationwide cross-sectional survey on pain and satisfaction after knee arthroplasty (KA). Please find the full protocol uploaded at ClinicalTrials.gov The goal of this observational study is to study pain and satisfaction in patients operated with knee arthroplasty. The main question it aims to answer are: - What is the incidence of persistent postsurgical pain in unselected knee arthroplasty patients - What is the level of satisfaction in unselected knee arthroplasty patients? Participants will be asked to answer a 22-item questionnaire.
opioid free anesthesia consists of combination of pharmacological and non pharmacological modalities that target different pathways of pain mechanism. combining myofascial plane blocks with infusion of adjuvants such as lidocaine or dexmedetomidine can offer equivalent intraoperative hemodynamic stability compared to that of opioid with better pain control postoperatively. this study will investigate the efficacy of combined erector spina block with lidocaine and dexmedetomidine infusion as opioid sparing anesthesia in spine surgeries
1. Evaluate differences between patients taking Duloxetine or placebo following lateral lumbar interbody fusion for postoperative narcotic consumption. 2. Evaluate differences between patients taking Duloxetine or placebo following lateral lumbar interbody fusion for postoperative pain, function, and quality of life. 3. Evaluate the correlation between preoperative screening tests (measuring pain centralization, anxiety, depression, and overall function) and patients' response to treatment (reduction in pain, anxiety, or depression and improvement in function).
Background: high or moderate intensity pain hits more than a half of patients with cancer and is not adequately treated way in 1/3 of this patients. Complexity of cancer pain makes right management difficult and the consequences of an incorrect management are far-reaching in a clinical and social way. A multimodal treatment tailored on the patient, and the evaluation of quality of life correlated to different treatment methodologies, must constitute a decisive element in terms of therapeutic choices. Over the past 30 years, the World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic step ladder has been used to guide the choices management of cancer-related pain, but in the last years the growth of innovative treatment strategies, led to the need to modulate this rigid yet useful system. Benefits would be obtained with interventional techniques (peripheral neural blockade, neuromodulatory device use, neuro-destructive techniques, and intrathecal drug delivery systems) performed in the initial parts of the treatment cycle (before the third step of the WHO scale), rather than applied according to the WHO scale algorithm. Some authors who adopted this approach, reported reduction in pain duration and less opioid consumption, minimizing the risk of opioid related side effects and an improving the overall quality of life . The hypothesis is that early application of interventional techniques in oncological patients has an improving effect in the treatment of chronic cancer pain in terms of efficacy and quality of life. Materials and methods: patients followed by the Cancer Pain Therapy Service of the Cancer National Institute Regina Elena, Rome, with chronic localizable abdominal pain with a value ≥ 7 according to the numeric rating scale (NRS) and a diagnosis of untreatable disease will be randomized into two groups: in the first group patients will be treated with early interventional neuromodulatory techniques, before high opioids dosages. The other group will follow the steps of the WHO scale. Every patient will receive the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of life-Core 30 Summary Score (EORTC-QLQ C30) survey to detect quality of life and the Numeric rate scale NRS. They will receive it before the treatment, after invasive procedure, one month later and six months later. Primary end point will be the difference of the quality of life questionnaire score between the groups; secondary end point will be difference in the NRS values. The statistic analysis will be based on two groups of patients responding to the including criteria. The sample will be made of 76 patients divided in two sub-sample of equal dimension to select and analyze in 18 months. The sample thus defined is consistent for a confidence interval of 80% and for a margin of error of less than 5%.