View clinical trials related to Neoplasms.
Filter by:Background: - The anticancer drug bevacizumab works by reducing the formation of new blood vessels in tumors, which can slow or stop the growth of cancer cells and supporting blood vessels. The experimental drug EZN-2208 works by limiting how well cancer cells can divide. Drugs similar to EZN-2208 also work by turning off the production of the HIF protein, which otherwise can help cancer cells to grow even when blood supply is limited. Researchers are interested in determining if EZN-2208 turns off HIF in patient tumors, and whether combining it with bevacizumab is an effective treatment for cancers that have not responded to standard treatment. Objectives: - To assess the safety and effectiveness of the combination of EZN-2208 and bevacizumab for solid tumors that have not responded to standard treatment. Eligibility: - Individuals at least 18 years of age who have solid tumors that have not responded to standard treatment. Design: - Participants will be screened with a full physical examination and medical history, blood and urine samples, and tumor imaging studies. - Participants will receive EZN-2208 and bevacizumab intravenously on an outpatient basis in 4-week cycles (with the exception of the first cycle, which will be 5 weeks). - Cycle 1: Participants will receive EZN-2208 once a week for 3 weeks in a row (days 1, 8, and 15), followed by 1 week without the drug. Participants will receive bevacizumab 1 week before EZN-2208 (day - 7) and then 3 weeks later (day 15). - Subsequent cycles: Participants will receive EZN-2208 once a week for 3 weeks in a row (days 1, 8, and 15), followed by 1 week without the drug. Participants will receive bevacizumab every 2 weeks (days 1 and 15). - Participants will have clinic visits with physical examinations and blood tests in the first 3 weeks of each cycle. Clinic visits may also include tumor imaging studies and tumor biopsies as directed by the study researchers. - Participants will continue to take the study drugs for as long as the tumor shrinks or does not grow, and as long as they do not experience intolerable or unsafe side effects from the drugs.
To establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of oral afatinib (BIBW2992) given in combination with gemcitabine or docetaxel in patients with relapsed or refractory tumors. To assess the safety of the combination. To investigate the PK characteristics of docetaxel or gemcitabine and of oral afatinib (BIBW2992) in the tested treatment schedule. To assess antitumor activity.
To determine the maximum tolerated dose or optimal biological dose, and the safety profile of MEDI3617 when given as a single-agent or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents in subjects with advanced solid malignancies resistant to standard therapy.
In this study, the investigators will use busulfan and cyclophosphamide (BuCy) backbone with the addition of fludarabine as the preparative Stem Cell Transplant (SCT) regimen. As an attempt to improve engraftment rate and reduce infections, the investigators are going to incorporate fludarabine in the conditioning regimen. The use of a BuCy backbone has been widely used and comparable to total body irradiation and cyclophosphamide (Cy/TBI) regimen. Encouraging data on adding fludarabine to the SCT regimen have been reported. A fludarabine-based, conditioning regimen, with adequate immunosuppressive activity could conceivably allow engraftment of stem cells from alternative donors in hematologic malignancies patients with acceptable engraftment rates and low transplant-related mortality. Regimen-related toxicity is believed to be a major contributing factor to GVHD. Therefore this approach may also lead to reduced GVHD, as some investigators have suggested. In an attempt to decrease the rate of viral infection and reactivation, the investigators will avoid ATG (Thymoglobulin) / Campath (anti-CD52), and instead administer Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF). The addition of fludarabine should compensate any increase risk of graft failure with the removal of the ATG/Campath. The investigators anticipate that the removal of ATG/Campath will facilitate immune reconstitution more efficiently after receiving a UCBT.
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and effectiveness of UCBT to treat patients with lymphoid hematological diseases and to see if this treatment can decrease the incidence of leukemia relapse, GVHD and infections. These patients have a type of blood cell disorder that is very hard to cure. This treatment that is being used in this trial is known as a stem cell transplant. This treatment might help the patient live longer without the disease. It uses much stronger doses of drugs and radiation to kill the diseased cells that could be given without the transplant. We also think that the healthy cells from the donor may help fight any diseased cells left after the transplant. For the transplant to take place, we will administer stem cells from a 'donor' whose cells best 'match' the patient's. In this study umbilical cords will be the source of the stem cells. Before the transplant, two very strong drugs plus total body irradiation will be given to as preconditioning. This treatment will kill most of your blood-forming cells in the bone marrow. The patient will then get then healthy stem cells. If the patient has the disease in the central nervous system (CNS), they will receive radiation to the head and spine before starting the conditioning. This is to try to get disease control in the CNS. Radiation will not be given for children under 2 yrs old. Currently, many umbilical cord blood units are available in public banks for transplantation in patients lacking bone marrow donors. UCB transplants (UCBT) may offer several advantages over adult bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplants, including: 1. rapid availability, 2. absence of donor risk, 3. low risk of transmissible infectious diseases, 4. low risk of acute GvHD (Graft vs. Host Disease) The three main causes of death after umbilical cord blood transplantation for these kind of disorders are graft failure, infection and disease relapse. In this study we are trying to address these three problems: To help improve engraftment we will add the drug Fludarabine to Cytoxan and total body irradiation. Fludarabine is a very strong medicine. We will try to decrease infections and reduce leukemia relapse by using fludarabine instead of antithymocyte globulin (ATG).
This study is being conducted to test study drug AZD2461 to see how it may work to treat solid tumors. The main purpose of this study is to determine the safety and tolerability of AZD2461. This is the first time the drug has been given to humans and is classed as a first time in man study. Its main purpose is to establish a safe dosage of the drug and provide additional information on any potential side effects this drug may cause. The study will also assess the blood levels and action of AZD2461 in the body over a period of time and will indicate whether the drug has a therapeutic effect on solid tumors.
ENABLE III is a randomized clinical trial that evaluates a phone-based palliative care intervention designed to improve quality of life, mood, and symptom management for patients with an advanced stage cancer and their caregivers. The primary aims of this clinical trial are to determine whether a palliative care intervention (introduced immediately or 12 weeks after diagnosis) can improve survival, quality of life, mood, symptom intensity and end-of-life care.
Primary Objective: - To evaluate the efficacy of SECOX regimen by adding oxaliplatin plus capecitabine to sorafenib versus sorafenib alone as palliative treatment for unresectable HCC patients to prolong overall survival (OS) for advanced HCC patients. Secondary Objective: - To compare the efficacy of SECOX regimen with Sorafenib alone for progression free survival (PFS) - To compare the efficacy of SECOX regimen with Sorafenib alone for response rate (RR) - To assess the overall safety profile of SECOX regimen in comparison of Sorafenib alone
This is an open-label, two-part study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of combination treatment with dalotuzumab + MK-2206, dalotuzumab + MK-0752, or dalotuzumab + ridaforolimus (MK-8669). Part 1 of the study will determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) observed after administration of each of the combinations at various doses and define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of each combination. Part 2 of the study will assess preliminary anti-tumor activity of these combinations (at MTD) in two groups of participants with selected tumor biomarkers: one group with metastatic or recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, or primary peritoneal cancer and one group with metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer. The dalotuzumab + ridaforolimus and dalotuzumab + MK-2206 arms will be enriched with female platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, or primary peritoneal cancer participants. The dalotuzumab + MK-0752 arm will be enriched with metastatic or recurrent wild-type kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) colorectal cancer participants. The primary hypothesis is that the DLTs observed in adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors after administration of each of the MK-MK doublets will be dose-dependent to allow for definition of a MTD within each MK-MK doublet.
This clinical trial studies multi-tracer positron emission tomography in patients with solid tumors. Diagnostic procedures, such as multi-tracer positron emission tomography, may help measure a patient's response to treatment.