View clinical trials related to Neoplasms.
Filter by:An open label, multicenter, phase Ia/Ib study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and initial efficacy of IBI318 in the treatment of patients with advanced malignancies.
An open label, single/multiple dose exploratory clinical study to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of autologous humanized anti-claudin18.2 chimeric antigen receptor T cell in advanced solid tumor.
The investigators aim to investigate the utility of radiomics to differentiate malignant nodules from benign nodules and invasive adenocarcinoma from non-invasive adenocarcinoma.
An open-label, Phase 1/2a study of HPN536 as monotherapy to assess the safety, tolerability and PK in patients with advanced cancers associated with mesothelin expression.(Phase 2 portion of the study was not conducted.)
An international, multicenter study to identify tumor molecular particularities and neoepitopes among participants with colorectal and pancreatic tumors undergoing surgery.
This is a single-arm, unicentric, single-stage clinical study of tamoxifen for patients with well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors and radiological progression with positive (> 1 percent) HR (estrogen and / or progesterone) expression by IHC. It will evaluate if Tamoxifen exerts antitumor action in patients with well differentiated NET and positive for the expression of HR, estrogen and / or progesterone.
This phase I/II trial studies how well patient portal and navigation program work in providing information for Asian American cancer patients. Patient portal and navigation program may help to improve the care provided to Asian American cancer patients.This study is offered in the following languages in addition to English: Chinese (Cantonese or Mandarin) and Vietnamese.
This study will characterize the safety and tolerability and identify the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of subcutaneous (SC) ALKS 4230 as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab.
SHR-A1403 is a humanized IgG2, anti-C-Met monoclonal antibody conjugated to microtubule inhibitor (c-Met ADC).The aim of this study is to assess the safety and tolerability of SHR-A1403，to define the dose limited toxicity（DLT）and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)，to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of SHR-A1403，to assess the antitumor activity of SHR-A1403 in patients with advanced solid tumors preliminarily and to recommend the reasonable dosage regimen of SHR-A1403 for the follow-up clinical trial.
Background: Central venous catheters are frequently used during cancer treatment with the aim of venepreservation. It can facilitate venous access for the safe administration of irritating or vesicant intravenous cancer medications and / or other fluids, to collect blood samples or to ensure accurate venous access for contrast during medical imaging. In addition, this means more comfort for the patient who needs to be punctured less peripherally. However, central venous catheters can also be a source of bloodstream infections and other complications, leading to increased morbidity and hospital costs (1). In our hospital, there is a general practice that if an infection of the device is suspected, the central venous catheter should be removed if antibiotics do not seem or prove to be effective. The objective of this trial is to assess the frequency of implanted port catheter-removal in cancer patients due to suspected infection of the device in a particular oncology center over a time period of seven years. Furthermore, evidence for real device infections (per/post-surgery) and the potential contribution of different (institution-specific) risk factors on device infection will be explored. There will be focused on implanted port catheters only, as this is the main used central venous access device within the oncological population. Trial objectives: The primary aim of this retrospective descriptive trial is to evaluate the frequency of implanted port catheter-removal in cancer patients due to suspected infection of the device, over a time period of seven years. The secondary aim is to examine whether the device infection could be confirmed during or after removal of the device. At last, the tertiary aim is to verify whether certain variables can be denoted as potential risk factors for central venous access infection. Selection of those variables of interest will be based on a thorough review of the literature and discussion with the responsible healthcare professionals.