View clinical trials related to Neoplasms.
Filter by:This is an open-label, cohort study to determine the feasibility and tolerability of the combination of TAK-228 and TAK-117 given on days 2-4, 9-11, 16-18, and 23-25 with paclitaxel on days 1, 8, and 15 for one 28-day cycle in patients with advanced solid tumors.
This study is a phase Ib, open label, multi-centre trial designed to estimate the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of lithium when combined with a standard chemotherapy regimen of oxaliplatin and capecitabine in patients with advanced, unresectable, oesophago-gastric or colorectal cancer who have received no previous treatment for advanced disease (previous adjuvant or neo-adjuvant treatment is acceptable if completed at least 6 months prior to registration). The study follows a modified Fibonacci, 3+3, dose escalation design. Patients are enrolled in cohorts of 3. All three patients in each cohort must complete at least two cycles of treatment to be evaluable for toxicity. If a patient cannot complete 2 cycles, another patient will be enrolled.
A feasibility study to provide 'proof of concept' of Elemental Diet (ED) as an acceptable/ useful feeding option for patient with inoperable malignant bowel obstruction and to examine the impact of ED on quality of life
The primary objective of this study is to determine the safety and tolerability of pamiparib, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or maximum administered dose (MAD) for pamiparib combined with TMZ, to select the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) and schedule of pamiparib in combination with TMZ, and to determine the antitumor activity of pamiparib in combination with TMZ.
This is a phase 2 study of AMG 337 in subjects with advanced or metastatic solid tumors that overexpress MET or harbor METex14del mutations resulting in MET exon 14 skipping.
This is a prospective study of the safety and efficacy of nivolumab for the treatment of relapsed or residual haematological malignancies after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). Eligible patients will receive nivolumab at a dose of 3mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks. The primary objective is to evaluate the incidence, severity and treatment responsiveness of GVHD following nivolumab treatment post-alloSCT.
The purpose of the project is to estimate the effect size of a technology based intervention for older adults with cancer for nausea and vomiting. Participants will be randomized to either an intervention or a wait control group. Outcomes such as symptom severity, quality of life and resource use will be examined.
This is a Phase 2, open-label, dose-rising study evaluating the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of three concentrations of SOR007 ointment (0.15%, 1.0%, and 2.0%) applied topically once per week for four weeks to the ectocervix of subjects with high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN).
To estimate progression-free survival at one year in elderly patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type unresectable mCRC and good performance status treated with FOLFIRI + panitumumab as first-line therapy. The clinical hypothesis of this study is that the combination of panitumumab and FOLFIRI is a good treatment option in elderly patients with good performance status and RAS/BRAF wild-type unresectable mCRC. Another purpose of this clinical trial is to determine the RAS/BRAF mutation status in liquid biopsies at baseline and at the time of disease progression.
The aim of present study was to study the osteopathic manipulative effects on pain relief and quality of life improvement on hospitalized oncology geriatric patients. A non-randomized comparison trial was performed in Unit of Oncology Rehabilitation, Palazzolo Institute, Don Carlo Gnocchi Foundation ONLUS, Milan, Italy, from September 2015 to March 2016. 23 older oncology patients were unrolled and allocated in two experimental groups: study group (OMT group, N=12) underwent to osteopathic manipulative treatment associated to physiotherapy and control group (PT group, N = 11) underwent only physiotherapy. At enrollment (T0), 23 recruited oncology patients completed the socio-demographic forms and were evaluated, from external examiner, pain intensity and quality of life. All patients were revaluated at the end of treatment (T4) for quality of life and every week (T1, T2, T3 and T4) for pain intensity. Standard level of significance was p<0.05.