View clinical trials related to Neoplasm.
Filter by:This is a Phase1, single-arm study for treatment. This is a prospective multicenter, multinational, open-label study to assess the effect of tusamitamab ravtansine on the QT interval in participants with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), nonsquamous non small cell lung cancer (NSQ NSCLC), or gastric/ gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma for which in the judgement of the Investigator, no standard alternative therapy is available.
Primary Objectives: Part 1 (Dose Escalation) - To determine the MTD/maximum administered dose (MAD) of SAR443216 administered as a single agent in participants with HER2 expressing solid tumors and determine the RD(s) for intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) administration in the dose escalation part. - To determine the safety of SAR443216 after intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) administration. Part 2 (Dose expansion) • To assess preliminary clinical activity of single agent SAR443216 at the RD(s) in participants with HER2 expressing solid tumors, with various levels of HER2 expression. Secondary Objectives: Part 1 • To assess preliminary clinical activity of single agent SAR443216 after IV and SC administration at the RD(s) in participants with HER2 expressing solid tumors, with various levels of HER2 expression. Part 2 • To determine the safety of SAR443216. Part 1 and 2 - To characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of SAR443216 when administered as a single agent after IV and SC (Part 1 only) administration. - To evaluate the immunogenicity of SAR443216 after IV and SC administration. - To assess preliminary clinical activity of single agent SAR443216 at the RD(s) in participants with HER2 expressing solid tumors, with various levels of HER2 expression.
Primary Objectives: - Phase 1: To characterize the safety and tolerability of isatuximab in combination with atezolizumab in participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), platinum-refractory recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), platinum-resistant/refractory epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), or recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), and to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). - Phase 2: To assess response rate (RR) of isatuximab in combination with atezolizumab in participants with HCC or SCCHN or EOC. - Phase 2: To assess the progression free survival rate at 6 months (PFS-6) of isatuximab in combination with atezolizumab, or as a single agent in participants with GBM. Secondary Objectives: - To evaluate the safety profile of isatuximab monotherapy (GBM only), or in combination with atezolizumab in Phase 2. - To evaluate the immunogenicity of isatuximab and atezolizumab. - To characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of isatuximab single agent (GBM only) and atezolizumab in combination with isatuximab. - To assess the overall efficacy of isatuximab in combination with atezolizumab, or single agent (GBM only).
The purpose of this study is to investigate BMS-986226 administered alone or in combination with nivolumab or ipilimumab.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of preladenant (MK-3814A) alone and in combination with pembrolizumab (MK-3475) (pembro) in participants with advanced solid tumors that have not responded to prior therapy. This study will be done in 2 parts. Part 1 will identify and confirm the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of preladenant when given alone or in combination with pembrolizumab. Part 2 of the study will determine the safety and efficacy of preladenant in combination with pembrolizumab at the RP2D in participants with select solid tumors .
This study is a dose escalation, and cohort expansion study in subjects with advanced cancer for which no standard therapy exists. Subjects must have received prior treatment for cancer that has not worked, or has stopped working.
This phase I/II trial studies the safety of topical phenylephrine solution and to see how well it works in preventing oral mucosa (mouth sores) in bone marrow transplant patients receiving cyclophosphamide and total body radiation therapy. Topical phenylephrine solution may prevent or lessen the severity of oral mucosa in patients receiving cyclophosphamide and total body radiation prior to undergoing a bone marrow transplant.
Background: - ECI301 is a drug that may help make cancer cells more visible to the immune system after radiation. The drug may also help the immune system destroy the cancer at sites that have not received radiation therapy. Researchers want to study ECI301 in people with advanced cancer or cancer that has spread in the body (metastatic). Objectives: - To test ECI301 with radiation therapy for advanced or metastatic cancer. Eligibility: - People at least 18 years of age with either metastatic or advanced cancer that may benefit from radiation therapy. Design: - Participants will be screened with a medical history and physical exam. They will also have blood and urine tests, and imaging studies. - All participants will have radiation therapy 5 days a week for 2 weeks. - They will have different doses of ECI301 to test its safety and effectiveness. ECI301 will be given in a vein during the second week of radiation therapy. Frequent blood tests and imaging studies will monitor the treatment. - After participants have ECI301, tumor samples may be taken from the site that had radiation and another site that did not have radiation. - Follow-up visits will include blood tests and imaging studies.
Background: - Procedures that use medical tools in or near a possible abnormality in the body often use computed tomography (CT) scans to locate the abnormality and guide the path that a needle will take to collect a sample of tissue. Xperguide and electromagnetic (EM) tracking are two new procedures being studied to help guide the needle. Xperguide is software that uses CT images to help the doctor choose the needle path. EM tracking uses special medical tools with miniature coils that act like a Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) device to show the location of the needle in the body. Xperguide and EM tracking have been used in humans and have good results, but they have not been compared with each other and regular CT to determine whether they are better than the standard approach. Objectives: - To compare the results of Xperguide, electromagnetic tracking, and regular computed tomography during a guided percutaneous procedure. Eligibility: - Individuals at least 18 years of age who are required to have a CT-guided percutaneous procedure. Design: - Participants will be screened with a physical examination and medical history, and the results of any previous imaging studies will be examined before study enrollment. - After a pilot phase, the study will involve two phases to compare the results of the different procedures. The first phase will involve comparing Xperguide to CT, and the second will involve comparing Xperguide to EM tracking. - Phase 1 participants will be assigned to one of two procedure groups: Group 1 will have Xperguide, and Group 2 will have regular CT. Participants who are scheduled to have repeated procedures (like a biopsy before and after chemotherapy) will be randomized for the first procedure and the second procedure will be done using the other method. - Phase 2 participants will be assigned to one of two procedure groups: Group 1 will have Xperguide, and Group 2 will have EM tracking. Participants who are scheduled to have repeated procedures (like a biopsy before and after chemotherapy) will be randomized for the first procedure and the second procedure will be done using the other method. - Standard post-procedure followup care will be given after the study procedure is completed.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether CG5503 (tapentadol) is effective and safe in the treatment of chronic tumor related pain compared to placebo.