View clinical trials related to Neoplasm Metastasis.
Filter by:Epidemiological, prospective and multicenter study to evaluate the utility of the BOMET-QoL questionnaire in patients with breast cancer (BC) and bone metastases (BM).
The combination of FDG-PET/CT and MRI at staging of rectal cancer in diagnosis is currently very little studied. The investigator have a unique opportunity to study this. Hypothetically, with PET/MR as one hybrid imaging method, alternatively as an additional method, it could increase the accuracy of rectal cancer of moderate and high risk type, especially at primary N-staging, but also in assessing other important prognostic factors such as T-staging, peritoneal involvement, metastasis to lateral lymph nodes, EMVI and MRF involvement. The same reasoning applies to the assessment of tumor regression after CRT. In the study, PET/MR is compared with PET/CT, diagnostic CT and MRI to evaluate the additional value of the hybrid imaging PET/MRI. The investigator also plan to evaluate how immunological, proliferative and prognostic biomarkers in blood and tumor tissue correlate with the radiological findings, and if the combination biomarker and radiology can provide additional prognostic information.
This phase II trials studies how well pembrolizumab and vactosertib work after standard of care chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer that has spread to the liver that can be removed by surgery (resectable hepatic metastases). Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as pembrolizumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Vactosertib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Giving pembrolizumab and vactosertib after standard of care chemotherapy, but before liver metastases surgery, may help shrink the cancer prior to surgery. This study also investigates pembrolizumab and vactosertib after liver metastases surgery, decrease the risk of the cancer recurring (coming back).
In this prospective randomized controlled single-center trial, based on a non-inferiority design, the outcome of the treatment of patients are analyzed, whereas in half of the cases the wounds are left open and the other ones are primary wound closed after local debridement after Fixator-Extern is removed. Although this topic embodies a daily business, there is no standard to be found in literature regarding the treatment of pin sites with closure by either primary or secondary intent.
The hypothesis is that liver venous deprivation (LVD) could strongly improve hypertrophy of the future remnant liver (FRL) at 3 weeks, as compared to portal vein embolization (PVE) in patient with liver metastases from colo-rectal origin considered as resectable.
This is a multicenter, open label, Phase 1 dose escalation study of TJ004309 in combination with standard dose atezolizumab in patients with advanced or metastatic cancer in patients who are refractory to or intolerant to all available therapy.
This is a phase III randomized-controlled, single-blind study comparing the standard schedule for antalgic radiotherapy of a single fraction of 8.0 Gy delivered through three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) to a single fraction of 20.0 Gy delivered through stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The primary aim of this trial is to double the complete response rate. Secondary aims are to compare general response rates, duration of pain response, acute and late toxicity, HRQoL through patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), pain flare, and re-irradiation need.
secondary spontaneous pneumothorax patients will be enrolled ,all of them will receive PRP with different doses and schedules
This will be a multi-center, open-label, single-arm, prospective study, in which up to 18 adult patients requiring radiotherapy for metastatic disease or for an inoperable primary tumor with no definitive curative treatment option, will undergo a combination treatment of intravenously (IV) delivered PROMITIL and standard of care radiotherapy. The treatment regimen will involve administration of two PROMITIL doses, delivered at a 21-day interval, and a course of EBR (type of RT according to investigator's preference), initiated 1-3 days after the first PROMITIL dose and completed within a 2-week period. EBR will consist of no more than 10 fractions delivered within 2 weeks as conventionally fractionated RT, or SBRT. Treatment safety will be assessed on a weekly basis throughout the two 21-day treatment courses (42 days) and throughout the follow-up period (up to Day 127). AEs will only be logged until 6 weeks after the last PROMITIL dose (up until Day 64). Disease status will be reevaluated between days 43-50 of the study, and every 6 weeks thereafter (Days 85 and 127±7 days). In addition, following completion of the treatment schedule, all patients will be followed up by phone every 12 weeks, until either death, disease progression (PD), withdrawn consent or trial cut-off date, i.e., for up to 2 years after patient accrual to study, (whichever occurs first). The following anticancer agents will NOT be allowed during the screening period, 6-week treatment period and until first disease reevaluation: cytotoxic agents, non-cytotoxic myelosuppressive agents (CDK 4/6 inibitiors, PARP inhibitors, m-TORS inhibitors and tyrosine kinase-inhibitors). Treatment with hormonal agents, monoclonal antibodies (anti-EGFr, anti-Her2, anti-VEGF and VEGFr, anti-PD1, anti-PDL1) and bisphosphonates can be continued during the study.
Nationally, the opioid crisis has become a major epidemic with increasing mortality rates each year. Orthopedic surgeons routinely prescribe narcotics instead of NSAIDs for post-op pain control because of risk of delayed healing and nonunion due to NSAID use. Orthopedic oncology, however, has a unique subset of patients that undergo prophylactic placement of intramedullary femoral nails. Because no fracture is present, these patients do not rely on inflammatory healing factors, allowing for post-op NSAID use. This study sets out to determine the effect of post-op toradol use in addition to opioids compared to solely opioids in patients undergoing prophylactic nailing of the femur.