Myocardial Ischemia Clinical Trial
Official title:
Prospective Randomized Study of Unprotected Left Main Stenting Versus Bypass Surgery
Unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) stenting, offering restoration of a native flow to left coronary artery, is the subject of intense investigations as a potential alternative to bypass surgery. The purpose of the study is to compare the short and long term results of unprotected left main stenting with coronary artery bypass surgery.
The natural history and the results of pharmacological treatment in patients with severe
narrowing of left main coronary artery show very poor prognosis (5 year survival less than
50%).
There is general agreement that surgical treatment improves 5 year survival in patients with
left main coronary artery obstruction 3, however long term survival rate (15 year follow-up)
is low in both groups (37% and 27% respectively in surgical and medical group). Median
survival was longer in surgical group in general population (13.3 vs 6.6 years) , but there
was no significant difference in patients with normal LV ejection fraction (14.7 vs 15
years).
With the advent of coronary stenting encouraging results were reported by several authors.
There was high success rate 98-100% for elective procedures and in these series the
mortality (for protected and non-protected left main) ranged from 0 to 3.4 %, and 6 month
event free survival rate was 70-80%. Restenosis rate in stented LM varied from 10-22% for
proximal LM to 40% for distal LM. Final minimal luminal area >=7mm2 post procedure, assessed
by IVUS, predicted low restenosis rate of 7%, while the area below <7mm2 was connected with
restenosis of 50%. Our and other experience showed that left main in-stent restenosis can be
treated successfully with another percutaneous intervention (including endarterectomy and
balloon angioplasty) as well as by surgical revascularization.
Six and 12-month survival rate depended on the LV function. Patients with LVEF>40% had
in-hospital event free survival of 98% and 9-month event free survival of 86%, whereas
patients with LVEF <40% had in-hospital and 9 month event-free survival of 67 and 22%
respectively. Additionally, in patients presented with acute myocardial infarction or
bail-out procedures, early and late results of LM stenting were not as good as for elective
cases.
Our previously presented promising results of left main stenting is mainly related to proper
technique of LM stenting (short inflations within LM, careful guiding catheter manipulation,
stent selection), as well as very cautiously designed follow-up (every month visit for first
six month, routine coronary angiography within 3-6 months after procedure). This initial
experience gives us the backgrounds for a larger prospective randomized trial comparing
elective surgical revascularisation and percutaneous intervention in patients with LM
coronary artery disease. It is our impression that design and the delivery system of the new
generation stent is uniquely suited to safely treat this difficult subset of patients. At
the present time we would limit the study to the discrete lesions in proximal (ostial and
mid) left main with reference luminal diameter >=3 mm. Based on published results of
stenting under IVUS examination for such a lesion we estimate the restenosis rate to be well
below 10%. As we expect, the survival and complication rate within one year in both group
will be similar. Therefore our main concern is weather both treatment strategies will offer
the same prevention of LV function, as well as improvement of functional capacity and
coronary reserve in both groups in a period of 2-3 years.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06032572 -
Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the VRS100 System in PCI (ESSENCE)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05846893 -
Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Drug-Eluting Stent for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Large Coronary Artery Disease
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04153006 -
Comparison of Fingerstick Versus Venous Sample for Troponin I.
|
||
Completed |
NCT01205776 -
EXCEL Clinical Trial
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04555174 -
BIOFLOW-VIII All-comers Orsiro Mission Safety and Performance Registry
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04582877 -
Pressure Guidewire System Multi-center, Prospective, Self-Control, Clinical Trial
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04390672 -
Multivessel TALENT
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03265535 -
Validation of a Single Rest-Stress Imaging Protocol for Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04522583 -
Increased CRP Concentrations in Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department With Troponin Elevation Aids to Rule Out Coronary Ischemia
|
||
Terminated |
NCT02407626 -
Optimization of Cardioprotection in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02554006 -
Predischarge Bundle to Minimize Negative Impact on Quality of Life of Nuisance Bleedings
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02510547 -
Comparison of a CrossBoss First Versus Standard Wire Escalation Strategy for Crossing Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion: the "CrossBoss First" Trial
|
Phase 4 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02189499 -
Feasibility Study of the Amaranth Medical FORTITUDE Bioresorbable Drug-Eluting Coronary Stent
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02264717 -
Dan-NICAD - Danish Study of Non-Invasive Diagnostic Testing in Coronary Artery Disease
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02197065 -
Pilot Study of Atorvastatin for Orthopedic Surgery Patients
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01681381 -
Evaluate Safety And Effectiveness Of The Tivoli® DES and The Firebird2® DES For Treatment Coronary Revascularization
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01679886 -
Comparison of Rubidium PET and SPECT With CZT Crystals for Detection of Myocardial Ischemia in Overweighed Patients and Women
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01892917 -
BIOFLOW-III Hungary Satellite Registry
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01655043 -
Absolute Quantification of Coronary Flow Reserve by Stress Perfusion MRI
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01434043 -
Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac CT Perfusion Compared to PET Imaging
|