View clinical trials related to Musculoskeletal Diseases.
Filter by:This study aims to implement a feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial to support patients with musculoskeletal problems and a co-existing mental condition, which the intervention will be the implementation of a Collaborative Care Model. In England, one in six adults suffers from a mental health condition, such as anxiety or depression. Despite these high numbers, mental health conditions are often unrecognised in physical healthcare settings, including patients with musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions. Patients with both a physical and mental health diagnosis are likely more difficult to treat in comparison to those with just a physical health condition. The Collaborative Care Model offers an alternative way of improving musculoskeletal rehabilitation as it takes into consideration both physical and mental health needs. This model involves physical and mental healthcare professionals working together to better identify and manage people with both conditions. Patients are then further supported by a Case Manager who coordinates access to relevant professionals/services following an assessment of both physical and mental health needs. The investigators propose a feasibility study to assess whether the collaborative care model is beneficial to orthopaedic patients in addressing both physical and mental health needs. Patients over 18 years old, with an MSK condition attending therapy services at the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital with a moderate to severe anxiety or depression score, may be eligible. Following informed consent, they will be randomly allocated to either treatment as usual or the intervention group (the collaborative care model with input from a Case Manager). All participants will participate for 6 months with a follow-up on months 3 and 6.
This study seeks to compare how patients rank perception of anxiety, modesty, dignity and overall satisfaction when patients are provided with either a standard patient gown or a standard patient gown plus a pair of specialized surgical undergarments (COVR Medical) for orthopedic surgical procedures.
The Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic (NSAC) Nudge Study is a naturalistic randomized controlled multicentre trial which aim is to measure the efficacy of nudging clinicians' attention towards patients' motivation for work, barriers for return to work and work environment challenges, on functional recovery as primary outcome, and health outcomes as secondary outcome. Patients will be recruited in five different NSACs across northern Norway. In total 1100 patients will be randomized to two equal probability treatment arms: 1) NSAC with the nudge, and 2) NSAC without the nudge. The nudge is tailored to the individual patient's needs using survey, and the clinicians are presented with a summary of this patient survey prior to consultations highlighting health problems and challenges as reported by the patient in the survey.
The aim of the study is the measurement and comparison of two manual therapy techniques, the Mulligan´s mobilization with movement technique, and de placebo technique, both applicated in patients with subacute neck pain.
Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSD) among sonographers/radiographers are prevalent in the healthcare industry. This pilot study will evaluate the use of a robotic assisted ultrasonography system (ROBUST) against the conventional abdominal ultrasound scanning procedure. The ROBUST will be developed to provide 6 degrees of freedom to allow radiographers to perform abdominal scanning without having to reach over patients. 10 sonographers with at least 5 years of experience will be recruited from SGH and SKH, to perform abdominal ultrasound scans on healthy volunteers. Each sonographer will be randomly assigned to scan a volunteer using conventional abdominal ultrasound scanning procedure and with ROBUST respectively. The study will be done in 2 phases, separated by at least a 1-month interval between scans. Phase 1: Scanning of volunteer using conventional abdominal ultrasound scanning procedure. Phase 2: Scanning of volunteer using ROBUST. Outcome measures will include ultrasound image quality, sonographer feedback and comfort level as well as satisfaction feedback from healthy volunteers. A panel of 4 reviewers, consisting of 2 radiologists and 2 senior radiographers will be invited to grade the images, using a 3-point Likert scale. The duration of each scanning will be recorded. The comfort level reported by sonographers will be assessed using the SGH Comfort Level Survey. In addition, the comfort level of healthy volunteers will also be assessed using a satisfaction questionnaire.
The primary purpose of this study is to conduct a multi-site clinical trial of the Recovery Force Movement and Compressions (RF MAC) System. The study is a randomized comparative study of DVT prophylaxis using either standard IPC (Group 1) or the RF MAC system (Group 2) in 300 patients after TJR surgery at two study sites: Tufts Medical Center (Boston, Massachusetts) and Eskenazi Hospital (Indianapolis, Indiana). This study is funded by a Phase II SBIR awarded to Recovery Force from the National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (R44-HL132624-02).
A unicompartmental (partial) knee replacement (UKR) is the removal of one part of the knee joint (a condyle), that has become damaged due to osteoarthritis, and replacing it with an artificial implant. The placement of these artificial implants and how they are aligned with each other is important because they can impact overall knee function and the long-term survival of the implant. A UKR is a highly effective, recognised procedure for patients with end-stage osteoarthritis affecting one compartment of the knee joint. The functional outcomes following UKA are at a minimum of equivalence to total knee arthroplasty procedures, with some recent literature demonstrating improved functional patient reported outcome scores. There have been significant developments in knee replacement surgery over recent years. In particular, the introduction of robotic surgical systems, such as the NAVIO and CORI systems (Smith+Nephew Plc). These systems are hand-held devices which can support the surgeon with the knee replacement procedure, the systems are image-free and do not require the patient to undergo any scans (such as CT scans). Comparisons of robotic systems to conventional instruments have demonstrated that robotic platforms produce fewer positioning errors in total knee replacement. This can result in more precise knee alignment and better outcomes following surgery. With both the NAVIO and CORI Surgical Systems there is a reduction in radiation exposure due to them being image-free. At present, there is some evidence available for the long-term outcomes of knee replacement implanted using robotic assistance (i.e. 2-10 years) however this study is designed to look at the early outcomes following UKR. There is no literature to date to show that robotic-assisted UKR is superior to conventional methods, within the early post-operative period (up to 12 months). This study is designed to show that the NAVIO/CORI surgical systems are better than conventional methods for UKR. The hypothesis is that they will be cost-effective, will reduce the time a patient spends in hospital following their surgery, will improve patient satisfaction during the early recovery period and will improve the patient's early post-operative mobility and function.
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) forms will be administered remotely to consecutive Orthopaedic patients presenting for new physician clinic visits. These patients will be sent either reminder e-mails, reminder digital patient portal ("MyChart") messages, or no reminder messages at all concerning PROMIS form completion at timepoints prior to their respective clinic visits and PROMIS form completion rates will consequently be assessed. The primary objective of this study is to develop an understanding of whether pre-visit reminder messages influence PROMIS form completion in Orthopaedic patients.
A total knee replacement is the removal of parts of the knee joint, that have become damaged due to osteoarthritis, and replacing these with artificial implants. The placement of these artificial implants and how they are aligned with each other is important because they can impact overall knee function and the long-term survival of the implant. It is reported that up to 34% of all patients following total knee replacement (TKR) have poor outcomes functionally. There have been significant developments in knee replacement surgery over recent years. In particular, the introduction of robotic surgical systems, such as the NAVIO and CORI systems (Smith+Nephew Plc). The NAVIO and CORI Surgical Systems are hand-held devices which can support the surgeon with the knee replacement procedure, the systems are image-free and do not require the patient to undergo any scans (such as CT scans). During the surgery, the surgeon uses the NAVIO/CORI hand-held device to map specific landmarks within the knee joint and determines the desired alignment using associated computer software. The tools to remove the bone and place the implants are controlled by the surgeon with the guidance of the NAVIO/CORI software. Comparisons of robotic systems to conventional instruments have demonstrated that robotic platforms produce fewer positioning errors in total knee replacement. This can result in more precise knee alignment and better outcomes following surgery. With both the NAVIO and CORI Surgical Systems there is a reduction in radiation exposure due to them being image-free. At present, there is some evidence available for the long-term outcomes of total knee replacement implanted using robotic assistance (i.e. 2-10 years) however this study is designed to look at the early outcomes following TKR. There is no literature to date to show that robotic-assisted TKR is superior to conventional methods, within the early post-operative period (up to 12 months). This study is designed to show that the NAVIO/CORI surgical systems are better than conventional methods for TKR. The hypothesis is that they will be cost-effective, will reduce the time a patient spends in hospital following their surgery, will improve patient satisfaction during the early recovery period and will improve the patient's early post-operative mobility and function.
Musculoskeletal ultrasound( MSUS) is highly operator-dependent and proper training is needed to ensure appropriate use and minimize risk of incorrect image interpretation.To acquire skills in MSUS, it is mandatory to assure training in both the cognitive ability to recognize normal and pathological findings within the images and the psychomotor component of the examination. This study will examine the effect of a novel developed e-learning platform "The Ultrasound LearNing plAtform (ULNA)", on pre- and post-course musculoskeletal ultrasound performance of rheumatology residents. Moreover, to examine the resident's satisfaction with the e-learning platform ULNA.