Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Reusable laryngoscope blades, which are the most commonly used devices for airway management, have been reported to be frequently contaminated and a possible source of infection. Although disposable laryngoscope blades are recommended to reduce the risk of infection, there are studies suggesting increased failed intubation attempt rates.

The major cause of anesthesia-related mortality and morbidity is the failure of airway management. The incidence of difficult airway is reported to be 1-4% in normal population while it ranges up to 12-20% in obese patients. Following the introduction of disposable blades and considering the increased rate of failed intubation in obese patients with these devices, the investigators aimed to make a comparison of successful intubation rates of plastic and metallic disposable blades in morbidly obese patients


Clinical Trial Description

Successful airway management is the first and most important step of patient safety in anesthesia practice, and most common reason of morbidity and mortality related to anesthesia is failure to provide optimum airway safety.

Intubation helps the anesthesiologist have complete control over airway by keeping airway open, facilitating control over ventilation, reducing the risk of aspiration and providing safe airway during resuscitation, and laryngoscopes are most commonly used tools for this purpose. Laryngoscope are comprised of a handle and a blade (also contains light source) which are mostly reusable. But these parts are easily contaminated during intubation, creating susceptibility to infection. Some studies report that even handles have a chance of 50% to be contaminated with blood. Insufficiently disinfected blades are also a major source of infection. Laryngoscopes contact with non-intact mucous membranes and blood frequently, thus play an important role in cross contamination. Abramson et al. reported that 1/3 of reusable laryngoscope blades are contaminated with bacteria after multiple uses. Concerns about hygiene and risk of infection (including prion infections) caused many health professionals tend towards use of disposable medical devices. Following their introduction, single use laryngoscope blades have been subject to many studies, and many opinions were discussed in different platforms. In studies in which intubation success rates of metallic reusable, metallic disposable and plastic disposable blades were compared, while some have demonstratedd their success rates to be identical, others concluded that plastic disposable blades were ineffective compared to two other.

Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation may not be easily performed in every case. Airway management and endotracheal intubation are easier in non-obese patients compared to obese patients. Short and relatively immobile neck, narrow interincisor distance, hypertrophic tonsillae, uvula and adenoids in obese patients makes intubation more difficult in these patients. Additionally, loss of muscle tonus causes tongue to obstruct airway and epiglottis to touch posterior wall of pharynx, thus obstructing airway further.

The investigators couldn't find any study conducted on obese patients evaluating success rates for intubation of metallic reusable, metallic disposable and plastic disposable blades in the literature. In this study, they aimed to compare intubation success rates of metallic reusable, metallic disposable and plastic disposable blades in intubation of obese patients. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT04477148
Study type Interventional
Source Turkish Society of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Contact
Status Completed
Phase N/A
Start date June 26, 2014
Completion date June 26, 2015

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03657927 - A Comparison of McGrath MAC Versus C-MAC Videolaryngoscopes in Morbidly Obese Patients N/A
Recruiting NCT04934826 - Comparison of the Absorption of Hydrolyzed or Intact Proteins in Morbid Obese Patients After the Roux Y Gastric Bypass N/A
Completed NCT03181347 - The Microbiology of Bariatric Surgery N/A
Completed NCT03886870 - Obesity, Lifestyle and Work Intervention N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04433338 - The PREBA Study: Effect of Preoperative Weight Loss With a 14-day Low-calorie Diet on Surgical Procedure and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing RYGB Surgery N/A
Completed NCT03553849 - Utilization of Very Low Calorie Diet in Obese General Surgery Patients N/A
Completed NCT05854875 - Diabetes Remission After RYGBP and RYGBP With Fundus Resection N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03203161 - Registry on Obesity Surgery in Adolescents
Not yet recruiting NCT03601273 - Bariatric Embolization Trial for the Obese Nonsurgical Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT02545647 - Banded Versus Non-banded Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass N/A
Recruiting NCT02129296 - Intragastric Balloon, Air Versus Fluid Filled: Randomized Prospective Study Phase 1/Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT01564732 - Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Plicated Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding N/A
Completed NCT02033265 - Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block: Influence of Obesity
Not yet recruiting NCT01652105 - Randomized Trial of Preoperative Diets Before Bariatric Surgery N/A
Completed NCT01963637 - Gastric Volumetry by Gastric Tomodensitometry With Gas N/A
Completed NCT01149512 - Outcomes of the Adjustable Gastric Band in a Publicly Funded Obesity Program N/A
Completed NCT01955993 - Fentanyl Metabolism in Obese Adolescents N/A
Terminated NCT01759550 - Prospective Case-Series of Ligasure Advance Pistol Grip and LigaSure Blunt Tip
Recruiting NCT01685177 - Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass vs Standard Duodenal Switch as a Second Step After Sleeve Gastrectomy in the Super-Morbid Obese Patient N/A
Completed NCT01675713 - Lifestyleintervention for the Treatment of Severe Obesity N/A