View clinical trials related to Metastatic Cancer.
Filter by:A proportion of prostate cancer (PCa) patients develop relapse following curative local treatment. Regional nodal recurrence is an emerging clinical situation since the introduction of new molecular imaging methods in the restaging of recurrent prostate cancer. More specifically, a subgroup of these patients is being diagnosed with a recurrence confined to the regional lymph nodes and limited in number (oligorecurrence) using choline or PSMA PET-CT. As there are no specific treatment recommendations for these type of patients, different treatment approaches are currently used, mostly focusing on local ablative treatments using radiotherapy or surgery. These treatments are coined metastasisdirected therapy (MDT). MDT in combination with or without temporary ADT could delay the subsequent risk of progression, and even cure limited regional nodal recurrences. Consequently, lifelong palliative ADT, with its toxicity and excess in non-cancer mortality might be postponed. The proposed trial randomizes patients with oligorecurrent nodal prostate cancer following primary PCa treatment to either metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) (salvage lymph node dissection, sLND or stereotactic body radiotherapy, SBRT) or MDT plus whole pelvis radiotherapy (WPRT: 45 Gy in 25 fractions).
This study focuses on treatment outcomes of human metastatic cancer which usually fares with dismal (<5%) survival at 5 years following first diagnosis of a metastasis. However, a subgroup of patients with an initial oligometastatic presentation (i.e. 1-5 clinically detectable lesions) have been reported to respond to complete surgical removal of detectable deposits with up to 20% disease-free survival at 10 years. Patients relapsing with a second oligometastatic presentation respond to a second round of ablation with encouraging rates of 5-year disease free survival. Based on patterns of response to therapy and relapse, we propose investigate on the hypothesis that metastatic disease may be limited in extent, slowly growing and amenable to successive eradication of metastatic deposits. For visible tumor ablation, we propose to employ the effective and safe technique of Single Dose Image-Guided Radiotherapy (SDRT) and to optimize its use in conjunction with systemic therapy. Where SDRT at a full ablative dose (24Gy) is deemed unfeasible, hypofractionated SBRT (9Gy x3) will be offered. Response assessment will be via local control, poly-metastasis-free survival and overall survival rates. Preliminary phase I/II studies indicate remarkable benefits from the SDRT/SBRT in patients with limited metastatic disease. The expected outcomes may be significant conceptual and practical changes in the management of selected metastatic settings resulting in long-term periods of disease-free and overall survival in settings presently associated with dismal prognosis.
This study compares the effectiveness of two different approaches to advance care planning among older African Americans and older Whites living in the community. The two approaches are a structured approach with an advance care planning conversation led by a trained person using Respecting Choices (First Steps) and a patient-driven approach which includes a Five Wishes advance care planning form written in plain language. The study will determine which approach is more effective at increasing advance care planning within each racial group and reducing differences between the two groups in advance care planning.
This first-in-human open-label, dose escalation study is designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and PK of MRX-2843 in subjects with relapsed/refractory advanced and/or metastatic solid tumors.
This is the first study to test Sym022 in humans. The primary purpose of this study is to see if Sym022 is safe and tolerable for patients with locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic solid tumor malignancies or lymphomas that are refractory to available therapy or for which no standard therapy is available.
This was the first study to test Sym023 in humans. The primary purpose of this study was to see if Sym023 is safe and tolerable for patients with locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic solid tumor malignancies or lymphomas that are refractory to available therapy or for which no standard therapy is available.
Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) can be considered for patients with so-called "oligometastatic" disease. However, since this is a relatively new technique, information on the optimal scheduling is lacking. Even prospective randomized trials on SABR for oligometastases typically allow different fractionation schedules to be used. This is especially true for non-spine bone and lymph node metastases, where the literature is scarce to non-existent. There is also emerging evidence that SABR can stimulate the immune response, by a variety of mechanisms such as increasing TLR4 expression on dendritic cells, increasing priming of T cells in draining lymph nodes, and increasing tumor cell antigen presentation by dendritic cells. Again, it is not clear which fractionation schedule elicits the most robust immune response. Therefore, it is opportune to compare the most commonly used stereotactic regimens regarding toxicity, efficacy, and immune priming. This trial is a non-randomized prospective phase I trial determining a regimen of choice for patients with non-spine bone and lymph node oligometastases (≤ 3 lesions). The metastatic lesion(s) must be visible on CT and < 5 cm in largest diameter. A total of ninety patients will be consecutively included in three different fractionation regimens. They will be offered stereotactic ablative radiotherapy to all metastatic lesions in 5, 3 or 1 fractions. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), defined as any acute grade 3 or 4 toxicity, will be recorded as the primary endpoint. Overall acute and late toxicity, quality of life, local control, and progression-free survival are secondary endpoints. Liquid biopsies will be collected throughout the course of this trial, i.e. at simulation, after each fraction and at 6 months after the end of the radiotherapy. Translational research will focus on assessment of circulating cytokines and flow cytometry analysis of immune cells.
This is an open-label, single-center, single-arm phase II clinical trial evaluating the combination of pembrolizumab, binimetinib, and bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma who have not responded to prior therapy.
The ENSURE study will comprise two phases. Phase 1: European multicenter survey of surveillance protocols after esophageal cancer surgery ENSURE questionnaire will be circulated to representatives from participating European countries. Phase 2: European multicenter retrospective observational study of the impact of postoperative surveillance protocols on oncologic outcome and HR-QL Phase 2 will constitute a retrospective observational study of patients undergoing treatment with curative intent for esophageal cancer at participating Centers from June 2009 to June 2015.
Immunotherapy for the treatment of several cancer entities steadily increased during the last years. The data from the finalized and ongoing studies show the tremendous impact of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) also for advanced metastatic patients. Especially the ICI with pembrolizumab and nivolumab have an increasing number of first line treatment approvals. However, in particular metastatic patients which receive ICI therapy are often irradiated for immediate palliation of several metastases. Preclinical work revealed that radiotherapy (RT) is capable to modulate the tumor phenotype, its microenvironment in a way that systemic anti-tumor immune responses are induced. However, radiation has also immune suppressive properties as e.g. the expression of immune checkpoint molecules is increased following radiotherapy. So the ICI therapy in combination with the RT has the potential to overcome the immunotolerance of the tumor and the metastases. More and more reports therefore describe a so-called systemic immune-modulating effect of radiotherapy (former and still often named as abscopal effect). However the timely application of ICI and RT is often randomly and depends on the clinical need for the palliative RT. The aim of this trial is therefore to standardize the chronology of RT in combination with ICI, to evaluate the effects of radio-immunotherapy with a stratified and comparable patient cohort. The ST-ICI study is a prospective and observational study not influencing the standard therapeutic scheme and will provide hints how the radio-immune therapy drives systemic anti tumor responses.