View clinical trials related to Mental Disorders.
Filter by:Does Family Centered Treatment (FCT) result in better youth, family, and cost outcomes, as compared to a Level II or Level III out-of-home placement (OHP)? The investigators test the hypotheses that among children/youth authorized to a Level II or Level III out-of-home placement, relative to youth who receive such a placement, those who receive FCT will have: - Better: family functioning and mental/behavioral health outcomes (youth and caregiver). - Lower probability of: being subject of a child protective services report, entering (or re-entering) foster care, being arrested, being retained in grade, being chronically absent (missing >15 days), dropping out of high school, or receiving an out-of-home placement. - Lower cost of care.
Persons with schizophrenia and other serious mental illnesses have a high risk for type 2 diabetes and an increased risk of premature mortality compared to the general population. The goals of the proposed study are to implement a multimodal lifestyle intervention to reduce that risk in these individuals living in residential care facilities, a common housing modality for people with serious mental illnesses. If successful, this intervention will lead to reduction in excess medical comorbidity and mortality in persons with serious mental illnesses.
The aim is to study the impact on patients and health care by an adaption of the Hamilton Family Health Team model of shared care between general practitioners (GPs), mental health services and other primary or specialized services. The study is done at six GP centers with 30 GPs in three boroughs in Oslo, Norway. At each GP center with shared care one clinical psychologist from a CMHC works two and a half day a week and a psychiatrist 1-2 hours a week. They are available for the GPs for discussions, and they give assessment and brief treatment as requested by the GPs. Other primary health and social care and other specialized mental health or substance addiction services are consulted according to needs of the patients. The study is a cluster randomized controlled study of GP patients and their health care in GP centers with shared care (experimental group) compared with usual health care in other GP centers (control group). In each of three boroughs one GP center is randomized to shared care for 18 months while another center continues with usual health care. Register data on patients and services are extracted for 12 months (T0) before implementation of shared care and for 12 months (T1) with shared care after 6 months implementation. The register data on patients and health care are extracted from the GP patient records, mental health and substance abuse services, and NAV (social/welfare services). The cohorts at T0 and T2 include all patients 16-65 years old seen by the GPs. Patient-reported mental health, functional impairment due to health problems, overall quality of life and satisfaction with health services are studied for a sub-sample of the register cohort at both T0 and T1. A qualitative sub-study of experiences with collaboration, the shared care model, implementation of the model, facilitators and barriers is done at the end of the 18 months period of shared care. The informants include patients, GPs and coworkers, and managers and professionals involved with shared care. The study protocol was approved by the regional and national committees on medical and health research, as well as by the data protection officer at health trust. Progress and status are described in Detailed description. Data analysis starts in September 2018.
This study will enroll participants with idiopathic rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD), for the purpose of preparing for a clinical trial of neuroprotective treatments against synucleinopathies.
The main goal is to evaluate the impact of the Primer La Llar housing program for the homeless population on the mental health of the participants. The hypothesis is that the housing program, which follows Housing first model, for the homeless population has a positive impact on the mental health of the participants, compared to the group that does not receive the intervention -treatment as usual group (meaning the "positive impact" a lower score on the symptomatology scales and lower toxic intake in the group receiving the intervention).
There are two aims of this study (a) to examine the effect of Teachers and Parents as Partners on student, parent, and teacher outcomes in middle school and (b) identify barriers and facilitators to implementing Teachers and Parents as Partners in middle school for students with behavior concerns.
Persons traumatized through sex trafficking can demonstrate similar neurobehavioral and executive function (EF) deficits as persons with cortical injuries. In this pilot study, occupation-based activity (OBA) programming was implemented at a residence for females who had been trafficked. The study hypothesis was that OBA would facilitate development of EF skills in these clients, enabling more successful occupational performance. Method: Eight women engaged in OBA sessions over the course of eight months. Session objectives were to maximize independence in daily life skills and to foster EF component skills such as problem-solving, decision-making, cooperation, direction following and appropriate self-expression. Outcome measures used were the Executive Function Performance Test (EFPT), the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) and the Occupational Therapy Task Observation Scale (OTTOS). Results: Gains were seen from baseline to final session in COPM score changes meeting minimally clinical difference, and OTTOS scores showing significant improvement: t(7)= -2.49, p=.04. Preliminary findings suggest that occupation-based programming may facilitate development of EF skills in sex-trafficked women.
Global mental health (MH) and substance use disorders prevention, treatment and research gaps require that efficacious treatments be scaled-up, leveraging existing platforms. In tandem, participation of Ministries ready to apply evidence-inform policies must sustain them over time. PRIDE SSA may generate templates for other low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) by conducting a state of the art scale up study in Mozambique and by establishing a collaborative research network of nascent research "Seed Teams." Such "Seed Teams," trained by the capacity building component, may work across the region to build capacity and conduct implementation research to sustainably scale-up MH services. Scale Up Research (Mozambique) in MH and substance use disorders will evaluate strategies and costs of scaling up an innovative, integrated, sustainable, stepped-care community approach. The scale up study will leverage: (1) Mozambique's task-shifting strategy of training psychiatric technicians (PsyTs) to provide MH care, (2) the WHO-funded epilepsy community care program successfully implemented in 5 Provinces, now primed for scale-up by the Health Ministry. The cost-effective approach redefines work roles without requiring new human resources. Importantly, it comports with the Health Ministry's plan to implement prevention and treatment for all MH conditions, rather than single disorders. The model employs evidence-based practices (EBPs; e.g. Psychopharmacology; Interpersonal Therapy), already in use by PsyTs to: a) establish a sustainable program delivered and supervised by non-MH professionals, overseen by MH specialists; b) provide community screening, care and/or referrals for all MH disorders; and c) use implementation tools to monitor sustainability. This collaborative network will scale-up a cost-effective, sustainable program and inform policy.
Research suggests that imagination is a powerful tool to change images inside our heads (e.g. memories) and make them less upsetting. It is thought that this occurs through changing the meaning attached to the memory (e.g. I am weak), therefore making it less upsetting to remember. Research has also linked some people's experience of psychosis to distressing trauma memories. Despite this, little is known about whether using imagination to change memories is helpful for people with psychosis. This project will look at whether a talking therapy that uses imagination to change trauma memories helps people with psychosis. This project will specifically look at whether this therapy helps; change the meaning linked to memory, make the memory less upsetting and frequent, and increase sense of control over the memory. This project will recruit six to twelve people with psychosis. Participants will be recruited from services within South London and the Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust's Psychosis Clinical Academic Group. Participants will first be interviewed about their posttraumatic stress difficulties, experiences of psychosis, mental health, and wellbeing. In this appointment, participants will also identify a traumatic memory to focus on during the talking therapy. Four questions about the trauma memory will be asked every day for the remainder of the project. Participants will then wait between one to three weeks before they receive three therapy sessions. Comparing participants to themselves for different periods of time makes sure that their memories do not become less upsetting over time, without therapy. After therapy, participants will continue daily measures for two weeks, with an appointment in the middle (i.e. one week post therapy). This appointment will include questions about posttraumatic stress difficulties, wellbeing and satisfaction with therapy. Participation will last between 6-8 weeks. Participants will be reimbursed for their time
Objectives: The objectives of this research proposal are to study the delivery of an evidence-based mental health intervention in the alternate setting of youth employment programs tied to regional economic development and to examine the use of an Interagency Collaborative Team Approach (ICTA) as an implementation scale-up strategy that addresses the human resource shortage and related access to care and capacity challenges in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Specifically, this study aims to examine the incorporation of the evidence-based Youth Readiness Intervention (YRI) into a program that promotes employment among youth through a pilot study and scale-up intervention study in Sierra Leone. Study population: The study population includes youth participants, ages 18-26, with elevated t-scores on assessments of functional impairment and emotional dysregulation, who live in the Kailhun District of Sierra Leone. Pilot study design: A cluster randomized three-arm trial will be employed in the pilot phase in the same districts as the scale-up study. Youth participants (N=180, 18-26 years old, 50% female), stratified by gender, will be randomized into the three study arms. Once youth participants are enrolled into the study, they will be assigned to community level sites based on geographical location. Each of these community level sites will make up one cluster. The clusters will then be randomly assigned into the three study arms so that sixty youth participants will be randomized into the youth entrepreneurship training (EPP) arm, sixty youth participants will be randomized into the YRI+EPP arm, and sixty youth participants will be randomized into the control arm . The pilot study will last approximately 12 weeks and data will be collected at baseline and post-intervention. Further, investigators will survey 120 third-party reporters for a total pilot study sample size of 300 participants. Pilot study primary outcomes: The primary outcomes of the pilot study are to assess implementation science aspects related to a new partnership with the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit's (GIZ), who will fund and deliver the entrepreneurship training. This will include pretesting the measures battery, assessing the logistics of integrating the YRI into the entrepreneurship training, and testing use of the Interagency Collaborative Team Approach to training, supervision, and fidelity monitoring.