Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Recruiting
Administrative data
| NCT number |
NCT06130371 |
| Other study ID # |
340/2023BO2 |
| Secondary ID |
|
| Status |
Recruiting |
| Phase |
|
| First received |
|
| Last updated |
|
| Start date |
January 4, 2024 |
| Est. completion date |
July 2025 |
Study information
| Verified date |
February 2024 |
| Source |
University Hospital Tuebingen |
| Contact |
Elise Bücklein, M.Sc. |
| Phone |
+497071-2982627 |
| Email |
elise.buecklein[@]uni-tuebingen.de |
| Is FDA regulated |
No |
| Health authority |
|
| Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) is a sex-specific depressive disorder where depressive
symptom severity drastically changes in relation to menstrual cycle phase. It is
characterized by late luteal phase symptoms of affective lability, irritability, depressed
mood, and anxiety. A lot remains unclear and further studies are needed in order to improve
the understanding of PMDD and to differentiate it from major depressive disorder (MDD). To
date, and in contrast to MDD, the neural correlates of PMDD have been sparsely and poorly
investigated. The aim of this study is therefore to investigate the neural correlates of PMDD
as compared to MDD and to relate them to stress reactivity. Therefore, three groups of
naturally cycling women will be investigated and compared, namely (1) women with MDD, (2)
women with PMDD, and (3) healthy control women.
Stress and HPA axis activity are assumed to play a crucial role in the development of many
mental disorders, including MDD. How stress reactivity and HPA axis activity are connected to
PMDD still needs to be investigated. Furthermore, the HPA axis can affect or suppress the
activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis, which is involved mainly in the
reproductive, but also the immune system, making it an important candidate for the
investigation of sex-specific differences in stress reactivity.
There are sex-specific differences in stress reactivity, but also in the prevalence of
stress-related diseases. Women are twice as likely to suffer from depression than men and the
first onset of MDD usually peaks during the reproductive years. As to why these differences
exist, a recent theory suggests that ovarian hormone fluctuations function as modulators of
women's susceptibility to stress and that altered reactivity to stressors during different
cycle phases plays a role in the etiology of depressive disorders. This hypothesis extends
the Social Signal Transduction Theory of Depression which first and foremost relates
depression to inflammation. They postulate a critical role of cytokines for understanding the
pathogenesis of depression. Therefore, ovarian hormone fluctuations, but also inflammation in
regard to MDD and PMDD and stress reactivity will be investigated in this study.
Description:
In the proposed study the investigators aim to investigate in more detail how women with MDD
and women with PMDD differ in their stress response from healthy women. The investigators are
directly comparing three groups of 1) women with MDD, 2) women with PMDD and 3) healthy
women. All women will be measured in two different cycle phases to disentangle the effects of
the menstrual cycle on stress reactivity. Furthermore, including inflammatory markers will
help to shed light on the connection between stress, depressive disorders and the immune
system.
The overall aim of this study is to elucidate the influence of stress on inflammation as well
as on brain function in women with MDD in contrast to PMDD. Therefore, the behavioral,
neural, immunological, and endocrine profiles of women with MDD as well as women with PMDD
will be compared to the ones of naturally cycling women. The goal is to delineate the
psychobiological characteristics of reproductive states and mental disorders. The results
will provide the basis to develop more targeted treatments in the framework of precision
medicine.
Open questions:
1. How do women with MDD, women with PMDD, and healthy women differ in their stress
reactivity on a neural level, as measured by fMRI activity?
2. How do women with MDD, women with PMDD, and healthy women differ in their stress
reactivity in their HPA axis response, as measured via cortisol levels?
3. How do women with MDD, women with PMDD, and healthy women differ in their stress
reactivity on an immunological level, as measured by inflammation markers?
The investigators hypothesize that after an acute psychosocial stressor,
1. women with MDD show hypoactivation in the CCN, especially so in the left DLPFC, when
compared to healthy controls. For women with PMDD, this effect might be pronounced only
when tested in the symptomatic, meaning the late luteal menstrual cycle phase.
2. women with MDD have higher cortisol levels than healthy controls but show a blunted
stress response. As there are no studies on cortisol reactivity in women with PMDD, it
is unclear how they will react to stress compared to healthy and MDD women.
3. women with MDD have higher inflammatory markers (such as IL-6 and TNF-alpha) when
compared to healthy controls. For women with PMDD the investigators also expect higher
inflammatory markers than in healthy controls.
This combined neuroimaging and stress study will investigate naturally cycling women with MDD
(n = 25), PMDD (n = 25) and matched healthy control women (n = 25). All participants will be
exposed to the Montreal Imaging Stress Task (MIST), a stress induction task during
neuroimaging using fMRI. In order to disentangle the influence of the menstrual cycle, within
a randomized design, one session will take place during the mid-follicular phase and one
during the late-luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Besides assessing heart rate variability
as a measure of stress, the investigators will obtain cortisol from saliva and hair samples,
as well as steroids (e.g., progesterone, estrogen, and ALLO) and inflammation markers from
blood samples (e.g., adipokines, IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-alpha).
The investigators plan to assess 75 women to compare women with MDD to women with PMDD and
healthy women. In total, the following samples will be recruited:
- Group 1: 25 women with MDD
- Group 2: 25 women with PMDD
- Group 3: 25 healthy women
If subjects qualify for the current study, the investigators will invite them to the
laboratory (T0) where they will give written, informed consent. Subsequently, the
investigators will perform a standardized clinical interview to screen for mental disorders
(SCID-5-CV). Participants will also be informed about the study process and the data
analysis. After the interview, they will receive a password-protected link provided by email
to assess, among others, depressive symptoms, personality traits, gender identity and norms,
sexual health, state and trait anxiety, and verbal intelligence using questionnaires.
Participants will also be asked to report their average cycle length. Participants then will
be divided into two groups, where Group A has their first MRI session in the mid-follicular
phase (before ovulation) and the second MRI session in the late-luteal phase (after
ovulation), and Group B has the first MRI session in the late-luteal phase and the second MRI
session in the mid-follicular phase. MRI sessions will be scheduled according to
self-reported beginning of menses and self-reported average cycle length.
For the PMDD group, PMDD diagnosis has to be confirmed by daily, prospective ratings of
premenstrual symptom severity during two consecutive cycles as this is an official criterion
for the disorder in the DSM-5. For this the smartphone app m-path will be used. They will be
asked daily about their premenstrual symptoms with the Daily Record of Severity of Problems
Questionnaire (DRSP) that takes about 3 minutes per day.
At the beginning and the end of the MRI sessions T1 and T2, a blood draw of 30 ml will be
performed by medically trained personnel. After ensuring that all requirements to take part
in an MRI study are met, the participants will be put into the MRI, and the MIST will be
applied. Throughout the session, saliva samples will be taken six times for the measurement
of salivary cortisol: once at arrival, once before the MIST, 40 minutes after the MIST, 60
minutes after the MIST and 120 minutes after the MIST. Additionally, at both MRI sessions,
hair samples are collected to record the cumulative cortisol secretion of the past three
months (= 3cm hair). At the end of the last measurement day (T2), participants will be
informed about the exact goals of the study and will have to sign a final consent form that
their data can be used after full disclosure of the goals.
Montreal Imaging Stress Task In the Montreal Imaging Stress Task (MIST), a frequently used
performance-based stress paradigm, arithmetic tasks are presented to generate increased
cognitive workload and thus performance demands. The arithmetic tasks must be solved either
without time pressure and social evaluation (control condition) or with time pressure and
social evaluation (stress condition). Before entering the fMRI scanner, arithmetic tasks are
practiced on a computer in an approximately 3-minute training session, in which task
difficulty is determined for the fMRI measurement. In total, the MIST lasts about 20 minutes.
MRI measurements will be performed at the 3T PRISMA scanner located at the Department of
Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen. On each measurement day, all
participants will undergo the MIST, a resting-state scan, an anatomical scan and a diffusion
tensor imaging (DTI) scan. For the resting-state scan (approx. 8 min), a low-TR multi-band
echo-planar-imaging (EPI) sequence will be applied. Participants will be instructed to keep
their eyes open while they are watching the Inscape movie that was specifically designed to
improve imaging at rest. The anatomical scan (approx. 8 min) will be acquired using an MPRAGE
(3-D Magnetization Prepared Rapid Gradient Echo) sequence consisting of 160 sagittal slices.
Lastly, the DTI scan (approx. 8 min) will be performed. All MR parameters will be established
with experts from the radiology department.
Determination of stress markers in saliva and hair. Biological stress markers are regarded as
so-called "objective" stress measures which, in addition to subjective stress parameters,
represent further facets of the multidimensionality of stress. While saliva samples can
represent physiological acute stress reactions or characteristic circadian rhythms, hair
samples represent the retrospective recording of cumulative cortisol secretion over a period
of several months. In the course of the laboratory measurement, the investigators will
repeatedly collect saliva samples in order to trace the stress reaction (i.e., increase in
cortisol). Due to the circadian rhythm, the laboratory measurement takes place between 15.00
and 20.00 in the afternoon only on workdays. Additionally, one hair sample per MRI
measurement is collected by cutting a small strand of hair as close to the scalp as possible
as a marker for chronic stress.
Blood samples for hormones and epigenetics. For measuring, among others, estradiol,
progesterone, allopregnanolone and testosterone, as well as inflammation markers (such as
adipokines, interleukines, and TNF-alpha), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) blood
samples will be taken after the MRI sessions. In addition to the phenotypic characterization,
all participants will provide EDTA-blood samples for epigenetic analyses which will be sent
to the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Research Group Molecular Psychiatry (Head:
Prof. Dr. Vanessa Nieratschker) for storage and analysis. Methylation changes will be studied
in peripheral blood due to the accessibility of the study material in living humans. The
investigation of brain material of living human participants for epigenetic processes is
unrealistic. As a similar differential methylation in peripheral blood as in the brain has
been demonstrated for the candidate genes under investigation in this study, the
investigators consider blood as an adequate surrogate material, reflecting the situation in
the brain. Furthermore, epigenetic factors influence the psychophysiological stress response
and can thus explain interindividual differences found within the current study.
