View clinical trials related to Major Surgery.
Filter by:The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of standard handover with AnesList© between physician anesthesists in operating room, for a complete transmission for a patient, on the occurence of event as death, serious complications or rehospitalization in month of postoperative after major surgery.
The investigator will evaluate the side effects of oliceridine.
Some patients participating in the underlying GUARDIAN trial (NCT04884802) will be additionally randomized to etomidate vs propofol for anesthetic induction.
The aim of the study is to collect information on feasibility and effect size of a confirmatory, prospective study with the question: Does a standardized checklist during intraoperative handover of anaesthesia care reduce the rate of postoperative complications?
In intensive care patients, high intraabdominal pressure is frequently encountered. Intra-abdominal pressure is often measured as high, especially after major abdominal surgery procedures. In recent years, various studies have reported that the increase in optic nerve diameter measured by ultrasound correlates with the level of intracranial pressure. Optic nerve diameter measurement with ultrasound is a non-invasive procedure. Intra-abdominal pressure measurements are also routinely performed in intensive care patients. In the measurement of abdominal pressure, the bladder catheter, which is already available in every patient who comes to intensive care, is used. In this study, the intra-abdominal pressure values present in the file of each patient undergoing major abdominal surgery who were taken to intensive care unit will be taken. Orbital USG will be performed on the 6th, 12th and 24th hours on admission to the intensive care unit to measure the diameter of the optic nerve, and the relationship between the intra-abdominal pressure value and optic nerve diameters will be investigated.
This multicentric, randomised controlled trial is to the investigators knowledge the first implementation of a multimodal, multidisciplinary prehabilitation approach using knowledge from different specialties to lower complications and to increase cost effectiveness after major surgery in elderly, frail patients.
Perioperative depressive symptoms (PDS) are common in population undergoing surgery, and this would be sharpened especially for complicated, high-risk major surgery. However, None of treatments could resolve this clinical problem during limited perioperative period. The remarkable effects of ketamine on treatment resistant depression have been verified by several clinical trials and the enantiomer S-ketamine (esketamine) showed similar antidepressant efficacy with better safety in recent studies. The efficacy and safety of esketamine administrated intra-operatively for PDS will be verified in this study. Other secondary outcomes such as anxiety, postoperative pain and psychiatric symptoms will also be investigated.
With the increasing number of surgical cases, intraoperative handover of anesthesia care is common and inevitable. Verbal handover from one anesthesiologist to another during surgery are being used in many hospitals. However, verbal handover is often an informal, unstructured process during which omissions and errors can occur. It is possible that an improved anesthesia handover may reduce the related adverse events. This study aims to test the hypothesis that use of a well-designed, structured handover-checklist to improve handover quality may decrease the occurrence of postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery.
The main objective of this study is to analyze the impact on three years survival of an enhanced recovery program (PRI) after radical surgery for colorectal cancer. As secondary objectives, we propose to analyze the weight of each of the predefined items in the oncological results as well as the quality of life. We design a multicentric prospective cohort study in people older than 18 years who are going to be operated on for colorectal cancer. 12 hospitals are being selected due to have a PRI implanted according to the RICA pathway published by the Spanish National Health Service. As stated by the literature, the intervention group will be formed for those hospitals with a minimum implementation level of 70% of the PRI and the control group will be the centers that do not reach this level of implementation. Compliance will be studied with 21 key performance indicators and results are analyzed with cancer survival indicators: Overall survival, cancer-specific survival and relapse-free survival). We will also study the time to recurrence, perioperative morbi-mortality, hospital stay and quality of life with the EQ-5D validated questionary. To create comparable treatment and control groups, the Propensity Index method will be used. To study each variable, multivariate regression will be used. Kaplan-Meier will be used for survival and the log-rank test for comparisons. Significance will be considered if p <0.05 (two tails).
The main objective is the multicenter and uniform implementation of a agreed upon perioperative evidence based program emanated from the Enhanced Recovery for abdominal surgery pathway (RICA) published by the Spanish National Health Service and the Aragon Institute of Health, in hospitals of the National Health Network. The evaluation and outcomes of such implementation is proposed as a secondary objective. Different established indicator will compared traditional care results with those from the new program in the short and medium term. 10 interested hospital centers are selected. In each of them a retrospective study will be conducted to analyze the clinical results obtained in abdominal surgery in the past six months. After making the necessary training to clinical teams and assure the project development and implementation in each center, a prospective study in which all patients in the program are being recruited will be held. Hospital stay as well as perioperative mortality and morbidity will be collected. We will analyze data from: days of hospital stay (potential and actual), efficiency (cost/procedure), quality of care, time to complete reintegration into family, social and labor environment and quality of life.