Clinical Trials Logo

Major Depression clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Major Depression.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT02891564 Completed - Major Depression Clinical Trials

ESTIA: Computerized Intervention Targeting Cognitive Control Deficits in Depressed Adults

Start date: January 2, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Project:EVO is a video-game based intervention that targets neural networks associated with cognitive control. The same networks have been implicated in poor treatment response in middle and older aged adults suffering from major depression. Related work has demonstrated that healthy older adults show significant improvement in cognitive control. In a very small sample of older adults suffering from depression (n=12), we found similar improvements in selective attention and working memory after 4 weeks of intervention, along with improvements in mood comparable to participants receiving an evidence-based psychotherapy. The intent of this proposal is to first determine if at least 2/3 of participants who use Project:EVO for four weeks demonstrate significant improvements in the function of these neural networks, and if improvements are observed, to conduct a second study to see if changes in neural network functions are associated with changes in mood. If we show that Project:EVO improves neural function and mood to a greater degree than a placebo cognitive training game, we will be in a position to move onto the next phase of study, which is to demonstrate the intervention's efficacy in a much larger sample of adults with depression.

NCT ID: NCT02872454 Completed - Major Depression Clinical Trials

Psychotherapeutic Text Messaging for Depression Pilot Study

TEXT4U
Start date: April 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Major depression is the leading cause of disability in the United States and is a major contributor to suicide, a leading cause of premature death. The majority of individuals with depression do not receive adequate pharmacologic or psychotherapeutic treatment due to difficulty accessing services or stopping treatment due to side effects, non-response, or the stigma associated with attending mental health clinic visits. Mobile health information technology services, such as text messaging, have the potential to provide effective self-management support for depression to nearly every adult in the US with depression. Guided self-help via text messaging has been shown to be effective for improving a range of health behaviors as well as symptoms of depression. However, previously studied depression text messaging services have not utilized the breadth of psychotherapeutic techniques shown to be effective for depression nor have they attempted to tailor the psychotherapeutic content to the individual in order to improve acceptability and outcomes. Advanced artificial intelligence methods (e.g., reinforcement learning) offers the capability to weed out ineffective messages and to target messages to individuals in order to substantially improve program effectiveness. This pilot study is the first step in towards developing an artificially intelligent text message service for depression. The specific aims of the study are to: 1) demonstrate the feasibility of recruiting and enrolling participants from the general population of US adults and delivering a text-messaging intervention for depression, 2) determine whether there are differences in the perceived helpfulness of messages derived from different psychotherapeutic treatment modalities, and whether these differences are moderated by participant characteristics (e.g., age, gender, depression symptom severity), 3) determine whether messages derived from different psychotherapeutic treatment modalities or their perceived helpfulness are associated with changes in depression symptoms, and whether these relationships are moderated by participant characteristics.

NCT ID: NCT02855918 Completed - Major Depression Clinical Trials

Blood Biomarkers in Suicidal Behaviour

2BSB
Start date: September 23, 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Suicidal behavior (SB) is a major public health problem in France, with more than 10,000 suicides and 220,000 suicide attempts per year. According to the commonly accepted model for understanding suicidal behavior, individuals who carry a suicidal act when subjected to stress factors (environmental stress, depression, substance ...) are those which have a specific vulnerability. These vulnerabilities can be considered as clinical parameters (propensity to despair, aggressive and/or impulsive traits), neurobiological parameters (dysfunction of the serotonergic system, ...) and cognitive parameters (taking disadvantageous decision ...). Suicidal vulnerability is partly underpinned by genetic factors. The interest of current researches is to identify biomarkers that will improve the opportunities for early identification of subject with a risk for SB. Numerous scientific studies, including post-mortem studies of the brains of suicide completers, have established a link between dysregulation of the ribonucleic acids editing (RNA) of certain genes, the enzymatic activity of Adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADARS) responsible for this edition and suicidal behavior. A prospective study is needed to quantify and qualify in the blood of depressed patients (with or without a history of suicide) and healthy controls, the editing changes and the expression and alteration of the activity of ADARS.

NCT ID: NCT02658682 Completed - Major Depression Clinical Trials

Secondary Prevention of Depression Applying an Experimental Attentional Bias Modification Procedure

Start date: January 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Depression (Major Depressive Disorder; MDD) has been dubbed "the common cold among the mental illnesses" and it is also a highly recurrent disorder. Secondary prevention has been identified as a key goal in the long-term management of depression. High recurrence rate suggests that there are specific vulnerability factors that increase people's risk for developing repeated episodes of the disorder. Preventive strategies should identify and ameliorate these factors to reduce the individual's risk of subsequent episodes. Biased attention for emotional stimuli is central to the cognitive model where increased sensitivity to negative cues is believed to fuel the negative thoughts and feelings in depression and play a key role in maintaining the illness. Selective biases in attention can be modified by a simple computerized technique; The Attention Bias Modification Task (ABM). This project aims to investigate whether ABM can reduce surrogate and clinical markers of relapse in a large group highly vulnerable to depressive episodes. The effects of ABM, immediately after the two weeks intervention, on three key risk factors for depression will be studied: Residual symptoms, cortisol awakening response and emotion regulation strategies. The participants will be followed up after 1 month, 6 months and 12 months. The hypothesis that ABM will reduce subsequent episodes of low mood over the following 12 months in this group in a manner predicted by early changes in these risk factors will be investigated. It will also be tested if such effects in the lab may be dependent on candidate genes which affect serotonin reuptake and which have been implicated in malleability and emotional learning. Effects on underlying neural correlates of emotion regulation will be studied in an fMRI experiment in a sub-sample and which will also be stratified by serotonin transporter genotype (see also NCT02931487). The predictive value of meta cognitions related to rumination and the possible mediating effects of automatic thoughts and perceived stress will also be investigated in a sub group (see also NCT02648165). The characterization of the cognitive, genetic and neural mechanisms underlying the ABM effect will have key implications for future treatment development and combination with other treatment modalities like pharmacotherapy.

NCT ID: NCT02648165 Completed - Major Depression Clinical Trials

Secondary Prevention of Depression Through Group-based ACT-Therapy Preceded by an Experimental ABM-Procedure

Start date: April 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Depression (major depressive disorder; MDD) is a very common mental disorder. Research suggests that individuals with prior depressive episodes have a risk of the relapse or recurrence of MDD. Secondary prevention has been identified as a key goal in the long-term management of the disease. The current project aims to investigate whether group based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) can reduce surrogate and clinical markers of relapse in a group highly vulnerable to depressive episodes. The group intervention will consist of eight sessions, and each group will consist of maximum 12 persons. The project also studies whether Attention Bias Modification (ABM) preceding the ACT intervention will enhance the effect. ABM will be administered over a fourteen days period prior to the ACT-intervention. Effect will be measured over a period of 12 months. The primary outcome is changes in depressive symptoms. ACT-specific secondary outcome measures are also included. Subjects with a history of major depression (n=200), currently in remission, will be recruited from Sørlandet Hospital (100 participants). Matched participants (100 participants) will be recruited at the University of Oslo. In the first phase, participants from Sørlandet hospital will be randomized to ABM treatment or control condition. In the second phase all participants from Sørlandet hospital will receive group based ACT treatment. Group based ACT and ABM represent interventions that are time and cost effective, and that could be made available to large number of individuals struggling with MDD.

NCT ID: NCT02633449 Completed - Major Depression Clinical Trials

Psychotherapy Plus: Combining Cognitive Behavioral Therapy With tDCS

Start date: February 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The study will investigate whether cognitive behavioral psychotherapy (CBT) combined with prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is more efficacious with regard to symptom reduction in depressed patients than CBT combined with sham-tDCS or CBT alone.

NCT ID: NCT02594696 Completed - Breast Cancer Clinical Trials

Proactive Psychiatry Consultation for Patients With Cancer and Severe Mental Illness

Start date: November 9, 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Individuals with severe mental illness (SMI) including schizophrenia and bipolar disorder are dying younger than the general population; cancer is a leading cause of death in this population. People with SMI have higher rates of dying from breast, lung, and colon cancer, and disparities in treatment appear to be one contributing factor. Individuals with SMI may be diagnosed with more advanced stage cancer and less likely to receive stage-appropriate cancer treatment. Although collaborative care models integrating medical and psychiatric care have shown promise in other populations, the challenge of treating SMI and cancer is distinct and relatively understudied. Patients may have uncontrolled psychiatric symptoms that can impact their understanding of their diagnosis and treatment decisions. Oncologists have less training and inadequate time to address multiple unmet needs. Mental health care is frequently fragmented from cancer care. The investigators want to understand if it is helpful for patients with SMI to be connected to a psychiatrist and case manager when cancer is diagnosed. Optimizing psychiatric symptoms and facilitating communication between the patient, the oncology team, and mental health providers may improve care. The goal is to pilot a pragmatic intervention for patients with cancer and SMI that can be integrated into cancer care, is acceptable to patients and oncology clinicians, and may promote the delivery of stage-appropriate cancer treatment to an underserved population. Patients will be connected to a psychiatrist and case manager at cancer diagnosis who will follow the patient and communicate with the oncology team during the 12 week intervention. All participants will complete brief surveys at baseline, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks. Oncology clinicians will provide feedback about the intervention at 12 weeks. Cancer treatment received and healthcare utilization will be assessed at 6 months post-intervention.

NCT ID: NCT02520271 Completed - Anxiety Disorders Clinical Trials

Ostrobothnia Depression Study (ODS). A Naturalistic Follow-up Study on Depression and Related Substance Use Disorders

ODS
Start date: October 2009
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Ostrobothnia Depression Study (ODS) was conducted in the South Ostrobothnia hospital district of Finland during 2009-2014. ODS is a naturalistic, open label, non-randomized follow-up study on depression and related substance use disorders (SUD). The study focuses on several aspects concerning the relation of depression and SUDs, the efficacy of selected assessment and treatment protocols, characteristics and genetics of the participants and the use of related biomarkers in clinical practice. The misused substance in focus is alcohol. In this study, dual diagnosis (DD) is defined as the simultaneous presence of clinically diagnosed major depressive disorder (MDD) and alcohol use disorder (AUD). The study was approved by the local ethics committee. Written informed consent was collected from all participants.

NCT ID: NCT02520024 Completed - Schizophrenia Clinical Trials

Assessing the Impact of Self-directed Care, Within a Medicaid-funded Environment,on Participation and Community Living

Start date: January 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This project proposed to demonstrate the effectiveness, costs, and benefits to participation and community living self-directed care programming within a financially sustainable Medicaid managed care environment. The study examined outcomes associated with the implementation of a novel self-directed care (SDC) approach being implemented in Delaware County, Pennsylvania in which consumers were able to access a set amount of renewable funds per year and direct how they were spent, both to purchase the types and amounts of rehabilitation and treatment services they desire (and from whom they choose) and to purchase a broad-range of individualized resources and services that are generally outside of Medicaid funding (e.g., health club memberships, yoga classes, support in taking care of bills).

NCT ID: NCT02507349 Completed - Schizophrenia Clinical Trials

Person-Centered Versus Measurement-Based Care in Mental Health

PCORI-SDM
Start date: August 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Fifteen minutes is the typical length of an outpatient medication management appointment for people with serious mental health conditions. These brief interactions with prescribers are frequently provider-driven with insufficient time focused on the patient's needs and personal recovery. Shared decision making is a strategy that could improve this interaction. This study examines how technology can be used in the care process to amplify the voice of the patient, support shared decisions, and improve treatment outcomes. Investigators will compare the effectiveness of Measurement-Based vs. Person-Centered Care on two primary patient-centered outcomes: the patient experience of care with medication treatment and the level of shared decision making. Investigators hypothesize that: 1. Person-Centered Care will result in greater improvement in patient experience of care with medication treatment than Measurement-Based Care. 2. Person-Centered Care will result in a greater level of shared decision making during the medication visit than Measurement-Based Care. The study team will collect information from patients, caregivers, and clinic staff at different points in time during the study. Patients will be asked to complete questionnaires, and additional data on their service use will be gathered. Some patients and providers will also be interviewed about their experiences with care. Investigators are especially interested to learn if and how these two approaches are perceived to change medication treatment, if patients are more satisfied and empowered in their care, and why and how providers perceive and adopt changes to their clinical care.