View clinical trials related to Lidocaine.
Filter by:The goal of this clinical trial is to to evaluate the efficacy of lidocaine sprayed at the laryngeal inlet combined with the endotracheal tube cuff compare with intravenous lidocaine on the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation in patients undergoing elective neurological procedures during general anesthesia with total intravenous technique. The main question it aims to answer is: - Does topical lidocaine sprayed at the laryngeal inlet combined with the endotracheal tube cuff have more effect on stabilizing hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation than intravenous lidocaine, in neurosurgical patients who undergo general anesthesia with total intravenous technique? Participants will be recruited and randomized to receive either lidocaine spray (Group SL) or intravenous lidocaine (group IL) to blunt hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the effects on postoperative analgesia of continuous lidocaine infusion via closed chest drainage tube for patients undergoing thoracoscopic partial lung resection. The main questions it aims to answer are: - To explore whether continuous lidocaine pumping via closed chest drainage tube has good analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects for patients undergoing partial thoracoscopic pneumonectomy. - Whether the multimodal analgesia combined with continuous lidocaine pump can reduce the postoperative application of opioids, reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications, and promote the recovery of postoperative lung function and accelerate recovery. For participants who undergoing the thoracoscopic partial lung resection with postoperative indwelling drainage tube, the epidural tube fixed in the drainage tube is connected to the completed infusion pump (marking the chest drain for analgesia). The comparison group only accept the intravenous analgesia after surgery.
1.Written informed consent must be obtained before any study specific procedures are undertaken.Qualified participants were identified at the pre-anesthesia evaluation clinic or ward. 2.80 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of I-II in our medical center scheduled to undergo elective surgery for hypertrophy of labia minor with MAC. Patients were randomized 1:1 into the Group 1 (normal saline) or Group 2 (lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg/hr, ideal body weight) by using a table of random, computer-generated digits in sealed and numbered envelopes by an anesthesiologist. All surgical procedure was performed by the same surgeon and the anesthetic data was recorded by a nurse anesthetist. All patients were fasted overnight before the procedure, and no medications were allowed before induction of anesthesia. Standard monitoring, such as non-invasive arterial blood pressure, electrocardiography (lead II), pulse oximetry, end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure (EtCO2) was applied for each patient. Participants were pre-oxygenated and adequately maintained with 100% oxygen at 3 L/min via a nasal cannula during the entire procedure. During anesthesia induction, all patients received intravenous fentanyl 0.5-1 mcg/kg, continuous infusion of propofol with target-controlled infusion (TCI; Fresenius Orchestra Primea; Fresenius Kabi AG, Bad Homburg, Germany) with the Ce of 4.0 mcg/mL and parecoxib. In addition, continuous infusion of equal volume normal saline and lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg/hr (ideal body weight) in group I and 2, respectively. In all patients, maintenance of the Ce of propofol was adjusted upward or downward by 0.5 mcg/mL to keep patient adequate sedation with acceptable pain (remaining moveless). If upward 2 times of propofol and the patient still move which affect the surgical procedure, fentanyl 0.5 mcg/kg was prescribed, and mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) within baseline levels. As soon as the last suture, the propofol and lidocaine were discontinued. After the procedure, all patients were sent to the PACU for further care under clear consciousness.
Study Summary Title Pharmacokinetic profile of lidocaine given as a weight-based infusion for postoperative surgical pain control Short Title Pharmacokinetic profile of lidocaine given as a weight-based infusion for postoperative surgical pain control Methodology Pharmacokinetic study of lidocaine in the surgical population Study Duration 1 year Study Center(s) University of Alberta Hospital Objectives The primary objective will be to map serum lidocaine levels over time in a diverse surgical patient population receiving a weight-based lidocaine infusion. Number of Subjects 40 Diagnosis and Main Inclusion Criteria ASA class 1-3 Age 18-40 or >75 Scheduled for elective major ENT flap, urology or general surgery. Study Product, Dose, Route, Regimen Lidocaine IV infusion - 1.5mg/kg bolus, then - 1mg/kg/h IV intraoperatively, then - 0.5-2 mg/kg/hr IV for 48 h, depending on clinical response
Spinal surgery often involves multiple segments. The trauma of surgery is large, the duration of postoperative pain is long, and the pain is severe. Therefore, the use of opioids in perioperative period is large. Although the application of * large amounts of opioids can effectively inhibit pain, it will delay the recovery of urine retention, sedation, respiratory depression and gastrointestinal function. The delayed recovery of gastrointestinal function will increase the postoperative complications, and then increase the length of hospital stay and the cost of patients. Therefore, reducing the dosage of opioids to promote the recovery of gastrointestinal function has become the research direction. Intravenous lidocaine has been proved to be effective in reducing the dosage of opioids during the perioperative period of gastrointestinal surgery and promoting the recovery of postoperative gastrointestinal function. However, there are few studies on the application of lidocaine during the perioperative period of spinal surgery, especially the impact on postoperative gastrointestinal function. In this study, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled study was conducted to explore the effect of perioperative lidocaine on the recovery of gastrointestinal function after adult lumbar surgery. We hypothesized that lidocaine could shorten the recovery time of gastrointestinal function after lumbar surgery
Cough suppression during emergence and tracheal extubation from general anaesthesia has become an important issue as part of patient safety. Cough arised from the mechanical irritation of endotracheal tube and cuff could be accompanied by various adverse effects such as laryngospasm, hypertension, tachycardia, arrhythmia and increase of intracranial, intraocular, or intra-abdominal pressure. Several cough-preventing strategies have been proposed for smooth emergence, such as opioids, dexmedetomidine or lidocaine. Maintenance of remifentanil infusion during emergence has been reported to be an effective method in reducing cough and cardiovascular change without delay of recovery. In previous studies, the effetive effect-site concentraions for 95% of adults (EC95) for preventing cough are a little different depending on anaestheic agent, type of surgery and sex, ranged from 2.14 to 2.94 ng/ml. However, since most of these studies are for sing lumen endotracheal tube, similar preventing effect would not be expected for double lumen tube (DLT) because of its large diameter and long length. Another problem is higher concentration of remifentanil more than 2.5 ng/ml could not guarantee the safety after extubation. The efficacy of a single IV bolus of lidocaine for the prevention of cough has been the subject of numerous trials. Therefore, combined use of lidocaine and remifentanil could effectively prevent emergence cough for DLT without the risk of high concentration of remifentanil.