View clinical trials related to Kidney Diseases.
Filter by:This is an open-label, parallel-group study to compare the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of IDN-6556 following a single 50 mg oral dose of IDN-6556 in subjects with severe renal impairment and matched healthy volunteers with normal renal function.
Vegetarian diets have been associated with a reduced risk of preventable diseases such as type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. These effects may be mediated through direct or indirect pathways. Although the high intakes of nuts, legumes, dietary fibre, whole grains, and unsaturated plant oils have each individually been associated with lower risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, so too has the displacement of red meats, processed meats, and saturated animal fats. One of the most important considerations in moving from animal-based diets to more plant-based diets is the replacement of animal proteins (e.g. meat, fish, dairy, eggs) with vegetable proteins (e.g. legumes, nuts, and seeds). It is unclear whether this particular replacement alone results in advantages for metabolic and cardiovascular health. To improve evidence-based guidance for dietary guidelines and health claims development, we propose to conduct a series of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the effect of plant-based protein in exchange for animal protein on blood lipids, glycemic control, blood pressure, body weight, uric acid, markers of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and kidney function and injury. The systematic review process allows the combining of the results from many small studies in order to arrive at a pooled estimate, similar to a weighted average, of the true effect. The investigators will be able to explore whether the effects of replacing animal-based protein for plant-based protein hold true across different sexes, age groups, and background disease states and whether the effect depends on the protein source, dose, or background diet. The findings of this proposed knowledge synthesis will help improve the health of Canadians through informing recommendations for the general public, as well as those at risk of heart disease and diabetes.
The purpose of this research study is to determine if the study drug H.C. Acthar gel slows the progression of your kidney disease. This drug is a steroid-based medicine with fewer side effects than other steroids used for treatment of kidney diseases similar to APOL1 nephropathy.
This study will evaluate the safety of LY2928057 and how LY2928057 affects hemoglobin in hemodialysis participants. This study will involve multiple doses of LY2928057 given during a 6 week period either after a participant discontinues or reduces treatment to stimulate red blood cells. This study will last up to 26 weeks for each participant.
The purpose of the ISCHEMIA-CKD trial is to determine the best management strategy for patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD), at least moderate inducible ischemia and advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD; estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <30 ml/min/1.73 m² or on dialysis). This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 777 randomized participants with advanced CKD. Participants were assigned at random to a routine invasive strategy (INV) with cardiac catheterization (cath) followed by revascularization (if suitable) plus optimal medical therapy (OMT) or to a conservative strategy (CON) of OMT, with cath and revascularization reserved for those who fail OMT. The trial is designed to run seamlessly in parallel to the main ISCHEMIA trial as a companion trial. SPECIFIC AIMS A. Primary Aim. The primary aim of the ISCHEMIA-CKD trial is to determine whether an invasive strategy of cardiac cath followed by optimal revascularization, in addition to OMT, will reduce the primary composite endpoint of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction in participants with SIHD and advanced CKD over an average follow-up of approximately 2.8 years compared with an initial conservative strategy of OMT alone with catheterization reserved for those who fail OMT. The primary endpoint is time to centrally adjudicated death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI). B. Secondary Aims. Major: To compare the incident of the composite of death, nonfatal MI, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure, and angina symptoms and quality of life, as assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, between the INV and CON strategies. Other secondary aims include: comparing the incidence of the composite of death, nonfatal MI, hospitalization for unstable angina, hospitalization for heart failure, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or stroke; composite of death, nonfatal MI, or stroke; composite endpoints incorporating cardiovascular death; composite endpoints incorporating other definitions of MI as defined in the clinical event charter; individual components of the primary and major secondary endpoints; stroke and health resource utilization, costs, and cost effectiveness. A major secondary aim of ISCHEMIA-CKD trial is to compare the quality of life (QOL) outcomes-patients' symptoms, functioning and well-being-between those assigned to an invasive strategy as compared with a conservative strategy. In the protocol, angina frequency and disease-specific quality of life measured by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) Angina Frequency and Quality of Life scales, respectively, are described as the tools that will be used to make this comparative assessment. Recent work has indicated that it is possible to combine the information from the individual domain scores in the SAQ into a new Summary Score that captures the information from the SAQ Angina Frequency, Physical Limitation and Quality of Life scales into a single overall score. The advantages of using a summary score as the primary measure of QOL effects of a therapy are a single primary endpoint comparison rather than two or three (eliminating concerns some may have about multiple comparisons) and a more intuitive holistic (patient-centric) interpretation of the effectiveness results. With these advantages in mind, the ISCHEMIA leadership has agreed that the SAQ Summary Score will be designated as the primary way this secondary endpoint will be analyzed and interpreted, with the individual SAQ scores being used in a secondary, explanatory and descriptive role. A key subgroup analysis will be to stratify the results among those with daily/weekly angina (baseline SAQ Angina Frequency score ≤60), monthly angina (SAQ Angina Frequency score 61-99) and no angina (SAQ Angina Frequency score = 100). Condition: Coronary Disease Procedure: Cardiac catheterization Phase: Phase III Condition: Cardiovascular Diseases Procedure: Angioplasty, Transluminal, Percutaneous Coronary, other catheter-based interventions Phase: Phase III Condition: Heart Diseases Procedure: Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Phase: Phase III
This study is a multicenter, non-randomized, retrospective study to collect long term (5 years post-transplant) clinical outcome data to test whether the results of the noninvasive immune monitoring test strategy performed in the parent study (CTOT-01, NCT00308802) in first six-month post-transplant is predictive of 5-year outcomes. Each center will complete a retrospective chart review for the data on patient survival, graft survival and renal function.
This is a pilot study to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics and effectiveness of PINTA 745 or placebo in treating protein energy wasting (PEW) in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis (MHD).
This study is a regulatory post-marketing surveillance in Japan and it is a local prospective and observational study of patients who have received Fosrenol. The objective of this research is to collect information on the safety of Fosrenol after its launching, which means collecting information on adverse events, especially adverse events in the digestive system including constipation and serious adverse events, and adverse drug reactions when the drug is administered to the below-mentioned target patients for six months. The secondary objective is to collect information on the safety of the drug when administered for more than six months, which means collecting information on the safety of the drug when administered for up to 12 months to the target patients who have already been treated with the drug for six months. And also if at the time of 12 months after administration of Lanthanum carbonate the dialysis is not conducted, extending its' administration will be continued until conduction of dialysis, or until Sept. 30, 2015. The efficacy of fosrenol is evaluated by observing the serum P(phosphorus) level and serum PTH (parathyroid hormone) level change.
Session-to-session variations in delivered Kt/V that may cause failure to achieve the prescribed dialysis dose may be significant in regular clinical practice. To date, this is not recognized due to monthly blood Kt/V measurements only. Suboptimal delivery of prescribed dialysis dose may be caused by low effective treatment time, vascular access dysfunction, hemodynamic stability, blood pump speed, membrane influences, lab value variability or others which may vary from session to session. Patients close to recommended target limits of dialysis dose may thus be "randomly" attributed to be adequately or inadequately dialyzed. Therefore, in the literature, use of average Kt/V values is recommended. Adimea allows easy Kt/V determination in every session and thus documentation of the monthly achieved Kt/V in patients who repeatedly miss Kt/V. Knowledge, therefore, of session-to-session variability as well as knowledge of dialysis dose monitoring at every dialysis may enhance and secure delivery of adequate dialysis. The main objective is the estimation of the pooled within-patient SDs (standard deviation) for single treatment Adimea and of urea kinetic modeling (UKM)/ blood spKt/V. Failure of Kt/V>1.2 delivery as well as its potential causes will be assessed. spKt/V target achievement is assessed by monitoring dose by Adimea at every dialysis. This shall demonstrate that session-to-session variability can be decreased with usage of Adimea.
Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for kidney failure in children. Kidney transplant recipients need to take immunosuppression for the rest of their lives after transplantation to prevent rejection of the graft. One of the important medications is called Tacrolimus which can prevent rejection of the kidney graft but at the same time is toxic to the kidney. Therefore, repeated blood levels of Tacrolimus with tests of kidney function will help physicians to prescribe the best dose for therapy to prevent kidney rejection and kidney toxicity. Failure of compliance with taking Tacrolimus is also an important cause of graft failure especially among teenagers, so repeated blood Tacrolimus levels are necessary to detect patients who fail to take their medications on a regular basis. We have developed a lab assay that measures Tacrolimus blood level and creatinine (for kidney function) using one dried blood spot (DBS) on filter paper similar to the filter paper used in the new born screen. We plan to teach patients how to do the test at home once a month and mail the filter paper back to OHSU for analysis for Tacrolimus and creatinine. The advantage of this method is that it is less painful for children then a regular blood dray from the vein, can be done easily at home, will be most cost effective as it will save the family a day of work or school and can detect both the Tacrolimus level and the kidney function at the same time. We will assess the effect of doing this simple finger prick at home on compliance, on Tacrolimus levels and kidney function over the study period of one year. We will also assess how satisfied patients are with this method instead of going to the lab or the hospital for blood test. All subjects will continue on their regular clinic visits and will continue to have their routine blood draws by intravenous method in the lab during the study.