View clinical trials related to Joint Diseases.
Filter by:A trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of SVF for the treatment of knee arthrosis. Patients will undergo a single liposuction to obtain the SVF. The SVF will then be isolated and frozen in our laboratory. The SVF will then be injected up to 2 times into the fat pad of the patient's knee.
Taking and moving objects is essential. When this becomes difficult, it affects daily functioning. This study aims to determine movement patterns, at the level of the shoulder, during different functional movements in elderly people aged 60 years and older. Movement patterns of people without shoulder problems and patients with a reverse shoulder prosthesis will be compared. These insights can contribute to improving functional rehabilitation in patients with a reverse shoulder prosthesis (RSA).
Optimal pain control with limited muscle weakness is paramount for a swift initiation of physical therapy and ambulation. Fascia iliaca compartment block (FIC) has been recommended since it offers the best pain control with low risk of motor block. Pericapsular nerve group block (PENG) with lateral femoral cutaneous block (LFCN) has been proposed as an effective alternative to FIB that offers similar pain control with a considerably lower risk of motor block. The aim of this study is to compare the afore mentioned blocks and determine which one yielded the least degree of quadriceps femoris muscle weakness and the better pain control (the lowest NRS score with least need for opioids).
MicroPort (MPO) is conducting this PMCF study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of its EVOLUTION® Revision Tibial System and EVOLUTION® Revision STEMMED CS Femur with the EVOLUTION® MP CS Tibial Insert. This type of study is required by regulatory authorities for all devices that have been approved in Europe to evaluate the medium and long-term clinical evidence.
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to investigate the efficacy of Manual Therapy Based on the Fascial Distortion Model (FDM) by comparing it with Core Stabilization Training (CST) or Control in individuals with temporomandibular disorders. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Is the efficacy of the addition of FDM-based Manual Therapy to conventional therapy different from the addition of CST or control? - Is the efficacy of the addition of CST to conventional therapy different from the addition of FDM or control? All participants in the intervention groups will be given eight-week conventional therapy (Rocabado Exercises and Patient Education) in addition to FDM-based Manual Therapy or CST. Participants in the control group will not be given any therapy during the study. Pain intensity, TMD severity, head posture, function, and disability will be assessed.
MADISON Total Knee Prosthesis is intended to be used for total knee arthroplasty to reduce pain and restore joint mobility of the knee. Clinical data for MADISON Total Knee Prosthesis available are not deemed sufficient to support performance and benefits claimed on the whole lifetime of the product. Thus, in order to maintain compliance with the EU regulation (2017/745) related to medical devices and following ISO 14/155:2020, SERF has set up post-market clinical follow-up study (PMCF) to confirm safety and performance of Total Knee Arthroplasty system MADISON. This study is designed to cover the expected 15-years follow-up, to retrieve data according to implant feature (Posterior Stabilized or Ultra Congruent) or fixation method and to gather data related to the revision of partial knee prosthesis. The primary objective of this study is to assess the clinical safety of MADISON total knee prostheses. The secondary objective is to evaluate the survival rates, the clinical performances and clinical benefits of MADISON total knee prosthesis.
This clinical study is conducted to collect data on hip arthroplasty with the SAGITTA EVL-R revision femoral stems manufactured by SERF. In order to reflect current practice, a comprehensive and continuous series of patients will be included. This study will confirm the performance and safety of the SAGITTA EVL R revision femoral stems within the framework of MDR 2017/745 and in relation to the recommendations of the MEDDEV guide 2.7.1. Rev 4 (Clinical Evaluation Guide), which provides for a systematic procedure to monitor clinical data in order to verify the claimed performance of medical devices.
This clinical study is conducted to collect data on hip arthroplasty with the SAGITTA EVL-R revision femoral stems manufactured by SERF. This study will confirm the performance and safety of the SAGITTA EVL R revision femoral stems within the framework of MDR 2017/745 and in relation to the recommendations of the MEDDEV guide 2.7.1. Rev 4 (Clinical Evaluation Guide), which provides for a systematic procedure to monitor clinical data in order to verify the claimed performance of medical devices. The primary objective is to evaluate the long-term survival rate (7 to 10 years post-op +/- 2 years) of SAGITTA EVL R stems. Secondary objectives are to : - study long term patient satisfaction with their hip prosthesis, - confirm the long-term safety of these implants by studying the possible complications observed, - evaluate the performance of these implants using clinical scores.
The ultrasound-guided selective blockade of the saphenous nerve in the adductor canal provides effective analgesia and reduces postoperative pain in patients undergoing arthroscopic medial meniscectomy. Selective blockade of the saphenous nerve in the adductor canal provides effective analgesia without quadriceps muscle weakness. It has been shown that the adductor canal block (ACB) block increases the spread of local anesthetics in a distal and proximal way. Therefore, the proximal spread of local anesthetics may cause possible quadriceps weakness. The distal spread of local anesthetics may increase analgesic effect via sciatic nerve. The different volumes for ACB is a topic of discussion. The aim of this study is to compare the different volumes of US-guided ACB performing for postoperative analgesia management after total knee arthroplasty surgery.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two different types of nerve blocks in patients undergoing surgery for primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. The main question aim to answer is: - is there a benefit in functional muscle power output of the leg? Participants will be randomized into either the intervention group or the control group and: - receive Subsartorial Saphenous Nerve Block (SSNB) + IPACK in intervention group (group 1) - receive Femoral Nerve Block (FNB) + IPACK in control group (group 2) Researchers will compare the 2 groups to see if there are differences in : - functional muscle power output of the leg? - muscle function, mobility, clinical and radiological results, ROM, pain control (NRS), opioid consumption, length of hospital stay, patient satisfaction, mobility, reduction of costs?