View clinical trials related to Intrauterine Device.
Filter by:This study was planned to determine whether the use of virtual reality glasses during intrauterine device insertion has an effect on the anxiety level of women.
We conducted a case-control study between December 2020-June 2021 at Istanbul Health Sciences University Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital family planning outpatient clinics. One hundred and forty-three patients who had copper intrauterine devices (T Cu 380 A) inserted for contraception were evaluated between the 6th week to 5 years after insertion. Patients were divided into two groups according to their ultrasonographic examinations as "displaced" or "normal" positions. Uterocervical angles were measured of both groups by transvaginal ultrasonography and investigated whether the uterocervical angle had any effect in predicting the displacement of copper intrauterine devices.
Unintended pregnancy is common among women of fertile age, and also among those who have recently given birth. A Swedish study has shown that about 7.7% experience a new pregnancy, and that 2.5% will have an abortion between 12-24 months from childbirth. This is a prospective observational intervention study, aiming to evaluate the effects of structured contraceptive counseling during pregnancy on uptake of contraception postpartum and more specifically on long-acting reversible contraceptive methods, and to identify and explore the provider's and patient's experiences of structured contraceptive counseling during pregnancy.
To investigate whether vaginal dinoprostone administered before the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system(IUs) insertion reduces failed insertions, insertion-related complications, and pain in Women With no Previous Vaginal Delivery.
Intrauterine device (IUD) insertion is a procedure that can cause pain. Fear of pain during IUD insertion is a barrier to use of this method. Currently, there is no recommended standard method for reducing pain during this procedure. From Cochrane Database 2015, some lidocaine formulations, such as lidocaine spray, lidocaine gel and lidocaine paracervical injection, could reduce pain during IUD insertion, but there is limited data on effect of lidocaine spray on reducing pain during insertion of IUD.
To investigate whether vaginal dinoprostone administered before intrauterine device (IUD) insertion reduces failed insertions, insertion-related complications and pain in nulliparous women.
Intrauterine devices are the most common used method of contraception in the world, mostly in developing countries, because they offer long-term, reversible and relatively safe contraception. At present, 50% of intrauterine devices users are women of reproductive age and most of them are requesting Intrauterine device removal to regain their fertility. In general, an intrauterine device should be removed during menses or preferably immediate after menses because intrauterine device removal is usually easy because the cervix is still soft. The intrauterine device is usually removed by firmly grasping the threads at the external os; traction should be applied away from the cervix. If resistance is present, the removal should be stopped until it is determined why the intrauterine device is not moving. Some deeply embedded intrauterine device may need to be removed by hysteroscope [4]. In practice, many women, however, have an intolerable pain during intrauterine device removal and some of them requesting painkiller or even anesthesia to allow the physician to remove it. Cervical hardening and adhesions are the major factors making IUD removal difficult especially in post-menopausal women. Insertion and removal of IUD in nulliparous women is possible but it may carry more pain, more difficulty than in parous women. We think that this problem is also present in women has no vagina delivery before. So, the intrauterine device removal actually has some difficulty or pain in the nulliparous women, women delivered by elective caesarian section or postmenopausal women. Many medical agents for cervical ripening prior to the removal have been emerged like misoprostol. Misoprostol is commonly used for cervical ripening in the first and second trimester miscarriage and prior intrauterine devices insertion. The use of vaginal misoprostol before intrauterine device insertion in women who had never delivered vaginally before may increase the ease and success of insertion with pain felt during the procedure . However and up to our knowledge; no studies had been reported the effect of misoprostol on removal pain in women delivered only by elective cesarean section.
The intrauterine device is a safe, reliable and long-acting reversible contraceptive method. Instrumentation of lower genital mucosa during intrauterine device application provokes pain because it is highly sensitive to touch. Fear of pain associated with intrauterine device insertion is considered a barrier to use this contraception method. The classic insertion instructions recommend performing bimanual examination and uterine sounding prior to intrauterine device insertion in order to confirm proper determination of uterine size and position. The pain during intrauterine device insertion could be due to cervical grasping by the tenaculum, traction on the cervical canal, stretching of the internal os by the uterine sound or the intrauterine device inserter, and lastly by irritation of the endometrial lining by the intrauterine device. Many studies investigated the use of various analgesics in different doses and routes of administration and found out that it has a significant impact on relieving of associated pain Some technical modifications have been emerged in trial to decrease pain during intrauterine device insertion. One of them is trans-abdominal ultrasound guided intrauterine device insertion which the participant with a full bladder is subjected to intrauterine device insertion under ultrasonographic guide without using tenaculum. This method effectively decreased the pain and time of intrauterine device insertion. A recent method named "Uterine Sounding Sparing Approach" has been reported very recently in literature by Ali et al., 2017. In this method; the sonographer performs T transvaginal ultrasound to evaluate the uterine position and the endometrial length in the sagittal view of the uterus. The intrauterine device was inserted directly into the uterine cavity without using uterine sounding. In spite of less pain reported by trans-abdominal ultrasound guided intrauterine device insertion (no vulsellum was used), this methods also have some drawbacks, firstly; the full bladder may displace the cervix upward making the intrauterine device application not quite easy and secondly; this method needs two investigators which may distress the women who wondering about this. These two drawbacks may decrease patient's and physician's satisfaction. The uterine sounding sparing approach lacks these two drawbacks which make it more satisfying. From above evidence, there is a strong need to compare the satisfaction rate between the two mentioned approaches in trial to answer this question. Up to our knowledge; no randomized trial has been conducted or registered to compare the satisfaction rate between two above approaches.
This study will be a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing cold compression to no intervention immediately prior to and during intrauterine device insertion. Subjects will be randomized to cold compress or no intervention (standard practice in our clinics). Following IUD insertion they will complete a validated pain scale survey regarding their pre-procedure and intra-procedure pain.