Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Intrauterine devices are the most common used method of contraception in the world, mostly in developing countries, because they offer long-term, reversible and relatively safe contraception. At present, 50% of intrauterine devices users are women of reproductive age and most of them are requesting Intrauterine device removal to regain their fertility. In general, an intrauterine device should be removed during menses or preferably immediate after menses because intrauterine device removal is usually easy because the cervix is still soft.

The intrauterine device is usually removed by firmly grasping the threads at the external os; traction should be applied away from the cervix. If resistance is present, the removal should be stopped until it is determined why the intrauterine device is not moving. Some deeply embedded intrauterine device may need to be removed by hysteroscope [4].

In practice, many women, however, have an intolerable pain during intrauterine device removal and some of them requesting painkiller or even anesthesia to allow the physician to remove it. Cervical hardening and adhesions are the major factors making IUD removal difficult especially in post-menopausal women.

Insertion and removal of IUD in nulliparous women is possible but it may carry more pain, more difficulty than in parous women. We think that this problem is also present in women has no vagina delivery before. So, the intrauterine device removal actually has some difficulty or pain in the nulliparous women, women delivered by elective caesarian section or postmenopausal women.

Many medical agents for cervical ripening prior to the removal have been emerged like misoprostol. Misoprostol is commonly used for cervical ripening in the first and second trimester miscarriage and prior intrauterine devices insertion. The use of vaginal misoprostol before intrauterine device insertion in women who had never delivered vaginally before may increase the ease and success of insertion with pain felt during the procedure .

However and up to our knowledge; no studies had been reported the effect of misoprostol on removal pain in women delivered only by elective cesarean section.


Clinical Trial Description

n/a


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT03600064
Study type Interventional
Source Assiut University
Contact
Status Completed
Phase N/A
Start date July 1, 2019
Completion date September 1, 2020

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03686085 - Vaginal Dinoprostone Administration Prior to a T380A Intrauterine Device Insertion in Nulliparous Women. Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05550064 - Structured Contraceptive Counseling During Pregnancy N/A
Completed NCT03383432 - Intrauterine Device Insertion: a Step for High Satisfaction N/A
Completed NCT05556421 - Can Uterocervical Angle Predict the Displacement of Copper Intrauterine Devices (T-Cu 380A)
Not yet recruiting NCT06179095 - The Effect of Virtual Reality on Anxiety During Intrauterine Device Insertion N/A
Completed NCT04045548 - Vaginal Dinoprostone Administration Prior to Insertion Levonorgestrel-releasing Intrauterine System in Women With no Previous Vaginal Delivery Phase 4
Completed NCT03870711 - 10% Lidocaine Spray for Intrauterine Device Insertion Phase 4
Completed NCT02898831 - Cold Compress for Pain Associated With Intrauterine Device Insertion N/A