Pain Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Trial Comparing Pain During Local Tumesent Injection In Fingers Using Different Syringe-Needle Combinations
Background: This study aims to obtain the most favorable syringe and needle combination,
which causes the least pain during local anesthesia tumescent injection in the simulation of
fully awake hand surgery.
Methods: A randomized single-blinded controlled trial is designed for 30 adult male healthy
subjects to compare the pain from injection using syringe and needle combination i.e. 1) 1 cc
syringe with 26G needle, 2) 3 cc syringe with 26 G needle, and 3) 5 cc needle with 26 G
needle. The injection will be performed in any of at the second, third and fourth fingers of
either subject's hand randomly. The injection will be SIMPLE block technique using 1 cc of
NaCl 0.9% solution under the injection speed of 30 seconds/cc. Subjects are required to rate
two check-point of VAS at the timing of needle puncture and just right after the completion
of the infiltration. Upon the completion of each finger, the subject is also asked to give
response to seri of questions regarding the procedures and their preferences. At the end of
all injections, subject is asked to rate his preference of syringe and needle combination.
METHODS
3.1 DESIGN This is a randomized, single-blinded controlled trial to measure local pain
following local anesthesia tumescent injection using a different combination of syringe and
needle in a healthy volunteer.
3.2 TIME AND PLACE The study will be conducted at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital (RSCM) in
February to March 2018
3.3 SAMPLE 30 male healthy subjects (aged 18-60 years) who volunteer to join this study and
meet the inclusion criteria are going to be selected with the convenient sampling method
3.4 SAMPLE SIZE Sample size for pilot study are used. The expected sample size is between
10-40 per groups, therefore we choose 30 subjects (90 fingers tested) to be included into 3
different treatment group
3.5 INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA As for the trial, we will include subjects who are
healthy in general, male and aged 18 to 60 years old. However, we also plan to exclude
subjects with history of blood or coagulation disorder, history of neuro vasculopathy,
history of liver and renal disease, currently active smoker or already stopped less than 1
month, had previous injury or surgery in hand, or hand scar detected, history of Raynaud's
phenomenon, history of vasospastic disorders, history of scleroderma, history of Buerger's
disease, history of Dupuytren's disease, and history of complex regional pain syndrome.
3.6 SUBJECTS ENROLLMENT Sampling method used are convenient method
3.7 METHODS Healthy subjects who met the inclusion criteria are included in the study.
Subjects are given explanations about the research and are requested to sign the informed
consent form, should they agree to join the study. Each subject will be assigned to three
injections using different combination of syringe and needle: 1. 1 cc syringe with 26 G
needle, 2. 3 cc syringe with 26 G needle and 3. 5 cc needle with 26 G needle. The injection
will be randomized to take place in any of at the second, third and fourth fingers of both
hands. Once one side is injected, the subject is asked to introduce the second hand, and for
the third injection, the hand is changed again. No washout periods are intentionally given
between needles.
Every subject is randomized into treatment of sequence using digital random generator from
www.randomizer.org. The first sequence for randomization is syringe choice, (code 1cc =1, 3
cc= 2., 5cc=3) randomized for 30 sets, with no repetition. The second sequence for
randomization is the hand choice (left hand=1, right hand=2) randomized for 30 sets, with
repetition. The third sequence for randomization is the finger choice for either hand (2nd
finger=1, 3rd finger=2, 4th finger=3) randomized for 30 sets, with repetition. The example
for subject randomization table are shown at APPENDICES.
The injection technique used is SIMPLE block. A SIMPLE block is a block technique using
infiltration where the point of needle injection is at the digitopalmar crease at its
mid-axis. The tumescent solution used is Normal Saline (NaCl 0.9%), the amount of solution is
one cc for each finger. We do not use lidocaine or anesthetic agents to avoid the bias of
reduced pain along the course of injection. The rates of injection of each finger are 30
seconds (slow infusion) to inject all one cc of tumescent solution subcutaneously, regardless
of syringe-needle combinations used. The metronome with the rate of 120 BPM is used so that
the injection rate is constant along 30 s period. The metronome was used using headphone in
injector ear, to avoid bias and creating anxiety to the subjects. The senior author (T.O.H.P)
will perform all injection, and are given three pieces of paper before ever injection, to
silently give information on tumescent technique, fingers sequence, syringe-needle
combinations sequence and the solution used. Subjects are seated comfortably, behind a screen
with a small opening large enough to introduce the tested hand. Both hands are placed on the
supine position on the table. Seating positions and hand positions are designed somewhat
ergonomics and comfort, to avoid creating bias due to positional discomfort. They could not
see any of the procedure and won't know which syringe-needle combinations is used. The
ambiance of procedure's room is situated to be silent, no music or unnecessary sounds are
made. Subjects are actively communicated of what treatment is coming next during the
procedures, so the readiness of subjects is precipitated.
A baseline subjective pain was marked by the subject using VAS, with the pain score from
1-10, 1 (very mild pain) to 10 (worst pain ever). VAS chart along with description placed on
the table within subject's visual field. Pen are prepared so the subjects could mark their
VAS score on the chart, with non-injected hand, when asked by operator. Its ensured that
operator don't know the score when VAS noted to avoid bias. The person in charge of
randomization prepared the syringe-needle combinations and solution as stated in the
envelope. He/she also note the VAS score during all the injection and distribute the
questionnaire after each injection.
The region of injection was sterilized with 70 % alcohol, and a waiting duration of 30 s was
provided for total evaporation. The point needle insertion is at digitopalmar crease at its
mid-axis at selected fingers. The procedure initiated by pinching the needle insertion point
using operator fingers to create the tactile distraction, pinching is maintained for 10
seconds. Then the needle inserted in a perpendicular fashion (90 degrees to the skin
surface), needles are proceeded down subcutaneously just beneath the dermis. Patient is asked
the VAS score at this point (Check-point 1-needle prick). After the needles inserted
subcutaneously, 30 second period of waiting is given to let the patient adapt to the needle
prick pain. After 30 seconds, the infiltration of the tumescent solution is initiated. All
one cc of the tumescent solution is infiltrated into the tissues within 30 seconds regardless
of the syringe size, metronome with 120 bpm are used to control the rate. Two check-point of
VAS are noted: the first initial injection and just after the completion of the infiltration.
For all injections, the needle was kept subcutaneous for whole procedures with great care to
stand still and minimize movement. Fresh needles are used when moving from one finger to the
other fingers.
Upon the completion of each fingers, the subject is asked to give answer to series of a
question regarding the procedures and their preferences. The answer given is written by
giving only checks or cross on the question papers, so that patient can use any hand to write
the answer with ease. Thus, these moments also could give some washout period for pain from
the injected hand before. At the end of all injections, subjects are asked which combinations
of syringe and needle they are preferred. The subjects were provided with four tablets of
paracetamol 500 mg after the whole injection for they to take in case he suffers persistent
pain. Subjects are asked to contact the researchers if pain persists or any adverse event
occurred.
Some parameters, which will be recorded and documented are: 1. Pain scale using VAS during
three checkpoints which are initial needle prick, initial infiltration of tumescent injection
and after the infiltration finished, 2. Patient responses and preference regarding the
procedures using questionnaire and 3. Patient preference of combinations of syringe and
needle
3.8 VARIABLE The research design includes several independent variables to be tested such as:
1 cc syringe with 26 G needle, 3 cc syringe with 26 G needle and 5 cc needle with 26 G
needle, tumescent solution used which is 1 cc NaCl 0.9% and finally the 3 choices of finger
to be injected which are selected between 2nd, 3rd or 4th finger on both hands. The dependent
variable in this study that will be analyzed are VAS score during three checkpoints; the
initial needle prick, the initial infiltration of tumescent injection, and after all the
infiltration finished, the patient preference and responses in patient preference
questionnaire are also tested, along with the patient choices of injections kits.
3.9 OPERATIONAL DEFINITION
- 2nd finger: index finger in either hand
- 3rd finger: long finger in either hand
- 4th finger: ring finger in either hand
- SIMPLE finger block is a block technique using infiltration where the point of needle
injection is at the digitopalmar crease at its mid-axis.
- Tumescent solution: The solution injected to finger during anesthesia, here we use
Normal Saline (NaCl 0.9%) only. The amount of solution is 1 cc for each finger.
- Rates of injection: the speed or time required to inject all solution in the syringe to
fingers
- The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) a subjective measure of pain that consist of a 10-cm
line with two end-point representing "no pain" and "worst pain imaginable." Subjects
were asked to rate their pain by placing mark on the line corresponding to their current
level of pain. The length along the line from "no pain" marker was then measured with a
ruler giving a pain score out of 10. The VAS chart is translated into Bahasa Indonesia.
- 1 cc syringe: in this research, we are using 1 cc syringe produced by Terumo® (Terumo
Corporation; Tokyo, Japan)
- 3 cc syringe: in this research, we are using 3 cc syringe produced by Terumo®
- 5 cc syringe: in this research, we are using 5 cc syringe produced by Terumo®
- 26-gauge needle: in this research, we are using 27-gauge needle produced by Terumo®
- Questionnaire: series of questionnaire asked after each injection procedure to assess
patient preferences and responses. The questionnaire is translated into Bahasa
Indonesia.
3.10 DATA ANALYSIS In this research, data processing is performed using an SPSS version 22.0
software. We assume that variance for each finger injected is the same (no significance
difference). For VAS score data is presented a table and graphic form of the mean and
standard deviation for numerical data, and with normal distribution and median. Minimum and
maximum for numerical data with abnormal distribution. An ANOVA test analysis were used if
the distribution is normal, Kruskall Wallis test analysis is used if the distribution is not
normal, to assess the significance of three combinations of syringe and needle and VAS. The
response for questionnaire also analyzed for their correlation with syringe used using chi
square test. The significance level was set at P<0.05 with Confidence Interval 95%.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05559255 -
Changes in Pain, Spasticity, and Quality of Life After Use of Counterstrain Treatment in Individuals With SCI
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04748367 -
Leveraging on Immersive Virtual Reality to Reduce Pain and Anxiety in Children During Immunization in Primary Care
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT04356352 -
Lidocaine, Esmolol, or Placebo to Relieve IV Propofol Pain
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05057988 -
Virtual Empowered Relief for Chronic Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04466111 -
Observational, Post Market Study in Treating Chronic Upper Extremity Limb Pain
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06206252 -
Can Medical Cannabis Affect Opioid Use?
|
||
Completed |
NCT05868122 -
A Study to Evaluate a Fixed Combination of Acetaminophen/Naproxen Sodium in Acute Postoperative Pain Following Bunionectomy
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05006976 -
A Naturalistic Trial of Nudging Clinicians in the Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic. The NSAC Nudge Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03273114 -
Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT06087432 -
Is PNF Application Effective on Temporomandibular Dysfunction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05508594 -
Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Relationship of Intranasally Administered Sufentanil, Ketamine, and CT001
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03646955 -
Partial Breast Versus no Irradiation for Women With Early Breast Cancer
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03472300 -
Prevalence of Self-disclosed Knee Trouble and Use of Treatments Among Elderly Individuals
|
||
Completed |
NCT03678168 -
A Comparison Between Conventional Throat Packs and Pharyngeal Placement of Tampons in Rhinology Surgeries
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03286543 -
Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the SPRINT Beta System
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03931772 -
Online Automated Self-Hypnosis Program
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02913027 -
Can We Improve the Comfort of Pelvic Exams?
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02181387 -
Acetaminophen Use in Labor - Does Use of Acetaminophen Reduce Neuraxial Analgesic Drug Requirement During Labor?
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06032559 -
Implementation and Effectiveness of Mindfulness Oriented Recovery Enhancement as an Adjunct to Methadone Treatment
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03613155 -
Assessment of Anxiety in Patients Treated by SMUR Toulouse and Receiving MEOPA as Part of Their Care
|