Outcome
Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
Other |
Injection Site Reaction - Pain (Site 1) |
Injection site reaction pain assessment @ injection site 1. Each subject received half the total dose of the IP into two separate injection sites. (injection site 1 and injection site 2) at each treatment visit. The information is reported under separate outcomes measures for each injection site. |
From initiation of PRO 140 monotherapy through week 14 |
|
Other |
Injection Site Reaction - Pain (Site 2) |
Injection site reaction pain assessment @ injection site 2. Each subject received half the total dose of the IP into two separate injection sites. (injection site 1 and injection site 2) at each treatment visit. The information is reported under separate outcomes measures for each injection site. |
From initiation of PRO 140 monotherapy through week 14 |
|
Other |
Injection Site Reaction - Injection Site Status (Site 1) |
Summary of injection site reaction assessment - Injection site status @ injection site 1. Each subject received half the total dose of the IP into two separate injection sites. (injection site 1 and injection site 2) at each treatment visit. The information is reported under separate outcomes measures for each injection site. |
From initiation of PRO 140 monotherapy through week 14 |
|
Other |
Injection SIte Reaction - Injection Site Status (Site 2) |
Summary of injection site reaction assessment - Injection site status @ injection site 2. Each subject received half the total dose of the IP into two separate injection sites. (injection site 1 and injection site 2) at each treatment visit. The information is reported under separate outcomes measures for each injection site. |
From initiation of PRO 140 monotherapy through week 14 |
|
Other |
Injection Site Reaction - Pruritus With Injection (Site 1) |
Summary of injection site reaction assessment - Pruritus with injection @Site 1. Each subject received half the total dose of the IP into two separate injection sites. (injection site 1 and injection site 2) at each treatment visit. The information is reported under separate outcomes measures for each injection site. |
From initiation of PRO 140 monotherapy through week 14 |
|
Other |
Injection Site Reaction - Pruritus With Injection (Site 2) |
Summary of injection site reaction assessment - Pruritus with injection @ Site 2. Each subject received half the total dose of the IP into two separate injection sites. (injection site 1 and injection site 2) at each treatment visit. The information is reported under separate outcomes measures for each injection site. |
From initiation of PRO 140 monotherapy through week14 |
|
Other |
Injection Site Reaction - Bleeding Site 1 |
Summary of injection site reaction assessment - bleeding @ Site 1. Each subject received half the total dose of the IP into two separate injection sites. (injection site 1 and injection site 2) at each treatment visit. The information is reported under separate outcomes measures for each injection site. |
From initiation of PRO 140 monotherapy through week 14 |
|
Other |
Injection Site Reaction - Bleeding - Site 2 |
Summary of injection site reaction assessment - bleeding @ Site 2. Each subject received half the total dose of the IP into two separate injection sites. (injection site 1 and injection site 2) at each treatment visit. The information is reported under separate outcomes measures for each injection site. |
From initiation of PRO 140 monotherapy through week14 |
|
Other |
Injection Site Reaction - Drug Absorption - Site 1 |
Summary of injection site reaction assessment - drug absorption @ Site 1. Each subject received half the total dose of the IP into two separate injection sites. (injection site 1 and injection site 2) at each treatment visit. The information is reported under separate outcomes measures for each injection site. |
From initiation of PRO 140 monotherapy through week14 |
|
Other |
Injection Site Reaction - Drug Absorption - Site 2 |
Summary of injection site reaction assessment - drug absorption @ Site 2. Each subject received half the total dose of the IP into two separate injection sites. (injection site 1 and injection site 2) at each treatment visit. The information is reported under separate outcomes measures for each injection site. |
From initiation of PRO 140 monotherapy through week 14 |
|
Other |
Injection Site Reaction - Pain Post Injection - Site 1 |
Summary of injection site pain assessment (VAS) post injection mean change from baseline. Subject-perceived injection site pain was assessed using the Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) post study treatment administration assessing average pain. Higher score is worse outcome. Each subject received half the total dose of the IP into two separate injection sites. (injection site 1 and injection site 2) at each treatment visit. The information is reported under separate outcomes measures for each injection site. |
From initiation of PRO 140 monotherapy through week 14 |
|
Other |
Injection Site Reaction - Pain Post Injection - Site 2 |
Summary of injection site pain assessment (VAS) post injection @ Site 2. Subject-perceived injection site pain was assessed using the Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) post study treatment administration assessing average pain. A higher score is a worse outcome. Each subject received half the total dose of the IP into two separate injection sites. (injection site 1 and injection site 2) at each treatment visit. The information is reported under separate outcomes measures for each injection site. |
From initiation of PRO 140 monotherapy through week 14 |
|
Other |
Injection Site Reaction - Pain Pre Injection - Site 1 |
Summary of injection site pain assessment (VAS) pre injection @ Site 1 Subject-perceived injection site pain was assessed using the Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) prior to study treatment administration assessing average pain since last treatment. Higher score is a worse outcome. Each subject received half the total dose of the IP into two separate injection sites. (injection site 1 and injection site 2) at each treatment visit. The information is reported under separate outcomes measures for each injection site. |
From week 2 through week 14 |
|
Other |
Injection Site Reaction - Pain Pre Injection - Site 2 |
Summary of injection site pain assessment (VAS) pre injection @ Site 2. Subject-perceived injection site pain was assessed using the Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) prior to study treatment administration assessing average pain since last treatment. Higher score is a worse outcome. Each subject received half the total dose of the IP into two separate injection sites. (injection site 1 and injection site 2) at each treatment visit. The information is reported under separate outcomes measures for each injection site. |
From week 2 through week 14 |
|
Other |
Pro 140 Concentration |
Summary of Pro 140 Concentration. Subjects may experience Virologic Failure (VF) any time during the treatment phase from week 1 to week 14. Subjects who experience VF will be followed up every 4 weeks until the viral load suppression is achieved (i.e., plasma HIV-1 RNA levels to return back to <50 copies/mL). |
At week 4, week 8, week 12 and viral failure visits |
|
Primary |
Time to Virologic Failure After Initiating PRO 140 Monotherapy. |
Time to virologic failure after initiating PRO 140 monotherapy. Virologic failure was defined as two (2) consecutive HIV-1 RNA levels of = 400 copies/mL. |
From initiation of PRO 140 monotherapy through week 14 or virological failure |
|
Secondary |
Proportion of Subjects With Virologic Failure |
Proportion of Participants with Virologic Failure after initiating PRO 140 monotherapy at or prior to Week 14. |
From initiation of PRO 140 monotherapy through week 14 |
|
Secondary |
Mean Change From Baseline in Viral Load |
Mean change in Viral Load (HIV-1 RNA levels - log 10 copies/ml)), at each visit within the 14-week treatment phase. |
From initiation of PRO 140 monotherapy through week 14 |
|
Secondary |
Change in Viral Load at the Last Virologic Failure Visit. |
Mean Change from Baseline in viral load at the last virologic failure visit from Week 1 to Week 14. VF can occur at any time during the treatment phase from week 1 to week 14. Subjects who experience Virologic Failure will be followed up every 4 weeks until the viral load suppression is achieved (i.e., plasma HIV-1 RNA levels to return back to <50 copies/mL) |
From baseline to virologic failure visit (VF). VF can occur at any time from Week 1 to Week 14. |
|
Secondary |
Mean Change in CD4 Cell Count by Visit |
Mean change in CD4 cell count, at each visit within the 14-week treatment phase |
From baseline (week 2) through week 14 |
|
Secondary |
Mean Change in CD4 Cell Count |
Change from baseline in CD4 cell count, within the 14-week treatment phase |
From baseline (week 2) to last visit |
|
Secondary |
Q1 QOL Health Status |
Quality of Life Q1 Current General Health Status, is collected from base line to virologic failure (VF can occur at any time from any time during the treatment phase from week 1 to week 14). Subjects who experience Virologic Failure will be followed up every 4 weeks until the viral load suppression is achieved (i.e., plasma HIV-1 RNA levels to return back to <50 copies/mL) |
From baseline to virologic failure (VF occurring at any time from Week 1 to Week 12 or virologic failure which ever comes first) |
|
Secondary |
Q2 QOL Current State of Health |
Subjects will rate their current state of health via Visual Analog Scale (VAS) using the line as a guide, with 0 as death or worst possible health and 100 as perfect or best possible health. A higher score indicates best outcome. Subjects may experience Virologic Failure (VF) any time during the treatment phase from week 1 to week 14. Subjects who experience VF will be followed up every 4 weeks until the viral load suppression is achieved (i.e., plasma HIV-1 RNA levels to return back to <50 copies/mL) |
From week 1 through treatment weeks 4, 8, 12 or VF visit |
|