Hepatitis C Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Cluster RCT to Increase HIV Testing in Substance Use Treatment Programs
This study will test two active evidence-based "practice coaching" (PC) interventions to improve opioid treatment programs' (OTPs') provision and sustained implementation of on-site 1) HIV testing and linkage to care and 2) HIV/Hepatitis C virus (HCV) testing and linkage to care among patients seeking/receiving substance use disorder treatment. Aims are: Aim 1: To evaluate the effectiveness of the PC interventions on improving patient uptake of HIV testing in OTPs including the incremental impact of the HIV/HCV intervention on HIV testing. Aim 2: To examine, using mixed-methods, the impact of the PC interventions on the initiation and sustained provision of HIV testing and timely linkage to care. Aim 3: To evaluate the health outcomes, health care utilization, and cost-effectiveness of the PC interventions compared incrementally to one another and to the control condition. Primary Hypothesis: 1. The two PC interventions will result in significantly higher proportions of patients tested for HIV than the information control condition during the "initial impact" period (7-12 months post-randomization or T3), controlling for the proportion of patients tested during the baseline period, T1 (Primary) and during the "sustained impact" period, 13-18 months post-randomization or T4 (Secondary). 2. The HIV/HCV PC intervention will result in significantly higher proportions of patients tested for HIV than the HIV PC intervention during the initial impact period (7-12 months post-randomization or T3), controlling for the proportion of patients tested during the baseline period, T1 (Secondary) and during the "sustained impact" period, 13-18 months post-randomization or T4 (Secondary).
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 51 |
Est. completion date | January 31, 2026 |
Est. primary completion date | July 31, 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Eligible sites must: 1. See at least 150 unduplicated patients/year/site 2. Be capable and willing to prospectively collect data on the number of patients who a) are offered any HIV and/or HCV tests; b) completed these tests; c) are referred to care/evaluation (and type of referral) if positive; and d) are linked to care/evaluation within 30 days of diagnosis 3. Be capable and willing to provide patient demographics, testing data within demographic categories of gender and race/ethnicity (in aggregate) and data on HIV/HCV test reimbursement processes and outcomes 4. Have key staff willing to consent to participate in study surveys, qualitative interviews and intervention coaching throughout the study Exclusion Criteria: - Sites will be excluded if: 1. Over 50% of patients served in the prior 6 months were HIV or HCV tested 2. They are terminated via PI decision/discretion |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Columbia University Medical Center | New York | New York |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Columbia University | Boston Medical Center, National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), New York University Abu Dhabi, Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene, Inc., San Francisco Department of Public Health, University of Miami, Weill Medical College of Cornell University |
United States,
Frimpong JA, Parish C, Feaster DJ, Gooden LK, Matheson T, Haynes L, Linas BP, Assoumou SA, Tross S, Kyle T, Nelson CM, Liguori TK, Toussaint O, Siegel K, Annane D, Metsch LR. A study protocol for Project I-Test: a cluster randomized controlled trial of a practice coaching intervention to increase HIV testing in substance use treatment programs. Res Sq [Preprint]. 2023 Jun 28:rs.3.rs-3059783. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3059783/v1. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | OTPs' incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) | The ICER is a statistic used to summarize the cost-effectiveness of a health care intervention and is defined by the difference in cost between two possible interventions, divided by the difference in their effect. One ICER will be calculated for the difference between the Information Control Group and HIV Testing PC Intervention Group. A second ICER will be calculated for the difference between the HIV Testing PC Intervention Group and the HIV/HCV Testing PC Intervention Group. | 6 months post randomization (T2). | |
Primary | Proportion of OTP patients HIV tested at 6 months post intervention or control, while controlling for HIV testing during the baseline period (T1) | The primary outcome measure will be a contrast of the proportion of OTP patients HIV tested during T3, controlling for HIV testing at baseline (T1). The primary test will be whether the proportion of patients tested across the two PC interventions--HIV Testing PC Intervention Group and HIV/HCV Testing PC Intervention Group--differs from the proportion of patients tested in the Information Control Group. | The period 7-12 months post site-randomization (T3). | |
Secondary | Proportion of OTP patients HIV tested at 12 months post intervention or control | The secondary outcome measure will be the proportion of OTP patients HIV tested during T4, controlling for HIV testing at baseline (T1). One test will be whether the proportion of patients tested across the two PC interventions--HIV Testing PC Intervention Group and HIV/HCV Testing PC Intervention Group--differs from the proportion of patients tested in the Information Control Group. A second test will be whether the proportion of OTP patients HIV tested during T4 in the HIV Testing PC Intervention Group differs from the proportion of patients tested in the HIV/HCV Testing PC Intervention Group. | The period 13-18 months post site-randomization. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03686722 -
Effect of Co-administration of Metformin and Daclatasvir on the Pharmacokinetis and Pharmacodynamics of Metformin
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04510246 -
Link Hepatitis C Notifications to Treatment in Tasmania
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03413696 -
Effects of Health Literacy and HCV Knowledge on HCV Treatment Willingness in HIV-coinfected Patients
|
||
Completed |
NCT03118674 -
Harvoni Treatment Porphyria Cutanea Tarda
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03109457 -
Hepatitis C Virus Detection in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
|
||
Completed |
NCT01458054 -
Effect of Omeprazole and Ritonavir on GSK2336805 Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Adults
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03740230 -
An Observational Study of Maviret (Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir) for Korean Chronic Hepatitis C Genotypes 1 to 6 Patients According to the Standard for Re-examination of New Drugs
|
||
Completed |
NCT03426787 -
Helping Empower Liver and Kidney Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03627299 -
Renal Transplants in Hepatitis C Negative Recipients With Nucleic Acid Positive Donors
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00006301 -
Immune Response to Hepatitis C Virus
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03949764 -
The Kentucky Viral Hepatitis Treatment Study
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03365635 -
Administration of Zepatier (Grazoprevir Plus Elbasvir) in Chronic Hemodialysis (HD) Patients With Hepatitis C
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04405024 -
Pilot Study on the Feasibility of Systematic Hepatitis C Screening of Hospitalized Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04525690 -
Improving Inpatient Screening for Hepatitis C
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04033887 -
Evaluation Study of RDTs Detecting Antibodies Against HCV
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT04546802 -
HepATocellular Cancer Hcv Therapy Study
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02961426 -
Strategic Transformation of the Market of HCV Treatments
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02683005 -
Study of Hepatitis C Treatment During Pregnancy
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03186313 -
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Combined Single Dose of Dactavira Plus Or Dactavira in Egyptian Adults With Chronic Genotype 4 HCV Infection
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02869776 -
Integrating HCV and HIV Screening During the Era of HIV Antigen Testing
|
N/A |