View clinical trials related to Hepatitis A.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of ABT-493 and ABT-530 with or without ribavirin (RBV) in participants with chronic hepatitis C virus, (HCV)-infection who previously failed treatment with a direct acting antiviral (DAA)-containing regimen.
The purpose of this study is to compare the immunogenicity and safety of three different immunization schedules of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (HAV) and/ or combined hepatitis A and B vaccine (HABV) in healthy Chinese infants.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and dasabuvir with or without ribavirin in US veterans with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C virus infection.
This is a Phase 3b, open-label, multicenter study to evaluate the proportion of subjects achieving sustained virologic response 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12), in adults with genotype 1 (GT1) chronic HCV infection, who received treatment with ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and dasabuvir with or without ribavirin.
This was a long-term follow-up study to evaluate the durability of sustained virologic response (SVR), persistence of direct-acting antiviral agent (DAA) resistance, and clinical outcomes for participants who received glecaprevir (ABT-493) and/or pibrentasvir (ABT-530) in prior AbbVie Phase 2 or 3 clinical studies for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection can result in a greater risk of adverse outcomes in HIV-infected individuals, including more rapid progression to cirrhosis and associated complications such as hepatocellular carcinoma. For this reason, as well as the shared routes of transmission between the two viruses, UK and International guidance recommends that all HBV-negative HIV-infected individuals be offered vaccination against HBV. Unfortunately, response rates in this population can be as low as 17.5 - 40% to standard vaccination courses. To improve this response, strategies such as the use of double dose of standard vaccines (e.g. Engerix B) is recommended in several guidelines for previous non-responders, although there is currently limited evidence for this approach. An alternative strategy is to use vaccines with novel adjuvants such as Fendrix and observational clinical data in the Investigators HIV cohort suggests that response rates can be as high as 81% of individuals achieving HBV surface antibody (HBsAb) levels >100 in a group that did not respond to previous standard HBV vaccine courses. However, the cost of Fendrix is considerably higher than Engerix B and controlled trials are required to confirm whether this approach is warranted. Furthermore, insights into the potential mechanisms by which Fendrix may elicit better responses would be valuable in optimising future vaccine strategies in this population. The Investigators propose to conduct a randomised, open label, active-controlled pilot study comparing double dose Engerix B and Fendrix in HIV-infected non-responders to standard HBV vaccine courses, which will provide the necessary data to design and power a larger multicentre randomised controlled trial. Outcome measures will include the proportion of individuals seroconverting with HBsAb levels >100 following each vaccination course, the magnitude and quality of the HBV-specific CD4+ T-cell responses elicited by each vaccine and the durability of the HBsAb response at 1 year following the end of vaccination.
This was an open-label study that evaluated the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of dose combinations of INO-1800 (DNA plasmids encoding Hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] and Hepatitis B core antigen [HBcAg]) and INO-9112 (DNA plasmid encoding human interleukin 12) delivered by electroporation (EP) in 90 (ninety) nucleos(t)ide analogue treated participants.
The purpose of this study is to describe the immunogenicity and safety of Sanofi Pasteur's DTaP-IPV-Hep B-PRP-T fully liquid combined hexavalent vaccine (Hexaxim®) administered at 2, 3, and 4 months of age and at 16 to 17 months of age in infants and toddlers who received a dose of Hep B vaccine at birth or within 1 week after birth. Primary Objective: - To describe the safety profile after each and all doses of Sanofi-Pasteur's DTaP-IPV-Hep B-PRP-T combined vaccine in Vietnamese infants and toddlers. Secondary Objective: - To demonstrate the non-inferiority of the immune response to all antigens induced by the study vaccine in Vietnamese infants one month after the third dose in a 3-dose primary series with the immune response to all antigens induced by the same study vaccine outside Vietnam. - To evaluate the immunogenicity of the study vaccine one month after the 3-dose primary series. - To describe the persistence of all antibodies before receipt of the booster vaccination. - To evaluate the immunogenicity of the study vaccine one month after the booster.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interactions between simeprevir and ledipasvir in a treatment regimen consisting of simeprevir (SMV), sofosbuvir (SOF), and ledipasvir (LDV) in treatment-naive participants with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection.
This phase IV clinical study was designed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the recombinant Hepatitis E vaccine(Hecolin®), manufactured by Xiamen Innovax Biotech CO., LTD., in healthy volunteers aged over 65 years of age at enrollment. The study volunteers will receive the 3 doses of Hecolin® administered intramuscularly according to a 0-1-6 month schedule.