View clinical trials related to Gingival Recession.
Filter by:The purpose was to compare root coverage outcomes between autogenous connective tissue graft (CTG) and decellularized human dermis (OrACELLâ„¢) in areas of facial gingival recession.
Non-carious cervical lesion is frequently associated with gingival recession, resulting in a combined lesion that has a different treatment prognosis when the two lesions appear alone. The literature presents few studies that propose a multidisciplinary approach (restorative and root coverage surgery procedures) to optimize the treatment of this combined lesion. The previously proposed approaches and materials have limitations and an optimal clinical protocol has not been established yet. Thus the aim of this study is to evaluate a novel multidisciplinary protocol with two resin composites and two different adhesive systems through a randomized clinical trial and laboratory studies. 120 combined lesions will be randomly assigned to one of the following groups: NP + TE (n = 30) - Partial restoration of cervical lesions with nanofilled composite and total-etch adhesive system and periodontal surgery for root coverage, NP + UA (n = 30) - partial restoration of cervical lesions with nanofilled composite and self-etching adhesive system and periodontal surgery for root coverage, MH + TE (n = 30) - partial restoration of cervical lesions with microhybrid composite and total-etch adhesive system and periodontal surgery for root coverage, MH + UA (n = 30) - partial restoration of cervical lesions with microhybrid composite and self-etching adhesive system and periodontal surgery for root coverage. Restorations will be assessed using the USPHS criteria after one week, six months and twelve months.
The aim of this study will be to clinically assess the soft tissue augmentation achieved by the de-epithelialized free gingival graft with coronally advanced flap versus the subepithelial connective tissue graft with coronally advanced flap as root coverage procedures for management of patients with Miller class I and II gingival recession.
Subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) is considered the gold standard for root coverage treatment. However, it is associated with postoperative morbidity, limited amount of donor tissue, and longer surgical time. Thus, the search for a tissue substitute for SCTG is increasing. Currently, one of the possible autogenous soft tissue substitutes found in the market is the Mucograft® xenogeneic matrix (CM). The results with the use of MC are very promising, both for root coverage as well as for the gain of keratinized tissue. The present study consists of a parallel randomized clinical trial to compare SCTG (control group) and CM (test group) in the treatment of Miller's class I and II gingival recessions, multiple in aesthetic areas (upper central incisors, Lateral and canine).
The purpose of this randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) is to determine the efficacy hyaluronic acid (HA) in combination with the coronally advanced flap (CAF) for the treatment of single gingival recession site. The hypothesis is that HA will result in improved the clinical outcomes and will reduce the pos-operative morbidity
A clinical and radiographic evaluation of using Erbium, Chromium, Scandium, Gallium and Garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser in recipient site bio-modification and de-epithelialized connective tissue graft harvesting compared to conventional scalpel surgical technique in the treatment of class I and II Miller gingival recession.
This research will be conducted in an attempt to achieve complete root coverage with physiologic probing depth and a harmonious view with the adjacent tissues using Platelet rich fibrin in conjunction with Coronally advanced flap and subepithelial connective tissue graft.
Subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTG) are accepted as the gold standard in covering denuded root surfaces. Combining enamel matrix derivatives (EMD) with periodontoplasic surgical operations is another method in covering denuded root surface. The aim of this study is to compare a SCTG operation group and EMD applied group in addition to SCTG using complete root coverage rate and a newer method root coverage esthetic scoring system (RES).
The aim of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy of the acellular porcine derived collagen matrix (PADM) in comparison with connective tissue graft (SCTG ) in the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions (MAGR). The primary objectives of the study were to evaluate mean and complete roots coverage. Additionally, the secondary objective was to evaluate and compare the clinical effectiveness of PADM and SCTG for the treatment of MAGR defects applying modified coronally advanced tunnel technique (MCAT).
Limitation of donor site and significant postoperative morbidity are often described in connective tissue graft harvesting. We want to show if mucoderm used in tunnel technique to recover miller class I and II recessions defects could be an alternative to connective tissue graft.