Clinical Trials Logo

Edema clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Edema.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT04991350 Terminated - Clinical trials for Diabetic Retinopathy

Effect of Ranibizumab Versus Bevacizumab on the Macular Perfusion in Diabetic Macular Edema

REBEL
Start date: November 26, 2021
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) group founded guidelines for treating patients with clinically significant diabetic macular edema (DME) with focal/grid macular laser photocoagulation. Since then, macular laser, and steroids, were the main therapies for the treatment of DME until anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGF) drugs were developed after a growing body of scientific evidence implicated VEGF in the pathophysiologic process of DME. Anti-VEGF drugs have been implicated in the treatment of DME. VEGF has been shown to play an important role in the occurrence of increased vascular permeability in DME. VEGF levels are significantly higher in patients with DME and extensive leakage than in patients with minimal leakage. Many studies such as Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research [DRCR] Network studies, RESTORE Study, RISE and RIDE Research Group, and The BOLT Study have supported the use of anti-VEGF agents in the treatment of DME with better visual outcomes using anti-VEGF injections alone or in combination with other treatments. Several ocular complications of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections have been reported including endophthalmitis, cataract, and retinal detachment. The different effects on macular perfusion between different anti-VEGFs have yet to be fully concluded with mixed conclusions that it increases or decreases or has no effect on perfusion of the macula in response to Anti-VEGF treatment. In many of these studies, however, patients with more ischemic retinas were not included. Retinal ischemia is a vital factor determining the diabetic retinopathy progression and prognosis. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) detects blood flow by analyzing signal decorrelation between two sequential OCT cross-sectional scans at the same location. As it detects the movements of red blood corpuscles within the vessels, compared to the stationary retinal surroundings, which will result in signal disparity and imaging The split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography (SSADA) algorithm improves the signal to noise ratio. OCTA is considered a reliable tool in the detection and quantification of macular ischemia in diabetics. In this study, the investigators aim to compare the effect of repeated intravitreal injections of ranibizumab and bevacizumab on the perfusion of different capillary layers in the macula of diabetic patients using OCTA.

NCT ID: NCT04976777 Completed - Macular Edema Clinical Trials

A Study to Evaluate an Updated Dexamethasone Intravitreal (Into the Eye) Applicator in Adult Participants With Macular Edema Due to Diseases of the Retina

Start date: October 12, 2021
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The Dexamethasone Posterior Segment Drug Delivery System (DEX PS DDS) Applicator is used to deliver an implant with medicine to the eye. AbbVie is updating the DEX PS DDS Applicator. This purpose of this study is to show that the updated DEX PS DDS Applicator works in adult participants with macular edema due to retinal diseases. The DEX PS DDS is approved for the treatment of macular edema. Participants will be placed into 1 of 2 groups, called treatment arms. Each group receives the same treatment drug delivered using different applicators. Around 54 adult participants with macular edema will be enrolled in the study in approximately 7-10 sites in the United States. Participants will receive a single intravitreal (into the eye) administration of DEX PS DDS implant using either the currently-approved DEX PS DDS Applicator or the the updated Applicator. The participants will be observed for a duration of 7 days, with the DEX PS DDS implant received on day 1 and follow-up through day 7. The updates being evaluated in this study are related to the DEX PS DDS Applicator only, with the safety and efficacy of the DEX PS DDS implant well characterized and the same as the currently marketed product. Participants will attend regular visits during the study at a hospital or clinic. The applicator function will be checked by medical assessment, checking for side effects, procedural complications and/or product complaints, and evaluating the administration procedure.

NCT ID: NCT04971213 Completed - Clinical trials for Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema

HIgh Flow Versus NIV for Acute Cardiogenic PuLmonary Oedema With Acute Respiratory Failure in an ED

Start date: September 22, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to compare non invasive ventilation to high flow nasal cannula oxygen for the management of patients admitted with an acute respiratory failure due to an acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema.

NCT ID: NCT04963127 Recruiting - Fractures, Bone Clinical Trials

Prospective Study of Diagnostic Accuracy of Spectral CT for the Detection of Bone Marrow Edema

Start date: July 15, 2021
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

Dual-Energy/Multi-Energy/Spectral-CT can visualize bone marrow edema associated with fractures, however, current scientific evidence is mostly derived from to retrospective analyses. Our prospective study systematically analyzes the diagnostic accuracy of the visualization of bone marrow edema by including patients who are scheduled for a CT scan to exclude or further characterize a fracture. After giving informed consent, the CT scan will be performed using a dose-neutral Dual-Energy-/Multi-Energy-/Spectral-CT acquisition technique. If the patient undergoes MRI of the same region within 7 days, this scan will be used as a gold-standard for bone marrow edema. This will allow the quantification of diagnostic accuracy.

NCT ID: NCT04955171 Recruiting - Macular Edema Clinical Trials

BEOVU Versus Eylea in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema

Start date: January 12, 2021
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Diabetic macular edema degeneration occur is a vision threatening condition. The investigators compare the efficacy of BEOVU and Eylea intravitreal treatment in the management

NCT ID: NCT04951128 Not yet recruiting - Edema Clinical Trials

The Effect of Local Tranexamic Acid on Post-operative Edema and Ecchymosis in Eyelid Surgery

Start date: August 1, 2021
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a synthetic inhibitor of plasminogen lysine receptor that has used to reduce intra-operative bleeding in a number of clinical scenarios. Anecdotally, TXA has used by plastic surgeons to reduce post-operative bruising. To date, there is limited data to valid the benefits and to evaluate the side effects of TXA. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of local TXA on edema and ecchymosis in eyelid surgery.

NCT ID: NCT04927234 Recruiting - Surgery Clinical Trials

Foot and Ankle Post-operative Oedema Management Using Geko™

Start date: October 7, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The multicentre randomised geko™ Foot and Ankle Trial will prospectively and systematically collect clinical data on patients randomised, on a 1:1 basis, to either standard care or standard care plus geko™ therapy to assess oedema management and patient outcomes during a follow-up period of up to three months post-surgery.

NCT ID: NCT04910503 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Diabetic Macular Edema

Medico Economic Evaluation of Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant Versus Dexametheasone Implant in Resistant Diabetic Macular Oedema

EMMA
Start date: October 29, 2021
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Diabetic macular oedema (DME) is the main cause of visual impairment (or visual acuity) in patients with diabetic retinopathy, as it leads to progressive thickening of the retina, which in the long term leads to progressive death of the photoreceptor cells. It is therefore important to continue to treat macular oedema that has been progressing for several months or even years (resistant DME). The management of DME necessarily involves controlling diabetes (improving glycated haemoglobin levels) and blood pressure, but this is often not enough. Thus, when DME is significant and leads to a decrease in visual acuity, treatments are administered directly into the eye (intravitreal injections). For some years now, corticosteroids have been injected into the vitreous body (the gel that fills the eyeball) through the white of the eye for their anti-inflammatory properties. Indeed, these drugs improve the permeability of the retinal vessels and thus reduce oedema. These intravitreal implants are most often used in patients who have already undergone cataract surgery (pseudophakic) because corticosteroids also tend to aggravate a cataract. Currently, there are two implants containing corticosteroids that can be injected: the dexamethasone implant and the fluocinolone acetonide implant. These two implants have different properties, particularly with regard to their duration of action. Today, the overall management at 3 years and the quality of life associated with the treatments deserve to be evaluated. This study is the first multicenter controlled trial comparing the two reference corticosteroid treatments in terms of overall cost of treatment and follow-up and patient quality of life, while considering their efficacy and side effects. This evaluation will make it possible to precisely define the respective place of each implant in the management of resistant DME.

NCT ID: NCT04905394 Completed - Bone Marrow Edema Clinical Trials

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Subchondroplasty in the Treatment of Bone Marrow Edema of the Knee

Start date: April 1, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Bone marrow lesions (BMLs) of the knee are common subchondral defects, often associated with pain and functional limitation. Subchondroplasty is a percutaneous procedure in which calcium phosphate is injected inside BML areas, ensuring stability and promoting the deposition of new bone. Primary outcome of this study was to obtain a reduction of the Numeric Rating Scale score of 4 points or more at 6 months follow-up in more than 75% of patients. The secondary outcome was to evaluate the osteoarthritic and bone marrow structure evolution in the months after the procedure.

NCT ID: NCT04895228 Recruiting - Bone Marrow Edema Clinical Trials

Impact of Sacroiliac Joint Injection on Bone Marrow Edema

Start date: May 15, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

SpA is a chronic, debilitating inflammatory rheumatic disease that affects axial and peripheral joints, internal organs, and other tissues. Sacroiliitis is a hallmark of axial SpA. Sacroliliitis has a great effect on spine pain, function and cephalic progression of the disease . The prevalence of SpA ranged from 9 to 30 per 10,000 persons in Caucasian populations, Europe or the United States . The management of axial SpA is really challenging. The traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were ineffective in controlling the axial disease. Biological agents such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) inhibitor and anti-interleukin 17 have shown promising results in achieving remission or low disease activity for axial SpA . Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is established as the imaging method of choice for the early diagnosis and follow-up of SpA patients. Although a positive imaging detection of the axial skeleton is no longer obligatory based on the new Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) classification criteria 2010, MRI imaging still plays a crucial role, especially in the early diagnosis arm. MRI has a high sensitivity in detection of acute inflammatory processes as well as the high-resolution visualization of anatomical alterations. The lack of radiation exposure makes MRI ideal for monitoring response to treatment .Bone marrow edema (BME) not only showed high sensitivity for detection of early sacroilitis, but also its reduction was a worthy indicator for disease remission. Intra Articular (IA) injections of SIJ with corticosteroids and anesthestics are often performed for pain relief. Although this technique is relatively old, it was not used on a lrage scale in axial SpA patients. Further, its effect on disease outcome measures were not well elucidated. To the best of our knowledge there is no single study have evaluated effect of steroid and local aneshestic injection on improvement of BME . Image guidance of the SIJ injection is fundamanetal, due to the complex anatomy of the joint causing a low accuracy when performed using blind technique .