View clinical trials related to Eczema.
Filter by:This is a multi-center, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, PK, PD and immumogenicity of GR1802 injection in comparison to placebo in patients with atopic dermatitis. Patients will receive GR1802 injection or Placebo every 2 Weeks.
Introduction Pollution is a significant public health issue. Research has shown a positive correlation between air pollution and chronic inflammatory dermatoses, including psoriasis and eczema. The incidence of these diseases has been steadily increasing since the beginning of industrialization. The mechanism behind this association involves the activation of the aromatic hydrocarbon receptor (AhR). The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) plays a role in regulating the balance between T helper 17 (TH17) and regulatory T cells (TREG), as well as in generating oxidative stress and producing pro-inflammatory cytokines. Studies in cultured keratinocytes have shown that a non-competitive antagonist that modulates AhR activity can reduce cutaneous inflammatory processes induced by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Objectives: It has been suggested that activation of the AhR by PAHs and dioxins may be related to the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. The main objective is to compare the levels of AhR pathway activation markers between cases and controls. Secondary objectives include correlating environmental exposure to AhR ligands with disease severity in patients. Finally, we will compare the expression of inflammatory and AhR activation markers in cultured peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) after in vitro stimulation with benzo(a)pyrene. Material and methods: The study will measure exposure to pollutants by determining blood dioxins and urinary PAH metabolites. Pro-inflammatory cytokines IL1β, TNFα, IL23, IL17 and IFNγ and Malondialdehyde (MDA) serum concentrations will be measured by ELISA. The TREG and TH17 lymphocyte population ratio will be evaluated by flow cytometry on isolated PBMCs. Additionally, the level of expression of CYP 1A1 and 1B1, pollutant-metabolizing enzymes induced by AhR, will be assessed on isolated PBMCs. The expression levels of the AhR and NfkB active fractions will be determined by immunofluorescence. Subsequently, levels of AhR activation markers will be compared after stimulation of PBMCs with benzo(a)pyrene.
The aim of this within-subject randomized study is to examine the efficacy of a VR immersive game for pain and anxiety management of children during the subcutaneous injection of dupilumab for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. We will recruit children from 6 to 17 years. The main research question is: 1. Does VR immersive game will generate less anxiety and pain than standard procedures, for children receiving dupilumab injection for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis? 2. Does the occurence of side effects is similar between both study groups? Participants will be randomized according to either sequences: VR-Standard care or Standard care-VR. During the VR sequence, participants will be playing the VR immersive game during the injection. During the Standard care sequence participants will not benefit from any pain management but passive distraction tools will be offered (and documented) to children. The investigators will take measures of pain and anxiety, using validated scales, before and after the procedures at each sequence.
This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase Ib clinical trial evaluating the safety tolerability, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity and preliminary efficacy of GR2002 Injection in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. The dosing period was 12 weeks and followed up to 20 weeks.
Clinical trials, specifically focused on atopic dermatitis, are crucial in assessing the safety and efficacy of new treatments. These trials serve as fundamental instruments in determining whether emerging medications outperform standard therapies, providing compelling evidence to support wider implementation. The main goal is to thoroughly scrutinize trial completion rates and voluntary withdrawals among this particular group of patients.
This is a multi-center, single arm, open-label study to evaluate safety in children patients with moderate-to severe atopic dermatis.
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of JYP0061 in adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. The main questions it aims to answer are: - The efficacy of JYP0061 in treating adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. - The safety profile of JYP0061 when administered to adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Participants will: - Be treated with either a low-dose or high-dose of JYP0061. - Undergo efficacy and safety evaluations as stipulated in the trial protocol.
This is a multi-center, open-label phase 2 study to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of CM310 in subjects with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a SVR care product. As we know, atopic dermatitis is a vicious circle that must be broken, but certain aggravating factors are added to this circle. There is a lot of talk about pollution but, more recently, studies have been carried out on the worsening role of dust mites on atopic skin. TOPIALYSE Baume Protect+ is a care product that is lipid-replenishing, repairing and protective: a triple reinforced action for 48 hours: anti-scratching, anti-irritation, and external anti-aggression. It is also intended for the whole family from birth for dry skin with an atopic tendency (with atopic eczema). The main objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the cosmetic product SVR TOPIALYSE Baume Protect+ versus Neutral Product on patients with mild atopic dermatitis, after 4 weeks of use with evaluation of the evolution mEASI (modified Eczema Area and Severity Index)
Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD), also called eczema, is a chronic skin condition. AD can make skin dry and itchy, and sometimes it can lead to serious health problems, such as asthma, food allergies, eye infections, and sleep problems. No cure exists for AD. Researchers know that people with AD have different kinds of harmless bacteria on their skin than do people without AD. They want to see if adding a harmless bacteria (Roseomonas mucosa) to the skin can help people with AD. Objective: To test a skin treatment that contains R. mucosa and ground cardamom seeds in people with AD. Eligibility: People aged 2 years and older with AD. Design: All study visits will be remote. Participants will have 5 visits over about 7 months. Participants will be screened. Researchers will review their AD and medical history. Participants will receive a study product in the mail. The product comes as a powder in single-use packets. Participants will be shown how to mix the powder with water in a single-use spray vial. They will spray the solution onto their skin 2 to 3 times per week for 14 weeks. Half of participants will receive the study powder. Half will receive a placebo; the placebo looks just like the study powder but contains no bacteria. They will not know which one they have. During 3 study visits, participants will take a skin swab. They will receive supplies in the mail to rub a cotton swab on their skin and mail it back to the researchers. Participants may opt to have pictures taken of their AD. Participants will fill out 4 online questionnaires.