View clinical trials related to Diabetic Foot.
Filter by:The goal of this three arms randomized clinical trial is to compare different revision times in persons with diabetes at high risk of suffering a diabetic foot reulceration (patients in remission). The literature suggests to clinically check the patients in a 4-6 weeks basis, despite this, this recommendation is based in expert opinions. The main question it aims to answer is: - Does different revision times could affect the reulceration rate in persons with diabetes in remission. Different revision time will be 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 6 weeks.
This is a follow-up study to evaluate the safety for the subjects with ALLO-ASC-DFU treatment in phase 3 clinical trial (ALLO-ASC-DFU-302) for 24 months
The objective of this study is to document the performance and the safety of UrgoStart Plus® Border, UrgoStart Plus® Pad and UrgoStart Interface® in the local treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (neuropathic or neuroischemic - non-critical ischemia) and venous or mixed predominantly venous leg ulcers, in real life conditions and current practice, in France.
The planned study is a Randomized Controlled Monocentric Trial, which will provide evidence on whether early angiography in PTA readiness ("immediate treatment," within 48h) has advantages over the "standard of care", i.e., an elective procedure ("elective PTA") in terms of clinical endpoints such as wound healing and infection according to WiFI classification, amputation rate, "major adverse limb events" (MALE=amputation, reintervention of the vessel, death), but also systemic complications such as "major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events" (MACE=myocardial infarction, stroke, death, restenosis, severe cardiac and cerebrovascular complications). Furthermore, the impact of PTA on the local wound microbiome remains unclear. Altered microbiome composition in ulcers can lead to severe local and systemic infections and complications, including major amputations. Nevertheless, the specific significance of the wound microbiome composition in chronic ischemic ulcers in type 2 diabetes and the impact of PTA on the wound microbiome in type 2 diabetes is unclear. The exact timing for treating pAVD by revascularization in DFS after initial diagnosis is unknown and has yet to be fully understood.
The growing incidence of DM can lead to the increased prevalence of diabetic foot complications, which have become a serious medical, social, and economic concern of global importance. this study aims to find a novel intervention that improve wound healing in diabetic foot ulcer to improve patients' quality of life, reduce amputation rate, and reduce the mortality rate among diabetic foot ulcer patients
This is a phase 2 study performed in diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) patients with chronic non-healing, neuro-ischemic wounds to investigate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of AUP1602-C.
This study is a platform study designed to efficiently test multiple biomarkers to identify diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) with a higher potential for healing versus not healing that ultimately could be applied at the point of care to drive personalized management decisions, and to better inform clinical trials of wound healing interventions
During their lifetime, 15 to 25% of patients with diabetes mellitus will develop a Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU) related to neuropathy and/or peripheral arterial disease. DFU is the leading cause of non-traumatic lower-extremity amputation worldwide. Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO), which complicates up to 60% of DFU, is a major trigger of amputation in over 80% of persons with diabetes resulting in subsequent loss of quality of life. It has been shown that medical treatment of DFO may prevent amputations with early diagnosis of osteomyelitis and appropriate use of antibiotics. Empirical antimicrobial treatment is not recommended for DFO as for other chronic infections. Surgically or radiologically acquired bone sample for culture is the reference standard recommended by the International Working Group of Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) to diagnose DFO and to determine the causative bacteria and their susceptibility. However, defining appropriate antimicrobial therapy directed to the causative bacteria in DFO is challenging since it requires bone biopsy (BB) procedures which are underused in clinical practice for various reasons: lack of availability, cost, and delay. Some clinicians also find bone biopsy cumbersome or too invasive. To overcome these barriers, we have set up for a few years a bedside blind BB procedure performed by diabetologists at the bedside in the clinical ward. Since then, this method has been used in more than 200 patients with DFO in the diabetology departments of Lariboisiere Hospital and Bichat Hospital (Paris). We have recently published our observational data of 79 patients showing that bedside BB is a simple, safe and efficient procedure for the diagnosis of DFO with a similar rate of complete healing at 12 months compared to conventional surgical or radiological bone biopsies. In order to extend and confirm these preliminary and observational results, the aim of this study is to compare the efficiency and safety of bedside BB versus conventional bone biopsy in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of patients with DFO. Our hypothesis is that bedside BB is non-inferior to conventional bone biopsy in DFO and can be used as a simpler alternative procedure to document DFO
The purpose of this study is to look at the benefits of using a Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) system compared with standard-of-care testing for patients with diabetes type 2 and diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) and how this will improve wound healing. The CGM system allows medical staff and patients with diabetes to monitor and make treatment decisions to improve glucose control, without the need for performing fingersticks. Hence, the use of CGM will decrease the painful and burdensome task of performing finger sticks several times per day and may prevent low blood glucose in patients with diabetes.
The purpose of this study is to understand the effects of the Bluedrop Monitoring System (BMS) on the development of diabetic foot ulcers. All Participants in this study will continue with their normal foot care and complete surveys with questions about their foot health every three months. Participants selected to receive the Bluedrop Monitoring System (BMS) will place it in their home and stand on it once a day for 12 months. Participants will also need to answer questions about their general foot health and, if using the system, their experience using the device and monitoring service.