View clinical trials related to Diabetic Foot.
Filter by:The goal of this clinical trial is to to evaluate the effectiveness of prevention strategies of recurrence in DFU's. It will also to detect the risk level of recurrence. The main question it aims to answer are: - Does intervention of prevention strategies effective to prevent the recurrence of DFU's? - How the risk level of the recurrence on DFU's patients? - How the impact of quality of life on DFU's patients? Researchers will compare intervention groups (receiving education covered various aspects, including they received guidance on foot examination, foot care, dietary habits, physical exercise, and stress management), and control groups (received standards follow-up care provided by healthcare providers, including pamphlets outlining care for DM patients based on the five pillars, including DM management, medication adherence, dietary practices, physical exercise routines, and foot care). Participants will: - For intervention group will be educated every month - Data for both intervention and control groups were collected monthly until three months.
This is an initial dose escalation safety and exploratory efficacy study to treat two groups of subjects with critically sized diabetic wounds and diabetic neuropathy using placental-derived stem cells (PDSC) transplanted by injection into soft tissues of the lower limb. Its primary objective is safety assessment and its secondary objective is determining optimum PDSC safe dose. Group 1 will receive implantation of cells in the ulcer, in the ulcer bed, and along the distal arterial vessels that supply blood to the foot. Group 2 will follow the same protocol for the foot but will have an additional dose of cells implanted in the anterior and posterior compartments of the same leg to determine the impact on peripheral neuropathy. Dose escalation and safety will be documented. Exploratory measures of efficacy include: ulcer healing, hemodynamic and anatomical effects on the arteries of the foot, and changes in the sensory perceptions of the foot.
The goal of this observational study is to assess the accuracy of screening for diabetic peripheral neuropathy by comparing the Ipswich touch test with the 10-g monofilament test in patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. The main question it aims to answer is: How does the accuracy of the Ipswich Touch Test for identifying peripheral neuropathy compare to the traditional 10-g monofilament test? Participants underwent both the Ipswich touch test and the 10-g monofilament test.
The goal of this open-label, post-market clinical follow-up study is to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of HealiAid Collagen Wound Dressing in patients classified into different types of wounds: venous ulcers, bedsores, diabetic foot wounds and burn wounds. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. The wound healing which was defined as the percentage of area change. 2. The duration of wound healing. 3. The granulation tissue growth of the wound. 4. The wound exudate. 5. Safety Indicators of which incidences after treatment. HealiAid will be applied to eligible subjects who will later be followed up for 12 weeks.
Introduction: Diabetic foot (DF) is among the most prevalent complications affecting individuals with diabetes. In Salamanca, 25,631 individuals are enrolled in the Diabetes Care Service, with only 3.06% undergoing a foot examination. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of implementing a standardized foot care protocol for individuals with diabetes, accompanied by a sensitization and training strategy for nursing professionals. Methodology: Quasi-experimental pre- and post-study with a control group conducted in the Health Centers of Salamanca. Population: Patients included in the Diabetes Care Service (306) (12,458 men and 11,348 women). Measurements: In professionals: number of professionals involved and satisfaction level. In diabetic individuals: Sociodemographic, anthropometric, lifestyle, and clinical variables related to disease control will be measured, along with variables related to protocol implementation (percentage of diabetics who have undergone foot examination, Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI), risk stratification and foot monitoring, percentage of individuals with DF, percentage of individuals with healed DF ulcers, and percentage of individuals who have undergone amputation). Improvement in quality of life will be measured using the COOP-WONCA questionnaire. Expected outcomes: It is anticipated that this study will provide evidence regarding the relationship between protocol implementation and an increase in the detection and care of at-risk feet and DF, as well as an improvement in the quality of life of individuals with diabetes.
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the optimal frequency for sharp debridement in promoting the healing of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. What is the comparative effect of weekly sharp debridement versus biweekly sharp debridement in combination with conventional treatment on granulation tissue and healing time in patients with DFUs? 2. What is the optimal modality or frequency of debridement based on the location of the DFU? Participants (ulcerated diabetic patients) will: - Undergo sharp debridement on a weekly basis (Group A). - Undergo sharp debridement on a biweekly basis (Group B). Researchers will compare Group A (weekly sharp debridement) with Group B (biweekly sharp debridement ) to see if the frequency of sharp debridement has a significant effect on granulation tissue and healing time in diabetic foot ulcers. In each group, there will be patients with ulcers in different locations (toes, metatarsal heads, and midfoot/hindfoot) to assess the effect of debridement based on the lesion location
Path Active™ comprises a pair of monitoring insoles which measure parameters associated with foot ulceration in diabetes: temperature and pressure. The insoles are linked via an app to the wearer's mobile phone and also to a clinical dashboard so that both wearer and clinician are alerted to early signs of skin damage on the foot so that immediate preventive action can be taken. The study will assess safety and tolerability of Path Active™ in 10 users, who have been assessed as having a 'high risk' of foot ulceration, over a period of 7 days.
The goal of this observational study is to learn about the association between cardiac valve calcification and the 1-year mortality after lower-extremity amputation in diabetic patients. Diabetic patients requiring lower-extremity amputation were retrospectively studied. Preoperative detailed anamnesis was taken. Cardiac valve calcification was assessed using echocardiography at baseline. One-year follow-up was conducted and included clinical visits, hospital record assessment, and telephone reviews to obtain the survival status of patients. Researchers compare the survival group to the mortality group to study the relationship between the cardiac valve calcification and mortality.
The aim of this observational study is to investigate the effects of the type, area and duration of ulceration on jaw pain, mandibular function limitation, TMD and swallowing in individuals with diabetic foot ulcers.The main questions it aims to answer are: - Does the change in foot structure due to diabetic foot ulcer have an effect on the temporomandibular jointand swalloving? - What are the determinants of tempomandibular dysfunction in individuals with diabetic foot ulcers? Participants (both groups) will be evaluated for quality of life, jaw functionality, mandibular dysfunction, oropharyngeal swallowing disorder, pain and diabetes complications.
Background: People with diabetes and either current or previous diabetic foot ulcer disease (DFUD) are at very high risk for adverse cardiovascular events including heart attacks and strokes. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are a class of medications that have shown to be very effective in reducing heart disease and event risk. However, one recent study found that SGLT2i's may increase minor amputation risk in those with DFUD, though this finding has not been replicated in other similar studies. However, as a result, there has been limited further investigation into this issue and as such the use of SGLT2i's in those with DFUD remains a contentious issue, despite their potential for significantly reducing cardiovascular disease risk in this population. In the absence of further randomised controlled trials investigating the use of SGLT2is in these populations, there is a need for clinical guidelines advising on their use based on expert clinical consensus, including specific criteria or scenarios in which they should or should not be used. The Delphi methodology is an iterative survey technique that uses expert opinion from various relevant backgrounds and experiences to generate a consensus based upon various statements and/or scenarios. Aim: The aim of this study is to use the Delphi technique to generate expert consensus-based clinical guidelines on the use of SGLT2i's in those with diabetes and DFUD. Methods: This is a Delphi technique-based study using a purposive sample of convenience. Consensus development methods will be used to generate clinical guidelines, endorsed by key clinical groups, on the use of SGLT2i's in patients with diabetic foot ulcer disease, including acknowledgement of specific scenarios or patient characteristics that may influence these guidelines. The consensus group will consist of n=20 healthcare practitioners, including GPs, secondary care diabetologists, foot care specialists, cardiologists and pharmacists in order to ensure a breadth of expertise and input. Two rounds of the Delphi consensus process will take place, in order to iteratively develop the consensus-based clinical guidelines. This process is expected to take 4-6 months. The analysis will be on-going throughout the study and completed within 3 months of the last questionnaire round of the Delphi process.