View clinical trials related to Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.
Filter by:The implantable Eversense ® CGM System obtained CE marking in 2016 for the 90-day device and in 2017 for the 180-day device.There is interest in real-world clinical evidence on the use of Eversense regarding changes in HbA1c and time in range (TIR), time below range (TBR), and time above range (TAR) in patients with type 1 diabetes. This is a prospective, multi-center, observational clinical study among adult participants aged 18 years or older with T1D and Eversense CGM System-naïve aimed to evaluate the change in HbA1c and glucometric parameters (TIR, TAR, TBR, mean daily glucose and standard deviation) in patients with T1D from multiple clinics in Italy using the Eversense CGM System for a 6-month time period.
The study investigates the effects of a mindfulness intervention on sleep and subsequent cardio-metabolic risk in an adult Atlanta population aged 18 and older.
This is a Phase 2a study designed to assess the effect of NLY01 in patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients will be monitored for safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamic effects on glycemic control.
Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is a challenging medical disorder, especially in children and adolescents. In order to prevent the chronic complications of hyperglycemia, the maintenance of near-normal glycemic control must be balanced with minimizing hypoglycemia. Although many pediatric endocrinologists provide an ICR plan for their newly diagnosed patients with T1DM, fixed dosing and other forms of insulin delivery are available. This proposal is designed to compare children and adolescents with newly diagnosed T1DM using a fixed insulin dose for fixed carbohydrate mealtime regimen (FIXED group) to children and adolescents with newly diagnosed T1DM using an ICR with variable carbohydrate intake (ICR group) mealtime regimen. In addition to determining the feasibility for a subsequently larger clinical trial, the aims of this investigator-initiated, prospective proposal, is twofold. The first is to determine if the caregivers of diabetics using a fixed insulin for fixed carbohydrate regimen (FIXED group) experience less anxiety than the caregivers of those using an ICR with variable carbohydrate intake regimen (ICR group) at 1- and 4-months post-randomization. The second is to determine if diabetics utilizing a fixed insulin for fixed carbohydrate regimen (FIXED group) have decreased glycemic variability (GV) than those using an ICR with variable carbohydrate intake regimen (ICR group) at 1- and 4-months post-randomization.
Sepsis is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Early diagnosis of sepsis and identification of more severe sepsis is important to improve the outcomes .Therefore, reliable markers are required to early identify the high-risk patients. Currently, lactate is widely applied as the marker for evaluating the severity of sepsis and for outcome predicting. DM affects lactate balance and raised baseline lactate. The objective of this study was to compare the different prognostic value of admission lactate for sepsis patients with or without DM.
This study is open to adults with type 2 diabetes who take metformin but still have too high blood sugar. The purpose of the study is to find the best dose of BI 456906 that reduces blood sugar. The study also looks at whether BI 456906 helps the participants lose weight. Participants are in the study for about 23 weeks. During this time, most participants visit the study site about 13 times. Some participants visit the study site about 20 times. At the start of the study, the participants are put into 7 groups. The participants in groups 1 to 6 get injections under the skin once or twice every week. Some participants get different doses of BI 456906 and other participants get placebo. Placebo injections look like the BI 456906 injections, but contain no medicine. Participants in group 7 get semaglutide injections every week. Semaglutide is another medicine for adults with type 2 diabetes. During the study, the doctors regularly take blood samples from the participants and measure their body weight. The changes in blood sugar levels and body weight are compared between the groups. The doctors also check the general health of the participants.
The study will look at how two different semaglutide versions reach and stay in the blood after injection. The study aims to show similar levels of semaglutide in the blood when using the different semaglutide versions. Participants will get 1 of the 2 versions of semaglutide. Which version participants get is decided by chance. One version is the one that doctors already can prescribe and the other is the new version. Participants will get the medicines as an injection under the skin of the stomach with the use of a pen-injector. The type of pen-injector is different for the two versions of semaglutide. The study will last for about 80-99 days. Participants will have 24 study visits with the study doctor. For 2 of the visits, participants will stay in the clinic for 4 days and 3 nights. Participants may have to stop the study if the study doctor thinks that there are risks for their health. Women cannot take part if pregnant, breast-feeding or planning to become pregnant during the study period.
Our primary objective is to improve glycemic control (Hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c]) over 3 months in individuals with diabetes by teaching practical application of diabetes education through "Cooking Matters" compared to usual care. Our secondary objective is to improve health related quality of life, adherence to diabetes self-management behaviors (physical activity, diet, glucose monitoring, and medication adherence) over 3-months compared to usual care. We hypothesize that participants in the cooking matters intervention will have significant improvement in glycemic control (HbA1c), HRQOL, and adherence to diabetes self- management compared to usual care. Our study is significant as it examines a novel approach to improving diabetes care and addressing glycemic control in diabetes.
This is a single-centre, open label (unblinded) prospective study investigating the performance and safety of FiberSense system in diabetic patients (Typ I and II). In the period of up to 30 days the performance of the FiberSense system is evaluated against laboratory gold standard method during 6 in-clinic sessions.
The aim of this study is to develop a retrospective, multicenter and observational study in Spain in real clinical practice to assess the employment of dapagliflozin and to compare its effectiveness and safety with the data of sitagliptin, a DPP4 inhibitor. This is a widely used molecule in Spain with a large safety profile. It was chosen as a comparator because of the number of patients treated and because it is a real alternative at the time of making a decision about the treatment.