Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Bupropion Hydrochloride Extended-release Tablet, and Escitalopram Oxalate Capsule in Subjects With Major Depressive Disorder

Depressive Disorder, Major Clinical Trial

Official title:

A Multi-centre, Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel Active-controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Bupropion Hydrochloride Extended-release (Bupropion XL 300mg Once Daily), Escitalopram Oxalate (Escitalopram, 10mg-20mg Once Daily) in Subjects With Major Depressive Disorder

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02191397
• Other study ID #: 114589
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 3
• Start date: February 10, 2015
• Est. completion date: October 25, 2016

Study information

• Verified date: February 2020
• Source: GlaxoSmithKline
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This multi-centre study will follow a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, active-controlled design and will evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of bupropion extended-release (XL) (300 mg/day) compared with escitalopram (10-20 mg/day) in outpatients and inpatients with major depressive disorder (MDD). The total duration of the study will be 11 weeks consisting of three phases. The screening phase (phase I) will be lasting for 0-14 days, subjects will be randomised to bupropion XL or escitalopram in a 1:1 ratio for acute phase treatment phase (phase II) for 8 weeks. There are 3 dose levels during this acute treatment phase. The 3-dose level plan is designed to ensure each drug is titrated according to the prescribing information and to reach an optimal clinical dose. Finally patients will enter the taper phase (phase III) for up to 1 week to assess and reduce the possible withdrawal symptoms.

In China almost all existing antidepressants are available on the market, but bupropion XL has not yet been approved. This Phase III clinical trial will be used for the purpose of registering bupropion XL in China.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 534
• Est. completion date: October 25, 2016
• Est. primary completion date: October 10, 2016
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Subjects must have the ability to effectively communicate with investigator, complete study related documents, comprehend the key components of the consent form and must provide written informed consent to participate in the study prior to any study-specific assessments or procedures.

• An in- patient or out-patient (male or female) and aged >=18 years.

• A diagnosis of MDD, nonpsychotic, single episode or recurrent, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (DSM-IV) (296.2/296.3), utilizing the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI).

• Established MDD diagnosis with a duration of at least 4 weeks.

• HAMD-17 total score of >=20 and a CGI-S score of >=4 at both the Screening Visit and the Baseline Visit.

• Subject must be in general good health and be considered clinically appropriate for therapy with bupropion or escitalopram, based upon the investigator's overall clinical evaluation.

• Female patients of child-bearing potential only: patients must not be lactating and must test negative for pregnancy at screening and agree to use a medically accepted method of birth control during the study.

• Liver function tests: alanine aminotransferase (ALT) <2x upper limit of normal (ULN); alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin <=1.5xULN (isolated bilirubin >1.5 x ULN is acceptable if bilirubin is fractionated and direct bilirubin <35%).

• Corrected QT (QTc) criteria: QTc <450 milliseconds (msec) or QTc <480msec for patients with bundle branch block. The QTc is the QT interval corrected for heart rate according to either Bazett's formula (QTcB), Fridericia's formula (QTcF), or machine or manual overread. For subject eligibility and withdrawal, QTcF will be used. For purpose of data analysis, QTcF will be used. The QTc should be based on single or averaged QTc values of triplicate electrocardiograms (ECGs) obtained over a brief recording period.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Has been diagnosed or received treatment for a primary Axis I disorder with the exception of MDD (including current or past diagnosis of anorexia nervosa or bulimia). Additionally, subjects diagnosed with dysthymic disorder within the past 2 years will be excluded.

• Current DSM-IV Axis II diagnosis that suggests non-compliance with the protocol.

• A subject who, in the assessment with the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) and investigator's judgment, poses suicidal risk, or had suicide attempt or behavior within 6 months prior to the Screening Visit.

• Current or past history of seizure disorder or brain injury (traumatic or disease related); or any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, predisposed to seizure; subjects treated with other medications or treatment regimes that lower seizure threshold. Note: single childhood febrile seizure is not exclusionary.

• In the Investigator's judgment, presence of clinically significant laboratory test results (including ECG, hematology, chemistry and urine), or the conditions which render patients unsuitable for the study (such as serious cardiovascular disease, uncontrolled hypertension, liver or renal insufficiency) and pose a safety concern or interfere with the accurate safety and efficacy assessments. Subjects with co-morbidities (such as diabetes, hypertension, hypothyroid, chronic respiratory diseases or other physical illness) were eligible if their condition had been stable for at least three months and they had been receiving standard therapy for the condition for at least three months.

• Unstable liver disease (as defined by the presence of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminaemia, oesophageal or gastric varices or persistent jaundice), cirrhosis, known biliary abnormalities (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones)

• Frequent and/or severe allergic reactions with multiple medications, or history of a medically significant adverse effect (including allergic reaction) from any medications or compounds in the study.

• Use of prohibited psychotropic drugs not allowed within seven days (14 days for monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), 30 days for fluoxetine) prior to the Baseline Visit.

• Subjects who have attended any studies investigating bupropion or escitalopram 6 months prior to this study, or use of bupropion or escitalopram in the last 4 weeks.

• Participation in other clinical studies unrelated to the current illness within 30 days or participation in other clinical studies related to the current illness within 3 months.

• Initiation of systematic psychotherapy within three months prior to the Screening Visit, or plans to initiate systematic psychotherapy during the study.

• Received electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), modify electroconvulsive therapy (MECT), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), or other physical therapy within the 6 months prior to the Screening Visit.

• Previous failure of bupropion or escitalopram treatment with adequate courses and doses.

• Previous or present failure of two different classes of antidepressants treatment with adequate courses (e.g. maximum labelled doses for >=4 weeks).

• History of substance abuse (alcohol or drugs) or substance dependence within 12 months (as defined in the DSM-IV).

• Other conditions which, in the Investigator's judgment, render patients unsuitable for the clinical study.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Depression
• Depressive Disorder
• Depressive Disorder, Major
• Disease

Intervention

Drug:
• Bupropion
Bupropion is an extended-release plain creamy white colored tablet which contains bupropion hydrochloride equivalent to 150 mg of bupropion.
• Bupropion Matching Placebo
Bupropion hydrochloride matching placebo tablets will be supplied to maintain blinding
• Escitalopram
Escitalopram is available as a Swedish orange capsule containing escitalopram oxalate equivalent to 10 mg of escitalopram.
• Escitalopram Matching Placebo
Escitalopram oxalate matching placebo tablets will be supplied to maintain blinding

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
China	GSK Investigational Site	Baoding	Hebei
China	GSK Investigational Site	Beijing
China	GSK Investigational Site	Beijing
China	GSK Investigational Site	Beijing
China	GSK Investigational Site	Changsha	Henan
China	GSK Investigational Site	Changsha	Hunan
China	GSK Investigational Site	Guangzhou	Guangdong
China	GSK Investigational Site	Guangzhou
China	GSK Investigational Site	Guiyang	Guizhou
China	GSK Investigational Site	Hangzhou	Zhejiang
China	GSK Investigational Site	Harbin	Heilongjiang
China	GSK Investigational Site	Kunming	Yunnan
China	GSK Investigational Site	Nanjing	Jiangsu
China	GSK Investigational Site	Nanning	Guangxi
China	GSK Investigational Site	Shanghai
China	GSK Investigational Site	Shanghai
China	GSK Investigational Site	Taiyuan	Shanxi
China	GSK Investigational Site	Wuhan
China	GSK Investigational Site	Xi'an	Shanxi
China	GSK Investigational Site	Xian	Shaanxi

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
GlaxoSmithKline

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

References & Publications (1)

Shen Y, Zhao Q, Yu Y, Tan Y, Zhang H, Xu X, Wang Z, Li Y, Hu J, Zhong J, Li H. Efficacy and safety of bupropion hydrochloride extended-release versus escitalopram oxalate in Chinese patients with major depressive disorder: Results from a randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. J Affect Disord. 2019 Oct 1;257:143-149. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.07.023. Epub 2019 Jul 5. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Mean Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale - 17 (HAMD-17) Total Score From Baseline to End of Acute Treatment Phase (Week 8)	HAMD-17 is used to assess the severity of depression and symptom improvement. It consisted of 17 questions. The HAMD-17 total score is calculated by summing the individual response scores if there is no missing response. HAMD-17 has a total score in a range of 0 (not present) to 52 (severe). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline total score (at Day 0, Week 0) from Week 8 observed total score. The Per Protocol (PP) Population is defined as all randomized participants in the Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Population who do not meet criteria of a major protocol deviation, with overall compliance of active drug for acute treatment phase in the range of 75%-125% and complete the first 6 weeks treatment and has HAMD-17 assessment at/after week 6 (that is >=35 days). All participants in the PP population were included in the mixed model repeated measures analysis. Only those participants with data available at the specified time point were analyzed.	Baseline (Week 0) and Week 8
Secondary	Response Rate Based on HAMD-17 Total Score	HAMD-17 is an extensively used tool to assess the severity of depression and symptom improvement during the treatment. The HAMD-17 adopted for this study consisted of 17 questions with multiple choice responses, each of which is numerically scored. The HAMD-17 total score is calculated by summing the individual response scores if there is no missing response. HAMD-17 has a total score in a range of 0 (not present) to 52 (severe). Values at Day 0, Week 0 was considered as Baseline value. Response was defined as decrease in HAMD-17 total scores at end of acute treatment phase (Week 8) relative to Baseline by at least 50%. Non-responder Imputation was used in calculation of rates.	Up to Week 8
Secondary	Remission Rate Based on HAMD-17 Total Score	HAMD-17 is an extensively used tool to assess the severity of depression and symptom improvement during the treatment. The HAMD-17 adopted for this study consisted of 17 questions with multiple choice responses, each of which is numerically scored. The HAMD-17 total score is calculated by summing the individual response scores if there is no missing response. HAMD-17 has a total score in a range of 0 (not present) to 52 (severe). Values at Day 0, Week 0 was considered as Baseline value. Remission was defined as HAMD-17 total scores at end of acute treatment phase (Week 8) <=7.	Up to Week 8
Secondary	Sustained Response Rate Based on HAMD-17 Total Score	HAMD-17 is an extensively used tool to assess the severity of depression and symptom improvement during the treatment. The HAMD-17 adopted for this study consisted of 17 questions with multiple choice responses, each of which is numerically scored. The HAMD-17 total score is calculated by summing the individual response scores if there is no missing response. HAMD-17 has a total score in a range of 0 (not present) to 52 (severe). Values at Day 0, Week 0 was considered as Baseline value. Sustained response was defined as response at end of acute treatment phase and an earlier visit and the decrease from Baseline in non-missing HAMD-17 total scores at all visits between these two visits by at least 40%.	Up to Week 8
Secondary	Sustained Remission Rate Based on HAMD-17 Total Score	HAMD-17 is an extensively used tool to assess the severity of depression and symptom improvement during the treatment. The HAMD-17 adopted for this study consisted of 17 questions with multiple choice responses, each of which is numerically scored. The HAMD-17 total score is calculated by summing the individual response scores if there is no missing response. HAMD-17 has a total score in a range of 0 (not present) to 52 (severe). Values at Day 0, Week 0 was considered as Baseline value. Sustained remission was defined as remission at end of acute treatment phase and an earlier visit and non-missing HAMD-17 total scores at all visits between these two visits <=8.	Up to Week 8
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8	MADRS is a 10-point rating scale. Each item is scored on a scale of 0-6, with a total score range of 0-60. Higher score indicates worst symptoms. This scale is mainly used to assess the efficacy of antidepressant treatment. The ratings were based on the signs and symptoms during the preceding week prior to the visit. Values at Day0, Week 0 was considered as Baseline value. The observed MADRS total score was considered as missing if any item is missing. Change from Baseline in MADRS was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the specific post-Baseline value. All participants in the PP population were analyzed and n=X in the category titles represented the number of participants with data available at the specified time points.	Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Secondary	Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Depressed Mood Subscale Score (Score of Item 1) at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8	HAMD-17 is an extensively used tool to assess the severity of depression and symptom improvement during the treatment. The HAMD-17 adopted for this study consisted of 17 questions with multiple choice responses, each of which is numerically scored. The HAMD-17 Depressed Mood Subscale is a factor score of item-1 (Depressed Mood) of HAMD-17 scale. This subscale has a score in a range of 0 (absence of depressed mood feelings) to 4 (when participants report virtually only these feeling states in his/her spontaneous verbal and non-verbal communicationtotal score). Values at Day 0, Week 0 was considered as Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline response from the specific post-Baseline response. All participants in the PP population were analyzed and n=X in the category titles represented the number of participants with data available at the specified time points.	Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Secondary	Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Anxiety/Somatization Subscale Score (Sum of Scores of Items 10, 11, 12, 13, 15 and 17) at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8	HAMD-17 is an extensively used tool to assess the severity of depression and symptom improvement during the treatment. The HAMD-17 adopted for this study consisted of 17 questions with multiple choice responses, each of which is numerically scored. The HAMD-17 Anxiety/Somatization subscale score was derived as sum of scores of items 10, 11, 12, 13, 15 and 17 from HAMD-17. This subscale has a score in a range of 0 (absence of condition) to 18 (most severe condition). Values at Day 0, Week 0 was considered as Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline response from the specific post-Baseline response. All participants in the PP population were analyzed and n=X in the category titles represented the number of participants with data available at the specified time points.	Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Secondary	Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Retardation Subscale Score (Sum of Scores of Items 1, 7, 8 and 14) at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8	HAMD-17 is an extensively used tool to assess the severity of depression and symptom improvement during the treatment. The HAMD-17 adopted for this study consisted of 17 questions with multiple choice responses, each of which is numerically scored. The HAMD-17 Retardation subscale score was derived as sum of scores of items 1, 7, 8 and 14 from HAMD-17. This subscale has a score in a range of 0 (absence of condition) to 14 (most severe condition). Values at Day 0, Week 0 was considered as Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline response from the specific post-Baseline response. All participants in the PP population were analyzed and n=X in the category titles represented the number of participants with data available at the specified time points.	Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Secondary	Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Sleep Disorder Subscale Score (Sum of Scores of Items 4, 5 and 6) at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8	HAMD-17 is an extensively used tool to assess the severity of depression and symptom improvement during the treatment. The HAMD-17 adopted for this study consisted of 17 questions with multiple choice responses, each of which is numerically scored. The HAMD-17 Sleep Disorder subscale score was derived as sum of scores of items 4, 5 and 6 from HAMD-17. This subscale has a score in a range of 0 (absence of condition) to 6 (most severe condition). Values at Day 0, Week 0 was considered as Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline response from the specific post-Baseline response. All participants in the PP population were analyzed and n=X in the category titles represented the number of participants with data available at the specified time points.	Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness Scale (CGI-S) Score at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8	CGI-S records the severity of illness at specific time points, with a range of responses from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill participants). Participants with zero values (0) representing "Not assessed" were excluded from analysis. Values at Day 0, Week 0 was considered as Baseline value. Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the specific post-Baseline value. All participants in the PP population were analyzed and n=X in the category titles represented the number of participants with data available at the specified time points.	Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Secondary	Percentage of Participants With a Clinical Global Impression Global Improvement (CGI-I) Score of 1 ("Very Much Improved") or 2 ("Much Improved") at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8	For CGI-I rating, the raters indicated their assessment of the participant's total improvement or worsening compared to the participant's condition at the Baseline visit, whether or not the improvement or worsening was thought to be treatment related. Scores ranges from 0 to 7 where 0 represents "Not assessed", and the remaining values 1-7 represent "Very much improved" (1) to "Very much worse" (7). Participants with score 0 were excluded from analysis. All participants in the PP population were analyzed and n=X in the category titles represented the number of participants with data available at the specified time points.	Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Secondary	Number of Participants With Any Non-serious Adverse Event (AE) and Any Serious AE (SAE)	An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment that may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization but may jeopardize the participant or may require medical or surgical intervention or all events of possible drug-induced liver injury with hyperbilirubinemia were categorized as SAE. Participants who received any of the study treatment and had any non-serious AE or SAE were considered for analysis. Safety Population comprised of all participants who took at least one dose of the study medication.	Up to Week 10
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin, Total Protein, Albumin and Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) at the Indicated Time Points	Blood samples were collected at Screening (within 14 days prior to dosing) and at Week 8, Taper visit (Week 9) and Follow-up visit (Week 10). Baseline was considered as the value obtained at Screening. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the specific post-Baseline values. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).	Up to Week 10
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at the Indicated Time Points	Blood samples were collected at Screening (within 14 days prior to dosing) and at Week 8, Taper visit (Week 9) and Follow-up visit (Week 10). Baseline was considered as the value obtained at Screening. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the specific post-Baseline values. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).	Up to Week 10
Secondary	Change From Baseline in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Total Neutrophil, Lymphocyte, Basophil, Eosinophil, Monocyte and Platelet Count at the Indicated Time Points	Blood samples were collected at Screening (within 14 days prior to dosing) and at Week 8, Taper visit (Week 9) and Follow-up visit (Week 10). Baseline was considered as the value obtained at Screening. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the specific post-Baseline values. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).	Up to Week 10
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin and Creatinine at the Indicated Time Points	Blood samples were collected at Screening (within 14 days prior to dosing) and at Week 8, Taper visit (Week 9) and Follow-up visit (Week 10). Baseline was considered as the value obtained at Screening. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the specific post-Baseline values. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).	Up to Week 10
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Gamma-glutamyl Transpeptidase (GGT) and Lactose Dehydrogenase (LD) at the Indicated Time Points	Blood samples were collected at Screening (within 14 days prior to dosing) and at Week 8, Taper visit (Week 9) and Follow-up visit (Week 10). Baseline was considered as the value obtained at Screening. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the specific post-Baseline values. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).	Up to Week 10
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium, Triglyceride and Urea at the Indicated Time Points	Blood samples were collected at Screening (within 14 days prior to dosing) and at Week 8, Taper visit (Week 9) and Follow-up visit (Week 10). Baseline was considered as the value obtained at Screening. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the specific post-Baseline values. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).	Up to Week 10
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin (MCH) at the Indicated Time Points	Blood samples were collected at Screening (within 14 days prior to dosing) and at Week 8, Taper visit (Week 9) and Follow-up visit (Week 10). Baseline was considered as the value obtained at Screening. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the specific post-Baseline values. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).	Up to Week 10
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Volume (MCV) at the Indicated Time Points	Blood samples were collected at Screening (within 14 days prior to dosing) and at Week 8, Taper visit (Week 9) and Follow-up visit (Week 10). Baseline was considered as the value obtained at Screening. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the specific post-Baseline values. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).	Up to Week 10
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count at the Indicated Time Points	Blood samples were collected at Screening (within 14 days prior to dosing) and at Week 8, Taper visit (Week 9) and Follow-up visit (Week 10). Baseline was considered as the value obtained at Screening. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the specific post-Baseline values. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).	Up to Week 10
Secondary	Number of Participants With Urinalysis Data Outside the Normal Range	Urine samples were collected at Screening (within 14 days prior to dosing) and at Week 8, Taper visit (Week 9) and Follow-up visit (Week 10). Number of participants with urine specific gravity and potential of hydrogen (pH) outside (higher or lower) the normal range are presented. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).	Up to Week 10
Secondary	Number of Participants With Vital Sign Parameters Outside the Clinical Concern Range	Vital signs including systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and heart rate (HR) were taken at Screening (within 14 days prior to dosing), randomization visit (Week 0) and at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, Taper visit (Week 9) and Follow-up visit (Week 10). SBP <30 or >170 millimeter of mercury (mmHg); DBP <20 or >110 mmHg and heart rate <40 or >120 beats per minute (bpm) were considered as values outside of clinical concern range and were presented as 'High' or 'Low' values. Number of participants with vital signs outside of clinical concern range at any post-Baseline visit are presented. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.	Up to Week 10
Secondary	Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range	ECG was recorded at Screening (within 14 days prior to dosing) and at Week 8, Taper visit (Week 9) and Follow-up visit (Week 10). PR interval <110 or >220 millisecond (msec); QRS interval <60 or >120 msec and corrected QT (QTc) interval >450 msec were considered as values outside of clinical concern range and were presented as 'High' or 'Low' values. Number of participants with ECG data outside of clinical concern range at any post-Baseline visit are presented. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.	Up to Week 10
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Changes in Sexual Function Questionnaire (CSFQ)	CSFQ is a questionnaire about sexual activity and sexual function (sexual intercourse, masturbation, sexual fantasies and other activity). CSFQ is a gender-specific questionnaire. Both male and female versions consist of 14 items, each with 5 possible answers. CSFQ has a score in a range of 14 to 70. Higher score indicates higher sexual activity and sexual function. Value at Day 0 (Week 0) was considered as Baseline value. Change from Baseline at Week 8 was calculated by subtracting the Baseline score from the specific post-Baseline score. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.	Baseline (Day 0) and Week 8
Secondary	Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior During Treatment Assessed by Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)	C-SSRS is an assessment tool that evaluates suicidal ideation and behavior. It consists of 10 items, each with two possible answers (yes/no). Suicidal ideation was interpreted if "yes" answer at any time during treatment to any one of the five suicidal ideation questions (item 1-5) on the C-SSRS. Suicidal behavior was interpreted if a "yes" answer at any time during treatment to any one of the five suicidal behavior questions (item 6-10) on the C-SSRS. Suicidal ideation or behavior is interpreted if a "yes" answer at any time during treatment to any one of the ten suicidal ideation and behavior questions (item 1-10) on the C-SSRS. Number of participants with at least one on-treatment C-SSRS assessment were analyzed. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.	Baseline and up to Taper visit (Week 9)