Outcome
Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
Primary |
UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA; Russell et al., 1980; Vázquez & Jiménez, 1994) |
The instrument measures the feeling of loneliness and consists of 20 items, 11 of which are negative (for example, I lack company) and nine positive (for example, I feel in tune with the people around me). All items are scored from 1 (never) to 4 (frequently). After reversing the score on items 1, 5, 6, 9, 10, 15, 16, 19 and 20, the scores corresponding to the 20 items are added, obtaining a total isolation score. The range of scores goes from 20 to 80, with a higher score corresponding to a greater degree of loneliness |
Pre-intervention, immediately after the intervention, and follow-up (3 months) |
|
Primary |
Health-related quality of life scale (EuroQol-5D; Herdman et al., 2001). |
This scale measures five dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each category consists of 1 item, ranging from 1 (no problems) to 3 (many problems). The second part of the EQ-5D-3L is a 20-centimeter vertical visual analog scale, ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). The individual must mark the point on the scale that best reflects the assessment of their current global health status. The use of the VAS provides a complementary score to the descriptive system of self-assessment of the individual's health status |
Pre-intervention, immediately after the intervention, and follow-up (3 months) |
|
Primary |
The World Health Organization Quality of Life-Old (WHOQOL-OLD Scale; Power et al., 2005; Lucas-Carrasco et al., 2011). |
The WHOQOL-OLD is a 24-item self-report instrument that is divided into six facets: Facet 1- Sensory abilities (items 1, 2, 10, 20); Facet 2- Autonomy (items 3, 4, 5, 11); Facet 3- Past, present and future activities (items 12, 13, 15, 19); Facet 4- Social participation (items 14, 16, 17, 18); Facet 5- Death (items 6, 7, 8, 9); and Facet 6- Intimacy (items 21, 22, 23, 24). Responses are based on a 5-point Likert-type response scale (ranging from 1-5), with items 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 reverse scored. WHOQOL-OLD total scores in each facet range from 4 to 20, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A global score (general QOL - GQOL) is also calculated from the set of 24 items |
Pre-intervention, immediately after the intervention, and follow-up (3 months) |
|
Primary |
The Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire-2 (GAD-2; Kroenke et al., 2007; García-Campayo et al., 2012) |
It is a self-report measure containing 2 items assessing anxiety symptoms. The items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (no days) to 3 (almost every day), where a high score indicates greater anxiety symptoms |
Pre-intervention, immediately after the intervention, and follow-up (3 months) |
|
Primary |
The Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2; Kroenke et al., 2003; Rodríguez-Muñoz et al., 2017) |
It is a self-report measure consisting of 2 items assessing depressive symptoms. The items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (never) to 3 (almost every day), where a high score indicates higher levels of depressive symptoms |
Pre-intervention, immediately after the intervention, and follow-up (3 months) |
|
Secondary |
The System Usability Scale (SUS; Brooke, 1996; Sevilla González et al., 2020) |
It is a self-reported measure that assesses the overall usability of the tool. It is a 10-item scale, measured on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Total SUS scores range from 0 to 100.The questionnaire is designed to be answered after the user's interaction with the system |
Immediately after the intervention |
|
Secondary |
The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ; Roberts & Attkisson, 1983) |
It is a self-report questionnaire that assesses the patient's overall satisfaction with the tool. It consists of 8 items on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (lowest score per item) to 4 (highest score per item). The total score ranges from 8 to 32, with higher values indicating higher satisfaction |
Immediately after the intervention |
|
Secondary |
Price they would be willing to pay |
We will ask them what price they would be willing to pay for DIAL, between 0 and 100 euros per month |
Immediately after the intervention |
|
Secondary |
Questions about skills |
Older people will be asked if DIAL has helped them in different facets of their lives. Specifically, if it has helped them to: improve their mood, feel more understood, feel listened to, feel supported, feel more supported, feel more accompanied, drink more water, have better hygiene, walk more, take their medication better, move more, talk more with people close to them, be more in contact with people close to them (family or friends) |
Immediately after the intervention |
|
Secondary |
Aspects related to the DIAL voice assistant |
They will be asked what aspects have improved in their life since the application has been installed in their home |
Immediately after the intervention |
|
Secondary |
Aspects related to DIAL's complementary care services (support person) |
They will be asked what aspects have improved in their life since they have had the complementary services of DIAL (the support person) |
Immediately after the intervention |
|