There are about 173942 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in United States. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
To assess the safety and tolerability of the use of telaprevir in the setting of post-exposure prophylaxis among HCW exposed to HCV genotype 1 or genotype 2. To assess the election rate of postexposure prophylaxis for HCV-related occupational exposures in HCW.
To determine whether antibiotic impregnated PICC catheters have a lower infection rate than a conventional PICC catheter in a tertiary care patient population. Secondary goals will be to determine if there is a difference between the two catheters with early and late infections, to determine the cost comparison including extra cost of treatment for a line related infection, to determine if there are any non-infectious related complication differences between the two catheters.
There is gender dimorphism in cardiovascular risk, with men at higher risk than women. However, the fundamental basis for the protective effect of female sex remains unclear. Recent data implicate the natriuretic peptide (NP) system as an important determinant of blood pressure. Also, NP levels are twice as high in women of reproductive age than in men, and gonadal steroids are important determinants of circulating NPs. These are the marked, but poorly understood differences in the NP status between men and women. The investigators hypothesize that gonadal steroids regulate NP release, specifically that testosterone inhibits and estrogen activates the NP axis, leading to differences in both resting NP levels and dynamic responses of the NP, RAAS, and kidneys to acute and chronic salt loading. Understanding the basis for gender differences in NP function should provide important insights regarding mechanisms underlying hypertension in men versus women.
The investigators propose a study to investigate the role of tetracycline injection into chalazia versus observation alone. The investigators hypothesize tetracycline injection will result in a significant decrease in lesion size when compared to observation alone.
The main clinical study will be a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, long term study involving a 100 week treatment period. The purpose of this study is to test for superiority of treatment with belimumab 10 mg/kg plus supportive therapy compared to placebo plus supportive therapy in idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN). The purpose of this study is also to investigate the effect of initiating earlier treatment with belimumab compared to delayed treatment with current immunosuppressive treatment regimens. The study will also determine the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of belimumab and further explore the mechanism of action of Belimumab as well as effects on quality of life. All subjects (on either active treatment or placebo) will receive background supportive therapy throughout the main clinical study, which includes angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and/or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) unless contraindicated and may include statins, diuretics, dietary salt restriction but excludes immunosuppressants (except low dose corticosteroids). Screening will be done within 5 to 2 weeks before the first scheduled dose of study treatment. A total of 94 evaluable subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio such that 47 subjects receive intravenous belimumab 10 mg/kg and 47 receive intravenous placebo. Subjects will be dosed on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 4 weeks through to, and including, Week 100, resulting in a total of 27 doses (giving 104 weeks of drug exposure). The dosing frequency will be adjusted to every 2 weeks if the subject's proteinuria as assessed by urinary protein creatinine ratio (PCR) is greater than 1000mg/mmol (greater than 10 g/24 h), to compensate for loss of belimumab in the urine. Subjects who are withdrawn from study treatment at any time during the study, eg for rescue therapy, will participate in follow-up visits every 12 weeks up to week 104. A subject will be regarded as having completed the main clinical study if they complete all phases of the main clinical study (screening, treatment period, 4 week and 16 week post last dose short term safety follow-up). Subjects who complete the main clinical study will therefore participate in the main clinical study for approximately 28 months. After the main clinical study, there will be a 5 year (long term) follow-up phase to assess long term outcomes.
Study WX-20-002 will confirm diagnostic efficacy and safety of a PET/CT scan using Iodine (124I) Girentuximab performed during the diagnostic work-up in patients with indeterminate cT1-renal masses.
Body contouring surgery has a higher potential for postoperative pain and wound healing complications. The purpose of this study is to determine if pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) devices can reduce the pain and complications associated with this type of surgery. Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) devices have been shown to be effective treatments to decrease healing time in nonunion fractures and pressure ulcers, and to reduce pain in whiplash injuries, persistent neck pain, and chronic lower back pain. These devices have been FDA approved for treatment of pain and edema (510(k) number: K070541). More recently, PEMF devices have been shown to decrease postoperative pain and narcotic use in breast augmentation patients. This study seeks to determine if PEMF will also cause similar effects in the more complex procedures performed on body contouring patients. The specific aims of this study are: 1. Evaluate if adjunct PEMF therapy will accelerate the rate of postoperative pain reduction in abdominal body contouring patients. 2. Evaluate if adjunct PEMF therapy will decrease the postoperative use of narcotic pain relievers in abdominal body contouring patients. PEMF devices have been shown to be effective in reduction of pain and pain medication use in breast augmentation patients. No literature has shown if PEMF is an effective adjunct to decrease pain or pain medication use in the abdominal body contouring patient. A decrease in pain would result in a better experience for patients and a reduction in pain medication may decrease complications associated with these medications. The PEMF therapy device being used in this study is a non-significant risk device because it is noninvasive and does not present a potential for serious risk to the health, safety, or welfare of a subject.
This project is being used to assess the utility of intravenous acetaminophen in the pediatric population undergoing palate repairs. This study is a prospective randomized double blinded placebo controlled study. The investigators will have two arms, one group of patients will receive intravenous acetaminophen and one group that will receive a placebo at a total of four doses over 24 hours. The results of this study may affect the intraoperative anesthetic management as well as post-operative surgical management of this specific patient population. The goal is to determine the benefit of adding a non-opioid analgesic and hypothesizing that it may reduce the amount of narcotic consumption in the post anesthesia care unit as well as during the post-operative stay.
The objectives of this study are to determine the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of alemtuzumab for infusion for the treatment of CIDP. Eligible subjects will be treated with alemtuzumab at the beginning of the study and then followed for three years. During the three year period, subjects will under go monthly safety evaluations consisting of blood and urine testing, symptom surveys and examination. Detailed neurological testing including nerve conduction testing, Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (CIDP/RODS) and Overall Neuropathy Limitations Scale (ONLS) assessments will be performed every six months for three years. The study will also investigate and compare the responsiveness of the outcome measures being used.
The primary curative treatment of lung cancer patients is surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy (either or all depending on the extent of disease). Surgical resection usually requires removal of a lobe of the lung (lobectomy). There are, however, some patients who are unable to have a lobectomy. There are several reasons why a patient should not have a lobectomy including prior operations in the same area of the lung or poor lung functions. Sub-lobe operations (less than a full lobectomy), are alternatives for these patients. Types of sub-lobe operations include wedge resection or segmentectomy. However, a randomized trial in early stage lung cancer patients that compared lobectomy versus wedge resection showed worse local control of cancer with wedge resection. Therefore, localized disease wedge resection is considered an inadequate operation. This inadequacy can be compensated if radiation seeds are added to the site of wedge resection. Iodine-125 (I-125) is the most commonly used radiation seed for this purpose. I-125, however, unfortunately has a relatively long half life (time taken for activity to become half) of 2 months. Therefore, the patient is technically 'radioactive' for an average of 6 months to 1 year. This can seriously compromise quality of life. Cesium-131 is another radiation seed that may more effectively treat lung cancer patients. Cs-131 has been previously used in prostate cancer successfully. Cs-131 has similar energy to I-125 but has a much shorter half life (9days as compared to 60 days for I-125). Patients who receive Cs-131 radiation seeds are expected to be radioactive for 30 days (1 month) as compared to 180 days (6 months) with I-125. The objective of this study is the use Cs-131 radiation seeds in lung cancer patients who are planning to undergo a wedge resection for localized disease and follow the patients for cancer control and toxicity. These results will be compared to pre-existing data for I-125 treatment outcomes in lung cancer patients who have had a wedge resection for localized disease.